Defining the value of medical microbiology consultation.

Medical microbiologists, defined as doctoral-level laboratory directors with subspecialty training in medical microbiology, lead the clinical laboratory operations through activities such as clinical consultations, oversight of diagnostic testing menu, institutional leadership, education, and scholastic activities. However, unlike their clinical colleagues, medical microbiologists are largely unable to bill for clinical consultations performed within the hospital and, therefore, unable to generate relative value units or a similar quantifiable metric. As hospital budgets tighten and justification of staffing becomes a necessity, this may present a challenge to the medical microbiologist attempting to prove their value to the organization. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. Consults were generated equally from internal (laboratory-based) and external (hospital-based) parties, with the majority directly impacting patient management. Near universal acceptance of the medical microbiologist's recommendation highlights the worth derived from their expertise. External consults required more time commitment from the medical microbiologist than internal consults, although both presented ample opportunity for secondary value, including impact through stewardship, education, clinical guidance, and cost reduction. This study is a description of the content and impact of consultations that underscore the importance of the medical microbiologist as a key member of the healthcare team. IMPORTANCE: Medical microbiologists are invaluable to the clinical microbiology laboratory and the healthcare system as a whole. However, as medical microbiologists do not regularly generate relative value units, capturing and quantifying the value provided is challenging. As hospital budgets tighten, justification of staffing becomes a necessity. To aid in providing tangible data, the Personnel Standards and Workforce subcommittee of the American Society for Microbiology conducted a multi-center study across seven medical centers to document clinical consultations and their impact. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide detailed evaluation of the consultative value provided by medical microbiologists.

Development of an automated amplicon-based next-generation sequencing pipeline for rapid detection of bacteria and fungi directly from clinical specimens.

The timely identification of microbial pathogens is essential to guide targeted antimicrobial therapy and ultimately, successful treatment of an infection. However, the yield of standard microbiology testing (SMT) is directly related to the duration of antecedent antimicrobial therapy as SMT culture methods are dependent on the recovery of viable organisms, the fastidious nature of certain pathogens, and other pre-analytic factors. In the last decade, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been successfully utilized as a diagnostic tool for various applications within the clinical laboratory. However, mNGS is resource, time, and labor-intensive-requiring extensive laborious preliminary benchwork, followed by complex bioinformatic analysis. We aimed to address these shortcomings by developing a largely Automated targeted Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (tmNGS) PipeLine for rapId inFectIous disEase Diagnosis (AMPLIFIED) to detect bacteria and fungi directly from clinical specimens. Therefore, AMPLIFIED may serve as an adjunctive approach to complement SMT. This tmNGS pipeline requires less than 1 hour of hands-on time before sequencing and less than 2 hours of total processing time, including bioinformatic analysis. We performed tmNGS on 50 clinical specimens with concomitant cultures to assess feasibility and performance in the hospital laboratory. Of the 50 specimens, 34 (68%) were from true clinical infections. Specimens from cases of true infection were more often tmNGS positive compared to those from the non-infected group (82.4% vs 43.8%, respectively, P = 0.0087). Overall, the clinical sensitivity of AMPLIFIED was 54.6% with 85.7% specificity, equating to 70.6% and 75% negative and positive predictive values, respectively. AMPLIFIED represents a rapid supplementary approach to SMT; the typical time from specimen receipt to identification of potential pathogens by AMPLIFIED is roughly 24 hours which is markedly faster than the days, weeks, and months required to recover bacterial, fungal, and mycobacterial pathogens by culture, respectively. IMPORTANCE: To our knowledge, this represents the first application of an automated sequencing and bioinformatics pipeline in an exclusively pediatric population. Next-generation sequencing is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and requires experienced personnel; perhaps contributing to hesitancy among clinical laboratories to adopt such a test. Here, we report a strong case for use by removing these barriers through near-total automation of our sequencing pipeline.

The Report Says What?: How the Medical Microbiologist can aid in the Interpretation of Next-Generation Sequencing Results.

The applications of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the clinical microbiology laboratory are expanding at a rapid pace. The medical microbiologist thus plays a key role in translating the results of these emerging technologies to the practicing clinician. Here we discuss the factors to consider to successfully develop standardized reporting for microbial targeted or metagenomic NGS testing in the clinical laboratory.

Clinical Impact of Multiplex Molecular Diagnostic Testing in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis Presenting to an Emergency Department: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Multiplex molecular diagnostic panels have greatly enhanced detection of gastrointestinal pathogens. However, data on the impact of these tests on clinical and patient-centered outcomes are limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, stepped-wedge trial to determine the impact of multiplex molecular testing at 5 academic children's hospitals on children presenting to the emergency department with acute gastroenteritis. Caregivers were interviewed on enrollment and 7-10 days after enrollment to determine symptoms, risk factors, subsequent medical visits, and impact on family members. During the pre-intervention period, diagnostic testing was performed at the clinician's discretion . During the intervention period, multiplex molecular testing was performed on all children, with results available to clinicians. The primary outcome was return visits to a healthcare provider within 10 days of enrollment. RESULTS: Potential pathogens were identified by clinician-ordered tests in 19 of 571 (3.3%) in the pre-intervention period compared with 434 of 586 (74%) in the intervention period; clinically relevant pathogens were detected in 2.1% and 15%, respectively. In the multivariate model, the intervention was associated with a 21% reduction in the odds of any return visit (odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, .70-.90) after adjusting for potential confounders. Appropriate treatment was prescribed in 11.3% compared with 19.6% during the intervention period (P = .22). CONCLUSIONS: Routine molecular multiplex testing for all children who presented to the ED with acute gastroenteritis detected more clinically relevant pathogens and led to a 21% decrease in return visits. Additional research is needed to define patients most likely to benefit from testing. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02248285.

Comparative genomics reveals the correlations of stress response genes and bacteriophages in developing antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus saprophyticus.

IMPORTANCE: Staphylococcus saprophyticus is the second most common bacteria associated with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in women. The antimicrobial treatment regimen for uncomplicated UTI is normally nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), or a fluoroquinolone without routine susceptibility testing of S. saprophyticus recovered from urine specimens. However, TMP-SMX-resistant S. saprophyticus has been detected recently in UTI patients, as well as in our cohort. Herein, we investigated the understudied resistance patterns of this pathogenic species by linking genomic antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) content to susceptibility phenotypes. We describe ARG associations with known and novel SCCmec configurations as well as phage elements in S. saprophyticus, which may serve as intervention or diagnostic targets to limit resistance transmission. Our analyses yielded a comprehensive database of phenotypic data associated with the ARG sequence in clinical S. saprophyticus isolates, which will be crucial for resistance surveillance and prediction to enable precise diagnosis and effective treatment of S. saprophyticus UTIs.

Multicenter evaluation of the BIOFIRE Joint Infection Panel for the detection of bacteria, yeast, and AMR genes in synovial fluid samples.

The bioMérieux BIOFIRE Joint Infection (JI) Panel is a multiplex in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous and rapid (~1 h) detection of 39 potential pathogens and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes directly from synovial fluid (SF) samples. Thirty-one species or groups of microorganisms are included in the kit, as well as several AMR genes. This study, performed to evaluate the BIOFIRE JI Panel for regulatory clearance, provides data from a multicenter evaluation of 1,544 prospectively collected residual SF samples with performance compared to standard-of-care (SOC) culture for organisms or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing for AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.9% or greater for all but six organisms and a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 100% for all AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel demonstrated a specificity of 98.5% or greater for detection of all organisms and a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 95.7% or greater for all AMR genes. The BIOFIRE JI Panel provides an improvement over SOC culture, with a substantially shorter time to result for both organisms and AMR genes with excellent sensitivity/PPA and specificity/NPA, and is anticipated to provide timely and actionable diagnostic information for joint infections in a variety of clinical scenarios.

Clinical utility of SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RT-PCR in a pediatric quaternary care setting.

BACKGROUND: During active transcription, SARS-CoV-2 generates subgenomic regions of viral RNA. While standard SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR amplifies region(s) of genomic RNA, it cannot distinguish active infection from remnant viral genomic material. However, screening for subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) by RT-PCR may aid in the determination of actively transcribing virus. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical utility of SARS-CoV-2 sgRNA RT-PCR testing in a pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis was performed on inpatients from February-September 2022 positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR with a concomitant order for sgRNA RT-PCR. Chart abstractions were conducted to determine clinical outcomes, management, and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices. RESULTS: Of 95 SARS-CoV-2 positive samples from 75 unique patients, 27 (28.4%) were positive by sgRNA RT-PCR. A negative sgRNA RT-PCR test allowed for de-isolation in 68 (71.6%) patient episodes. Regardless of age or sex, a positive sgRNA RT-PCR result significantly correlated with disease severity (P = 0.007), generalized COVID-19 symptoms (P = 0.012), hospitalization for COVID-19 (P = 0.019), and immune status (P = 0.024). Moreover, sgRNA RT-PCR results prompted changes in management in 28 patients (37.3%); specifically, therapeutic escalation in 13/27 (48.1%) positives and de-escalation in 15/68 (22.1%) negatives. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these findings underscore the clinical utility of sgRNA RT-PCR testing in a pediatric population as we report significant associations between sgRNA RT-PCR results and clinical parameters related to COVID-19. These findings align with the proposed use of sgRNA RT-PCR testing to guide patient management and IPC practices in the hospital setting.

The Clinical Performance of the BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel for the Detection of Viruses and Bacteria from Nasopharyngeal Swabs.

Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) utilizes reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify respiratory pathogens. This panel qualitatively detects and identifies 14 viruses, including influenza virus A with H1 pdm09, H1, and H3 subtyping; influenza B; respiratory syncytial virus (RSV); human metapneumovirus; parainfluenza virus 1; parainfluenza virus 2; parainfluenza virus 3; parainfluenza virus 4; coronavirus (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1); adenovirus; and human rhinovirus/enterovirus, and 3 bacteria, including Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Bordetella pertussis. Reproducibility, which was assessed with contrived specimens containing 12 targets at 3 clinical sites, with 2 operators at each site for 5 days, was 99.4% for Flu A H3 and Flu B, 98.9% for RSV, and 100% for the remaining 9 targets assayed. A multicenter clinical trial evaluated the performance of the BioCode RPP with 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from 5 geographically distinct sites and revealed comparable performance between the BioCode RPP and FilmArray Respiratory Panel (FA-RP). Specifically, the positive percent agreements (PPAs) for various pathogens ranged between 80.8% and 100% compared with the FA-RP (1.7 and 2.0). Negative percent agreement ranged from 98.4% to 100% for BioCode RPP. The BioCode RPP also offers scalable automated testing capability of up to 96 specimens in a single run with total sample-to-result time under 5 h. The invalid rate of the BioCode RPP on initial testing was 1.0% (26/2,649). IMPORTANCE Early detection of microbial pathogens causing respiratory tract infection plays a crucial role in clinical management. The BioCode Respiratory Pathogen Panel (BioCode RPP) is a high-throughput test that utilizes RT-PCR in combination with barcoded magnetic beads to amplify, detect, and identify 17 respiratory pathogens, including 14 viruses and 3 bacteria. This study summarizes data generated from a multicenter clinical trial evaluating the performance of the BioCode RPP on 2,647 nasopharyngeal swab specimens from five geographically distinct sites.

Evaluation of Piperacillin-Tazobactam Testing against Enterobacterales by the Phoenix, MicroScan, and Vitek2 Tests Using Updated Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Breakpoints.

In 2022, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) updated piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) breakpoints for Enterobacterales, based on substantial data suggesting that historical breakpoints did not predict treatment outcomes for TZP. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not yet adopted these breakpoints, meaning commercial manufacturers of antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices cannot obtain FDA clearance for the revised breakpoints. We evaluated the Phoenix (BD, Sparks, MD), MicroScan (Beckman Coulter, Sacramento, CA), and Vitek2 (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) TZP MICs compared to reference broth microdilution for a collection of 284 Enterobacterales isolates. Phoenix (n = 167 isolates) demonstrated 84.4% categorical agreement (CA), with 4.2% very major errors (VMEs) and 1.8% major errors (MEs) by CLSI breakpoints. In contrast, CA was 85.0% with 4.3% VMEs and 0.8% MEs for the Phoenix with FDA breakpoints. MicroScan (n = 55 isolates) demonstrated 80.0% CA, 36.4% VMEs, and 4.8% MEs by CLSI breakpoints and 81.8% CA, 44.4% VMEs, and 0.0% MEs by FDA breakpoints. Vitek2 (n = 62 isolates) demonstrated 95.2% CA, 6.3% VMEs, and 0.0% MEs by CLSI and 96.8% CA, 0.0% VMEs, and 2.2% MEs by FDA breakpoints. Overall, the performance of the test systems was not substantially different using CLSI breakpoints off-label than using on-label FDA breakpoints. However, limitations were noted with higher-than-desired VME rates (all three systems) and lower-than-desired CA (MicroScan and Phoenix). Laboratories should consider adoption of the revised CLSI breakpoints with automated test systems but be aware that some performance challenges exist for testing TZP on automated systems, regardless of breakpoints applied.

Evaluation of the Performance of Manual Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods and Disk Breakpoints for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are an emerging cause of serious infections with high associated mortality in immunocompromised patients. Treatment of S. maltophilia infections is complicated by intrinsic resistance to many antimicrobials, including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and some cephalosporins. Despite this, >90% of isolates are susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), which is front-line therapy for this organism. Side-effects of SXT include bone marrow suppression, which precludes its use for many neutropenic patients. In this population, levofloxacin (LEV), minocycline (MIN), ceftazidime (CAZ), ciprofloxacin (CIP) and tigecycline (TIG) are used as alternative therapies - all of which require testing to inform susceptibilities. The reference standard method for testing S. maltophilia is broth microdilution (BMD), but very few clinical laboratories perform reference BMD. Furthermore, interpretive criteria are not available for CIP or TIG for S. maltophilia, although generic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) MIC breakpoints are available for these drugs. We assessed performance of disk and gradient diffusion tests relative to BMD for 109 contemporary isolates of S. maltophilia Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV and MIN disk diffusion was 93%, 89%, and 95%, respectively. Categorical agreement for SXT, LEV, MIN and CAZ gradient strips was 98%, 85%, 93%, 71%, respectively by Etest (bioMerieux), and 98%, 83%, 99%, and 73%, by MTS (Liofilchem). CIP and TGC, two clinically valuable alternatives to SXT, did not demonstrate promising disk to MIC correlates using CLSI M100 P. aeruginosa or PK/PD breakpoints. Manual commercial tests perform well for S. maltophilia, with the exception of tests for LEV and CAZ, where high error rates were observed.

Reporting of Antimicrobial Resistance from Blood Cultures, an Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Survey Summary: Resistance Marker Reporting Practices from Positive Blood Cultures.

BACKGROUND: We assessed how laboratories use and handle reporting of results of rapid diagnostics performed on positive blood culture broths, with a focus on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers. METHODS: A survey assembled by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Diagnostics Committee was circulated from December 2020 to May 2021. The survey was sent to local hospitals, shared on the ClinMicroNet and Division C listservs, and included in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey. RESULTS: Ninety-six laboratories of various sizes across the United States (95%) and outside of the United States (5%) participated. Of the laboratories that had at least 1 rapid diagnostic in place (94%), significant heterogeneity in methods used and reporting practices was found across community (52%) and academic (40%) laboratories serving hospitals of various sizes. Respondents had implemented 1 to 6 different panels/platforms for a total of 31 permutations. Methods of reporting rapid organism identification and AMR results varied from listing all targets as "detected"/"not detected" (16-22%) without interpretive guidance, to interpreting results (23-42%), or providing therapeutic guidance comments to patient-facing healthcare teams (3-17%). CONCLUSIONS: Current approaches to reporting molecular AMR test results from positive blood culture vary significantly across clinical laboratories. Providing interpretative comments with therapeutic guidance alongside results reported may assist clinicians who are not well-versed in genetic mechanisms of AMR. However, this is currently not being done in all clinical laboratories. Standardized strategies for AMR gene result reporting are needed.

COVID-19 outcomes in children, adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Pediatric oncology patients are at risk for poor outcomes with respiratory viral infections. Outcome data for COVID-19 in children and young adults with cancer are needed; data are sparse for obese/overweight and adolescent and young adult subgroups. We conducted a single center cohort study of COVID-19 outcomes in patients younger than 25 years with cancer. Candidate hospitalization risk factors were analyzed via univariable and multivariable analyses. Eighty-seven patients with cancer and COVID-19 were identified. Most were Hispanic/Latinx (n = 63, 72%). Forty-two (48%) were overweight/obese. Anticancer therapy included chemotherapy only (n = 64, 74%), chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T, n = 7), hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT, n = 12), or CAR-T and HSCT (n = 4). There was no COVID-19 related mortality. Twenty-six patients (30%) required COVID-19 related hospitalization; 4 required multiple hospitalizations. Nine (10%) had severe/critical infection; 6 needed intensive care. COVID-19 resulted in anticancer therapy delays in 22 (34%) of 64 patients on active therapy (median delay = 14 days). Factors associated with hospitalization included steroids within 2 weeks prior to infection, lymphopenia, previous significant non-COVID infection, and low COVID-19 PCR cycle threshold value. CAR-T recipients with B-cell aplasia tended to have severe/critical infection (3 of 7 patients). A COVID-19 antibody response was detected in 14 of 32 patients (44%). A substantial proportion of COVID-19 infected children and young adults with cancer require inpatient management; morbidity may be high in B-cell immunodeficiency. However, a majority of patients can be taken through chemotherapy without prolonged therapy delays. Viral load is a potential outcome predictor in COVID-19 in pediatric cancer.

A multi-center study to determine genetic variations in the fusion gene of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) from children <2 years of age in the U.S.

The fusion (F) protein of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major target of immunoprophylactic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines. Recently reported mutations in F gene antigenic sites can vary among RSV types A and B. To further understand mutations in RSV F proteins, we performed subtyping and F gene sequencing on 400 RSV-positive respiratory samples collected at four pediatric hospitals within the United States from children under 2 years old between 2018 and 2020. RSV B was predominant in 2018-2019 and RSV A in 2019-2020 (55.5% and 85.5% respectively). Compared to the reference sequence, all RSV B samples had at least one antigenic polymorphism with the most changes at sites AM14/V (100%) and Ø (93.3%) followed by II (5.8%), IV (3.9%), and p27 (2.9%). The most frequent mutations among RSV B for AM14/V site were in L172Q (100%), S173L (100%), and K191R (95.2%) while for Ø site they were in I206M (93.3%) and Q209R (93.3%). Conversely, polymorphisms were observed in only 15.3% of RSV A samples overall, specifically at antigenic sites p27 (5.9%), IV (3.0%), II (2.5%), AM14/V (2.0%), I (2.0%), and Ø (0.5%). Among RSV A cases, T122A at p27 (n = 10) and S276N at II (n = 3) were the most common substitution sites. S276N at site II was found in both RSV types. Although polymorphisms in F proteins of RSV B were more common than those in RSV A samples, changes in both subtypes were observed in key F antigenic sites which could potentially impact the efficacy of mAb therapies and vaccines.

Evaluation of the Performance and Clinical Impact of a Rapid Phenotypic Susceptibility Testing Method Directly from Positive Blood Culture at a Pediatric Hospital.

Bloodstream infection poses a significant medical emergency that necessitates timely administration of appropriate antibiotics. Standard laboratory workup for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) involves subculture of organisms from positive blood bottles followed by testing using broth microdilution; however, this process can take several days. The Accelerate Pheno Blood Culture panel (Pheno) provides rapid phenotypic testing of selected Gram-negative organisms directly from positive blood cultures. This has the potential to shorten the AST process to several hours and impact time to antimicrobial optimization and subsequent clinical outcomes; however, these metrics have not been assessed in pediatric populations. We retrospectively compared two patient cohorts with blood cultures positive for on-panel Gram-negative organisms: 82 cases tested by conventional AST methods, and 80 cases postintervention at our pediatric hospital. Susceptibility testing from the Pheno yielded 91.5% categorical agreement with a broth microdilution-based reference method with 7.4% minor error, 1.1% major error, and 0.1% very major error rates. The median time from blood culture positivity to AST decreased from 20.0 h to 9.7 h (P < 0.001), leading to an overall decrease in time from blood culture positivity to change in therapy from 36.0 h to 25.0 h (P < 0.001). There was no observed change in length of stay or 30-day mortality. Median duration on meropenem decreased from 64.8 h to 31.6 h (P = 0.04). We conclude the Pheno had accurate performance and that implementation allowed for faster AST reporting, improved time to optimal therapy, and decreased duration on meropenem in children.

The Hidden Crisis in the Times of COVID-19: Critical Shortages of Medical Laboratory Professionals in Clinical Microbiology.

The COVID pandemic has put a spotlight on laboratory medicine, showcasing how vital diagnostic testing is for society and the health care system. It has also brought to light and accelerated the critical shortage of trained and experienced laboratory personnel that has been felt for decades. The need for laboratory professionals is expected to grow by 11% between 2020 and 2030, a higher rate of growth than the overall average for all other health care occupations. Here, the background to this workforce shortage is reviewed. Some proposed actions to help address the issue are put forth, including increasing awareness of the medical laboratory science profession along with bolstering training opportunities and awareness of alternate routes to obtaining certification as a medical laboratory scientist. In addition, recent survey data specifically related to the employee shortages in microbiology are presented which demonstrate that 80% of microbiology laboratories have vacant positions and that filling these positions is challenging for a number of reasons, including a lack of qualified applicants.

The Successes and Challenges of SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Testing in the United States.

SARS-CoV-2 was identified and diagnostic methods developed at an impressive speed due in great part to the wider use of molecular methods in 2019 compared with 2002 during the SARS pandemic. The development of rapid and novel molecular diagnostic assays, leveraging of the high adaptability of molecular tests, and the integration of SARS-CoV-2 genotyping into public health, clinical, and research laboratories have been some of the successes in SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing. The main challenges are related to regulatory hurdles, supply chain constraints, and laboratory preparation.