RESUMEN
Children with Down syndrome (DS) are at an increased risk of developing clonal myeloproliferative disorders. The balance between treatment intensity and treatment-related toxicity has not yet been defined. We analyzed this population to identify risk factors and optimal treatment. This single-center retrospective study included 78 DS patients <16 years-old with Transient Abnormal Myelopoiesis (TAM, n = 25), Acute Myeloblastic Leukemia (DS-AML, n = 41) of which 35 had classical Myeloid Leukemia associated with DS (ML-DS) with megakaryoblastic immunophenotype (AMKL) and 6 sporadic DS-AML (non-AMKL). Patients with DS-AML were treated according to four BFM-based protocols. Classical ML-DS vs. non-DS-AMKL were compared and the outcome of ML-DS was analyzed according to treatment intensity. Only four patients with TAM required cytoreduction with a 5-year Event-Free Survival probability (EFSp) of 74.4 (±9.1)%. DS-AML treatment-related deaths were due to infections, with a 5-year EFSp of 60.6 (±8.2)%. Megakaryoblastic immunophenotype was the strongest good-prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.000). When compared ML-DS with non-DS-AMKL, a better outcome was associated with a lower relapse rate (p = 0.0002). Analysis of administered treatment was done on 32/33 ML-DS patients who achieved CR according to receiving or not high-dose ARA-C block (HDARA-C), and no difference in 5-year EFSp was observed (p = 0.172). TAM rarely required treatment and when severe manifestations occurred, early intervention was effective. DS-AML good outcome was associated with AMKL with a low relapse-rate. Even if treatment-related mortality is still high, our data do not support the omission of HDARA-C in ML-DS since we observed a trend to detect a higher relapse rate in the arm without HDARA-C.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is an infrequent disease characterized by clinical and biological features related to poor prognosis. Adapted therapies were designed without a clear consensus regarding the best treatment options. We aimed to compare the outcome between infant ALL cases receiving Interfant versus BFM-based protocols. PROCEDURE: This is a retrospective observational study. From April 1990 to June 2018, infant ALL cases were enrolled in one of the five consecutive treatment protocols. Clinical, demographic, and biological features and outcome were evaluated. A comparative analysis was performed between Interfant protocols and BFM-based protocols. RESULTS: During the studied period, 1913 ALL patients were admitted and 116 (6%) were infants. Treatment administered was: ALL-BFM'90 (n = 16), 1-ALL96-BFM/HPG (n = 7), Interfant-99 (n = 39), Interfant-06 (n = 35), and ALLIC-BFM'2009 (n = 19). The 5-year event-free survival probability (EFSp) was 31.9(standard error [SE] 4.6)% for the entire population, with a significant difference among risk groups according to Interfant-06 criteria (P = .0029). KMT2A-rearrangement status was the strongest prognostic factor (P = .048), independently of the protocol strategy. The median time for relapse was 24.1 months for patients with minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative versus 11.5 months for those with MRD-positive (P = .0386). EFSp and cumulative relapse risk probability (CRRp) were similar. Interfant protocols showed comparable induction (8.1% vs 7.1%, P = .852) and complete remission mortality (21.6% vs 28.6%, P = .438), failing to reduce the relapse rate (48.5% vs 30.7%, P = .149). CONCLUSIONS: Interfant protocols and BFM-based protocols presented comparable results. The risk group stratification proposed by Interfant-06 was validated by our results, and MRD seems useful to identify patients with an increased risk of early relapse.
