Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid with Avdoralimab: Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Labeled Phase 2 Study.

RATIONALE: Experimental data support the role for C5a-C5aR1 axis activation in bullous pemphigoid. We assessed the efficacy and safety of avdoralimab, a specific anti-C5aR1 mAb, for treating bullous pemphigoid. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 open-labeled randomized multicenter study. Patients with proven bullous pemphigoid were randomized (1:1) to receive superpotent topical steroids alone (group A) or with avdoralimab (group B). All patients received 0.05% clobetasol propionate cream until 15 days after the healing of lesions. Patients in group B additionally received 3 injections of avdoralimab every week for 12 weeks. The main criterion of evaluation was the proportion of patients with initial control of disease activity still in complete clinical remission at 3 months with no relapse during the study period. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were randomized: 7 to group A and 8 to group B. Two patients in group A and in group B achieved control of disease activity at week 4. Only 1 patient was still in complete clinical remission at week 12 in group B, and none was in group A. No adverse event related to the treatment was reported. CONCLUSIONS: This proof-of-concept pilot study did not show preliminary signal of additional avdoralimab efficiency compared with superpotent topical steroids alone.

Sustained Remission Without Corticosteroids Among Patients With Pemphigus Who Had Rituximab as First-Line Therapy: Follow-Up of the Ritux 3 Trial.

Importance: The Ritux 3 trial demonstrated the short-term efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with rituximab compared with a standard corticosteroid regimen in pemphigus. No data on the long-term follow-up of patients who received rituximab as first line are available. Objective: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the Ritux 3 treatment regimen. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 7-year follow-up study of the Ritux 3 trial included patients with pemphigus from 25 dermatology departments in France from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015. Exposure: Patients were initially randomized in the rituximab plus prednisone group or prednisone-alone group. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the 5- and 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) without corticosteroids, assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Secondary outcomes were occurrence of relapse, occurrence of severe adverse events (SAEs), and evolution of antidesmoglein (Dsg) antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay values to predict long-term relapse. Results: Of the 90 patients in the Ritux 3 trial, 83 were evaluated at the end of follow-up study visit (44 in the rituximab plus prednisone group; 39 in the prednisone-alone group) with a median (IQR) follow-up of 87.3 (79.1-97.5) months. Forty-three patients (93%) from the rituximab plus prednisone and 17 patients (39%) from the prednisone-alone group had achieved complete remission without corticosteroids at any time during the follow-up. Patients from the rituximab group had much longer 5- and 7-year DFS without corticosteroids than patients from the prednisone-alone group (76.7% and 72.1% vs 35.3% and 35.3%, respectively; P < .001), and had about half the relapses (42.2% vs 83.7%; P < .001). Patients who received rituximab as second-line treatment had shorter DFS than patients treated as first line (P = .007). Fewer SAEs were reported in the rituximab plus prednisone group compared with the prednisone-alone group, 31 vs 58 respectively, corresponding to 0.67 and 1.32 SAEs per patient, respectively (P = .003). The combination of anti-Dsg1 values of 20 or more IU/mL and/or anti-Dsg3 values of 48 or more IU/mL yielded 0.83 positive predictive value and 0.94 negative predictive value to predict long-term relapse. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of the Ritux 3 trail, first-line treatment of patients with pemphigus with the Ritux 3 regimen was associated with long-term sustained complete remission without corticosteroid therapy without any additional maintenance infusion of rituximab.

Efficacy of Methotrexate Alone vs Methotrexate Plus Low-Dose Prednisone in Patients With Alopecia Areata Totalis or Universalis: A 2-Step Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Poor therapeutic results have been reported in patients with alopecia areata totalis (AT) or universalis (AU), the most severe and disabling types of alopecia areata (AA). Methotrexate, an inexpensive treatment, might be effective in AU and AT. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of methotrexate alone or combined with low-dose prednisone in patients with chronic and recalcitrant AT and AU. Design, Setting, and Participants: This academic, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 dermatology departments at university hospitals between March 2014 and December 2016 and included adult patients with AT or AU evolving for more than 6 months despite previous topical and systemic treatments. Data analysis was performed from October 2018 to June 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive methotrexate (25 mg/wk) or placebo for 6 months. Patients with greater than 25% hair regrowth (HR) at month 6 continued their treatment until month 12. Patients with less than 25% HR were rerandomized: methotrexate plus prednisone (20 mg/d for 3 months and 15 mg/d for 3 months) or methotrexate plus placebo of prednisone. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point assessed on photos by 4 international experts was complete or almost complete HR (Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] score <10) at month 12, while receiving methotrexate alone from the start of the study. Main secondary end points were the rate of major (greater than 50%) HR, quality of life, and treatment tolerance. Results: A total of 89 patients (50 female, 39 male; mean [SD] age, 38.6 [14.3] years) with AT (n = 1) or AU (n = 88) were randomized: methotrexate (n = 45) or placebo (n = 44). At month 12, complete or almost complete HR (SALT score <10) was observed in 1 patient and no patient who received methotrexate alone or placebo, respectively, in 7 of 35 (20.0%; 95% CI, 8.4%-37.0%) patients who received methotrexate (for 6 or 12 months) plus prednisone, including 5 of 16 (31.2%; 95% CI, 11.0%-58.7%) who received methotrexate for 12 months and prednisone for 6 months. A greater improvement in quality of life was observed in patients who achieved a complete response compared with nonresponder patients. Two patients in the methotrexate group discontinued the study because of fatigue and nausea, which were observed in 7 (6.9%) and 14 (13.7%) patients receiving methotrexate, respectively. No severe treatment adverse effect was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, while methotrexate alone mainly allowed partial HR in patients with chronic AT or AU, its combination with low-dose prednisone allowed complete HR in up to 31% of patients. These results seem to be of the same order of magnitude as those recently reported with JAK inhibitors, with a much lower cost. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02037191.

Anti-BP180 IgG antibody ELISA values correlate with adverse pregnancy outcomes in pemphigoid gestationis.

BACKGROUND: Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) occur in 35% of patients with pemphigoid gestationis (PG). No biological predictor of APO has been established yet. OBJECTIVES: To assess a potential relationship between the occurrence of APO and the serum value of anti-BP180 antibodies at the time of PG diagnosis. METHODS: Multicentre retrospective study conducted from January 2009 to December 2019 in 35 secondary and tertiary care centres. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (i) diagnosis of PG according to clinical, histological and immunological criteria, (ii) ELISA measurement of anti-BP180 IgG antibodies determined at the time of PG diagnosis with the same commercial kit and (iii) obstetrical data available. RESULTS: Of the 95 patients with PG included, 42 had one or more APO, which mainly corresponded to preterm birth (n = 26), intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (n = 18) and small weight for gestational age at birth (n = 16). From a ROC curve, we identified a threshold of 150 IU ELISA value as the most discriminating to differentiate between patients with or without IUGR, with 78% sensitivity, 55% specificity, 30% positive and 91% negative predictive value. The threshold >150 IU was confirmed using a cross-validation based on bootstrap resampling, which showed that the median threshold was 159 IU. Upon adjusting for oral corticosteroid intake and main clinical predictors of APO, an ELISA value of >150 IU was associated with the occurrence of IUGR (OR = 5.11; 95% CI: 1.48-22.30; p = 0.016) but not with any other APO. The combination of blisters and ELISA values higher than 150 IU led to a 2.4-fold higher risk of all-cause APO (OR: 10.90; 95% CI: 2.33-82.3) relative to patients with blisters but lower values of anti-BP180 antibodies (OR of 4.54; 95% CI 0.92-34.2). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that anti-BP180 antibody ELISA value in combination with clinical markers is helpful in managing the risk of APO, in particular IUGR, in patients with PG.