Preferences of Canadian patients and physicians for adjuvant treatments for melanoma.

Background: Past research suggests that patients with early- and late-stage melanoma will endure adverse events and inconvenient treatment regimens for improved survival. Evidence about the preferences of Canadian patients and physicians for novel adjuvant treatments for melanoma is unavailable. Methods: Patient and physician preferences for adjuvant treatments for melanoma were assessed in an online discrete choice experiment (dce). Treatment alternatives were characterized by 8 attributes with respect to dosing regimen, efficacy, and toxicities, with levels corresponding to those for dabrafenib-trametinib, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and interferon. For patients, the effects of melanoma on quality of life and ability to work and perform activities of daily living were also assessed. Patients were recruited by Canadian melanoma patient advocacy groups through e-mail and social media. Physicians were recruited by e-mail. Results: Of 94 patients who started the survey, 51 completed 1 or more dce questions. Of 166 physicians sent the e-mail invitation, 18 completed 1 or more dce questions. For patients, an increased probability of remaining cancer-free over 21 months was the most important attribute. For physicians, an increased chance of the patient's remaining alive over 36 months was the most important attribute. Patients and physicians chose active treatment over no treatment 85% and 86% of the time respectively and a treatment with attributes consistent with dabrafenib-trametinib 71% and 67% of the time respectively. A substantial proportion of patients reported worrying about future diagnostic tests and their cancer coming back. Conclusions: Canadian patients and physicians are generally concordant in their preferences for adjuvant melanoma treatments, preferring active treatment to no treatment and dabrafenib-trametinib to other options.

Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib compared with sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Canada.

BACKGROUND: In Canada and elsewhere, pazopanib and sunitinib-tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptors-are recommended as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mrcc). A large randomized noninferiority trial of pazopanib versus sunitinib (comparz) demonstrated that the two drugs have similar efficacy; however, patients randomized to pazopanib experienced better health-related quality of life (hrqol) and nominally lower rates of non-study medical resource utilization. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of pazopanib compared with sunitinib for first-line treatment of mrcc from a Canadian health care system perspective was evaluated using a partitioned-survival model that incorporated data from comparz and other secondary sources. The time horizon of 5 years was based on the maximum duration of follow-up in the final analysis of overall survival from the comparz trial. Analyses were conducted first using list prices for pazopanib and sunitinib and then by assuming that the prices of sunitinib and pazopanib would be equivalent. RESULTS: Based on list prices, expected costs were CA$10,293 less with pazopanib than with sunitinib. Pazopanib was estimated to yield 0.059 more quality-adjusted life-years (qalys). Pazopanib was therefore dominant (more qalys and lower costs) compared with sunitinib in the base case. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, pazopanib was dominant in 79% of simulations and was cost-effective in 90%-100% of simulations at a threshold cost-effectiveness ratio of CA$100,000. Assuming equivalent pricing, pazopanib yielded CA$917 in savings in the base case, was dominant in 36% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations, and was cost-effective in 89% of simulations at a threshold cost-effectiveness ratio of CA$100,000. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with sunitinib, pazopanib is likely to be a cost-effective option for first-line treatment of mrcc from a Canadian health care perspective.

Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma in Canada.

BACKGROUND: In the phase iii palette trial of pazopanib compared with placebo in patients with advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (sts) who had received prior chemotherapy, pazopanib treatment was associated with improved progression-free survival (pfs). We used an economic model and data from palette and other sources to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pazopanib in patients with advanced sts who had already received chemotherapy. METHODS: We developed a multistate model to estimate expected pfs, overall survival (os), lifetime sts treatment costs, and quality-adjusted life-years (qalys) for patients receiving pazopanib or placebo as second-line therapy for advanced sts. Cost-effectiveness was calculated alternatively from the health care system and societal perspectives for the province of Quebec. Estimated pfs, os, incidence of adverse events, and utilities values for pazopanib and placebo were derived from the palette trial. Costs were obtained from published sources. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, pazopanib is estimated to increase qalys by 0.128. The incremental cost of pazopanib compared with placebo is CA$20,840 from the health care system perspective and CA$15,821 from the societal perspective. The cost per qaly gained with pazopanib in that comparison is CA$163,336 from the health care system perspective and CA$124,001 from the societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, pazopanib might be cost-effective from the Canadian health care system and societal perspectives depending on the threshold value used by reimbursement authorities to assess novel cancer therapies. Given the unmet need for effective treatments for advanced sts, pazopanib might nevertheless be an appropriate alternative to currently used treatments.

Cost-effectiveness of lapatinib plus letrozole in her2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The cost-effectiveness of first-line treatment with lapatinib plus letrozole for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (hr+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (her2+) metastatic breast cancer (mbc) has not been assessed from the Canadian health care system and societal perspectives. METHODS: A partitioned survival analysis model with 3 health states (alive, pre-progression; alive, post-progression; dead) was developed to estimate direct and indirect costs and quality-adjusted life years (qalys) with lapatinib-letrozole, letrozole, anastrozole, or trastuzumab-anastrozole as first-line treatment. Clinical inputs for lapatinib-letrozole and letrozole were taken from the EGF30008 trial (NCT00073528). Clinical inputs for anastrozole and trastuzumab-anastrozole were taken from a network meta-analysis of published studies. Drug costs were obtained from the manufacturer's price list, the Quebec list of medications, and imsBrogan. Other costs were taken from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan's Schedule of Benefits and Fees and published studies. A 10-year time horizon was used. Costs and qalys were discounted at 5% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the effects of changes in model parameters. RESULTS: Quality-adjusted life years gained with lapatinib-letrozole were 0.236 compared with trastuzumab-anastrozole, 0.440 compared with letrozole, and 0.568 compared with anastrozole. Assuming a health care system perspective, incremental costs were $5,805, $67,029, and $67,472 respectively. Given a cost per qaly threshold of $100,000, the probability that lapatinib-letrozole is preferred was 21% compared with letrozole, 36% compared with anastrozole, and 68% compared with trastuzumab-anastrozole. Results from the societal perspective were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In postmenopausal women with hr+/her2+ mbc receiving first-line treatment, lapatinib-letrozole may not be cost-effective compared with letrozole or anastrozole, but may be cost-effective compared with trastuzumab-anastrozole.

Healthcare utilization and costs associated with skeletal-related events in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.

BACKGROUND: Patients with bone metastases secondary to prostate cancer are predisposed to skeletal-related events (SREs), including spinal cord compression, pathological fracture, surgery to bone and radiotherapy to bone. The objective of this study was to document current patterns of healthcare utilization and costs of SREs in patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study using the Thomson MedStat MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database from September 2002 to June 2011. Study subjects included all persons with claims for prostate cancer and for bone metastases, and one or more claims for an SRE. Unique SRE episodes were identified based on a gap of at least 90 days without an SRE claim, and classified by treatment setting (inpatient or outpatient) and SRE type (spinal cord compression, pathological fracture, surgery to bone or radiotherapy). RESULTS: Of 3919 patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases, 2090 (53%) had one or more SRE episodes. Among 1237 patients who met all other criteria, there were 1623 SRE episodes over a mean (s.d.) follow-up of 16.1 (12.9) months. The percent of episodes that required inpatient treatment ranged from 14% (radiotherapy) to 82% (surgery to bone). On average, inpatient episodes with surgery to bone (n = 36 episodes) were most costly (mean (s.e.) $88,838 ($11,830)/episode), whereas outpatient episodes with surgery to bone (n = 8 episodes) were least costly (mean (s.e.) $4749 ($1690)/episode). Of the total SRE costs (mean (s.e.) $20,984 ($951)/episode), 41% were attributable to outpatient radiotherapy (n = 1169 episodes), 23% to inpatient radiotherapy (n = 184 episodes), and 19% to inpatient treatment of pathological fractures (n = 101 episodes). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with prostate cancer and bone metastases, SREs are associated with high costs and hospitalizations.

Association between treatment effects on disease progression end points and overall survival in clinical studies of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between progression-free survival and time to progression (PFS/TTP) and overall survival (OS) has been demonstrated in a variety of solid tumours but not in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify controlled trials of cytokine or targeted therapies for mRCC reporting information on treatment effects on PFS/TTP and OS for one or more comparison. The associations between treatment effects on PFS/TTP and OS were analysed using linear regression. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies representing 10943 patients, 75 treatment groups, and 41 comparisons were identified. The correlation coefficient between the negative log of the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS/TTP (-ln HR(PFS/TTP)) vs the negative log of the HR for OS (-ln HR(OS)) was 0.80 (P<0.0001). In linear regression, the coefficient on -ln HR(PFS/TTP) vs -ln HR(OS) was 0.64 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.470.81; R(2)=0.63), suggesting each 10% relative risk reduction (RRR) for PFS/TTP was associated with a 6% RRR for OS. A 1-month gain in median PFS/TTP was associated with a 1.17-month gain in median OS (95% CI: 0.59,1.76; R(2)=0.28). CONCLUSION: In trials of treatments for mRCC, treatment effects on PFS/TTP are strongly associated with treatment effects on OS.

Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared with clodronate in multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: In the U.K. Medical Research Council Myeloma IX trial (mmix), zoledronic acid 4 mg once every 3-4 weeks, compared with clodronate 1600 mg daily, reduced the incidence of skeletal related events (sres), increased progression-free survival (pfs), and prolonged overall survival (os) in 1970 patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma. The incidence of confirmed osteonecrosis of the jaw was higher with zoledronic acid than with clodronate. The objective of the present study was to evaluate, based on the findings in mmix, the cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared with clodronate in patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma. METHODS: An economic model was used to project pfs, os, the incidence of sres and adverse events, and expected lifetime health care costs for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are alternatively assumed to receive zoledronic acid or clodronate. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (icer) of zoledronic acid compared with clodronate was calculated as the ratio of the difference in cost to the difference in quality-adjusted life years (qalys). Model inputs were based on results of mmix and published sources. Results were generated under different assumptions regarding the beneficial effects of zoledronic acid on os beyond 5 years after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Assuming lifetime treatment effects of zoledronic acid, treatment with zoledronic acid (compared with clodronate) increased qalys by 0.27 at an additional cost of CA$13,407, yielding an icer of CA$49,829 per qaly gained. If the threshold icer is CA$100,000 per qaly, the estimated probability that zoledronic acid is cost-effective is 80%. Assuming that the benefits of zoledronic acid on pfs and os diminish over 5 years beginning at the end of year 5, the icer is CAN$63,027 per qaly gained. If the benefits of zoledronic acid on pfs and os are assumed to persist for 5 years only, the icer is CAN$76,948 per qaly gained. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with clodronate, zoledronic acid represents a cost-effective treatment alternative in patients with multiple myeloma.

Cost effectiveness of carvedilol for heart failure.

In this study, we examine the cost effectiveness of carvedilol for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). We use a Markov model to project life expectancy and lifetime medical care costs for a hypothetical cohort of patients with CHF who were assumed alternatively to receive carvedilol plus conventional therapy (digoxin, diuretics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) or conventional therapy alone. Patients on carvedilol were assumed to experience a reduced risk of death and hospitalization for CHF, which is consistent with findings from the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Trials Program. The benefits of carvedilol were projected under 2 alternative scenarios. In the first ("limited benefits"), benefits were conservatively assumed to persist for 6 months, the average duration of follow-up in these clinical trials, and then end abruptly. In the other ("extended benefits"), they were arbitrarily assumed to persist for 6 months and then decline gradually over time, vanishing by the end of 3 years. We estimated our model using data from the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Trials Program and other sources. For patients receiving conventional therapy alone, estimated life expectancy was 6.67 years; corresponding figures for those also receiving carvedilol were 6.98 and 7.62 years under the limited and extended benefits scenarios, respectively. Expected lifetime costs of CHF-related care were estimated to be $28,756 for conventional therapy, and $36,420 and $38,867 for carvedilol (limited and extended benefits, respectively). Cost per life-year saved for carvedilol was $29,477 and $12,799 under limited and extended benefits assumptions, respectively. The cost effectiveness of carvedilol for CHF compares favorably to that of other generally accepted medical interventions, even under conservative assumptions regarding the duration of therapeutic benefit.

Use of surrogate measures in cost-effectiveness analyses of lipid-lowering therapies.

Use of surrogate measures of effectiveness in cost-effectiveness analyses requires the assumption that a constant and monotonic relationship exists between the surrogate measure and the clinical outcome of interest. Results from epidemiologic studies and randomized controlled trials provide considerable support for the use of changes in lipids as a surrogate measure of effectiveness for changes in coronary heart disease risk and mortality in cost-effectiveness analyses of lipid-lowering therapies. Accordingly, the cost-effectiveness of lipid-lowering therapies is examined using efficiency-frontier analysis and a variety of surrogate measures, including the percent change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the ratio of LDL-C to high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and the percentage of patients attaining goal LDL-C levels. These analyses suggest that niacin, fluvastatin (20 and 40 mg), simvastatin (5 mg), pravastatin (20 mg), and atorvastatin (10-80 mg) are cost-effective therapies; simvastatin (10, 20, and 40 mg), pravastatin (10 and 40 mg), all dosages of lovastatin, and the bile acid sequestrants are not. Advantages and limitations of this methodology are discussed.

The causal role for genital ulcer disease as a risk factor for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus. An application of the Bradford Hill criteria.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Genital ulcer disease (GUD) has been reported to increase the risk for the acquisition of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although many investigators have reported an increased risk for HIV infection in persons with concurrent or previous GUD, not all studies have been designed to determine whether GUD causes an increased risk for HIV infection or acts only as a risk marker for infection. The evidence from the literature is discussed, and the criteria for causal inference proposed by Sir Austin Bradford Hill are applied. GOAL: To evaluate the strength of the association between GUD and infection by HIV. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control, cross-sectional, and cohort studies that examined the association between HIV seroconversion and GUD were chosen from the literature. Twenty-seven epidemiologic studies were selected for analysis, many of which reported separate analyses of the association between HIV infection and herpes simplex virus infection, syphilis, or nonspecified GUD. The studies were analyzed to investigate the magnitude of association between GUD and HIV, and the evidence evaluated using Hill's criteria. RESULTS: Approximately two thirds of the analyses reported a statistically significant association between GUD and HIV infection. Fourteen studies reported 29 separate analyses using a case-control design, 18 of which reported a statistically significant association between GUD (GUD, herpes, and syphilis) and HIV infection, four analyses were of varying significance depending on the analytical technique used, and seven were nonsignificant. Thirteen studies reported 23 separate longitudinal analyses that used a nested case-control or cohort design: 11 reported a significant association, 11 had nonsignificant findings, and results of one study varied. No study reported a statistically significant negative association. When applying the literature to Hill's criteria, all nine criteria for causal inference were met, providing additional evidence that genital ulcers are associated with an increased risk for the development of HIV infection. CONCLUSIONS: The published evidence suggests that GUD increases the risk for HIV acquisition. Few studies, however, have examined carefully the temporal association between preexisting GUD and subsequent HIV acquisition. The analyses that simultaneously controlled for additional risks for HIV infection, such as lifetime sex partners or history of injection drug use, report a generally lower risk for HIV associated with GUD. It is likely that studies that adequately control for risk factors will find a lower risk associated with GUD than was reported in the literature earlier in the HIV epidemic. Future research needs and the problems associated with conducting these types of studies are discussed.

The benefits and risks of over-the-counter availability of nicotine polacrilex ("nicotine gum").

Nicotine polacrilex ("nicotine gum") is effective in helping persons to quit smoking cigarettes. Because many persons try to quit without formal assistance, it may be an appropriate product for over-the-counter (OTC) purchase. Some smokers, however, might use such a product in lieu of more effective methods of cessation, and still others might use it to cope with enforced periods of nicotine abstinence (eg, at the work place) and thereby delay their decision to quit. The study's objective was to assess the public health benefits and risks of OTC availability of nicotine gum. A Markov model was developed and used to contrast two alternative policy scenarios: one in which nicotine gum was assumed to remain available only by prescription, and another in which it was assumed to be made available for OTC purchase. Various data sources were used to estimate the model, including the Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Supplement to the 1991 National Health Interview Survey and the 1986 Adult Use of Tobacco Survey. Primary outcome measures included the numbers of persons who would try to quit smoking, the numbers who would use various methods of smoking cessation, including OTC nicotine gum, and the numbers of current adult smokers who would be abstinent at the end of 10 years. Findings suggest that an average of 3 million persons each year would use OTC nicotine gum. As a consequence of OTC availability, an additional 450,000 smokers would be abstinent at the end of 10 years. These results are sensitive to assumptions regarding the effectiveness of OTC nicotine gum, as well as to the effect of OTC availability on the use of other methods of smoking cessation. The number of persons who would quit smoking, however, increases under a fairly wide range of assumptions. Over-the-counter availability of nicotine gum may confer significant public health benefits.

The risks and benefits of an Rx-to-OTC switch. The case of over-the-counter H2-blockers.

In recent years, many new over-the-counter (OTC) medications have resulted from the granting of OTC status by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to drug entities that previously were available only by prescription (Rx). While the benefits to consumers of Rx-to-OTC switches may be substantial, they also involve some degree of risk, as usage typically expands and physician supervision diminishes. This study explores the potential utility of techniques of decision analysis in evaluating the balance of these benefits and risks. Histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2-blockers), which are currently available only by prescription, are presented as a case study and were examined to determine how OTC availability of these agents would alter the patterns, effectiveness, and risks of self-treatment for acid-peptic disorders. Currently, about 5.7 million persons experience an episode of dyspepsia during any given quarter, of whom 3.5 million self-medicate with antacids. Study results indicate that OTC availability of H2-blockers would: 1) increase the proportion of persons with dyspepsia who self-medicate from 61.8% currently to 64.1%; 2) increase the proportion of persons who experience complete relief of their symptoms while self-medicating from 37.9% currently to 43.2%; 3) result in 14 additional cases of serious hematologic disorders and an additional 22,000 instances of minor side effects per quarter, but cause the overall rate of side effects among persons who self-medicate to decline; 4) cause an additional 300 persons per quarter with gastric cancer to self-medicate before seeking professional care, but cause no change in the median time between onset of symptoms and the decision to seek such care; and 5) decrease by 277,000 the number of persons per quarter who seek professional care for dyspepsia. On balance, results suggest that OTC H2-blockers may be a relatively safe and effective means of self-care for acid-peptic disorders, and may substantially reduce the number of patient encounters with the medical care system for minor gastrointestinal complaints. This study also illustrates the potential utility of the techniques of decision analysis to the formulation of drug regulatory policy.

Cimetidine and adverse reactions: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of short-term therapy.

PURPOSE: We pooled data from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to determine the frequency of adverse reactions among patients treated with cimetidine for acute acid-peptic disorders. METHODS: Meta-analysis was used to analyze data obtained from a search of English language reports of trials of cimetidine in the ambulatory treatment of acute acid-peptic disorders that were published between January 1982 and April 1987. RESULTS: Of 161 trials of cimetidine that we identified, 84 provided complete reporting of data on adverse reactions and, of these, 24 employed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. Across these 24 trials, the overall rate of reported adverse reactions among 622 patients randomly assigned to receive cimetidine was 10.9%; the corresponding rate among 516 patients randomly assigned to receive placebo was 10.1%. This difference was not statistically significant (p greater than 0.10), nor were any significant differences noted in the frequencies of reported central nervous system or gastrointestinal adverse reactions (p greater than 0.10). Rates of adverse reactions also did not differ by dosage or trial duration. The overall rate of adverse reactions reported in the 60 trials that did not utilize a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was similar to the rate reported in those that did. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the frequency of adverse reactions among patients receiving cimetidine for acute acid-peptic disorders is not significantly different from that of patients receiving placebo.

Maternal smoking during pregnancy and expenditures on neonatal health care.

Cigarette smoking during pregnancy substantially increases the risk of low-weight birth, and infants born to smokers weigh less, on average, than those born to nonsmokers. Low birth weight is an important predictor of neonatal morbidity and death, and the intensity of neonatal care is significantly higher for low-birth-weight infants. In this study, we estimate expenditures on neonatal care based on the relation between maternal smoking during pregnancy and the incidence of low-weight births. Our results indicate that maternal smoking during pregnancy was responsible for 35,816 low-weight births in the U.S. in 1983, or about 14.5% of all low-weight births. We also estimate that 14,977, or 6.6%, of all admissions to neonatal intensive care units were a result of maternal smoking and that these admissions cost approximately $272 million, representing 8.5% of total national expenditures on neonatal intensive care services. We estimate that the average cost of neonatal care was $288 higher for infants born to smokers than for those born to nonsmokers.

PIP: An estimated 21-39% of low-birthweight births are attributable to maternal smoking during pregnancy. Low birthweight is the single most important predictor of neonatal morbidity and mortality; moreover, the intensity of neonatal care is significantly higher for these infants. Previous studies of the economic burden of cigarette smoking-related morbidity have not considered the costs that arise due to smoking during pregnancy. This study calculated expenditures on neonatal care in the US based on the relationship between maternal smoking and the incidence of low-birthweight deliveries. In 1983, maternal smoking during pregnancy was responsible for 35,816 low-weight births (under 2500 grams) in the US, or 14.5% of the total number of low-weight births in that year. 14,977 (6.6%) of admissions to Neonatal Intensive Care Units in 1983 were attributable to smoking during pregnancy. Total costs for these hospitalized infants were US$272 million--approximately 8.5% of total national expenditures on neonatal intensive care. Of this amount, US$267 million represents costs that would not have been incurred in the absence of maternal smoking during pregnancy. The cost of neonatal care in the US in 1983 was thus an average of US$288 higher for infants born to women who smoked during pregnancy. These findings show that, in addition to representing a significant threat to neonatal health, cigarette smoking during pregnancy also imposes a substantial economic burden on the medical care system. Greater attention to the relationship between maternal smoking and neonatal care expenditures is needed to stimulate health care providers to plan interventions aimed at reducing smoking during pregnancy.

Cost effectiveness of labetalol and propranolol in the treatment of hypertension among blacks.

The cost effectiveness of labetalol and propranolol in the treatment of black adults with mild to moderate hypertension was assessed using published reports from US clinical trials of these agents among such patients. Data from these studies suggest that labetalol and propranolol lower diastolic blood pressure among black hypertensive adults by 11.2 mmHg and 8.4 mmHg, respectively. Results indicate that, for a hypothetical cohort of 1,000 patients on monotherapy, patients treated with labetalol would experience two to seven fewer strokes over a ten-year period, depending upon age and sex, and annual drug costs would be reduced by $190. For stepped care, annual costs would be $205 and $212 lower for those treated initially with labetalol. Labetalol therefore may be more cost effective than propranolol among black adults with mild to moderate hypertension.

Cost-effectiveness of nicotine gum as an adjunct to physician's advice against cigarette smoking.

A nicotine chewing gum has recently become available for use as an aid in giving up cigarette smoking. Although its efficacy has been demonstrated in clinic-based smoking cessation programs, its value in a primary care setting is uncertain. We examined the cost-effectiveness of nicotine gum as an adjunct to physician's advice and counseling against smoking during routine office visits. Our findings indicate that the cost per year of life saved with this intervention ranges from $4113 to $6465 for men and from $6880 to $9473 for women, depending on age. This compares favorably with other widely accepted medical practices, eg, treatment of hypertension or hyperlipidemia. Our study, therefore, suggests that nicotine gum is a cost-effective adjunct to physician's advice against cigarette smoking in a primary care setting.