Immunotherapy With Interferon α11, But Not Interferon Beta, Controls Persistent Retroviral Infection.

Type I Interferons (IFNs), including numerous IFNα subtypes and IFNß, are key molecules during innate and adaptive immune responses against viral infections. These cytokines exert various non-redundant biological activities, although binding to the same receptor. Persistent viral infections are often characterized by increased IFN signatures implicating a potential role of type I IFNs in disease pathogenesis. Using the well-established Friend retrovirus (FV) mouse model, we compared the therapeutic efficacy of IFNα11 and IFNß in acute and chronic retroviral infection. We observed a strong antiviral activity of both IFNs during acute FV infection, whereas only IFNα11 and not IFNß could also control persistent FV infection. The therapeutic treatment with IFNα11 induced the expression of antiviral IFN-stimulated genes (ISG) and improved cytotoxic T cell responses. Finally, dysfunctional CD8+ T cells solely regained cytotoxicity after IFNα11 treatment. Our data provide evidence for opposing activities of type I IFNs during chronic retroviral infections. IFNß was shown to be involved in immune dysfunction in chronic infections, whereas IFNα11 had a strong antiviral potential and reactivated exhausted T cells during persistent retroviral infection. In contrast, during acute infection, both type I IFNs were able to efficiently suppress FV replication.

Diverse Immunomodulatory Effects of Individual IFNα Subtypes on Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses.

Clinical administration of Interferon α (IFNα) resulted in limited therapeutic success against some viral infections. Immune modulation of CD8+ T cell responses during IFNα therapy is believed to play a pivotal role in promoting viral clearance. However, these clinical studies primarily focused on IFNα subtype 2. To date, the immunomodulatory roles of the remaining 10-13 IFNα subtypes remains poorly understood, thereby precluding assessments of their potential for more effective treatments. Here, we report that virus-specific CD8+ T cell responses were influenced to various extents by individual IFNα subtypes. IFNα4, 6, and 9 had the strongest effects on CD8+ T cells, including antiproliferative effects, improved cytokine production and cytotoxicity. Interestingly, augmented cytokine responses were dependent on IFNα subtype stimulation of dendritic cells (DCs), while antiproliferative effects and cytotoxicity were mediated by IFNAR signaling in either CD8+ T cells or DCs. Thus, precise modulation of virus-specific CD8+ T cell responses may be feasible for specific antiviral immunotherapies through careful selection and administration of individual IFNα subtypes.

Impact of immune suppressive agents on the BK-Polyomavirus non coding control region.

BACKGROUND: Reactivation of the BK-Polyomavirus (BKPyV) can cause a polyomavirus associated nephropathy in approx. 10% of kidney transplant recipients. In these cases, current therapy is based on the reduction of immunosuppression. Since BKPyV-transcription is driven by the Non-Coding-Control-Region (NCCR) we were interested whether NCCR-activity is affected by immunosuppressive agents. METHODS: Plasma samples from 45 BKPyV-positive patients after renal transplantation were subjected to PCR-analysis. NCCR-amplicons were cloned into a plasmid that allows the quantification of early and late NCCR-activity by tdTomato and eGFP expression, respectively. HEK293T-cells were transfected with the reporter-plasmids, treated with immunosuppressive agents, and subjected to FACS-analysis. In addition, H727-cells were infected with patient derived BKPyV, treated with mTOR-inhibitors, and NCCR activity was analysed using qRT-PCR. RESULTS: While tacrolimus and cyclosporine-A did not affect NCCR-promoter-activity, treatment with mTOR1-inhibitor rapamycin resulted in the reduction of early, but not late-NCCR-promoter-activity. Treatment with dual mTOR1/2 inhibitors (INK128 or pp242) led to significant inhibition of early, however, concomitantly enhanced late-promoter-activity. In BKPyV infected cells both rapamycin and INK128 reduced early expression, however, INK128 resulted in higher late-mRNA levels when compared to rapamycin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that mTOR1-inhibitors are able to reduce early-expression of wildtype and rearranged NCCRs, which might contribute to previously described inhibition of BKPyV-replication. Dual mTOR1/2-inhibitors, however, additionally might shift viral early into late-expression promoting synthesis of viral structural proteins and particle production.

Induction of Type I Interferons by Therapeutic Nanoparticle-Based Vaccination Is Indispensable to Reinforce Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cell Responses During Chronic Retroviral Infection.

T cell dysfunction and immunosuppression are characteristic for chronic viral infections and contribute to viral persistence. Overcoming these burdens is the goal of new therapeutic strategies to cure chronic infectious diseases. We recently described that therapeutic vaccination of chronic retrovirus infected mice with a calcium phosphate (CaP) nanoparticle (NP)-based vaccine carrier, functionalized with CpG and viral peptides is able to efficiently reactivate the CD8+ T cell response and improve the eradication of virus infected cells. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect were largely unclear. While type I interferons (IFNs I) are considered to drive T cell exhaustion by persistent immune activation during chronic viral infection, we here describe an indispensable role of IFN I induced by therapeutic vaccination to efficiently reinforce cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CTL) and improve control of chronic retroviral infection. The induction of IFN I is CpG dependent and leads to significant IFN signaling indicated by upregulation of IFN stimulated genes. By vaccinating chronically retrovirus-infected mice lacking the IFN I receptor (IFNAR-/-) or by blocking IFN I signaling in vivo during therapeutic vaccination, we demonstrate that IFN I signaling is necessary to drive full reactivation of CTLs. Surprisingly, we also identified an impaired suppressive capability of regulatory T cells in the presence of IFNα, which implicates an important role for vaccine-induced IFNα in the regulation of the T cell response during chronic retroviral infection. Our data suggest that inducing IFN I signaling in conjunction with the presentation of viral antigens can reactivate immune functions and reduce viral loads in chronic infections. Therefore, we propose CaP NPs as potential therapeutic tool to treat chronic infections.

Interferon α subtypes in HIV infection.

Type I interferons (IFN), which are immediately induced after most virus infections, are central for direct antiviral immunity and link innate and adaptive immune responses. However, several viruses have evolved strategies to evade the IFN response by preventing IFN induction or blocking IFN signaling pathways. Thus, therapeutic application of exogenous type I IFN or agonists inducing type I IFN responses are a considerable option for future immunotherapies against chronic viral infections. An important part of the type I IFN family are 12 IFNα subtypes, which all bind the same receptor, but significantly differ in their biological activities. Up to date only one IFNα subtype (IFNα2) is being used in clinical treatment against chronic virus infections, however its therapeutic success rate is rather limited, especially during Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection. Recent studies addressed the important question if other IFNα subtypes would be more potent against retroviral infections in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Indeed, very potent IFNα subtypes were defined and their antiviral and immunomodulatory properties were characterized. In this review we summarize the recent findings on the role of individual IFNα subtypes during HIV and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus infection. This includes their induction during HIV/SIV infection, their antiretroviral activity and the regulation of immune response against HIV by different IFNα subtypes. The findings might facilitate novel strategies for HIV cure or functional cure studies.

Different antiviral effects of IFNα and IFNß in an HBV mouse model.

Interferons α and ß (IFNα and IFNß) are type I interferons produced by the host to control pathogen propagation. However, only a minority of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients generate a sustained response after treatment with recombinant IFNα. The anti-HBV effect of IFNß and the underlying mechanism are not well-understood. Here, we compared the antiviral activities of IFNα and IFNß by application of IFNα or IFNß expression plasmids using the well-established HBV hydrodynamic injection (HI) mouse model. Injection of IFNα expression plasmid could significantly reduce HBV serum markers including HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA as well as the number of HBcAg positive cells in the liver, while IFNß showed only a weak inhibition of HBV replication. In contrast to IFNß, IFNα resulted in elevated expression levels of IFN stimulated genes (ISGs) as well as the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 6 (IL6) in the liver. Moreover, IFNß treated mice showed higher expression levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL10 and TGFß in the liver compared to IFNα. Our results demonstrated that both IFNα and IFNß exert antiviral activities against HBV in HI mouse model, but IFNα is more effective than IFNß.