BACKGROUND: A dermocosmetic (DC) containing salicylic acid, niacinamide, and thermal spring water has been developed for the management of mild to moderate acne. AIM: To assess the efficacy of DC as an adjunct to benzoyl peroxide (BPO) every other day compared with BPO over 3 months, and its efficacy as maintenance post-BPO care compared with vehicle for another 3 months. METHODS: Single-center, randomized, double-blind study in 100 patients with mild to moderate facial acne according to the Global Acne Severity (GEA) Scale. During phase 1, subjects received either BPO + vehicle (vehicle group) or BPO + DC (DC group) for 12 weeks. During phase 2, patients were re-randomized to receive either the vehicle or the DC for 12 weeks. Assessments included inflammatory and non-inflammatory lesion count, acne severity using the GEA Scale, local tolerance, quality of life, and quantity of product used. RESULTS: During phase 1, both groups, DC and vehicle, reached the same level of efficacy at month 3, although the quantity of BPO used was significantly reduced in the DC group (P=0.0001). During phase 2, acne continued to significantly improve (all P<0.05) in the DC group, as did clinical signs and symptoms; while patients randomized to vehicle reported relapses of their acne and related symptoms. CONCLUSION: The use of DC significantly reduces the need for BPO with no impact on the efficacy of mild to moderate acne. The use of DC as a maintenance post-BPO allowed a significant reduction of acne relapse compared with vehicle after 3 months of follow-up, with a good tolerance. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(12):1172-1177. doi:10.36849/JDD.7449R1.
Acne Vulgaris , Dermatologic Agents , Humans , Acne Vulgaris/diagnosis , Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Adapalene , Benzoyl Peroxide/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Quality of Life , Salicylic Acid/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Double-Blind Method
Introduction: Hand eczema is frequent among hairdressers. The aim of this open survey was (i) to assess the prevalence and identify causing factors of hand issues encountered by hairdressers and (ii) to assess the benefit of a cosmetic skin care in clinical signs and symptoms through a clinical observational survey. Methods: The survey was conducted among 391 hairdressers and hairdresser-related professionals, collecting information on frequency of daily procedures, frequency/type/severity of hand issues, and glove usage. The satisfaction provided by a dermocosmetic containing niacinamide, glycerin, shea butter and thermal spring water was examined in an evaluation visit one month after survey initiation. Results: Investigated subjects were mostly hairdressers (73%). In their daily procedures, a majority (≥76%) always or often used shampoos, hair dyes, oxidants, bleachers, straighteners and perms. Overall, a majority (>60%) of subjects always or often had hand irritation due to this use (except for straighteners). Most subjects (≥60%) reported using gloves in their procedures except with shampoos and straighteners. Among hand problems reported at survey initiation, the most intense was skin dryness, followed by redness, irritation, cracks, and fissures. Hand problems induced annoyance in their activities for most subjects (>65%), leading to discontinuation of their professional activities for 28% subjects. The test dermocosmetic was applied for 1 week up to 1 month. At evaluation visit (1 month), the intensity of all hand signs and symptoms was decreased compared to initiation visit. In addition, 58.3% subjects reported return to professional activities instantly at evaluation visit versus 31.3% at initial visit. Most subjects (≥73%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the test cream properties. Conclusion: Our survey confirms the impact of hand issues experienced by hairdresser professionals and highlights the need for gloves and for efficient hand care products.
Skin conditions such as acne, atopic dermatitis, skin toxicity from oncology treatment, and scars are among the most common health conditions and negatively impact quality of life (QoL). Yet the physician perception of this impact often varies greatly from the patient perception. This is important because patient illness perception is closely linked with seeking help and treatment adherence behaviors. The objective of this review is to better understand the impact of these four highly prevalent skin conditions on QoL including their health-related economic factors to improve treatment outcomes. The literature search included literature published on QoL with acne, atopic dermatitis, scars (from any cause) and skin toxicities on PubMed between 2015 and 2020. We found that patients with skin conditions have a much higher frequency of altered QoL and psychological distress than those without. Also, skin conditions negatively impact self-image and can cause feelings of isolation, loneliness, lower self-esteem, and lower body satisfaction. Additionally, physical discomfort adds to the psychological distress. These physical and psychological impacts are an enormous financial burden on patients, their families and society. We found evidence that holistic treatment including treating the skin condition itself, providing wider peer and psychological support as well as shared decision-making, therapeutic patient education and dermatologist involvement improves outcomes. Holistic history-taking, checklists, or the use of more formal QoL scoring tools can be incorporated into routine consultations to better assess patient well-being and provide clinicians with important information for adapting treatment to individual patient requirements. In conclusion, this review highlights the overall impact of skin conditions (including psychological and QoL impacts) and the importance of providing holistic care to optimize treatment outcomes. A comprehensive QoL screening tool would be useful to help provide patient-centered treatment.
