Association between pathologic response and survival after neoadjuvant therapy in lung cancer.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy improves event-free survival (EFS) and pathologic complete response (0% residual viable tumor (RVT) in primary tumor (PT) and lymph nodes (LNs)), and is approved for treatment of resectable lung cancer. Pathologic response assessment after neoadjuvant therapy is the potential analog to radiographic response for advanced disease. However, %RVT thresholds beyond pathologic complete response and major pathologic response (≤10% RVT) have not been explored. Pathologic response was prospectively assessed in the randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial (NCT02998528), which evaluated neoadjuvant nivolumab (anti-programmed death protein 1) plus chemotherapy in patients with resectable lung cancer. RVT, regression and necrosis were quantified (0-100%) in PT and LNs using a pan-tumor scoring system and tested for association with EFS in a prespecified exploratory analysis. Regardless of LN involvement, EFS improved with 0% versus >0% RVT-PT (hazard ratio = 0.18). RVT-PT predicted EFS for nivolumab plus chemotherapy (area under the curve = 0.74); 2-year EFS rates were 90%, 60%, 57% and 39% for patients with 0-5%, >5-30%, >30-80% and >80% RVT, respectively. Each 1% RVT associated with a 0.017 hazard ratio increase for EFS. Combining pathologic response from PT and LNs helped differentiate outcomes. When compared with radiographic response and circulating tumor DNA clearance, %RVT best approximated EFS. These findings support pathologic response as an emerging survival surrogate. Further assessment of the full spectrum of %RVT in lung cancer and other tumor types is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02998528 .

Treatment preference for monthly oral ibandronate and weekly oral alendronate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: A randomized, crossover study (BALTO II).

OBJECTIVES: Patient preference strongly influences long-term medication use in chronic diseases such as postmenopausal osteoporosis. METHODS: This 6-month, open-label, crossover, international study randomized 350 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis to monthly oral ibandronate 150mg for 3months followed by weekly alendronate 70mg for 12weeks, or vice versa. RESULTS: Of patients expressing a preference (93.1%), more preferred the monthly ibandronate regimen (70.6%) than the weekly alendronate regimen (29.4%). The monthly ibandronate preference rate was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The most common reasons for ibandronate preference were ease of staying on treatment long-term (81.5%) and better lifestyle fit (75.4%). More women found the monthly ibandronate regimen more convenient (76.6%) than the weekly alendronate regimen (23.4%). The monthly ibandronate convenience rate was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The safety profiles of the two regimens were similar. CONCLUSION: The strong patient preference for monthly ibandronate over weekly alendronate replicates previous study findings and may lead to improved treatment adherence in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Patient preference for once-monthly ibandronate versus once-weekly alendronate in a randomized, open-label, cross-over trial: the Boniva Alendronate Trial in Osteoporosis (BALTO).

OBJECTIVE: Ibandronate, a potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, can be administered with extended interval dosing. Patient preferences were assessed for once-monthly versus once-weekly bisphosphonate treatment using a previously developed, open-label, cross-over trial design. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a 6-month, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study with a two-period and two-sequence cross-over treatment design. After screening, eligible patients (postmenopausal women with osteoporosis) were randomized to once-monthly ibandronate 150 mg followed by once-weekly alendronate 70 mg for a total of 6 months (Sequence A) or once-weekly alendronate followed by once-monthly ibandronate for a total of 6 months (Sequence B). The primary objective was to evaluate patient-reported preference for either the once-monthly ibandronate regimen or the once-weekly alendronate regimen based on responses to a preference questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were enrolled into this study (Sequence A, 170; Sequence B, 172). In the primary analysis of patient preference, 71.4% of women selected once-monthly ibandronate and 28.6% of women selected once-weekly alendronate. Overall, 66.1% preferred the once-monthly ibandronate regimen to the once-weekly alendronate regimen (26.5%) and 7.4% of participants stated no preference for either regimen. The preference rate for once-monthly ibandronate was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). 'Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time' was the most common reason given for patient preference for both the once-monthly ibandronate (61%, 169/276) and once-weekly alendronate (25%, 70/276) regimens. Additionally, 17% (47/276) of patients who preferred once-monthly ibandronate chose 'it is easier to tolerate side effects' as did 4.3% (12/276) of patients who preferred alendronate. Significantly more women found once-monthly ibandronate to be more convenient (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more women with postmenopausal osteoporosis preferred once-monthly ibandronate therapy to once-weekly alendronate therapy, and found the once-monthly regimen to be more convenient. Ease of following a treatment regimen for a long time was the most common reason given for the patients' preferences.