Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 4 de 4
1.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 48: 7-14, 2023 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36347732

BACKGROUND: Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the mainstay regimen for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to investigate DAPT compliance and switching patterns in ACS patients prescribed ticagrelor and aspirin. Secondly, we evaluated the impact of a pilot strategy of close surveillance telephone calls. METHODS: The study enrolled 150 consecutive ACS patients who underwent PCI and were prescribed DAPT (aspirin and ticagrelor). This cohort, the "close surveillance arm," then received telephone calls from a healthcare professional to inquire about DAPT for up to one year. These findings, and clinical outcomes, were then compared to a "historical arm" of ACS patients (n = 505) who received PCI and were prescribed DAPT before initiation of the program. Finally, healthcare providers were surveyed about their experience with prescribing DAPT. RESULTS: The rate of ticagrelor cessation trended lower in the close surveillance arm (22.00 % versus 31.70 %, p = 0.0783). The most common reasons for ticagrelor cessation were adverse medication reaction (dyspnea), bleeding, and financial burden. Nevertheless, the adverse events were few and similar between the two groups during follow-up. Over 96 % of healthcare providers surveyed stated that they worry about their patients' DAPT compliance post-PCI. CONCLUSION: Noncompliance and switching medications are still common for patients who undergo PCI for ACS. A close surveillance program identified patients at risk for medication cessation or switching and could potentially mitigate this phenomenon and improve quality of care.


Acute Coronary Syndrome , Myocardial Infarction , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Ticagrelor/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Drug Therapy, Combination , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Aspirin/adverse effects , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(12): e009496, 2020 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33272031

BACKGROUND: The supra-annular leaflet position and tall stent frame of the self-expanding Evolut PRO or Evolut PRO+ transcatheter heart valves (THVs) may cause coronary occlusion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)-in-TAVR and present challenges for future coronary access. We sought to evaluate the risk of TAVR-in-TAVR with Evolut PRO or Evolut PRO+ THVs and the feasibility of future coronary access. METHODS: The CoreValve Evolut PRO Prospective Registry (EPROMPT; NCT03423459) prospectively enrolled patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis to undergo TAVR using a commercially available latest generation self-expanding THV at 2 centers in the United States. Computed tomography was performed 30 days after TAVR, which we used to simulate TAVR-in-TAVR with a second Evolut PRO or Evolut PRO+ THV and evaluate for risk of coronary obstruction and feasibility of future coronary access. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients enrolled with interpretable computed tomography are reported herein. Computed tomography simulation predicted sinus of Valsalva sequestration and resultant coronary obstruction during future TAVR-in-TAVR in up to 23% of patients. Computed tomography simulation predicted that the position of the pinned THV leaflets would hinder future coronary access in up to 78% of patients after TAVR-in-TAVR. CONCLUSIONS: Further THV design improvements and leaflet modification strategies are needed to mitigate the risk of coronary obstruction during TAVR-in-TAVR with self-expanding THVs and to facilitate future coronary access. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03423459.


Aortic Valve Stenosis , Coronary Occlusion , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Tomography , Treatment Outcome , United States
3.
Am J Cardiol ; 112(4): 574-9, 2013 Aug 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23683951

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a marker of systolic and diastolic dysfunction and a strong predictor of mortality in heart failure patients. The present study aimed to assess the relationship of BNP with aortic stenosis (AS) severity and prognosis. The cohort comprised 289 high-risk patients with severe AS who were referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Patients were divided into tertiles based on BNP level: I (n = 96); II (n = 95), and III (n = 98). Group III patients were more symptomatic, had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons and EuroSCORE scores, and had a greater prevalence of renal failure, atrial fibrillation, and previous myocardial infarction; lower ejection fraction and cardiac output; and higher pulmonary pressure and left ventricular end diastolic pressure. The degree of AS did not differ among the 3 groups. Stepwise forward multiple regression analysis identifies ejection fraction and pulmonary artery systolic pressure as independent correlates with plasma BNP. Mortality rates during a median follow-up of 319 days (range 110 to 655) were significantly lower in Group I compared with Groups II and III, p <0.001. After multivariable adjustment, the strongest correlates for mortality were renal failure (hazard ratio 1.44, p = 0.05) and medical/balloon aortic valvuloplasty (HR 2.2, p <0.001). Mean BNP decreased immediately after balloon aortic valvuloplasty from 1,595 ± 1,229 to 1,252 ± 1,076, p = 0.001 yet increased to 1,609 ± 1,264, p = 0.9 at 1 to 12 months. After surgical aortic valve replacement, there was a nonsignificant, immediate decrease in BNP level from 928 ± 1,221 to 896 ± 1,217, p = 0.77, continuing up to 12 months 533 ± 213, p = 0.08. After transcatheter aortic valve implantation, there was no significant decrease in BNP immediately after the procedure; however, at 1-year follow-up, the mean BNP level decreased significantly from 568 ± 582 to 301 ± 266 pg/dl, p = 0.03. In conclusion, a high BNP level in high-risk patients with severe AS is not an independent marker for higher mortality. BNP level does not appear to be significantly associated with the degree of AS severity but does reflect heart failure status.


Aortic Valve Stenosis/blood , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Biomarkers/blood , Cardiac Catheterization , Chi-Square Distribution , Comorbidity , Echocardiography , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate
4.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med ; 13(3): 177-82, 2012.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22336532

BACKGROUND: A fractional flow reserve (FFR) of <0.8 is currently used to guide revascularization in lesions with intermediate coronary stenosis. Whether there is an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurement or a cutoff value that can reliably determine which of these intermediate lesions requires intervention is unclear. AIMS: We assessed IVUS measurement accuracy in defining functional ischemia by FFR. METHODS: The analysis included 205 intermediate lesions (185 patients) located in vessel diameters >2.5 mm. Positive FFR was considered present at <0.8. IVUS measurements were correlated to the FFR findings in intermediate lesions with 40%-70% stenosis. Fifty-four (26.3%) lesions had FFR<0.8. RESULTS: There was moderate correlation between FFR and IVUS measurements, including minimum lumen area (MLA) (r=0.36, P<.001), minimum lumen diameter (MLD) (r=0.25, P=<.001), lesion length (r=-0.43, P<.001), and area stenosis (r=-0.33, P=.01). A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) identified MLA<3.09 mm(2) (sensitivity 69.2%, specificity 79.5%) as the best threshold value for FFR<0.8. The correlation between FFR and IVUS was better for large vessels compared to small vessels. ROC analysis identified the best threshold value for FFR<0.8 of MLA<2.4 mm(2) [area under curve (AUC)=0.74] in lesions with reference vessel diameters of 2.5-3 mm, MLA<2.7 mm(2) (AUC=0.77) in lesions with reference vessel diameters of 3-3.5 mm, and MLA<3.6 mm(2) (AUC=0.70) in lesions with reference vessel diameters >3.5 mm. CONCLUSION: Anatomic measurements of intermediate coronary lesions obtained by IVUS show a moderate correlation to FFR values. The correlation was better for larger-diameter vessels. Vessel size should always be taken into account when determining the MLA associated with functional ischemia.


Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization , Chi-Square Distribution , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/physiopathology , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , District of Columbia , Female , Humans , Linear Models , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/physiopathology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Registries , Sensitivity and Specificity , Severity of Illness Index
...