Thoracotomy in the emergency department for resuscitation of the mortally injured.

PURPOSE: Emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy is an intervention of last resort for the acutely dying victim of trauma. In light of improvements in pre-hospital emergency systems, improved operative strategies for survival such as damage control and improvements in critical care medicine, the most extreme of resuscitation efforts should be re-evaluated for the potential survivor, with success properly defined as the return of vital signs which allow transport of the patient to the operating room. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients at a suburban level I trauma center who underwent emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy as an adjunct to the resuscitation efforts normally delivered in the trauma receiving area over a 22 year period was performed. Survival of emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy was defined as restoration of vital signs and transport out of the trauma resuscitation area to the operating room. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were identified, of whom 27 survived the emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy and were transported to the operating room. Review of pre-hospital and initial hospital data between these potential long term survivors and those who died in the emergency department failed to demonstrate trends which were predictive of survival of emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy. The only subgroup which failed to respond to emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy was patients without signs of life at the scene who arrived to the treatment facility without signs of life. CONCLUSION: The patient population of the "potential survivor" has been expanded due to advances in critical care practices, technology, and surgical technique and every opportunity for survival should be provided at the outset. Emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy is warranted for any patient with thoracic or subdiaphragmatic trauma who presents in extremis with a history of signs of life at the scene or organized cardiac activity upon arrival. Patients who have no evidence of signs of life at the scene and have no organized cardiac activity upon arrival should be pronounced.

Clearing the cervical spine in victims of blunt trauma.

Cervical spine injuries occur in 2.3% to 6.4% of victims of blunt trauma. The difficulty of identifying the minority of patients with cervical spine injuries continues to challenge those who triage and treat the acutely injured. We retrospectively reviewed our practice for cervical spine clearance, which consists of three-view plain radiographs supplemented by focused further studies, such as computed or plain film tomography and flexion/extension views, as needed. Fifty-four patients with cervical spine injuries were identified during a 39-month period, which represented approximately 1% of the patients evaluated. Eighty cervical spine injuries were found, of which nine were missed. Review of the six patients in whom the nine cervical spine injuries were missed demonstrated error in the interpretation of radiographic studies in five patients, only two of whom were felt to have technically adequate films in hindsight. We conclude that a protocol based on three-view plain film radiographs supplemented by focused additional studies will allow the visualization of virtually all cervical spine injuries and that the main cause of missed injuries is errors of interpretation.