Preoperative brachytherapy of early-stage cervical cancer: A multicenter study by the SFRO brachytherapy group.

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a multicenter cohort of preoperative brachytherapy (PBT) for treatment of early-stage cervical cancer (ESCC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted among five French comprehensive cancer centers on behalf of the SFRO Brachytherapy Group to examine the outcome of patients with ESCC who received PBT between 2001 and 2019 because of adverse prognostic factors (tumor size >2 cm, presence of lymphovascular invasion, adenocarcinoma).Brachytherapy was followed 4-8 weeks later by surgery. Local relapse free, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free, and overall survival and adverse effects were examined. Uni- and multivariate analyses were conducted looking for oncological prognostic factors. RESULTS: A total of 451 patients were identified, with a mean tumor size of 24.7 mm. Adenocarcinoma accounted for 43.5% of cases, and lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) was present in 15.7%. A complete histological response was observed in 69.6%. With a mean follow-up of 75.4 months, DFS, LRFS, and OS rates at five years were 88% [95% CI (84-91), 98% [95% CI (96-99), and 92% [95% CI (87-95)], respectively. At the last follow-up, 8.2% of patients had died, including 31 (6.8%) from cervical cancer. Severe side effects range from 1.1% to 2%. At multivariate analysis, adenocarcinoma histological type, tumor size ≥2 cm, and the presence of residual tumors were prognosticators for DFS and DMFS. CONCLUSION: PBT shows excellent oncological outcomes in this cohort of patients with adverse histoprognostic factors. Favorable survival rates and low complications rates were observed, supporting this strategy in the management of ESCC.

French college of gynecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF) recommendations for clinical practice: Place of breast self-examination in screening strategies.

Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in the world. Numerous studies have shown that the risk of metastatic disease increases with tumor volume. In this context, it is useful to assess whether the regular practice of formal breast self-examination (BSE) as opposed to breast awareness has an impact on the number of cancers diagnosed, their stage, the treatments used and mortality. DESIGN: The Commission of Senology (CS) of the Collège National de Gynécologie et Obstétrique Français (CNGOF) respected and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. METHODS: The CS studied 16 questions individualizing four groups of women (general population, women aged over 75, high-risk women, and women previously treated for breast cancer). For each situation, it was determined whether the practice of BSE versus abstention from this examination led to detection of more breast cancers and/or recurrences and/or reduced treatment and/or increased survival. RESULTS: BSE should not be recommended for women in the general population, who otherwise benefit from clinical breast examination by practitioners from the age of 25, and from organized screening from 50 to 74 (strong recommendation). In the absence of data on the benefits of BSE in patients aged over 75, for those at high risk and those previously treated for breast cancer, the CS was unable to issue recommendations. Thus, if women in these categories wish to undergo BSE, information on the benefits and risks observed in the general population must be given, notably that BSE is associated with a higher number of referrals, biopsies, and a reduced quality of life.

Information and oncosexological management in breast cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer treatment is a particularly high-risk situation for the deterioration of sexual health, leading to an alteration in body image and physical deteriorations such as vaginal trophicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the information received by patients concerning this alteration of their sexual health in relation to their treatment, and to identify their expectations and needs in terms of oncosexual management. STUDY DESIGN: A bicentric qualitative retrospective study was conducted, involving women aged 18 to 80, treated for breast cancer by total or partial mastectomy after 2014 and having had a follow-up consultation between July and December 2019. Data were collected using medical files and a de-identified questionnaire sent by post or e-mail after obtaining consent. The main outcome measures were the proportion of patients who received informations about oncosexology and those who felt impact on their sexual health. RESULTS: Of the 274 patients included in the study, 60% said they had received no information about the sexological side effects of their disease or treatment. Of these, 62.5% dared not talk about it during consultation. Patients were keen to receive oncosexological advice or treatment from a specialized nurse or doctor. In 76.1% of cases, patients declared that they had been sexually active in the year prior to their cancer diagnosis, compared with 54.94% after treatment. They reported a loss of femininity in 24% of cases, and 40.5% had no sexual desire. CONCLUSION: Women treated for breast cancer report a lasting alteration in their body image and sexual activity. Information on the impact of the disease and its treatment on sexual health is inadequate, even though patients are keen to receive specialized care with professional sexology consultations. The impact of breast cancer on sexual health should systematically explained to the patients, especially as treatment options exist and can be offered.

[Place of breast self-examination in screening strategies. French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF) recommendations for clinical practice]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF. Place de l'auto-examen des seins dans les stratégies de dépistage.

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in the world. In France, over 60,000 new cases are currently diagnosed, and 12,000 deaths are attributed to it annually. Numerous studies have shown that the risk of metastatic disease increases with tumor volume. In this context, it is useful to assess whether the regular practice of breast self-examination (BSE) has an impact on the number of cancers diagnosed, their stage, the treatments used and mortality. DESIGN: the CNGOF's Commission de Sénologie (CS), composed by 17 experts and 3 invited members, drew up these recommendations. No funding was provided for the development of these recommendations. The CS respected and followed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. METHODS: The CS studied 16 questions concerning BSE, individualizing four groups of women (general population, women aged over 75, high-risk women, and women previously treated for breast cancer). For each situation, it was determined whether the practice of BSE compared with abstention from this examination led to the detection of more breast cancers and/or recurrences and/or reduced treatment and/or increased survival. RESULTS: BSE should not be recommended for women in the general population, who otherwise benefit from a clinical breast examination (by the attending physician or gynecologist) from the age of 25, and from organized screening from 50 to 74 (strong recommendation). However, in the absence of data on the role of BSE in patients aged over 75, those at high risk of breast cancer and those previously treated for breast cancer, the CS was unable to issue recommendations. Thus, if women in these latter categories wish to undergo BSE, they must be given rigorous training in the technique, and information on the benefits and risks observed in the general population. Finally, the CS invites all women who detect a change or abnormality in their breasts to consult a healthcare professional without delay. CONCLUSION: BSE is not recommended for women in the general population. No recommendation can be established for women aged over 75, those at high risk of breast cancer and those previously treated for breast cancer.

SENODAY: A New Perspective of Handling Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of a same day breast cancer diagnosis and management protocol, consequently decreasing time to treatment and immediately reassuring patients with benign diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 women underwent breast exam during SENODAY in our cancer center between January 2020 and December 2022. Patients are first seen by a breast surgeon who mentions whether the patient's history and physical exam are suspicious of malignancy. Patients are then sent to the radiologist who performs a complete radiologic assessment, classifies the lesions, and performs a biopsy when necessary. The specimen is sent to the pathologist who uses the imprint cytology technique to obtain a preliminary diagnosis. Effective counseling is established in case of breast cancer diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 60 women, 25 patients were reassured by breast imaging and 35 underwent histopathological analysis (17 patients with a 1-day protocol and 18 with the standard definitive technique). Clinical examination was found to have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 89.47%. The positive predictive value was 80 % and the negative predictive value was 100%. However, we did not find a strong correlation between imaging and definitive pathology. Moreover, on imprint cytology, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 100%. Finally, the mean time-to-treat was 28.6 days. CONCLUSIONS: SENODAY reassured 68.3% of patients. It also offered effective counseling and a treatment plan to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients within 1 day. Same day histological diagnosis by imprint cytology is effective and feasible with an excellent accuracy.

Breast Cancer and SARS-Cov2: Lessons from a Pandemic.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The COVID-19 pandemic introduced drastic containment measures, which had a direct impact on breast cancer management. During the first wave, a delay in care and a decrease in new consultation numbers was observed. It would be interesting to study the resulting long-term consequences on breast cancer presentation and time to first treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the surgery Department of the Anti-Cancer Center of Nice, France. Two periods of 6 months were compared: a pandemic period from June to December 2020 (after the end of the first wave), and a control period one year earlier. The primary endpoint was to measure the time to care access. The patients and cancer characteristics and the management type were also compared. RESULTS: A total of 268 patients underwent diagnosis for breast cancer in each period. The time from biopsy to consultation was shortened after the containment was lifted (16 days vs. 18 days, p=0.024). The time between first consultation and treatment was unchanged between the two periods. The tumor size was larger in the pandemic period (21 mm vs. 18 mm, p=0.028). The clinical presentation was different: 59.8% of patients consulted for a palpable mass in the pandemic period, vs. 49.6% in the control period (p=0.023). There was no significant change in therapeutic management. The use of genomic testing was significantly increased. The number of breast cancer cases diagnosed decreased by 30% during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Even though a rebound was expected after the first wave, the number of consultations for breast cancer remained constant. This finding shows the fragility of screening adherence. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to reinforce education in the face of crises that may be repeated. Management of breast cancer did not change, which is a reassuring aspect regarding the care pathway in anticancer centers.

Feasibility and early toxicity of intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer using the papillon + system: First results.

Background and Purpose: Breast intra operative radiation therapy has been evaluated with different systems delivering 20-21 Gy with treatment times around 30 min. Papillon + TM Contact X-ray machine was designed to produce a 50 kVp beam with a high dose rate ≥ 15 Gy/minute. A pilot study with the first prototype was conducted in Nice. Materials and methods: The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 60 years, unifocal ductal breast adenocarcinoma ≤ 2.5 cm, grade 1-2. Surgical local excision with sentinel node dissection was performed and the applicator was placed in the tumor bed after excision with a prescribed dose of 20 Gy. The main end point of the study was the doses measured with the Gafchromic films; two were located at the skin surface and two in the excision cavity. Secondary endpoints were early toxicity and relapse free survival. Results: Between 10/2018 and 09/2019, 26 patients were included. Mean Gafchromic doses were 18.8 Gy ± 2 Gy at the south pole, 15.6 Gy ± 2.81 Gy at the equator and 2.5 Gy ± 1.67 Gy at the skin. With a median follow-up time of 12 months, no skin or subcutaneous toxicity > grade 2, no local relapse and no metastasis were observed. Conclusion: This is the first phase II study testing the Papillon + tm system for breast IORT with in vivo dosimetry measurements and reassuring clinical data.

[Non-genetic indications for risk reducing mastectomies: Guidelines of the National College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)]. / Indications des mastectomies de réduction de risque en dehors du risque avéré de prédisposition héréditaire : recommandations du Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF).

OBJECTIVE: To determine the value of performing a risk-reducting mastectomy (RRM) in the absence of a deleterious variant of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, in 4 clinical situations at risk of breast cancer. DESIGN: The CNGOF Commission of Senology, composed of 26 experts, developed these recommendations. A policy of declaration and monitoring of links of interest was applied throughout the process of making the recommendations. Similarly, the development of these recommendations did not benefit from any funding from a company marketing a health product. The Commission of Senology adhered to the AGREE II (Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare) criteria and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method to assess the quality of the evidence on which the recommendations were based. The potential drawbacks of making recommendations in the presence of poor quality or insufficient evidence were highlighted. METHODS: The Commission of Senology considered 8 questions on 4 topics, focusing on histological, familial (no identified genetic abnormality), radiological (of unrecognized cancer), and radiation (history of Hodgkin's disease) risk. For each situation, it was determined whether performing RRM compared with surveillance would decrease the risk of developing breast cancer and/or increase survival. RESULTS: The Commission of Senology synthesis and application of the GRADE method resulted in 11 recommendations, 6 with a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and 5 with a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). CONCLUSION: There was significant agreement among the Commission of Senology members on recommendations to improve practice for performing or not performing RRM in the clinical setting.

[Is preoperative axillary radio-cytology justified after ACOSOG Z001?] / La radio-cytologie axillaire préopératoire est-elle justifiée après l'ACOSOG Z001 ?

INTRODUCTION: Invasive breast cancer without clinical adenopathy (cN0) is currently explored by the sentinel node (GS) technique, except in the case of positive preoperative radio-cytological screening, where axillary curage (CA) remains systematic from the outset. Since the publication of the ACOSOG-Z0011 trial, abstention from CA is possible in patients presenting less than three metastatic GS. As a result, the value of axillary radio-cytological screening is being questioned as it could potentially lead to axillary surgical over-treatment. The objective of this study was to study clinically N0 patients with positive axillary cytology and to compare it to a group of patients with positive GS. METHOD: One hundred and forty-seven patients with cN0 pN+ breast cancer treated between 2014 and 2016 were selected retrospectively. Two groups were constituted according to the initial radio-cytological evaluation. A CA was systematically performed. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with positive axillary cytology (n=31 vs. n=116) had more metastatic lymph nodes (P=0.01) in the AC, larger (P<0.001), less differentiated (P<0.001) tumours, and shorter recurrence-free survival (P=0.0114). It also appeared that 38.7 % of patients with a positive cytology had at most two metastatic nodes and could, according to the results of ACOSOG, benefit from therapeutic de-escalation. CONCLUSION: X-ray cytological screening remains essential in order to select a subgroup of patients with a high lymph node tumour load. Additional studies are necessary in order to be able to offer therapeutic de-escalation to 1/3 of these patients without the risk of under-treatment for the remaining 2/3.

[Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast and gynecologic cancers management. Experience of the Surgery Department in the Nice Anticancer Center]. / Impact de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur les prises en charge pour cancer du sein et gynécologique.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the containment measures and the recommendations of several societies in oncology may have impacted the request for initial care for cancers. METHODS: In this monocentric retrospective study, the number and the characteristics of patients received for a first consultation for a breast or gynecologic tumor were compared between the containment period and a control period. The times from diagnosis to treatment and the type of initial care were compared too. RESULTS: During the outbreak, 91 patients were seen for a new request, versus 159 during the control period, a decrease of 43.5 %. Patients were older (62.9 versus 60.9 years old) but this difference was not significant. Tumor stage was not modified. Concerning senology, the time from the biopsy to the first consultation was 5.5 days longer during the outbreak (difference statistically insignificant). Among the 51 patients requiring a surgical treatment during the outbreak, 16 (31.48 %) were postponed after the end of the containment measures. After all, the average time from the consultation to the treatment was not modified. No modification of type of treatment was observed. DISCUSSION: At the height of the pandemic, benefits and risks of the cancer treatment had to be daily balanced against the risk of exposition to the COVID-19. The evaluation of practices for cancer care is essential to understand the real impact of COVID-19 outbreak on global cancer management, so as to get prepared to further crises.

[Preoperative breast imaging review: Interests and limits of specialized validation in oncology]. / Relecture préopératoire en sénologie : intérêts et limites d'une validation spécialisée en oncologie.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of systematic radiological review by breast specialist radiologist of malignant breast lesion imaging on the therapeutic management of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collection was performed for patients with histopathologically proved breast cancer or suspicious breast lesion on imaging realized out of our institution. Patients underwent systematic mammary and axillary ultrasound, imaging review and if necessary complementary mammographic images. We analyzed the number of additional breast biopsies and axillary lymph node fine needle aspiration (FNA) with their histopathological results. We assessed their impact by comparing the final surgical treatment to the one planned before review. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen patients were included, with a total of 230 BIRADS 0, 4, 5 or 6 breast lesions. Seventy-six additional breast core biopsies were realized, leading to diagnose 43 additional BIRADS 6 lesions (24 infiltrative carcinomas, 9 DCIS and 10 atypical lesions) in 30 patients (13.82%). Thirty-five additional lymph node FNA were realized with 12 metastatic nodes and 3 false negative samples. Imaging review lead to change surgical treatment in 59 patients (27.19%, P<0.01) with modification in breast surgery in 37 patients, axillary surgery in 8 patients and both sites surgery in 12 patients. CONCLUSION: This study shows an impact of systematic radiological review by breast specialist radiologist in therapeutic management of patients treated for malignant breast lesion.

Clinical nomogram to predict bone-only metastasis in patients with early breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Bone is one of the most common sites of distant metastasis in breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to combine selected clinical and pathologic variables to develop a nomogram that can predict the likelihood of bone-only metastasis (BOM) as the first site of recurrence in patients with early breast cancer. METHODS: Medical records of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer were retrospectively collected. On the basis of the analysis of patient and tumour characteristics using the Cox proportional hazards regression model, a nomogram to predict BOM was constructed for a 4175-patient-training cohort. The nomogram was validated in an independent cohort of 579 patients. RESULTS: Among 4175 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, 314 developed subsequent BOM. Age, T classification, lymph node status, lymphovascular space invasion, and hormone receptor status were significantly and independently associated with subsequent BOM. The nomogram had a concordance index of 0.69 in the training set and 0.73 in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a clinical nomogram to predict subsequent BOM in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. Selection of a patient population at high risk for BOM could facilitate research of more specific staging approaches or the selective use of bone-targeted therapy.

The exportability of the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria for omitting axillary lymph node dissection after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy findings: a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To determine the exportability of the criteria defined by the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial for selecting patients who are eligible for omitting completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy result and to investigate whether not following the Z0011 criteria might affect patient outcomes. METHODS: From a multicenter database, we selected 188 patients with positive SLNs and then excluded patients with positive SLNs on immunohistochemistry only. We retrospectively applied the Z0011 criteria and grouped the patients as eligible or ineligible for omitting cALND. The eligible group was compared with the cohort included in the Z0011 trial and with the ineligible group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated for each group, and univariate analyses assessed associations between the groups and clinicopathological variables. RESULTS: The final analysis involved 125 patients with positive SLNs. Eighty-seven patients (69.6 %) were potentially eligible for omitting cALND. The estrogen receptor status, T stage, grade, and number of positive non-SLNs were not statistically different between the eligible group and the Z0011 cohort. The ineligible group had significantly more positive non-SLNs (P = 0.01) and a lower 5-year overall survival rate than the eligible group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The similarity of clinical characteristics between the Z0011 trial cohort and our eligible group confirms the exportability of these criteria to another population. The worse prognosis of patients who did not meet the Z0011 criteria suggests prudence before disregarding or enlarging broadening the indications for omitting cALND.

[Breast cancer surgery]. / Chirurgie du cancer du sein.

The surgery for breast cancer is frequently the first step in a multi-disciplinary care. It allows for local control, but also to establish crucial prognostic factor indicating potential adjuvant therapy. The current trend s towards de-escalation of surgical treatment for reducing the functional and aesthetic morbidity. At the local level, this de-escalation has been made possible by performing most often breast conservative surgery because of the development of oncoplastic techniques, but also because of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. At the axillary level, the reduction of morbidity has been made possible by the advent of the sentinel node biopsy which is more and more indicated year after year.

Selection of patients with advanced-stage cervical cancer for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the era of PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report the false-negative rate of positron-emission tomography (PET) /Computed Tomography (CT) for para-aortic (PA) lymph node (LN) metastasis and to examine if PA lymphadenectomy could be omitted when PET/CT of the pelvic area is negative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients without evidence of extrapelvic disease on preoperative imaging or in the PA area were included. Each patient underwent a laparoscopic PA lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were included. Seven patients (11%) had PALN metastasis. The false-negative rate of PET/CT was 11%. When PET/CT was positive for pelvic nodes, the risk for PA metastasis was 18% versus 8% when PET/CT was negative in the pelvic area (p=0.24). CONCLUSION: The apparent low sensitivity of the PET/CT does not make it a relevant alternative to surgical LN staging when no uptake is visualized in the PA area. However, for patients in whom PET/CT is negative in the pelvic area, the risk of metastasis in the PA area is low.

Hypoxia imaging of uterine cervix carcinoma with (18)F-FETNIM PET/CT.

PURPOSE: Our aims were to assess the feasibility of imaging hypoxia in cervical carcinoma with (18)F-fluoroerythronitroimidazole ((18)F-FETNIM) and to compare (18)F-FETNIM uptake with metabolic uptake of (18)F-FDG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 16 patients with cervical carcinoma. After imaging with FDG, (18)F-FETNIM PET/CT was performed and tumor-to-muscle (T/M) ratio uptake was assessed. (18)F- FETNIM uptake was correlated to FDG uptake and osteopontin (OPN), a marker of hypoxia, and patients' outcomes. RESULTS: All tumors were detected by (18)F-FDG PET. (18)F-FETNIM T/M ratios ranged from 1.3 to 5.4. There was no significant correlation between (18)F-FETNIM and (18)F-FDG uptake. High (18)F-FETNIM uptake (T/M > 3.2) was associated with reduced progression-free survival (log-rank = 0.002) and overall survival (log-rank = 0.02). Osteopontin ranged from 39 to 662 µg/L (median, 102.5 µg/L). Patients with OPN greater than 144 µg/L had reduced progression-free survival compared with those with OPN less than 144 µg/L (log-rank = 0.03). We found no significant correlation between (18)F-FETNIM uptake and OPN blood levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results showed that a high uptake of (18)F-FETNIM was associated with a worse progression-free and overall survival.

Surgical management modifications following systematic additional shaving of cavity margins in breast-conservation treatment.

BACKGROUND: Positive wide local excision margins are the most important risk factor of local breast-carcinoma recurrence. Shaving additional margins could lower the need for re-excisions when wide local excision margins are positive and cavity margins are negative. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study, from January 2007 to December 2008, included 99 women with breast carcinomas who underwent wide local excision with 4 additional, systematically shaved, surgical cavity margins. All therapeutic decisions concerning post-wide local excision treatment were made by consensus during multidisciplinary meetings. RESULTS: This systematic cavity-shaving strategy avoided 25 re-excisions (25.3%), and 6 patients required new surgery because of carcinoma found in the additional cavity-shaving margins, despite negative wide local excision margins. No preoperative factor predictive of positive cavity margins was identified. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic shaving of additional cavity margins changed the surgical management after breast-conservation treatment.

Management of lymph nodes in endometrioid uterine cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the standard surgery for endometrial cancer. However, the indication and extent of surgical lymph node staging continues to be controversial if the carcinoma is confined to the uterus, even in the eyes of the experts. The survival benefit of this invasive staging technique has not been clearly demonstrated in this setting. RECENT FINDINGS: We have focused our review on lymph node disease in patients with early endometrial cancer. We report on the important issues surrounding lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer and the results of a recent large randomized trial that do not indicate a benefit of surgical staging. Other issues, including complications and the benefits of combining laparoscopy with lymphadenectomy, will also be discussed. SUMMARY: Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomies are not appropriate for low-risk patients with endometrioid uterine cancer. The risk-benefit balance for these patients seems rather in favor of not performing surgical staging. On the contrary, high-risk patients would seem to benefit from complete pelvic and para-aortic lymph node staging with adjuvant treatments tailored to the results of lymphadenectomy.

[Sentinel lymph node biopsy in invasive breast cancer in 2009]. / Mise au point sur le prélèvement du ganglion sentinelle dans le cancer invasif du sein en 2009.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) despite the limited recidive long-term results. SLNB can not only reduce ALND morbidity but also provide ultrastadification with serial sectionning and immunohistochemistry analysis which increase the sensitivity of detection of sentinel node (SN) metastasis. Micrometastasis or isolated tumor cells are frequently discovered. However, their diagnostic and pronostic values are still subject to controversy. Most of large randomized trials have determined that double detection (colorimetric and isotopic) improved SN identification rate and decreased false negative rate; and that periareolar injection was equally effective, even superior than peritumoral injection with the major advantage of its simplicity in non palpable tumors. One of the unsolved problems of SLNB is to determine if its indications may be extended to larger tumors, to node sampling before or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or after previous lumpectomy or breast surgery, in case of palpable axillary node, and in case of multifocal tumor. Another challenge is to determine if complementary ALND in case of SLND metastasis is necessary, because 40 to 70% of non sentinel nodes (NSN) are tumor-free. Several predictive models (nomograms, scores, partitioning recursive models) have been developed to predict non-SN status in SN-positive patients. These models must be validated in independent cohorts to enable their use in routine.