Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
Future Oncol ; 2024 Feb 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415370

RESUMEN

Elranatamab efficacy in the single-arm, registrational MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359) was compared with that of physician's choice of treatment (PCT) for triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. MagnestisMM-3 eligibility criteria were applied to two USA-based oncology electronic health record databases, COTA and Flatiron Health (FH), to identify cohorts for this study (NCT05932290). Applied statistical techniques accounted for cohort imbalances. MagnetisMM-3 (BCMA-naive; n = 123) outcomes were compared with those from COTA (n = 239) and FH (n = 152). Elranatamab was associated with a significantly higher objective response rate (risk ratios, 1.88-2.25), significantly longer progression-free survival (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.37-0.57), and, across most analyses, significantly longer overall survival (HRs, 0.46-0.66) versus PCT. BCMA-naive patients who were treated with elranatamab exhibited significantly better outcomes than patients treated in real-world clinical practice.


Elranatamab is a new medicine for the treatment of people with multiple myeloma. In the ongoing clinical trial MagnetisMM-3, most people had fewer myeloma cells when treated with elranatamab. However, MagnetisMM-3 only looks at the effects of elranatamab without comparing it to other myeloma treatments. Therefore, a new study was designed to compare the effectiveness of elranatamab in the MagnetisMM-3 study with other treatments used in real-world clinical practice (not in a clinical trial). Data from people in MagnetisMM-3 was compared with data from two US databases (COTA and Flatiron Health) containing health records of patients treated for multiple myeloma in real-life clinical practice. The same criteria used to select patients for the MagnetisMM-3 trial (123 people) were used to identify people with similar characteristics in COTA (239 people) and Flatiron Health (152 people). More people treated with elranatamab had fewer myeloma cells in their bodies after treatment than people who received their doctor's choice of treatment in clinical practice. In fact, six out of ten people treated with elranatamab had fewer myeloma cells versus about three in ten people from each real-world database. People treated with elranatamab versus physician's choice of treatment lived longer without their disease getting worse and lived longer overall. In conclusion, this study found that more people treated with elranatamab responded to treatment and lived longer than similar people from the COTA and Flatiron Health databases who were given treatments available in a real-world clinical setting.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05932290 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

2.
PLoS One ; 15(1): e0227914, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31945774

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study is to examine how moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) is currently managed in real-world clinical practice across the United States (US) and European Union Five (EU5; France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom). METHODS: Data from the 2017 Adelphi Inflammatory Bowel-Disease Specific Programme (IBD-DSP) were used. The IBD-DSP is a database of patient chart information abstracted by selected gastroenterologists across the US and EU5. Eligible gastroenterologists who agreed to participate were asked to complete patient record forms for the next seven consecutive eligible adult patients with UC. Only charts from patients with moderate-to-severe UC were included in the analysis (defined as those with documented administration of either an immunosuppressant [IM] or a biologic). Treatment patterns were reported descriptively. RESULTS: 411 and 1191 patient charts were included in the US and EU5 (mean ages 44.2 and 39.6 years; 53.0% and 43.5% female), respectively. For those with complete treatment history, 40.7% and 52.9% used either an IM or biologic as their first treatment (with or without steroids). Usage of these therapies increased in subsequent lines. The percentage of patients treated with combination therapy (i.e., biologic therapy with a concomitant IM) in first line generally varied between 10-20% (e.g., US: adalimumab (ADA), 10.8%; infliximab (IFX), 18.2%; EU5: ADA, 12.5%; IFX, 19.9%), though increased in later lines in the EU5. Among patients currently using a biologic therapy, between 10-40% of patients used a higher than indicated dose or greater than indicated dosing frequency during maintenance (e.g., US: IFX, 37.1%; ADA, 13.4%; EU5: IFX, 39.1%; ADA, 36.1%). In both the US and EU5, the primary reason for switching therapy was efficacy-related. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, many patients with moderate-to-severe UC use an IM or biologic as their first therapy after diagnosis. Combination therapy and dose escalation are also common, and underscore the challenges with managing this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Combinación de Medicamentos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
J Med Econ ; 22(9): 859-868, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31012362

RESUMEN

Aims: To evaluate the cost differences between a treatment strategy including tofacitinib (TOFA) vs treatment strategies including adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), and vedolizumab (VEDO) among all patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) (further stratified by patients naïve/exposed to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFis]). Materials and methods: An Excel-based decision-analytic model was developed to evaluate costs from the perspective of a third-party US payer over 2 years. Efficacy and safety parameters were taken from prescribing information and published trials. All patients started induction therapy on the first treatment in the strategy and continued if efficacy criteria were met and no major adverse event occurred (in which cases they proceeded to the next treatment in the strategy). Results: The cost per member per month (PMPM) of the TOFA->IFX->VEDO->GOL strategy ($1.11) was lower than that of the ADA->IFX->VEDO->GOL strategy ($1.34; Δ = $-0.23) among the TNFi-naïve population (n = 204 patients out of a plan of one million members). Similarly, the use of TOFA before ADA (i.e. TOFA->ADA->IFX-> VEDO) was also associated with lower PMPM costs than the use of ADA before TOFA (i.e. ADA->TOFA->IFX->VEDO): $1.15 vs $1.25 (Δ = $-0.10). Similar, and often larger, differences were observed in both the overall moderate-to-severe population and the TNFi-exposed population. Sensitivity analyses resulted in the same conclusions. Limitations: Our model relied on efficacy data from prescribing information and published trials, which were not head-to-head and slightly differed with respect to methods. Additionally, our model used representative minor and major ADRs (and the associated costs) to represent toxicity management, which was a simplifying assumption. Conclusions: This analysis, the first of its kind to evaluate TOFA vis-à-vis other advanced therapies in the US, suggests the early use of TOFA among both TNFi-naïve and TNFi-failure patients results in lower PMPM costs compared with other treatment alternatives.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/economía , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéutico , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Piperidinas/economía , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/economía , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirroles/economía , Pirroles/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/economía , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Recursos en Salud/economía , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Infliximab/economía , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Modelos Econométricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Pirroles/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/agonistas , Estados Unidos
4.
J Orthop Sci ; 20(4): 750-60, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25963609

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Chronic pain affects between 10-20 % of the population of Japan and several specific types of chronic pain have been found to be associated with worse health outcomes. The aim of the current study was to investigate the economic burden of chronic pain as well as the health status among Japanese patients. METHODS: Data from the Japan National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), a cross-sectional health survey of adults, were used (N = 30,000). Respondents with chronic pain (N = 785) were compared with respondents without chronic pain (N = 29,215) with respect to health status (using the SF-12v2), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI questionnaire), and healthcare resource use using regression modeling, controlling for demographic and health history covariates. Indirect costs were calculated using wage rates and the human capital method. RESULTS: Back pain (72.10 %) and shoulder pain/stiffness (54.90 %) were the most prevalent pain types. Adjusting for demographic and health history differences, respondents with chronic pain reported lower health status [mental component summary (MCS): 44.26 vs. 51.14; physical component summary (PCS): 44.23 vs. 47.48; both p < 0.05], greater absenteeism (4.74 vs. 2.74 %), presenteeism (30.19 vs. 15.19 %), overall work impairment (31.70 vs. 16.82 %), indirect costs (¥ 1488,385 vs. ¥ 804,634), activity impairment (33.45 vs. 17.25 %), physician visits (9.31 vs. 4.08), emergency room (ER) visits (0.19 vs. 0.08), and hospitalizations (0.71 vs. 0.34) (all p < 0.05). Nearly 60 % of respondents with chronic pain were untreated. The mean level of pain severity in the last week was 5.26 (using a 0-11 scale); being female, being elderly, having low income, and having multiple pain types were significantly associated with greater pain severity (all p < 0.05). Regular exercise was associated with lower pain severity (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that chronic pain has a significant association in an individual's health status, work productivity, daily activity impairment, healthcare resource use, and economic burden in Japan. Along with low treatment rates, a multidisciplinary approach may lead to an improved quality of life and reduce the economic burden among patients with chronic pain in Japan.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Dolor Crónico/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Internet , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia
5.
Nat Sci Sleep ; 7: 1-11, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25610008

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have suggested that patients who experience insomnia report a number of significant impairments. However, despite this literature, fewer studies have focused on the burden of insomnia among patients in Japan. The objective of the current study is to extend this work in Japan to further understand the effect of insomnia on health-related quality of life (hrQOL). Further, another objective is to understand general predictors of hrQOL among patients with insomnia. METHODS: Data from the 2012 Japan National Health and Wellness Survey, an annual, cross-sectional study of adults aged 18 years or older, were used (N=30,000). All National Health and Wellness Survey respondents were categorized based on the incidence of self-reported insomnia diagnosis and prescription medication usage (clinical insomniacs under treatment versus [vs] good sleepers without insomnia or insomnia symptoms). Comparisons among different groups were made using multiple regression models controlling for demographics and health history. RESULTS: Clinical insomniacs (n=1,018; 3.4%) reported significantly worse hrQOL compared with good sleepers (n=20,542) (mental component summary: 34.2 vs 48.0; physical component summary: 48.0 vs 52.8; health utilities: 0.61 vs 0.76; all P<0.05). Health behaviors (smoking, exercise, alcohol use) and comorbidities were the strongest predictors of health utilities for clinical insomniacs. For all three clinical insomniac subgroups of interest, those with a physical comorbidity but not a psychiatric one, those with a psychiatric comorbidity but not a physical one, and those without either a physical or psychiatric comorbidity, large decrements in health utilities were observed for respondents who did not engage in any positive health behaviors (0.61, 0.57, 0.64, respectively) relative to good sleepers (0.78). However, the gap in health utility scores between these subgroups and good sleepers diminishes with an increasing number of positive health behaviors (eg, clinical insomniacs with a physical comorbidity but not a psychiatric comorbidity performing all three positive health behaviors =0.67 vs good sleepers =0.78). DISCUSSION: A significant burden remains for those with insomnia who are treated. Given the particularly low levels of hrQOL among treated insomnia patients who have poor health behavior profiles and have psychiatric comorbidities, physicians should place particular emphasis on these patients who are most in need of intervention. Improved treatments may help to address the unmet needs of these patient populations.

6.
Nat Sci Sleep ; 6: 101-11, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25093001

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Middle-of-the-night (MOTN) awakenings with difficulty returning to sleep are among the most common symptoms of insomnia. Despite the epidemiological studies that have been conducted, there is a lack of data on the impact of MOTN awakenings on health status and socioeconomic indicators in comparison with other insomnia symptoms. METHODS: Data were analyzed from the 2011 US National Health and Wellness Survey (adults ≥18 years old; N=60,783), which asked respondents whether they had experienced specific symptoms of insomnia (ie, MOTN awakenings, difficulty falling asleep, waking several times, waking up too early, or poor quality of sleep). Respondents who reported only one insomnia symptom were compared among insomnia subgroups and with no insomnia symptom controls with respect to demographics, health history, and health outcomes (Short Form-12v2, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire, and costs). Additional analyses compared respondents with only MOTN awakenings and matched controls on health outcomes. RESULTS: MOTN awakenings without other insomnia symptoms were reported by 3.5% of respondents. Poor quality of sleep was associated with the strongest effects on health status compared with other insomnia symptoms even after adjusting for demographic and health characteristics differences. Differences across insomnia symptoms with respect to cost-related outcomes were generally modest, though all were higher (if not significantly so) than respondents without insomnia. Respondents who experienced only waking several times and only MOTN awakenings had the highest direct costs, while respondents who experienced only poor quality of sleep and only difficulty falling asleep had the highest indirect costs. Respondents with only MOTN awakenings reported significantly worse mental and physical health status and worse health utilities relative to insomnia-free matched controls (all P<0.05). Annual per-employee indirect costs were also significantly higher ($4,328 vs $3,000; P<0.05). Among only MOTN awakenings respondents, 74.6% were considered only symptomatic (ie, they did not report having insomnia or having been diagnosed with insomnia). CONCLUSION: These findings collectively highlight the prevalence and socioeconomic impact of specific types of insomnia symptoms, including MOTN awakenings, experienced by adults in the US.

7.
PLoS One ; 9(1): e86070, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24465875

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization has called for global and regional assessments of the burden of hepatitis C (HCV) along with country-specific patient profiles to better inform healthcare policy. The present investigated the characteristics and burden of patients reporting a diagnosis of HCV infection in the US, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, urban China, and Japan using a consistent methodology of patient-reported surveys. METHODS: The 2010 5EU (N = 57,805), 2009 US (N = 75,000), 2008/2009 Japan (N = 37,683), and 2009/2010 urban China (N = 33,261) waves of the National Health and Wellness Survey were used as the data source. Within each country, patients with a self-reported diagnosis of HCV were compared with those who did not report a diagnosis of HCV on sociodemographics, health behaviors, comorbidities, and health outcomes (e.g., Short Form-12v2). The effect of HCV was examined using regression analysis applying sampling weights. RESULTS: The prevalence of HCV ranged from 0.26% (China) to 1.42% (Italy). Patients in Japan and Italy (61.60 and 61.02 years, respectively) were the oldest, while patients in the US were the most likely to be obese (39.31%) and have concomitant anxiety (38.43%) and depression (46.05%) compared with other countries. Pooling countries and adjusting for sociodemographics, health behaviors, and comorbidities, HCV was associated with significantly lower physical component summary scores (b = -2.51) and health utilities (b = -0.04) and greater overall work impairment (b = 8.79), physician visits (b = 2.91), and emergency department visits (b = 0.30) (all p<.05). The effects on health status were strongest in the US and UK while the effects on healthcare resource use were strongest in Japan. CONCLUSIONS: HCV was associated with a significant humanistic and economic burden. These results suggest that the manifestation of the HCV burden, and the profile of the patients themselves, varied dramatically by country. Successful disease management should be cognizant of region-specific unmet needs.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepacivirus/fisiología , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/epidemiología , Internacionalidad , Demografía , Eficiencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Hepatitis C Crónica/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
8.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 11: 175, 2013 Oct 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24148832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to quantify the burden of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) with respect to health-related quality of life, work productivity and activity impairment, and healthcare resource utilization. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2010 EU National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), which included participants from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK (5 EU, N = 57,805) as well as the 2010 US NHWS (N = 75,000). The NHWS is an annual, cross-sectional, self-administered Internet survey which employs a stratified random sampling frame to match the age and gender characteristics of the NHWS sample with known population statistics. Participants who self-reported a diagnosis of PAD were compared with participants who did not self-report a diagnosis of PAD on health-related quality of life (mental and physical component summary scores and health utilities from the Short Form-12v2), work productivity and activity impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire), and healthcare resource use in terms of the number of physician visits, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations in the past six months through regression modeling adjusting for demographics and health characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 743 (1.29%) and 777 (1.04%) participants self-reported a diagnosis of PAD in the 5 EU and US, respectively. After adjusting for demographics and health characteristics, patients with PAD reported worse health-related quality of life, as measured by health utilities (5 EU: 0.66 vs. 0.70; US: 0.66 vs. 0.72; all p < .05), greater overall work impairment percentage (5 EU: 38.27% vs. 27.48%; US: 23.89% vs. 14.26%) and greater healthcare resource use compared to participants without PAD (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a significant burden for patients with PAD in both the 5 EU countries and the US with respect to both quality of life and economic outcomes. Improved management of these patients may have profound effects from both patient and societal perspectives.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Eficiencia , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Trabajo , Adulto Joven
9.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 22(11): 983-90, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24083674

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of menopausal symptoms and menopausal symptom severity on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work impairment, healthcare utilization, and costs. METHODS: Data from the 2005 United States National Health and Wellness Survey were used, with only women 40-64 years without a history of cancer included in the analyses (N=8,811). Women who reported experiencing menopausal symptoms (n=4,116) were compared with women not experiencing menopausal symptoms (n=4,695) on HRQoL, work impairment, and healthcare utilization using regression modeling (and controlling for demographics and health characteristic differences). Additionally, individual menopausal symptoms were used as predictors of outcomes in a separate set of regression models. RESULTS: The mean age of women in the analysis was 49.8 years (standard deviation,±5.9). Women experiencing menopausal symptoms reported significantly lower levels of HRQoL and significantly higher work impairment, and healthcare utilization than women without menopausal symptoms. Depression, anxiety, and joint stiffness were symptoms with the strongest associations with health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Menopausal symptoms can be a significant humanistic and economic burden on women in middle age.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Eficiencia , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Menopausia/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Absentismo , Adulto , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Comorbilidad , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/economía , Estado de Salud , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Menopausia/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Autoinforme , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trabajo
10.
Int J Womens Health ; 5: 261-9, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23737678

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several studies have documented a significant association between vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and a decrement in health outcomes among postmenopausal women, but these studies have mostly focused on the US. The aim of the current study was to broaden this investigation by examining the burden of VMS symptoms in the European Union with respect to both humanistic and economic outcomes. METHODS: All women aged 40-75 years who completed the 2010 5EU (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) National Health and Wellness Survey were identified as potential respondents and invited to participate in an additional cross-sectional, Internet-based survey. Only postmenopausal women from 5EU were included in the current analyses (n = 3801). VMS was assessed using the Menopausal Rating Scale, and was used in multiple regression models as the primary predictor of health status (EQ-5D-3L), work productivity loss, and the number of physician visits due to menopause. RESULTS: Over half (50.3%) of postmenopausal women experienced either mild (24.6%), moderate (17.6%), or severe (8.1%) VMS. Controlling for confounding variables, mild (b = -0.03, P < 0.05), moderate (b = -0.07, P < 0.05), and severe VMS (b = -0.17, P < 0.05) were each associated with worse health utilities relative to women without VMS. Similarly, increased resource use (b = 1.04-2.39, all P < 0.05), overall work impairment (b = 8.71-19.69, all P < 0.05), and activity impairment (b = 11.22-24.54, all P < 0.05) were also observed as VMS severity increased (with each b representing the difference between each level of severity and the reference category). CONCLUSION: These results suggest a high prevalence of VMS in Western Europe. These symptoms are also associated with both humanistic and economic outcomes. Improved management of VMS may be able to increase the health status and ability to work productively as well as reduce societal direct costs.

11.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res ; 12(6): 821-9, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23252362

RESUMEN

Although gout has been found to be associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), few studies have examined the burden of gout in the presence of concomitant cardiometabolic conditions. The present study evaluated the effect of gout on HRQoL and work productivity among patients with hypertension. Data from the 2010 National Health and Wellness Survey were obtained for respondents ≥18 years of age who had self-reported, physician-diagnosed hypertension or blood pressure levels ≥140/90 mmHg (≥130/80 mmHg for those with physician-diagnosed diabetes or chronic kidney disease). Bivariate analysis was used to evaluate differences between patients with and without self-reported comorbid gout. Generalized linear models were used to evaluate differences in productivity (using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scale) and HRQoL (using the physical component summary [PCS], mental component summary and health utilities from the SF-12v2 health survey). As uric acid levels may influence other organ systems, core modeling did not include comorbidities other than osteoarthritis and depression as covariates. Sensitivity analyses were controlled for the Charlson comorbidity index. A total of 22,686 patients with self-reported hypertension met study eligibility requirements. Of these, 4.51% reported having gout. These patients were older, more likely to be male and have insurance through Veteran Affairs (all p-values < 0.05). Patients with comorbid gout reported lower levels of mental component summary scores (47.25 vs 48.93), PCS scores (39.06 vs 43.78) and health utilities (0.68 vs 0.73; all p-values < 0.05). For both PCS and health utilities, differences between groups exceeded clinically meaningful cutoffs. Sensitivity analyses conducted on PCS and health utilities uncovered slightly smaller, but statistically significant and clinically meaningful, effects (p-values < 0.05). The effect of gout on overall work impairment (23.33 vs 17.40% with and without comorbid gout, respectively) remained after controlling for the Charlson comorbidity index. Significantly greater impairment in daily activities (38.96 vs 28.32%; p < 0.05) was also observed among patients with comorbid gout. Results demonstrate that gout has significant and clinically meaningful impact on work productivity, physical HRQoL and utilities independent of other health conditions.


Asunto(s)
Gota/fisiopatología , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Eficiencia , Femenino , Gota/complicaciones , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estados Unidos
12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23226014

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent literature has suggested that emphysema and chronic bronchitis, traditionally considered to be entities overlapping within chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), may be distinct disorders. Few studies have examined the differences in patient characteristics and health outcomes between these conditions. This study examined whether COPD phenotypes represent distinct patient populations, in a large nationally representative US sample. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2010 US National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). NHWS respondents (n = 75,000) were categorized as a COPD phenotype based on their self-reported diagnosis of COPD only (n = 970), emphysema only (n = 399), or chronic bronchitis only (n = 2071). Phenotypes were compared on demographics, health characteristics, treatment patterns, health outcomes, work productivity, and resource use. Variables were compared using Chi-square and analysis of variance tests for categorical and continuous outcomes, respectively. Health outcomes were also examined using regression modeling, controlling for demographic and health characteristic covariates. RESULTS: Patients with chronic bronchitis were significantly younger (51.38 years versus 63.24 years for COPD versus 63.30 years for emphysema, P < 0.05) and more likely to be employed (46.98% versus 23.81% for COPD versus 28.33% for emphysema, P < 0.05). Relative to the other phenotypes, patients with chronic bronchitis were also significantly more likely to be female, nonwhite, and to exercise currently (all P < 0.05), and were significantly less likely to be a current or former smoker (P < 0.05). Controlling for demographic and health characteristics, patients self-identified as having COPD only reported significantly worse physical quality of life (adjusted mean 36.69) and health utilities (adjusted mean 0.65) and significantly more absenteeism (adjusted mean 7.08%), presenteeism (adjusted mean 30.73%), overall work impairment (adjusted mean 34.06%), and activity impairment (adjusted mean 46.59%) than the other phenotypes (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest considerable heterogeneity among different COPD phenotypes with respect to demographics, health characteristics, disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and health outcomes. Research aimed at understanding the differences in patient characteristics and disease presentation of these phenotypes could be used to guide treatment recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Bronquitis Crónica , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Enfisema Pulmonar , Absentismo , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Bronquitis Crónica/diagnóstico , Bronquitis Crónica/epidemiología , Bronquitis Crónica/terapia , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Costo de Enfermedad , Eficiencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Empleo , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Hospitalización , Humanos , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Enfisema Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Enfisema Pulmonar/epidemiología , Enfisema Pulmonar/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Factores Sexuales , Ausencia por Enfermedad , Fumar/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
13.
Clin Exp Gastroenterol ; 5: 203-12, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23162373

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several studies have examined the effect of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on health outcomes in Western Europe, but less research has focused on the constipation subtype (IBS-C). The current study addresses this gap by comparing patients with IBS-C and matched controls for health status, work productivity, and resource utilization. METHODS: Data were obtained from the 2010 5EU National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS), which includes respondents from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Only participants from France (n = 15,051), Italy (n = 7580), and the UK (n = 15,065) were included in the analyses. Respondents who reported a physician diagnosis of IBS and reported only constipation symptoms were compared with respondents who did not report being diagnosed with IBS using a propensity score-matching methodology (matching on sociodemographics, health behaviors, and comorbidities). Differences between patients with IBS-C and matched controls were examined on health status (Short Form Survey Instrument version 2), work productivity (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire), and health care resource use in the past 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 83 (0.55%), 109 (1.44%), and 204 (1.35%) respondents reported a diagnosis of IBS with only constipation symptoms in France, Italy, and the UK, respectively. Within each country, patients with IBS-C reported significantly worse health status compared with matched controls (all P < 0.05) and significantly more physician visits (all P < 0.05). More hospitalizations were also observed in the UK (P < 0.05). Among those who were employed, patients with IBS-C in France and the UK also reported significantly more presenteeism than matched controls (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings highlight the pervasive influence of IBS-C on the day-to-day functioning of sufferers, their ability to be productive at work, and their influence on the wider health care system. Significant unmet needs remain, and improved management of this condition could result in significant and clinically meaningful gains in health status as well as alleviating a societal cost burden.

14.
Gastroenterology ; 143(5): 1179-1187.e3, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22885331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastrointestinal (GI) diseases account for substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost. Statistical analyses of the most recent data are necessary to guide GI research, education, and clinical practice. We estimate the burden of GI disease in the United States. METHODS: We collected information on the epidemiology of GI diseases (including cancers) and symptoms, along with data on resource utilization, quality of life, impairments to work and activity, morbidity, and mortality. These data were obtained from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; National Health and Wellness Survey; Nationwide Inpatient Sample; Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; National Vital Statistics System; Thompson Reuters MarketScan; Medicare; Medicaid; and the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative's National Endoscopic Database. We estimated endoscopic use and costs and examined trends in endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: Abdominal pain was the most common GI symptom that prompted a clinic visit (15.9 million visits). Gastroesophageal reflux was the most common GI diagnosis (8.9 million visits). Hospitalizations and mortality from Clostridium difficile infection have doubled in the last 10 years. Acute pancreatitis was the most common reason for hospitalization (274,119 discharges). Colorectal cancer accounted for more than half of all GI cancers and was the leading cause of GI-related mortality (52,394 deaths). There were 6.9 million upper, 11.5 million lower, and 228,000 biliary endoscopies performed in 2009. The total cost for outpatient GI endoscopy examinations was $32.4 billion. CONCLUSIONS: GI diseases are a source of substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/economía , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/epidemiología , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estadísticas Vitales
15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22500121

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine quality of life, work productivity, and health care resource use among employed adults ages 40-64 years with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the United States. METHODS: Data from the 2009 National Health and Wellness Survey were used. All employed adults ages 40-64 years with or without a self-reported diagnosis of COPD were included in the study. Impact on quality of life (using the mental and physical component summary scores and health utilities from the Short Form-12v2), work productivity and activity impairment (using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire), and resource use were analyzed using regression modeling. RESULTS: There were 1112 employed adults with COPD versus 18,912 employed adults without COPD. After adjusting for demographics and patient characteristics, adults with COPD reported significantly lower mean levels of mental component summary (46.8 vs 48.5), physical component summary (45.6 vs 49.2), and health utilities (0.71 vs 0.75) than adults without COPD. Workers with COPD reported significantly greater presenteeism (18.9% vs 14.3%), overall work impairment (20.5% vs 16.3%), and impairment in daily activities (23.5% vs 17.9%) than adults without COPD. Employed adults with COPD also reported more mean emergency room visits (0.21 vs 0.12) and more mean hospitalizations (0.10 vs 0.06) in the previous 6 months than employed adults without COPD. All of the above differences were significant at two-sided P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: After adjusting for various confounders, employed adults with COPD reported significantly lower quality of life and work productivity, and increased health care resource utilization than employed adults without COPD. These results highlight the substantial impact and burden of COPD in the United States workforce.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia , Empleo , Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Calidad de Vida , Absentismo , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Costo de Enfermedad , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Hospitalización , Humanos , Modelos Lineales , Modelos Logísticos , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/psicología , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 10: 30, 2012 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22420468

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although osteoarthritis (OA) often affects older persons, it has a profound effect on individuals actively employed. Despite reports of reduced productivity among workers with OA, data are limited regarding the impact of OA among workers. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of self-rated OA severity on quality of life, healthcare resource utilization, productivity and costs in an employed population relative to employed individuals without OA. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis used data derived from the 2009 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Multivariable analyses characterized outcomes and costs (direct medical costs and indirect) among workers (full-time, part-time, or self-employed) ≥ 20 years of age who were diagnosed with OA and who self-rated their OA severity as mild, moderate, or severe relative to workers without OA. Evaluated outcomes included productivity, assessed using the Work Productivity and Impairment (WPAI) scale; health-related quality of life, using the SF-12v2 Health Survey; and healthcare resource utilization. RESULTS: 4,876 workers reported being diagnosed with OA (45.0% mild, 45.9% moderate, and 9.1% severe); 34,896 workers comprised the non-OA comparator cohort. There was a greater proportion of females in the OA cohort (55.5% vs 45.6%; P < 0.0001) and more individuals in the 40-64 year and ≥ 65 year age ranges (P < 0.0001). As OA severity increased, workers reported more frequent pain, poorer quality of life, greater use of specific healthcare resources (hospitalizations) and reduced productivity. All outcomes indicated a significantly greater burden among workers with OA relative to those without OA (P < 0.0001). Estimated total annual costs per worker were $9,801 for mild OA, $14,761 for moderate OA, $22,111 for severe OA compared with $7,901 for workers without OA (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Workers with OA were characterized by significant disease and economic burdens relative to workers without OA that substantially increased with greater self-rated OA severity. Greater levels of OA severity were associated with reductions in quality of life and productivity, and increases in healthcare resource utilization and costs.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Empleo , Osteoartritis/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Absentismo , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Empleo/psicología , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Osteoartritis/economía , Osteoartritis/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Trabajo/fisiología
17.
Value Health ; 15(2): 299-304, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22433761

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to estimate the time to breakeven and 5-year net costs of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) taking both direct and indirect costs and cost savings into account. METHODS: Estimates of direct cost savings from LAGB were available from the literature. Although longitudinal data on indirect cost savings were not available, these estimates were generated by quantifying the relationship between medical expenditures and absenteeism and between medical expenditures and presenteeism (reduced on-the-job productivity) and combining these elasticity estimates with estimates of the direct cost savings to generate total savings. These savings were then combined with the direct and indirect costs of the procedure to quantify net savings. RESULTS: By including indirect costs, the time to breakeven was reduced by half a year, from 16 to 14 quarters. After 5 years, net savings in medical expenditures from a gastric banding procedure were estimated to be $4970 (±$3090). Including absenteeism increased savings to $6180 (±$3550). Savings were further increased to $10,960 (±$5864) when both absenteeism and presenteeism estimates were included. CONCLUSIONS: This study presented a novel approach for including absenteeism and presenteeism estimates in cost-benefit analyses. Application of the approach to gastric banding among surgery-eligible obese employees revealed that the inclusion of indirect costs and cost savings improves the business case for the procedure. This approach can easily be extended to other populations and treatments.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/economía , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Laparoscopía/economía , Absentismo , Adulto , Algoritmos , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Costos y Análisis de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad/cirugía , Estados Unidos
18.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 11(1): 14-9, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22337216

RESUMEN

This retrospective, observational study was conducted to determine overlap of prevalence between atrial fibrillation (AF), an increasingly common condition that primarily affects the elderly population, and dyspepsia, which is also common. Because the overlap of these conditions could interfere with health care including medication selection, the effect on patient outcomes was also evaluated. A demographically representative population of adults in the United States self-administered an Internet-based questionnaire, and responses were evaluated to determine the presence of AF and measures of comorbidity, including CHADS2 score of stroke risk. Health-related quality of life, work productivity and activity impairment, and health care resource utilization were also assessed. The impact of dyspepsia on these patient outcomes was then examined with multiple regressions and generalized linear models. From the sample population, 1297 participants reported being diagnosed with AF, of whom 34% (449/1297) reported diagnosis of dyspepsia. Those with dyspepsia had a higher mean CHADS2 score than those without dyspepsia. Despite this higher risk, significantly fewer AF patients with dyspepsia than those without dyspepsia were taking either prescription medication to treat AF or anticoagulants for stroke prevention. Dyspepsia was associated with significantly lower levels of both mental and physical health-related quality of life. Work and activity impairment and health care resource utilization were also significantly higher among AF patients with dyspepsia than among those without. The burden of dyspepsia in AF patients should be considered during medication selection. Selection of agents associated with lower rates of dyspepsia may lead to greater patient acceptance of and adherence to therapy.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial , Costo de Enfermedad , Dispepsia/epidemiología , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/organización & administración , Ajuste de Riesgo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Análisis Multivariante , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo/métodos , Ajuste de Riesgo/organización & administración , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
COPD ; 9(1): 46-57, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22292597

RESUMEN

Abstract To address the gap in knowledge about the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on older working adults, this study examined quality of life, worker productivity, and healthcare resource utilization among employed adults aged 65 and older with and without COPD. Among 2009 National Health and Wellness Survey (a cross-sectional, internet-based survey representative of the US adult population) respondents, employed adults aged 65 years and older, with COPD (n = 297) and without COPD (n = 3061), were included in analyses. Impact of self-reported COPD diagnosis on mean quality of life (using health utilities and mental, MCS, and physical, PCS, component summary scores from SF-12v2), work productivity and activity impairment (using the WPAI questionnaire), and resource use were examined. Adjusting for demographic and health characteristics such as co-morbidities (weighted to project to the US population) in regression models (linear, negative binomial, or logistic, as appropriate given the outcome measure), older workers with COPD reported significantly lower MCS (52.1 vs. 53.4, p < .05), PCS (40.3 vs. 47.2, p < .05), and health utilities (0.72 vs. 0.79, p < .05) than those without COPD, and significantly greater percentages of impairment while at work (presenteeism) (12.6% vs. 8.7%, p < .0001), overall work impairment (absenteeism and presenteeism combined) (19.3% vs. 10.0%, p < .05), and impairment in daily activities (23.9% vs. 13.7%, p < .05). There were no significant differences in absenteeism or healthcare use. Quality of life and work productivity suffered among employed adults aged 65 years and older with COPD, emphasizing the need for disease management in this population.


Asunto(s)
Eficiencia Organizacional , Empleo , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Absentismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Población Negra , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
20.
Value Health ; 15(1 Suppl): S65-71, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22265070

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Viral hepatitis C (HCV) affects 170 million patients worldwide and 2 million patients in Japan. The objective of the current study was to examine the burden of HCV in Japan from a patient's perspective. METHODS: Using data from the 2008 and 2009 Japan National Health and Wellness Surveys, patients who reported an HCV diagnosis (n = 306) were compared with a propensity-score-matched control group (n = 306) on measures of quality of life (using the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Survey Instrument version 2), work productivity (using the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire), and health-care resource use. All analyses applied sampling weights to project to the population. RESULTS: Prior to matching, patients with HCV had higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (4.88% vs. 0.02%) and cirrhosis (12.20% vs. 0.11%) than did subjects without HCV. The propensity-matching process eliminated differences between the two groups on demographics and patient characteristics. The postmatching analysis found significantly lower levels of quality of life for patients with HCV as measured by bodily pain (72.07 vs. 76.28), general health (44.64 vs. 48.61), and mental health (66.50 vs. 70.32) (all Ps < 0.05). Furthermore, compared with the matched group, the HCV group had significantly higher workplace absenteeism (8.59% vs. 4.12%), overall work impairment (26.08% vs. 17.32%), and health-care provider visits in the past 6 months (14.80 vs. 9.74). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that HCV can be a substantial burden on patients in terms of quality of life in both physical and mental health measures. In addition, HCV can be a significant cost driver in terms of health-care use and lost productivity.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Hepatitis C/economía , Calidad de Vida , Absentismo , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Eficiencia , Femenino , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado de Salud , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Cirrosis Hepática/economía , Cirrosis Hepática/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Masculino , Salud Mental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...