Early Dinner Improves the Glycemic Profile in Habitual Late Eaters With Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Short Term.

Background Late dinner (LD) can worsen the glucose profile in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We assessed the short-term effect of early dinner (ED) on glycemic control in habitual late eaters with uncontrolled T2D. Methodology This interventional, single-arm, within-group trial recruited 10 habitual late eaters with uncontrolled T2D (glycosylated hemoglobin: 7-9% and either fasting plasma glucose (FPG): ≥140 mg/dl or post-prandial plasma glucose: ≥200 mg/dl). They had their usual LD (beyond 22:00 hours) on Days 0-3 and ED (before 20:00 hours) on Days 4-10. Continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) parameters, two-hour post-dinner, and fasting (10-hour post-dinner) investigations were analyzed. Bedtime hunger was assessed using a Labeled Magnitude Satiety Scale. Results The mean dinner time was reduced from 22:28 hours to 19:29 hours. CGMS revealed that ED lowered the 10-hour post-dinner incremental area under the curve (22,587.9 ± 5,168.3 mg/dl×mins vs. 15,886.3 ± 4,288.7 mg/dl×mins, P < 0.002), 10-hour post-dinner average blood glucose (ABG) (137.5 ± 9.3 mg/dl vs. 125 ± 7.9 mg/dl, P < 0.002), 24-hour ABG (132.2 ± 7.5 mg/dl vs. 124.8 ± 5.4 mg/dl, P = 0.037), and night mean amplitude of glucose excursion (83.7 ± 5.8 mg/dl vs. 69.3 ± 7.5 mg/dl, P = 0.027). ED also reduced FPG (119.8 ± 7.3 mg/dl vs. 105.2 ± 5.7 mg/dl, P = 0.015), fasting insulin (15.0 ± 4.3 µIU/ml vs. 9.7 ± 2.7 µIU/ml, P < 0.002), and HOMA-IR (4.36 ± 1.2 vs. 2.56 ± 0.79, P < 0.002). Post-dinner glucose, insulin, and inflammatory markers were unchanged. Bedtime hunger increased significantly on Days 4 and 5 but returned to baseline by Day 10. Conclusions A simple modification of dinner time in habitual late eaters with uncontrolled T2D improves FPG, glycemic control, and insulin resistance in the short term.

Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (STAR) deficiency: Our experience and systematic review for phenotype-genotype correlation.

OBJECTIVE: Lipoid congenital adrenal hyperplasia (LCAH) is caused by mutations in STAR. A systematic review of phenotype-genotype correlation and data on testicular histology in LCAH patients is unavailable. We aim to describe our experience and provide phenotype-genotype correlation. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Retrospective review of three genetically proven LCAH patients from our centre and per-patient data analysis from a systematic review of 292 probands. The phenotypic subgroups of 46,XY were Group A (typical female genitalia), Group B (atypical genitalia) and Group C (typical male genitalia). RESULTS: We report three new LCAH probands from India, all diagnosed post-infancy with preserved gonadal function and one novel variant. The systematic review reports 46,XY to 46,XX LCAH ratio of 1.1 (155:140). Patients with 46,XY LCAH in Group A were diagnosed in infancy (116/117) and had higher mineralocorticoid involvement than Group C (96.4% vs. 75%, p = 0.035), whereas Group C had preserved gonadal function. Hyperplastic adrenals are noted in ~60% of LCAH diagnosed with primary adrenal insufficiency in infancy. There was no report of gonadal germ cell cancer and rare reports of germ cell neoplasia in situ in adolescents, especially with intraabdominal gonads. Two-thirds of LCAH probands were East-Asian and 11/16 regional recurrent variants were from East Asia. There was minimal overlap between variants in Groups A (n = 55), B (n = 9) and C (n = 8). All nonsense and frameshift and most of the splice-site variants and deletion/insertions were present in Group A. CONCLUSIONS: We report three new cases of LCAH from India. We propose a phenotype-derived genotypic classification of reported STAR variants in 46,XY LCAH.

Comparative Study of Insulin Sensitivity and Resistance and Their Correlation with Androgens in Lean and Obese Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

There is a lack of consensus on the optimal screening strategy for insulin resistance (IR), particularly in lean women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Therefore, we conducted a cross-sectional study in 80 women with PCOS (28 lean/52 obese) and 80 age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls. Using a 5-point 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (0, 30, 60, 90, 120 min), we examined glucose and insulin excursions, IR, insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function (ßF), and the effect of androgens on IR. Lean and obese women with PCOS had similar glucose but higher insulin (except fasting in lean women) and insulin AUC as compared to their respective controls (p < 0.05). Lean women with PCOS were equally insulin-resistant but more hyperinsulinemic than the obese controls (p < 0.05). Although ßF ([1st phase: 481.71 ± 263.53 vs. 430.56 ± 232.37], [2nd phase: 815.16 ± 447.12 vs. 752.66 ± 428.95]) was comparable in lean and obese women with PCOS, lean women had better insulin sensitivity (112.78 ± 66.26 vs. 75.49 ± 55.6) (p < 0.05). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) and androstenedione decreased with increasing BMI in lean women, and this correlated with deteriorating insulin sensitivity and exaggerated hyperinsulinemia. In obese women with PCOS, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) correlated negatively with BMI and hyperinsulinemia, and positively with insulin sensitivity. This data suggests that estimating only fasting insulin may miss IR in lean women with PCOS; hence, additional time points in OGTT will add value to screening for IR. DHEAS and androstenedione may have a beneficial effect on insulin sensitivity and may be used to screen IR in lean women, while SHBG can be used as a predictive marker for IR in obese women with PCOS.