Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 20
1.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 13: 868795, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35846291

Objective: To evaluate the effect of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) status in the impact of lifestyle over Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Methods: Baseline and 1 year follow up data from the PREDIMED-plus cohort (men and women, 55-75 years old with overweight/obesity and MetS) were studied. Adherence to an energy-restricted Mediterranean Diet (er-MeDiet) and Physical Activity (PA) were assessed with a validated screeners. Hepatic steatosis index (HSI) was implemented to evaluate NAFLD while the SF-36 questionnaire provided HRQoL evaluation. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of baseline NAFLD on HRQoL as affected by lifestyle during 1 year of follow up. Results: Data from 5205 patients with mean age of 65 years and a 48% of female participants. Adjusted linear multivariate mixed regression models showed that patients with lower probability of NAFLD (HSI < 36 points) were more responsive to er-MeDiet (ß 0.64 vs ß 0.05 per er-MeDiet adherence point, p< 0.01) and PA (ß 0.05 vs ß 0.01 per MET-h/week, p = 0.001) than those with high probability for NAFLD in terms Physical SF-36 summary in the 1 year follow up. 10 points of er-MeDiet adherence and 50 MET-h/week were thresholds for a beneficial effect of lifestyle on HRQoL physical domain in patients with lower probability of NAFLD. Conclusion: The evaluation of NAFLD by the HSI index in patients with MetS might identify subjects with different prospective sensitivity to lifestyle changes in terms of physical HRQoL (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89898870).


Metabolic Syndrome , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease , Aged , Female , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life
2.
PLoS One ; 17(4): e0265079, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35417452

BACKGROUND: Cardio-vascular disease and depression are thought to be closely related, due to shared risk factors. The aim of the study was to determine the association between cardio-vascular risk (CVR) factors and depressive status in a population (55-75 years) with metabolic syndrome (MetS) from the PREDIMED-Plus trial. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Participants were classified into three groups of CVR according to the Framingham-based REGICOR function: (1) low (LR), (2) medium (MR) or (3) high/very high (HR). The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) was used to assess depressive symptoms at baseline and after 2 years. The association between CVR and depressive status at baseline (n = 6545), and their changes after 2 years (n = 4566) were evaluated through multivariable regression models (logistic and linear models). HR women showed higher odds of depressive status than LR [OR (95% CI) = 1.78 (1.26, 2.50)]. MR and HR participants with total cholesterol <160 mg/mL showed higher odds of depression than LR [OR (95% CI) = 1.77 (1.13, 2.77) and 2.83 (1.25, 6.42) respectively)] but those with total cholesterol ≥280 mg/mL showed lower odds of depression than LR [OR (95% CI) = 0.26 (0.07, 0.98) and 0.23 (0.05, 0.95), respectively]. All participants decreased their BDI-II score after 2 years, being the decrease smaller in MR and HR diabetic compared to LR [adjusted mean±SE = -0.52±0.20, -0.41±0.27 and -1.25±0.31 respectively). MR and HR participants with total cholesterol between 240-279 mg/mL showed greater decreases in the BDI-II score compared to LR (adjusted mean±SE = -0.83±0.37, -0.77±0.64 and 0.97±0.52 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Improving cardiovascular health could prevent the onset of depression in the elderly. Diabetes and total cholesterol in individuals at high CVR, may play a specific role in the precise response. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial (ISRCTN89898870).


Depression , Aged , Cholesterol , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 31(5): 690-697, 2022 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35041531

Background: Despite considerable evidence concerning heart failure (HF) risk factors, there is scarce information about the effect and degree of control regarding socioeconomic and gender inequalities. Methods: Cohort study including HF patients >40 years of age attended in 53 primary health care centers in Barcelona (Spain). Socioeconomic status (SES) was determined by an aggregated deprivation index (MEDEA) according to the neighborhood of residence. Logistic multivariable regression was performed to analyze differences in cardiovascular risk factor control, stratifying by SES and sex. Results: A total of 8235 HF patients were included. Mean age was 78.1 (standard deviation 10.2) years, and 56.0% were women. The most prevalent cardiovascular risk factors were hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. Blood pressure was the worst controlled factor in both genders with the lowest SES (odds ratio [OR] 0.56 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.71) and (OR 0.52, 0.46-0.71), respectively. In women, a social gradient was observed for glycemic and body mass index control, which were worse in the most unfavorable socioeconomic position (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.77), and (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32-0.64), respectively. Men presented worse control of blood pressure (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.71) and smoking habit (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.90) in the most deprived socioeconomic bracket. Conclusion: Patients with HF in the most disadvantaged socioeconomic levels presented the worst degree of control for cardiovascular risk factors, and this negative effect was stronger in women.


Cardiovascular Diseases , Heart Failure , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Risk Factors , Social Class , Socioeconomic Factors
5.
J Hypertens ; 37(2): 426-431, 2019 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30063640

OBJECTIVE: Various studies have suggested that a delay in the time between diagnosing hypertension and its correct control (D-C, diagnostic-control time) is linked to a worse prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between D-C time and all-cause mortality, or the incidence of cardiovascular events, in patients more than 60 years newly diagnosed with hypertension. METHODS: This is a longitudinal, retrospective, population study employing data gathered from the electronic medical records of patients recently diagnosed with hypertension in 45 primary healthcare centres located in Barcelona (Catalonia). A multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression models were constructed. Goodness-of-fit was assessed through the Hosmer & Lemeshow test. RESULTS: A total of 18 721 newly diagnosed hypertensive patients were included between 2007 and 2012. The follow-up lasted until October 2015, or the appearance of a cardiovascular event or death because of any cause. The median D-C time was 49 days and its distribution by tertiles was the following: 29 days or less, 30-124 days, and at least 125 days. Higher hypertensive status, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and male sex were independently associated with longer D-C time (≥125 days). At 5.4 years follow-up, patients with longer D-C times presented statistically significant greater incidence of all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: A delay in blood pressure control is significantly associated with an increase in the rate of all-cause mortality.


Blood Pressure , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/physiopathology , Incidence , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Obesity/physiopathology , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Time Factors
6.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 72(9): 845-851, 2018 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29899056

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the effect of social determinants of health on heart failure (HF) community-dwelling patients is scarce. We aimed to analyse the presence of socioeconomic inequalities, and their impact on hospitalisations and mortality, in patients with HF attended in a universal healthcare coverage system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study carried out in patients with HF aged >40 and attended at the 53 primary healthcare centres of the Institut Català de la Salut in Barcelona (Spain). Socioeconomic status (SES) was determined by an aggregated deprivation index (MEDEA). Cox proportional hazard models and competing-risks regression based on Fine and Gray's proportional subhazards were performed to analyse hospitalisations due to of HF and total mortality that occurred between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2012. RESULTS: Mean age was 78.1 years (SD 10.2) and 56% were women. Among the 8235 patients included, 19.4% died during the 4 years of follow-up and 27.1% were hospitalised due to HF. A gradient in the risk of hospitalisation was observed according to SES with the highest risk in the lowest socioeconomic group (sHR 1.46, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.68). Nevertheless, overall mortality did not differ among the socioeconomic groups. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of finding a gradient that linked socioeconomic deprivation to an increased risk of hospitalisation, there were no differences in mortality regarding SES in a universal healthcare coverage system.


Health Status Disparities , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospitalization , Universal Health Insurance , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Medical Audit , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Social Class , Spain/epidemiology
7.
BMC Fam Pract ; 18(1): 38, 2017 03 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28302060

BACKGROUND: It is common to find a high variability in the accuracy of heart failure (HF) diagnosis in electronic primary care medical records (EMR). Our aims were to ascertain (i) whether the prognosis of HF labelled patients whose ejection fraction (EF) was missing in their EMR differed from those that had it registered, and (ii) the causes contributing to the differences in the availability of EF in EMR. METHODS: Retrospective cohort analyses based on clinical records of HF and attended at 52 primary healthcare centres of Barcelona (Spain). Information of 8376 HF patients aged > 40 years followed during five years was analyzed. RESULTS: EF was available only in 8.5% of primary care medical records. Cumulate incidence for mortality and hospitalization from 1st January 2009 to 31th December 2012 was 37.6%. The highest rate was found in patients with missing EF (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.68 -1.95) compared to those with preserved EF. Patients hospitalized the previous year and those requiring home healthcare (HR 1.81, 95% Confidence Interval 1.68-1.95 and HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.46-1.71, respectively) presented a higher risk of having an adverse outcome. Older patients, those more socio-economically disadvantaged, obese, requiring home healthcare, and taking loop diuretics were less likely to have an EF registered. CONCLUSIONS: EF is poorly recorded in primary care. HF patients with EF missing at medical records had the worst prognosis. They tended to be older, socio-economically disadvantaged, and more fragile.


Documentation , Electronic Health Records , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Stroke Volume/physiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Failure/diagnostic imaging , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Obesity/epidemiology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Spain
8.
Aten Primaria ; 49(7): 389-398, 2017.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28314542

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of computerized clinical practice guidelines on the management, diagnosis, treatment, control, and follow-up of the main cardiovascular risk factors: hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN: Pre-post controlled study. SETTING: Catalonia, autonomous community located in north-eastern Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 35-74 years assigned to general practitioners of the Catalan Health Institute. INTERVENTION: The intervention group consisted of individuals whose general practitioners had accessed the computerized clinical practice guidelines at least twice a day, while the control group consisted of individuals whose general practitioner had never accessed the computerized clinical practice guidelines platform. MAIN OUTCOMES: The Chi-squared test was used to detect significant differences in the follow-up, control, and treatment variables for all three disorders (hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus) between individuals assigned to users and non-users of the computerized clinical practice guidelines, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 189,067 patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 56 years (standard deviation 12), and 55.5% of whom were women. Significant differences were observed in hypertension management, treatment and control; type 2 diabetes mellitus management, treatment and diagnoses, and the management and control of hypercholesterolaemia in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS: Computerized clinical practice guidelines are an effective tool for the control and follow-up of patients diagnosed with hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolaemia. The usefulness of computerized clinical practice guidelines to diagnose and adequately treat individuals with these disorders remains unclear.

9.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 21(4): 224-30, 2015.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26205157

BACKGROUND: The role of cardiovascular risk factor control in the development of heart failure (HF) has not yet been clearly established. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of cardiovascular risk factor control on the occurrence of a first episode of hospital admission for HF. METHODS: A case-control study using propensity score-matching was carried out to analyse the occurrence of first hospital admission for HF taking into account the degree of cardiovascular risk factor control over the previous 24 months. All patients admitted to the cardiology unit of the Hospital del Mar between 2008 and 2011 because of a first episode of HF were considered cases. Controls were selected from the population in the hospital catchment area who were using primary care services. Cardiovascular risk factor measurements in the primary healthcare electronic medical records prior to the first HF episode were analysed. RESULTS: After the matching process, 645 participants were analysed (129 HF cases and 516 controls). Patients suffering a first HF episode had modest increments in body mass index and blood pressure levels during the previous two years. Adjusted odds ratio for experiencing a first HF hospital admission episode according to systolic blood pressure levels and body mass index was (OR: 1.031, 95% CI: 1.001-1.04), and (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.03-1.15), respectively. CONCLUSION: Increased levels of body mass index and systolic blood pressure during the previous 24 months may determine a higher risk of having a first HF hospital admission episode.


Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Primary Health Care , Smoking/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Pressure , Body Mass Index , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
10.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 144(10): 435-9, 2015 May 21.
Article Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24889750

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The ankle-brachial index allows for the detection of subclinical cardiovascular disease and risk, by diagnosing peripheral arterial disease and arterial calcification. Asymptomatic hypertensive men, between 45-55 years and with the suspicion of low risk, could be an important population group to benefit from this technique. The aim of the study was to compare the frequency of abnormal ankle-brachial index (subclinical peripheral arterial disease and arterial calcification) between asymptomatic hypertensive and non-hypertensive men, of the same age and suspicion of low risk. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and forty-four asymptomatic men (122 hypertensive and 122 non-hypertensive), between 45 and 55 years and an REGICOR index<10, were voluntarily recruited using consecutive sampling. Complete anamnesis, physical examination, laboratory tests and ankle-brachial index determination were carried out on all patients. RESULTS: We detected abnormal ankle-brachial index values in 9.8% (12 cases) of the hypertensive subjects and in 1.6% (2 cases) of non-hypertensive subjects (P=.006). In the multivariate analysis, hypertension was significantly associated with an abnormal ankle-brachial index (P<.026) (odds ratio [OR] 5.9, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-28.3), smoking (P=.018) (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.2-6.2) and abdominal obesity (P=.005) (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.3-5.9). CONCLUSIONS: The population group analyzed in this study might be considered as an overriding segment for detecting subclinical cardiovascular disease and risk with the ankle-brachial index. Further studies are needed to establish the prevalence of abnormal ankle-brachial index in this population in order to assess its efficiency.


Ankle Brachial Index , Hypertension/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Vascular Calcification/diagnosis , Asymptomatic Diseases , Case-Control Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Vascular Calcification/complications , Vascular Calcification/epidemiology
11.
BMC Public Health ; 13: 364, 2013 Apr 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23597262

BACKGROUND: Intensive interventions on smoking cessation increase abstinence rates. However, few electronic mail (E-mail) based intensive interventions have been tested in smokers and none in primary care (PC) setting. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive E-mail based intervention in smokers attending PC services. METHODS/DESIGN: Randomized Controlled Multicentric Trial. STUDY POPULATION: 1060 smokers aged between 18-70 years from Catalonia, Salamanca and Aragón (Spain) who have and check regularly an E-mail account. Patients will be randomly assigned to control or intervention group. INTERVENTION: Six phase intensive intervention with two face to face interviews and four automatically created and personal E-mail patients tracking, if needed other E-mail contacts will be made. Control group will receive a brief advice on smoking cessation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Will be measured at 6 and 12 months after intervention: self reported continuous abstinence (confirmed by cooximetry), point prevalence abstinence, tobacco consumption, evolution of stage according to Prochaska and DiClemente's Stages of Change Model, length of visit, costs for the patient to access Primary Care Center. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive and logistic and Poisson regression analysis under the intention to treat basis using SPSS v.17. DISCUSSION: The proposed intervention is an E-mail based intensive intervention in smokers attending primary care. Positive results could be useful to demonstrate a higher percentage of short and long-term abstinence among smokers attended in PC in Spain who regularly use E-mail. Furthermore, this intervention could be helpful in all health services to help smokers to quit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01494246.


Electronic Mail , Internet/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Control Groups , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/economics
12.
BMC Psychiatry ; 12: 230, 2012 Dec 18.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23249399

BACKGROUND: Studies show the effectiveness of group psychoeducation in reducing symptoms in people with depression. However, few controlled studies that have included aspects of personal care and healthy lifestyle (diet, physical exercise, sleep) together with cognitive-behavioral techniques in psychoeducation are proven to be effective.The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a psychoeducational program, which includes aspects of personal care and healthy lifestyle, in patients with mild/moderate depression symptoms in Primary Care (PC). METHODS: In a randomized, controlled trial, 246 participants over 20 years old with ICD-10 major depression were recruited through nurses/general practitioners at 12 urban Primary Care Centers (PCCs) in Barcelona. The intervention group (IG) (n=119) received a group psychoeducational program (12 weekly, 1.5 h sessions led by two nurses) and the control group (CG) (n=112) received usual care. Patients were assessed at baseline and at, 3, 6 and 9 months. The main outcome measures were the BDI, EQ-5D and remission based upon the BDI. RESULTS: 231 randomized patients were included, of whom 85 had mild depression and 146 moderate depression. The analyses showed significant differences between groups in relation to remission of symptoms, especially in the mild depression group with a high rate of 57% (p=0.009) at post-treatment and 65% (p=0.006) at 9 month follow up, and only showed significant differences on the BDI at post-treatment (p=0.016; effect size Cohen's d'=.51) and at 6 and 9 month follow-up (p= 0.048; d'=.44).In the overall and moderate sample, the analyses only showed significant differences between groups on the BDI at post-treatment, p=0.02 (d'=.29) and p=0.010 (d'=.47), respectively.The psychoeducation group improved significantly on the EQ-5D at short and long-term. CONCLUSIONS: This psychoeducational intervention is a short and long-term effective treatment for patients with mild depression symptoms. It results in a high remission rate, is recommended in PC and can be carried out by nurses with previous training. In moderate patients, group psychoeducation is effective in the short-term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov identifier NCT00841737.


Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Primary Health Care/methods , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Psychotherapy/methods , Adult , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life/psychology , Remission Induction , Spain
13.
BMC Res Notes ; 5: 684, 2012 Dec 13.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23237104

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepine (BZD), the long-term treatment of which is harmful for cognitive function, is widely prescribed by General Practitioners in Spain. Based on studies performed in other countries we designed a nurse-led BZD withdrawal program adapted to Spanish Primary Care working conditions. RESULTS: A pseudo-experimental (before-after) study took place in two Primary Care Centres in Barcelona. From a sample of 1150 patients, 79 were identified. They were over 44 years old and had been daily users of BZD for a period exceeding six months. Out of the target group 51 patients agreed to participate. BZD dosage was reduced every 2-4 weeks by 25% of the initial dose with the optional support of Hydroxyzine or Valerian. The rating measurements were: reduction of BZD prescription, demographic variables, the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) to measure quality of life, the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, and the Goldberg Depression and Anxiety Scale.By the end of the six-month intervention, 80.4% of the patients had discontinued BZD and 64% maintained abstinence at one year. An improvement in all parameters of the Goldberg scale (p <0.05) and in the mental component of SF-12 at 3.3 points (p = 0.024), as well as in most components of the MOS scale, was observed in the group that had discontinued BZD. No significant differences in these scales before and after the intervention were observed in the group that had not discontinued. CONCLUSIONS: At one year approximately 2/3 of the patients had ceased taking BZD. They showed an overall improvement in depression and anxiety scales, and in the mental component of the quality of life scale. There was no apparent reduction in the sleep quality indicators in most of the analysed components. Nurses in a Primary Care setting can successfully implement a BZD withdrawal program.


Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Anxiety/drug therapy , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Nurse Practitioners/organization & administration , Primary Health Care , Adult , Anxiety/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder/physiopathology , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Humans , Hydroxyzine/pharmacology , Hydroxyzine/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Plant Extracts/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Research Design , Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals , Sleep/drug effects , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires , Valerian/chemistry
14.
Eur J Gen Pract ; 18(2): 100-6, 2012 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22574692

BACKGROUND: Immigration is a relevant public health issue and there is a great deal of controversy surrounding its impact on health services utilization. OBJECTIVE: To determine differences between immigrants and non-immigrants in the utilization of primary health care services in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: Population based, cross-sectional, multicentre study. We used the information from 16 primary health care centres in an area near Barcelona, Spain. We conducted a multilevel analysis for the year 2008 to compare primary health care services utilization between all immigrants aged 15 or more and a sample of non-immigrants, paired by age and sex. RESULTS: Overall, immigrants living in Spain used health services more than non-immigrants (Incidence Risk Ratio (IRR) 1.16 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.15-1.16) and (IRR 1, 26, 95% CI: 1.25-1.28) for consultations with GPs and referrals to specialized care, respectively. People coming from the Maghreb and the rest of Africa requested the most consultations involving a GP and nurses (IRR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.33-1.36 and IRR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.44, respectively). They were more frequently referred to specialized care (IRR 1.44, 95% CI: 1.41-1.46) when compared to Spaniards. Immigrants from Asia had the lowest numbers of consultations with a GP and referrals (IRR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.66-0.88 and IRR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.95, respectively. CONCLUSION: On average, immigrants living in Catalonia used the health services more than non-immigrants. Immigrants from the Maghreb and other African countries showed the highest and those from Asia the lowest, number of consultations and referrals to specialized care.


Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual , Female , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spain , Specialization , Young Adult
15.
BMC Public Health ; 12: 209, 2012 Mar 19.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22429693

BACKGROUND: The promotion of health and the interventions in community health continue to be one of the pending subjects of our health system. The most prevalent health problems (cardiovascular diseases, cancer, diabetes...) are for the most part related to life habits. We propose a holistic and integral approach as the best option for tackling behavior and its determinants. The research team has elaborated the necessary educational material to realize group teaching, which we call "Health Workshops". The goal of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness of these Health Workshops in the following terms: Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL), incorporate and maintain a balanced diet, do physical activity regularly, maintain risk factors such as tension, weight, cholesterol within normal limits and diminish cardiovascular risk. METHODS/DESIGN: Controlled and random clinical testing, comparing a group of persons who have participated in the Health Workshops with a control group of similar characteristics who have not participated in the Health Workshops.Field of study: the research is being done in Health Centers of the city of Barcelona, Spain. POPULATION STUDIED: The group is composed of 108 persons that are actually doing the Health Workshops, and 108 that are not and form the control group. They are assigned at random to one group or the other. DATA ANALYSIS: With Student's t-distribution test to compare the differences between numerical variables or their non parametric equivalent if the variable does not comply with the criteria of normality. (Kolmogorov-Smirnof test). Chi-square test to compare the differences between categorical variables and the Logistic Regression Model to analyze different meaningful variables by dichotomous analysis related to the intervention. DISCUSSION: The Health Workshop proposed in the present study constitutes an innovative approach in health promotion, placing the emphasis on the person's self responsibility for his/her own health.The rhythm of a weekly session during 8 weeks with recommended activities to put into practice, as well as the support of the group is an opportunity to incorporate healthy habits and make a commitment to self-care. The sheets handed out are a Health Manual that can always be consulted after the workshop ends. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT01440738.


Diet/standards , Group Processes , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Quality of Life , Self Care/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Blood Pressure , Body Weight , Clinical Protocols , Diet/economics , Female , Holistic Health , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Program Evaluation , Psychometrics , Quality Control , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
16.
Aten Primaria ; 44(5): 280-7, 2012 May.
Article Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21955598

OBJECTIVE: To obtain adapted versions for the Spanish population of a specific version of the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire Revised (IPQ-R(e)) and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ), conceptually and linguistically equivalent to the original questionnaires. DESIGN: Cultural adaptation of questionnaires: linguistic validation. SETTING: Five primary care centres and a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary team was selected. A pilot study was performed on 30 people with chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, stable ischaemic heart disease, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or osteoarthritis) METHOD: The project proceeded in 3 phases: I) Double forward-translation, II) Pilot study and III) Double back-translation. Three consensus meetings were held, one in each phase. Another meeting was held with one of the authors of the original questionnaire, where we knew about a short version, the BIPQ. It was also included in the study. Double forward and back-translations were performed and consensus was reached in both stages. RESULTS: Phase I) The majority of IPQ-R(e) items did not raise problems of translation. Phase II) In the pilot study we detected that patients found some difficulties in connection with the comprehension and self administration of some items. Therefore it was decided to employ trained interviewers, to introduce changes in the IPQ-R(e) format and vocabulary and to adapt a specific version with fewer items that solved most of these difficulties Phase III) Back-translations were very similar to the original version. The BIPQ forward and back-translation process caused no difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: After lingüistic validation, IPQ-R(e) and BIPQ versions conceptually and lingüistically equivalent to original instruments were obtained.


Attitude to Health , Chronic Disease , Surveys and Questionnaires , Cultural Characteristics , Humans , Spain , Translations
17.
Gerontology ; 55(6): 666-73, 2009.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19776537

BACKGROUND: Differences in recording concurrent chronic conditions (CCs) could change the weight of the influence of the different CCs on health status. OBJECTIVES: To determine the role of musculoskeletal disorders as concurrent CCs. METHODS: Cross-sectional study. Discharged patients with CCs were selected by random stratification. Sociodemographic and clinical variables, health status (SF-36), type and number of self-reported and hospital discharge summary CCs were recorded. Relationships were analyzed using linear regression models. RESULTS: In the 227 patients included, mean self-reported CCs were 6.22 (SD 3.37) and mean hospital discharge CCs were 3.1 (SD 1.95). The most-frequent self-reported CCs were hypertension 48.4%, back pain 40.4%, neck pain 39.6%, and musculoskeletal disorders 38.4%. The most frequent discharge CCs were arterial hypertensive disease 38.3%, all cancers 22.0%, ischemic heart diseases, and angina 15.9%. Musculoskeletal disorders had the greatest negative influence on SF-36 dimensions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal disorders were underestimated in the discharge summary in comparison with those reported by patients.


Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Health Status , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Back Pain/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Pain/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology
18.
Clin Rheumatol ; 28(10): 1157-65, 2009 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19562403

The purpose of this study is to determine how health-related quality of life (HRQL) is perceived by patients with rheumatoid arthritis using textual analysis and to identify associations between sociodemographic and clinical variables and patients' perceptions. Multicentre, cross-sectional study, including 781 patients (78.8% females, mean age 60.65 years, standard deviation 14.22). Sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected. A questionnaire was used which included an open question, "What does HRQL mean to you?" Cluster analysis was used, and answers to the open question were analysed using textual analysis. Cluster analysis showed three typologies differentiated by gender, age, and socioeconomic level and by the terms used to describe perceptions of HRQL with no marked clinical differences. Characteristic phrases were "to be totally independent, to have no pain, and to do things without thinking about the negative effects" (typology 1); "to have no pain and control my moods and my illness has made me a little excitable" (typology 2); and "to feel well enough to do things for myself" (typology 3). Three representative typologies of patients were identified who differed clearly in their perceptions of HRQL. Textual analysis may be considered as a valid tool for the analysis of complex issues such as quality of life.


Arthritis, Rheumatoid/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Self Concept , Age Factors , Aged , Cluster Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
19.
Orthopedics ; 31(8): 753, 2008 Aug.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19292422

Knee osteoarthritis is one of the most prevalent health problems in our society. It accounts for 10% of all primary care visits in general medicine and 30% of outpatient appointments. The objectives of this cross-sectional descriptive study of 100 patients suffering from gonarthritis were to assess pain, functional capacity, and joint damage in patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis, as well as the possible repercussions for subsequent surgical treatment. Sociodemographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected, and pain and functional capacity were evaluated by using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. The majority (71) of patients were women, mean age 71 years (SD=7.84), of low educational (66%) and financial (89%) status, with mean disease duration of 11.8 years. Of the total, 87% presented with comorbidity. Radiographs revealed a varus malalignment in 31% of patients and a valgus malalignment in 17%, with bone collapse in 39% of these. The factors that most affect surgery and subsequent rehabilitation are closely linked to social status, the general state of the patient, and the radiological severity of gonarthritis. Most of the patients were obese and suffered from comorbid conditions, and some presented with psychopathology. These factors may influence surgery, and thus improvements in primary care should be made as a way of offering a simpler and more effective treatment for gonarthritis.


Arthralgia/epidemiology , Joint Instability/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Age Distribution , Aged , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Spain/epidemiology
...