Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Clin Dent ; 28(1 Spec No A): A1-6, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28422459

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the ability of the Philips Sonicare DiamondClean power toothbrush and the ADA Reference manual toothbrush to reduce plaque and gingival inflammation by routine manual toothbrush users. METHODS: This was a randomized, single-blind, parallel-design study. Eligible subjects were generally healthy non-smokers who exhibited mild to moderate gingivitis upon study entry. Enrolled subjects were randomly allocated to commence twice-daily home use of either a Philips Sonicare DiamondClean (DiamondClean) power toothbrush or an ADA reference manual toothbrush (MTB) for a period of four weeks. Clinical safety and efficacy were assessed after a two- and four-week period of home use. Statistical analysis was performed for the modified intent to treat (mITT) population using a mixed model with the Baseline score as a covariate. RESULTS: A total of 182 volunteers were screened, 144 (72 per treatment) were randomized, and 142 subjects completed this study. Following four weeks of use, the Least Square (LS) Mean SE) percent reduction in surface plaque was 34.9% (1.8) for DiamondClean and 8.0% (1.7) for MTB, (p < 0.0001). At the same four-week time point, the LS Mean (SE) percent reduction in gingival inflammation for DiamondClean was 25.5% (1.9) and 19.1% (1.9) for MTB (p = 0.0213). For gingival bleeding, the LS Mean (SE) percent reduction in sites with gingival bleeding for DiamondClean was 57.4% (3.06) and 31.4% (3.04) for MTB (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The Philips Sonicare DiamondClean power toothbrush was statistically significantly more effective than a manual toothbrush in reducing supragingival plaque, gingival inflammation, and gingival bleeding following a four-week period of home use. Both products were safe for home use.


Asunto(s)
Placa Dental/terapia , Hemorragia Gingival/terapia , Gingivitis/terapia , Cepillado Dental , Adulto , Índice de Placa Dental , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Índice Periodontal , Método Simple Ciego
2.
J Clin Dent ; 28(1 Spec No A): A29-35, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28422462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of the Philips Sonicare DiamondClean plus Premium plaque control brush head with the Oral-B 7000 plus CrossAction brush head on gingivitis and supragingival plaque reduction following a 42-day period of home use. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel, examiner-blind, prospective clinical trial conducted on generally healthy subjects. Eligible subjects met the following eligibility criteria: age 18-65, non-smoker, routine manual toothbrush user, ≥ 50 sites of gingival bleeding per the Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), and ≥ 1.8 plaque score per the Modified Plaque Index (MPI), assessed three to six hours following the last oral hygiene procedure. Eligible subjects were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to use either a Philips Sonicare DiamondClean with Premium plaque control brush head power toothbrush (SPC) or an Oral-B® 7000 with CrossAction™ brush head power toothbrush (OCA), for twice daily home use over a period of 42 days. All subjects were dispensed a standard fluoride-containing dentifrice and both toothbrushes were to be used in their respective Deep Clean modes. Safety and efficacy evaluations were performed at 14 and 42 days following Baseline. RESULTS: Two-hundred eighty-four subjects completed this trial (142 subjects per treatment group). Least squares mean (95% CI) estimates for reduction and percent reduction of gingivitis per Modified Gingival Index (MGI) following 42 days of product use for the SPC group were 1.17 (1.10, 1.24) and 45.68% (42.95%, 48.40%); for the OCA group they were 0.69 (0.62, 0.76) and 26.83% (24.10%, 29.56%). The mean difference (95% CI) between the two treatment groups was 0.48 (0.38, 0.58) and 18.85% (14.99%, 22.70%) for reduction and percent reduction, respectively. The lower limit of the 95% CI for the difference in Overall score between the two treatment groups was greater than the predefined non-inferiority margin (i.e., -0.10 or -5%); therefore SPC was declared non-inferior to OCA. In addition, since the 95% CI for the difference did not include zero, SPC was declared superior to OCA in the reduction of gingivitis per MGI at Day 42 (p-value < 0.0001). Similarly, for MGI at Day 14 and for GBI and MPI at Day 14 and Day 42, significantly larger reductions were observed for SPC compared to OCA (p-value < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Philips Sonicare DiamondClean with Premium plaque control brush head (SPC) was statistically superior to the Oral-B 7000 with CrossAction brush head (OCA) in reducing gingival inflammation, gingival bleeding, and supragingival plaque following 14 and 42 days of home use. Both products were safe for use.


Asunto(s)
Placa Dental/terapia , Gingivitis/terapia , Cepillado Dental , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Índice de Placa Dental , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice Periodontal , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto Joven
3.
Am J Dent ; 15 Spec No: 23B-25B, 2002 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12516678

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of a new oral hygiene device, the Sonicare Elite toothbrush, with a soft-bristled manual toothbrush (Oral-B 35). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a single-blind crossover with two arms. A sample of 25 subjects who met the entrance criteria was divided into two sequences at random: manual-Sonicare Elite, or Sonicare Elite-manual. Within each treatment arm, subjects were given a dental cleaning and polish, and written brushing instructions, and were allowed to use the assigned brush for at least 10 days at home before reporting for two plaque reduction evaluations. Upon completion of the first treatment arm, subjects were assigned the remaining brush and repeated the same protocol as before. Pre- and post-brushing scores were recorded at all visits after 12-18 hours of overnight plaque accumulation and were used to calculate a plaque reduction score at each evaluation. The scores were then averaged over the repeated visits with the same brush and the averages from the two brushes were paired within subjects. ANOVA was performed to determine if a difference existed between the two groups in terms of overall plaque reduction. RESULTS: The Sonicare Elite achieved a significantly greater reduction in plaque than the manual toothbrush (36.0% compared to 25.7%; P < 0.05). No adverse events related to either brush were reported during the study.


Asunto(s)
Placa Dental/prevención & control , Cepillado Dental/instrumentación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios Cruzados , Índice de Placa Dental , Profilaxis Dental , Suministros de Energía Eléctrica , Diseño de Equipo , Eritrosina , Femenino , Colorantes Fluorescentes , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mucosa Bucal/patología , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Higiene Bucal , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Método Simple Ciego , Sonicación/instrumentación , Estadística como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA