RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Late-onset epilepsy is a heterogenous entity associated with specific aetiologies and an elevated risk of premature mortality. Specific multimorbid-socioeconomic profiles and their unique prognostic trajectories have not been described. We sought to determine if specific clusters of late onset epilepsy exist, and whether they have unique hazards of premature mortality. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study linking primary and hospital-based UK electronic health records with vital statistics data (covering years 1998-2019) to identify all cases of incident late onset epilepsy (from people aged ≥65) and 1:10 age, sex, and GP practice-matched controls. We applied hierarchical agglomerative clustering using common aetiologies identified at baseline to define multimorbid-socioeconomic profiles, compare hazards of early mortality, and tabulating causes of death stratified by cluster. RESULTS: From 1,032,129 people aged ≥65, we identified 1048 cases of late onset epilepsy who were matched to 10,259 controls. Median age at epilepsy diagnosis was 68 (interquartile range: 66-72) and 474 (45%) were female. The hazard of premature mortality related to late-onset epilepsy was higher than matched controls (hazard ratio [HR] 1.73; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.51-1.99). Ten unique phenotypic clusters were identified, defined by 'healthy' males and females, ischaemic stroke, intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), ICH and alcohol misuse, dementia and anxiety, anxiety, depression in males and females, and brain tumours. Cluster-specific hazards were often similar to that derived for late-onset epilepsy as a whole. Clusters that differed significantly from the base late-onset epilepsy hazard were 'dementia and anxiety' (HR 5.36; 95%CI 3.31-8.68), 'brain tumour' (HR 4.97; 95%CI 2.89-8.56), 'ICH and alcohol misuse' (HR 2.91; 95%CI 1.76-4.81), and 'ischaemic stroke' (HR 2.83; 95%CI 1.83-4.04). These cluster-specific risks were also elevated compared to those derived for tumours, dementia, ischaemic stroke, and ICH in the whole population. Seizure-related cause of death was uncommon and restricted to the ICH, ICH and alcohol misuse, and healthy female clusters. SIGNIFICANCE: Late-onset epilepsy is an amalgam of unique phenotypic clusters that can be quantitatively defined. Late-onset epilepsy and cluster-specific comorbid profiles have complex effects on premature mortality above and beyond the base rates attributed to epilepsy and cluster-defining comorbidities alone.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo , Isquemia Encefálica , Demencia , Epilepsia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Aprendizaje Automático no Supervisado , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Epilepsia/complicaciones , Hemorragia Cerebral/complicaciones , Demencia/complicaciones , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to develop a multimodal machine learning (ML) approach for predicting incident depression in adults with epilepsy. METHODS: We randomly selected 200 patients from the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program registry and linked their registry-based clinical data to their first-available clinical electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study. We excluded patients with a clinical or Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E)-based diagnosis of major depression at baseline. The NDDI-E was used to detect incident depression over a median of 2.4 years of follow-up (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.5-3.3 years). A ReliefF algorithm was applied to clinical as well as quantitative EEG and MRI parameters for feature selection. Six ML algorithms were trained and tested using stratified threefold cross-validation. Multiple metrics were used to assess model performances. RESULTS: Of 200 patients, 150 had EEG and MRI data of sufficient quality for ML, of whom 59 were excluded due to prevalent depression. Therefore, 91 patients (41 women) were included, with a median age of 29 (IQR = 22-44) years. A total of 42 features were selected by ReliefF, none of which was a quantitative MRI or EEG variable. All models had a sensitivity > 80%, and five of six had an F1 score ≥ .72. A multilayer perceptron model had the highest F1 score (median = .74, IQR = .71-.78) and sensitivity (84.3%). Median area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and normalized Matthews correlation coefficient were .70 (IQR = .64-.78) and .57 (IQR = .50-.65), respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: Multimodal ML using baseline features can predict incident depression in this population. Our pilot models demonstrated high accuracy for depression prediction. However, overall performance and calibration can be improved. This model has promise for identifying those at risk for incident depression during follow-up, although efforts to refine it in larger populations along with external validation are required.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but severe neuroimmunological condition associated with a significant financial burden. NMOSD is also associated with increased health care utilization, including neurology outpatient visits, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) use, long-term medication, among others. We aimed to evaluate real-world patient experiences in access to care and NMOSD burden in an Argentinean cohort. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a self-administered survey and was conducted in Argentina (2022). Patients with NMOSD were divided into three groups: private health insurance (PHI), social health insurance (SHI), and public health insurance (PHI, Ministry of Public Health). Differences in access and health care barriers were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred patients with NMOSD (74 women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 38.7 years were included. Their EDSS was 2.8 and they were followed for 5.2 years. Of them, 51%, 11%, and 13% were employed (full-time: 57.5%), currently unemployed and retired by NMOSD, respectively. 55% of them visited between 2-3 specialists before NMOSD diagnosis. Aquaporin-4-antibody and/or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody testing was requested in 91% (health insurance covered this partially in 15.3% and 32.9% of the time the test was entirely paid by patient/family). Patients with NMOSD receiving private medical care reported greater access to MRI, outpatient visits, and fewer issues to obtain NMOSD medications compared to those treated at public institutions. A longer mean time to MRI and neurology visit was found in the PHI group when compared with the other two subgroups. Regression analysis showed that private insurance (OR=3.84, p=0.01) was the only independent factor associated with appropriate access to NMOSD medications in Argentina. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that barriers to access and utilization of NMOSD care services in Argentina are common. NMOSD patients experienced problems to receive NMOSD medication properly, especially those from the public sector.
Asunto(s)
Acuaporina 4 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Neuromielitis Óptica , Femenino , Humanos , Acuaporina 4/inmunología , Argentina/epidemiología , Autoanticuerpos , Costo de Enfermedad , Estudios Transversales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/economía , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuromielitis Óptica/economía , Neuromielitis Óptica/epidemiología , Neuromielitis Óptica/inmunología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Masculino , AdultoRESUMEN
Objective: To better understand the patient experience with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) through the course of the illness. Background: NMOSD is a rare autoimmune disorder that causes recurrent inflammatory attacks of the optic nerve, spinal cord, and brain. Knowledge and awareness of NMOSD in the general medical community are often limited, resulting in potential delays in diagnosis and treatment. Design/methods: We developed a comprehensive 101-question survey to understand the patient's perspective on their journey from initial presentation to present condition. The survey covered basic demographics, symptoms, medical tests used to reach a diagnosis, and the patient's psychosocial responses to their diagnosis. The survey included questions to determine internal consistency in responses. We shared the survey with members of the Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Clinic Facebook group and received responses from 151 patients. All data collected were self-reported and presented as summary statistics. Results: The majority of survey responses were from patients who were female (83%) and White (76%), Asian (7%), or African American (7%). Initial symptoms of disease included fatigue, pain, stiffness/spasticity, bladder and bowel dysfunction, cognitive/emotional symptoms, and visual disturbances. Initial reactions to NMOSD diagnosis were frequently fear, anxiety, and/or depression. Mean (SD) time to diagnosis was 2.2 (3.2) years. First contact with a medical professional was felt to be not helpful or somewhat helpful for many patients (71%), in part due to uncertain diagnosis and/or treatment. However, once referred to specialists (primarily neurologists), the majority of patients (87%) reported finding a professional who could help. Tests leading to diagnosis included magnetic resonance imaging, lumbar puncture, and blood tests for autoantibodies including aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). While approximately 30% of patients still felt challenged for a variety of reasons, most patients reported that having a diagnosis and being under the care of a specialist contributed to a comprehensive plan with hope for their future. Conclusions: The NMOSD patient journey frequently begins with anxiety, fear, and frustration. Finding the right specialist and identifying appropriate screening tests can lead to earlier diagnosis and progression toward better patient outcomes.
RESUMEN
Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is not only a sophisticated and highly technological investigation but a new and better way to conceptualize the spatial and temporal dynamics of epileptic activity. The first intracranial investigations with SEEG were carried out in France in the mid-twentieth century; however, its use in North America is much more recent. Given its significantly lower risk of complications and its ability to sample both superficial and deep structures as well as both hemispheres simultaneously, SEEG has become the preferred method to conduct intracranial EEG monitoring in most comprehensive epilepsy centers in North America. SEEG is an invasive neurophysiological methodology used for advanced pre-surgical work-up in the 20% of drug-resistant patients with more complex focal epilepsy in whom non-invasive investigations do not allow to decide on surgical candidacy. SEEG uses stereotactically-implanted depth electrodes to map the origin and propagation of epileptic seizures by creating a three-dimensional representation of the abnormal electrical activity in the brain. SEEG analysis takes into account the background, interictal, and ictal activity, as well as the results of cortical electrical stimulation procedures, to reliably delineate the epileptogenic network. By means of a clinical vignette, this article will walk general neurologists, but especially neurology trainees through the immense potential of this methodology. In summary, SEEG enables to accurately identify the epileptogenic zone in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who otherwise would be not amenable to surgical treatment, the best way to improve seizure control and achieve seizure-freedom in this patient population.
RESUMEN
The regular use of patient-reported measures (PRMs) has been associated with greater patient satisfaction and outcomes. In this article, we will review the Calgary Comprehensive Epilepsy Program's successful experience with PRMs in both clinical and research settings, as well as our current challenges and future directions. Our experience will illustrate that is feasible and convenient to implement PRMs, and especially electronic PRMs (ePRMs), into epilepsy clinics. These PRMs have direct clinical and research applications. They inform clinical decision making through readily interpretable scales to which clinicians can expeditiously respond. Equally, they are increasingly forming an integral and central component of intervention and outcomes-based research. However, implementation studies are necessary to address knowledge gaps and facilitate adoption and dissemination of this approach. A natural symbiosis of the clinical and research realms is precision medicine. The foundations of precision-based interventions are now being set whereby we can maximize the quality of life and psychosocial functioning on an individual level. As illustrated in this article, this exciting prospect crucially depends on the routine use of ePRMs in the everyday care of people with epilepsy. Increasing ePRMs uptake will clearly be a catalyst propelling precision epilepsy from aspiration to clinical reality.
RESUMEN
Importance: Enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (eiASMs) have been hypothesized to be associated with long-term risks of cardiovascular disease. Objective: To quantify and model the putative hazard of cardiovascular disease secondary to eiASM use. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study covered January 1990 to March 2019 (median [IQR] follow-up, 9 [4-15], years). The study linked primary care and hospital electronic health records at National Health Service hospitals in England. People aged 18 years or older diagnosed as having epilepsy after January 1, 1990, were included. All eligible patients were included with a waiver of consent. No patients were approached who withdrew consent. Analysis began January 2021 and ended August 2021. Exposures: Receipt of 4 consecutive eiASMs (carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, rufinamide, or topiramate) following an adult-onset (age ≥18 years) epilepsy diagnosis or repeated exposure in a weighted cumulative exposure model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Three cohorts were isolated, 1 of which comprised all adults meeting a case definition for epilepsy diagnosed after 1990, 1 comprised incident cases diagnosed after 1998 (hospital linkage date), and 1 was limited to adults diagnosed with epilepsy at 65 years or older. Outcome was incident cardiovascular disease (ischemic heart disease or ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke). Hazard of incident cardiovascular disease was evaluated using adjusted propensity-matched survival analyses and weighted cumulative exposure models. Results: Of 10â¯916â¯166 adults, 50â¯888 (0.6%) were identified as having period-prevalent cases (median [IQR] age, 32 [19-50] years; 16 584 [53%] female), of whom 31â¯479 (62%) were diagnosed on or after 1990 and were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline. In a propensity-matched Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age, sex, baseline socioeconomic status, and cardiovascular risk factors, the hazard ratio for incident cardiovascular disease was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.06-1.39) for those receiving eiASMs. The absolute difference in cumulative hazard diverges by more than 1% and greater after 10 years. For those with persistent exposure beyond 4 prescriptions, the median hazard ratio increased from amedian (IQR) of 1.54 (1.28-1.79) when taking a relative defined daily dose of an eiASM of 1 to 2.38 (1.52-3.56) with a relative defined daily dose of 2 throughout a maximum of 25 years' follow-up compared with those not receiving an eiASM. The hazard was elevated but attenuated when restricting analyses to incident cases or those diagnosed when older than 65 years. Conclusions and Relevance: The hazard of incident cardiovascular disease is higher in those receiving eiASMs. The association is dose dependent and the absolute difference in hazard seems to reach clinical significance by approximately 10 years from first exposure.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological autoimmune condition and the leading non-traumatic cause of neurological disability worldwide. Disease-modifying therapies (DMT) directly impact on the long-term prognosis of patients with MS preventing relapses and the associated disability progression. Here, we analyzed the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on DMT access in Mexican patients. METHODS: We evaluated the association between SES and DMT access using the MS registry from the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery in Mexico City. We included 974 patients with MS (McDonald 2010 criteria). We categorized SES according to the 2018 Mexican Association of Market Research Agencies (AMAI) SES classification. We analyzed DMT type, MS phenotype, educational level, symptomatic onset to diagnosis, EDSS at arrival, as well as the progression index. Chi-squared and Wilcoxon tests were used, and multivariable analysis performed for DMT access. RESULTS: When comparing the lower versus higher levels of SES, a significant association was found on the percentage of patients with higher levels of disability (EDSS >6) at arrival, the proportion of patients not receiving any DMT and a higher proportion of secondary progressive MS (p=0.006, p<0.001and p=0.004, respectively). We also found that lower educational levels had a significance and inverse association with EDSS on first visit (p=0.019), symptomatic onset to diagnosis (p<0.001) and a higher disability status at arrival (EDSS >6, p=0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that SES is an important factor determining not only prompt but overall access to highly effective DMT. Lower SES are associated with greater levels of disability at the first clinic visit and a higher proportion of patients not receiving DMT up to 12 months of follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva , Esclerosis Múltiple , Humanos , México , Recurrencia , Clase SocialRESUMEN
Achalasia is a disease characterized by the inability to relax the esophageal sphincter due to a degeneration of the parasympathetic ganglion cells located in the wall of the thoracic esophagus. Achalasia has been associated with extraesophageal dysmotility, suggesting alterations of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) that extend beyond the esophagus. The purpose of the present contribution is to investigate whether achalasia may be interpreted as the esophageal manifestation of a more generalized disturbance of the ANS which includes alterations of heart rate and/or blood pressure. Therefore simultaneous non-invasive records of the heart inter-beat intervals (IBI) and beat-to-beat systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 14 patients (9 female, 5 male) with achalasia were compared with the records of 34 rigorously screened healthy control subjects (17 female, 17 male) in three different conditions: supine, standing up, and controlled breathing at 0.1 Hz, using a variety of measures in the time and spectral domains. Significant differences in heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV) were observed which seem to be due to cardiovagal damage to the heart, i.e., a failure of the ANS, as expected according to our hypothesis. This non-invasive methodology can be employed as an auxiliary clinical protocol to study etiology and evolution of achalasia, and other pathologies that damage ANS.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Nervioso Autónomo/fisiopatología , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Sistema Cardiovascular/fisiopatología , Acalasia del Esófago/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Disautonomías Primarias/fisiopatología , Adulto , Acalasia del Esófago/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disautonomías Primarias/complicaciones , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been investigated in many autoimmune conditions as a biomarker of inflammation and/or disease activity. The role of NLR in AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is far from clear. In this study, NLR was evaluated in patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD at disease onset and its prognostic impact was subsequently assessed. Methods: In this multicenter study, we retrospectively included all recent/newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD (n=90) from three different countries in Latin America (LATAM): Argentina, Ecuador, and Mexico. NLR was compared between AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD and healthy controls (HC, n = 365). Demographic, clinical, paraclinical (including imaging), and prognostic data at 12 and 24 months were also evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis was used to describe and identify independent associations between the log-transformed NLR and clinical (relapses and EDSS) and imaging (new/enlarging and/or contrast-enhancing MRI lesions) outcomes. Results: NLR was higher in NMOSD patients during the first attack compared with HC (2.9 ± 1.6 vs 1.8 ± 0.6; p<0.0001). Regardless of immunosuppressant's initiation at disease onset, NLR remained higher in NMOSD patients at 12 (2.8 ± 1.3; p<0.0001) and 24 (3.1 ± 1.6; p<0.0001) months. No association was found at 12 and 24 months between the log-transformed NLR and the presence of relapses, new/enlarging and/or contrast-enhancing MRI lesions, and/or physical disability. Conclusions: In this cohort of LATAM patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD, NLR was abnormally high in attacks but also during follow-up. However, a high NLR was not an independent predictor of clinical or imaging outcomes in our models.
Asunto(s)
Acuaporina 4/inmunología , Autoanticuerpos/sangre , Linfocitos/inmunología , Neuromielitis Óptica/inmunología , Neutrófilos/inmunología , Adulto , Argentina , Ecuador , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Recuento de Linfocitos , Masculino , México , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neuromielitis Óptica/sangre , Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuromielitis Óptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas SerológicasRESUMEN
INTRODUCCIÓN: El síndrome de Vulpian-Bernhardt (SVB) es un fenotipo clínico atípico e infrecuente de la esclerosis lateral amiotrófica (ELA) que condiciona un importante retraso diagnóstico, por lo que reconocer sus características clínicas y electrofisiológicas tiene relevancia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo y transversal. Se revisaron los expedientes clínicos de pacientes con diagnóstico de ELA en el período de enero de 2017 a diciembre de 2019. Se incluyeron los que cumplían criterios para SVB para describir su frecuencia, características clínicas y electrofisiológicas. RESULTADOS: Veinte pacientes (15,8%) cumplieron los criterios para el SVB; el 55% eran mujeres; la edad de inicio de los síntomas era de 46,6 ± 12,9 años; presentaba tabaquismo el 40%; la mediana de retraso del diagnóstico fue de 24 (12-96) meses; la mediana en afectarse un segundo segmento corporal fue de 24 (12-132) meses, que fue el lumbosacro en el 65%; el promedio en la escala Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale fue de 27 ± 7 puntos; el 45% cumplía los criterios de El Escorial para ELA definida en el momento del diagnóstico y el 58,8%, los de Awaji. Se contó con 19 estudios de neuroconducción y 17 electromiogramas, y se encontró una razón abductor digiti minimi-abductor pollicis brevis (APB/ADM) < 0,6 en el 63% (mano dividida). CONCLUSIONES: Existe un retraso importante en el diagnóstico de enfermedades de la motoneurona en general y de SVB en particular. Calcular la razón APB/ADM y aplicar los criterios de Awaji en el estudio de electrofisiología puede ser de gran ayuda para aumentar la certeza diagnóstica en esta entidad clínica
INTRODUCTION: Vulpian-Bernhardt syndrome (VBS) is an atypical rare clinical phenotype of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) that causes a significant delay in diagnosis, and thus it is important to recognise its clinical and electrophysiological features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study. We reviewed the clinical records of patients diagnosed with ALS in the period from January to December 2019. Those meeting criteria for VBS were included so as to describe their frequency as well as their clinical and electrophysiological features. RESULTS: Twenty patients (15.8%) met criteria for VBS; 55% were female; age at onset of symptoms was 46.6 ± 12.9 years; 40% were smokers; median delay in diagnosis was 24 (12-96) months; median time to involvement of the second body segment was 24 (12-132) months, which was lumbosacral in 65%; mean Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale score was 27 ± 7 points; 45% met the El Escorial criteria for ALS defined at diagnosis and 58.8% met the Awaji criteria. There were 19 nerve conduction studies and 17 electromyograms, and an abductor digiti minimiabductor pollicis brevis (ADM/APB) ratio < 0.6 was found in 63% (split hand). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant delay in the diagnosis of motor neuron diseases in general and more particularly in VBS. Calculating the ADM/APB ratio and applying the Awaji criteria in the electrophysiology study can be a valuable aid to increase diagnostic certainty in this clinical entity
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/epidemiología , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esclerosis Amiotrófica Lateral/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , México/epidemiología , Fenotipo , Diagnóstico PrecozRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies regarding MRI-defined acute optic nerve lesions (aONL) in patients with first-ever neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD)-related optic neuritis (ON) have been reported worldwide and none of them was conducted in Latin America (LATAM). Therefore, we aimed to assess the frequency of aONL at disease onset using conventional brain MRI in LATAM. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and brain MRIs (≤30 days from ON onset) of patients with ON as first lifetime NMOSD attack. Patients from Argentina (n=48), Ecuador (n=24), Brazil (n=22), Venezuela (n=10) and Mexico (n=8) were included, and further divided into two subgroups according to either presence (P-MRI) or absence (A-MRI) of aONL (T2 hyperintensity and/or contrast enhancement). Clinical, paraclinical, imaging and prognostic data were compared. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included and aONL were found in 86 (76.7%) at disease onset. Aquaporin-4 antibodies were detected in 69.6%. Non-Caucasian patients comprised 59.8% of the total cohort. In P-MRI, conventional brain MRI showed isolated or combined unilateral (54.4%, [8.5% of these aONL were associated with chiasmatic lesions]) and bilateral (46.6%, [35.9% of these aONL were associated with chiasmatic lesions]) lesions. Thus, 100% of chiasmatic lesions were associated with unilateral or bilateral lesions. No statistically significant differences were found in age, gender, ethnicity, clinical course, mean follow-up time, disability, and spinal cord MRI findings. However, rituximab use was higher in P-MRI than in A-MRI (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: More than three quarters of LATAM patients with first-ever NMOSD-related ON have aONL detected by brain MRI. Unilateral lesions were the most common finding. Further studies including different ethnicities are needed to assess the generalizability of our results.
Asunto(s)
Neuromielitis Óptica , Neuritis Óptica , Acuaporina 4 , Argentina , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Brasil , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , México , Neuromielitis Óptica/complicaciones , Neuromielitis Óptica/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuromielitis Óptica/epidemiología , Nervio Óptico/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuritis Óptica/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuritis Óptica/epidemiología , VenezuelaRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is currently hitting the world in the form of a pandemic. Given that some reports suggest that this infection can also occur with neurologic manifestations, this narrative review addresses the basic and clinical aspects concerning the nervous system involvement associated with this disease. More than one third of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 can present with both central and peripheral neurological manifestations. The former include dizziness and headache, while the latter include taste and smell disturbances. Other reported neurological manifestations are cerebrovascular disease and epileptic seizures. According to published reports, neurological disorders are not uncommon in COVID-19 and can sometimes represent the first manifestation of the disease; therefore, neurologists should consider this diagnostic possibility in their daily practice. Since maybe not all COVID-19 neurological manifestations are due to SARS-CoV-2 direct effects, it is important to monitor the rest of the clinical parameters such as, for example, oxygen saturation. Similarly, follow-up of patients is advisable, since whether neurological complications may develop lately is thus far unknown.
La enfermedad del coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), infección causada por el coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2), actualmente afecta al mundo en forma de una pandemia. Debido a que algunos reportes apuntan a que esta infección puede cursar también con manifestaciones neurológicas, en esta revisión narrativa se abordan los aspectos básicos y clínicos concernientes a la afectación del sistema nervioso por esta enfermedad. Más de un tercio de los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 pueden presentar manifestaciones neurológicas, tanto centrales como periféricas. Entre las primeras se encuentran el mareo y la cefalea; y entre las segundas, las alteraciones del gusto y el olfato. Otras manifestaciones neurológicas reportadas son la enfermedad vascular cerebral y las crisis epilépticas. Según los informes publicados, los padecimientos neurológicos no son infrecuentes en COVID-19 y en ocasiones pueden representar la primera manifestación de la enfermedad, de modo que los neurólogos deberán considerar esta posibilidad diagnóstica en su práctica cotidiana. Dado que no todas las manifestaciones neurológicas de COVID-19 pudieran deberse a efectos directos de SARS-CoV-2, es importante monitorear el resto de los parámetros clínicos, por ejemplo, la oxigenación. De igual forma, es recomendable el seguimiento de los pacientes, ya que hasta el momento se ignora si las complicaciones neurológicas pueden desarrollarse tardíamente.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/virología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Mareo/virología , Cefalea/virología , Humanos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Trastornos del Olfato/virología , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Trastornos del Gusto/virologíaRESUMEN
Abstract Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is currently hitting the world in the form of a pandemic. Given that some reports suggest that this infection can also occur with neurologic manifestations, this narrative review addresses the basic and clinical aspects concerning the nervous system involvement associated with this disease. More than one third of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 can present with both central and peripheral neurological manifestations. The former includes dizziness and headache, while the latter includes taste and smell disturbances. Other reported neurological manifestations are cerebrovascular disease and epileptic seizures. According to published reports, neurological disorders are not uncommon in COVID-19 and can sometimes represent the first manifestation of the disease; therefore, neurologists should consider this diagnostic possibility in their daily practice. Since maybe not all COVID-19 neurological manifestations are due to SARS-CoV-2 direct effects, it is important to monitor the rest of the clinical parameters such as, for example, oxygen saturation. Similarly, follow-up of patients is advisable, since whether neurological complications may develop lately is thus far unknown.
Resumen La enfermedad del coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), infección causada por el coronavirus 2 del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave (SARS-CoV-2), actualmente afecta al mundo en forma de una pandemia. Debido a que algunos reportes apuntan a que esta infección puede cursar también con manifestaciones neurológicas, en esta revisión narrativa se abordan los aspectos básicos y clínicos concernientes a la afectación del sistema nervioso por esta enfermedad. Más de un tercio de los pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19 pueden presentar manifestaciones neurológicas, tanto centrales como periféricas. Entre las primeras se encuentran el mareo y la cefalea; y entre las segundas, las alteraciones del gusto y el olfato. Otras manifestaciones neurológicas reportadas son la enfermedad vascular cerebral y las crisis epilépticas. Según los informes publicados, los padecimientos neurológicos no son infrecuentes en COVID-19 y en ocasiones pueden representar la primera manifestación de la enfermedad, de modo que los neurólogos deberán considerar esta posibilidad diagnóstica en su práctica cotidiana. Dado que no todas las manifestaciones neurológicas de COVID-19 pudieran deberse a efectos directos de SARS-CoV-2, es importante monitorear el resto de los parámetros clínicos, por ejemplo, la oxigenación. De igual forma, es recomendable el seguimiento de los pacientes, ya que hasta el momento se ignora si las complicaciones neurológicas pueden desarrollarse tardíamente.