Postmastectomy radiotherapy for all node positive patients: The case against.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) is accepted as the standard of care for women with early breast cancer with 4 or more involved axillary nodes. However the role of PMRT in women with 1-3 involved nodes remains controversial and guidelines vary. We present the arguments against advocating postmastectomy radiotherapy for all women with node positive breast cancer.

The value of 3D images in the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment. Results from a prospective multicentric clinical trial.

PURPOSE: BCCT.core (Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment. cosmetic results) is a software created for the objective evaluation of aesthetic result of breast cancer conservative treatment using a single patient frontal photography. The lack of volume information has been one criticism, as the use of 3D information might improve accuracy in aesthetic evaluation. In this study, we have evaluated the added value of 3D information to two methods of aesthetic evaluation: a panel of experts; and an augmented version of the computational model - BCCT.core3d. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Within the scope of EU Seventh Framework Programme Project PICTURE, 2D and 3D images from 106 patients from three clinical centres were evaluated by a panel of 17 experts and the BCCT.core. Agreement between all methods was calculated using the kappa (K) and weighted kappa (wK) statistics. RESULTS: Subjective agreement between 2D and 3D individual evaluation was fair to moderate. The agreement between the expert classification and the BCCT.core software with both 2D and 3D features was also fair to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of 3D images did not add significant information to the aesthetic evaluation either by the panel or the software. Evaluation of aesthetic outcome can be performed using of the BCCT.core software, with a single frontal image.

Autologous breast reconstruction using the immediately lipofilled extended latissimus dorsi flap.

BACKGROUND: The latissimus dorsi flap is a popular choice for autologous breast reconstruction. To dramatically improve volume, we report our experience of using the immediately lipofilled extended latissimus dorsi (ELD) flap and show it as a valid option for autologous breast reconstruction. METHODS: Patients undergoing the procedure between December 2013 and June 2016 were included. Demographic, clinical and operative factors were analysed, together with in-hospital morbidity and duration of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 71 ELD flaps with immediate lipofilling were performed. Forty-five reconstructions were immediate and the remaining 26 delayed. Median (range) volume of autologous fat injected immediately was 171 ml (40-630 ml). Contralateral reductions were performed in 25 patients with the median reduction volume 185 g (89-683 g). Median duration of admission was 6.5 (3-18) days and patients were followed up for 12 months (1-37). Three total flap failures occurred and had to be excised (4%). One haematoma occurred requiring drainage (1%). Signs of infection requiring intravenous antibiotics occurred in five patients (7%). In 5 patients wound dehiscence occurred, and only two of these required resuturing (3%). In total, 7 patients developed a seroma requiring repeated drainage (10%). Three reconstructions experienced mild mastectomy flap necrosis with no needing reoperation (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience represents the largest series to date and shows that in carefully selected patients the technique is safe, can avoid the requirement for implants, and has the potential to streamline the reconstructive journey.

Neoadjuvant Therapy in Early Breast Cancer: Treatment Considerations and Common Debates in Practice.

Neoadjuvant treatment offers a number of benefits for patients with early breast cancer, and is an important option for consideration by multidisciplinary teams. Despite literature showing its efficacy, the use of neoadjuvant therapy varies widely. Here we discuss the clinical evidence supporting the use of neoadjuvant therapy in early stage breast cancer, including patient selection, monitoring response, surgery and radiotherapy considerations, with the aim of assisting multidisciplinary teams to determine patient suitability for neoadjuvant treatment.

Whither surgical quality assurance of breast cancer surgery (surgical margins and local recurrence) after paterson.

PURPOSE: The Kennedy report into the actions of the disgraced Breast Surgeon, Paterson focussed on issues of informed consent for mastectomy, management of surgical margins and raised concerns about local recurrence rates and the increasing emphasis on cosmesis after mastectomy for breast cancer. This article assesses whether Kennedy's recommendations apply to the UK as a whole and how to address these issues. New GMC advice on consent and newer nonevidenced innovations in immediate reconstruction have altered the level of informed consent required. Patients deserve a better understanding of the issues of oncological versus cosmetic outcomes on which to base their decisions. Involvement of the whole multidisciplinary team including Oncologists is necessary in surgical planning. Failure to obtain clear microscopic margins at mastectomy leads to an increased local recurrence, yet has received little attention in the UK. Whereas, other countries have used surgical quality assurance audits to reduce local recurrence; local recurrence rates are not available and the extent of variation across the UK in margin involvement after surgery, its management and relationship to local recurrence needs auditing prospectively to reduce unnecessary morbidity. To reassure public, patients and the NHS management, an accreditation system with more rigour than NHSBSP QA and peer review is now required. Resource and efforts to support its introduction will be necessary from the Royal College of Surgeons and the Association of Breast Surgeons. New innovations require careful evaluation before their backdoor introduction to the NHS. Private Hospitals need to have the same standards imposed.

Immediate lipofilling in breast conserving surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of breast conserving surgery (BCS) is to excise the cancer with clear margins whilst at the same time leaving a good or excellent cosmetic result. A significant percentage of women, who have large cancers or have limited breast volumes, achieve poor cosmetic outcomes. BCS with immediate volume replacement using lipofilling or autologous fat transfer is a new technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of a pilot study of patients having BCS and immediate lipofilling performed in The Edinburgh Breast Unit. METHODS: Questionnaires were mailed to 35 women who had BCS with immediate lipofilling and completed by 32 and results compared with those from a contemporary series of 39 women who had BCS alone. The cancers were significantly larger in the lipofilling group (median 21 mm vs. 16 mm p = 0.011) and the patients were non-significantly younger (median age 49 years vs. 54 p = 0.06). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 36 months, results from the Breast Q™ questionnaire showed significantly better cosmetic outcomes with lipofilling (most p < 0.001) and less local breast symptoms (p = 0.0045). There have been no local recurrences in either group and only 1 of the 35 patients was recalled following post-operative surveillance annual mammography. CONCLUSION: BCS and immediate lipofilling provides superior cosmetic outcomes to standard BCS.

Intra-operative assessment of excised breast tumour margins using ClearEdge imaging device.

INTRODUCTION: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) aims to remove a breast cancer completely and obtain clear margins. Complete excision is essential to reduce the risk of local recurrence. The ClearEdge™ (CE) imaging device examines margins of excised breast tissue intra-operatively. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of the device in detecting margin involvement in patients having BCS. METHODS: In Phase-1 58 patients underwent BCS and had 334 margins assessed by the device. In Phase-2 the device was used in 63 patients having BCS and 335 margins were assessed. Patients with margins considered close or involved by the CE device were re-excised. RESULTS: The margin assessment accuracies in Phase-1 and Phase-2 compared to permanent section pathology were very similar: sensitivity (84.3% and 87.3%), specificity (81.9% and 75.6%), positive predictive value (67.2% and 63.6%), and negative predictive value (92.2% and 92.4%). The false positive rate (18.1% and 24.4%) and false negative rate (15.7% and 12.7%) were low in both phases. In Phase-2 re-excision rate was 37%, but in the 54 where the CE device was used appropriately the re-excision rate was 17%. Had all surgeons interpreted all images appropriately and re-excised margins detected as abnormal by the device in Phase-2 then the re-excision rate would have been 7%. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the CE device has potential to reduce re-excision after BCS and further randomized studies of its value are warranted.

Should patients with early breast cancer still be offered the choice of breast conserving surgery or mastectomy?

Breast conserving therapy (BCT) for breast cancer aims to achieve long-term local disease control with reduced local morbidity. BCT has similar long-term survival outcomes to mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer and recent studies have reported similar rates of recurrence compared with mastectomy. An increasing number of studies have shown improved overall survival among women treated with BCT regardless of cancer phenotype compared with mastectomy. Despite BCT being at least equivalent in outcome to mastectomy many women with small breast cancers continue to be treated by mastectomy and several studies in the last decade have shown a trend of increasing numbers of unilateral and bilateral mastectomies. The advent of increasingly effective neoadjuvant treatment has allowed even more women to have breast conservation. Not only has neoadjuvant therapy been shown to increase the rates of BCT, it does so without increasing in breast recurrence rates. Patients who are suitable for BCT should be advised that BCT is the best treatment option for them. They should be informed that not only does it confer at least equivalent survival and local recurrence rates but that compared with mastectomy it has the advantages of less complications, better quality of life and many less operations if reconstructive surgery is performed. It may no longer be appropriate to offer women suitable for BCT the choice of mastectomy or BCT.

Association between underestimation of tumour size by imaging and incomplete excision in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Completeness of excision is the most important factor influencing local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this case-control study was to determine factors influencing incomplete excision in patients undergoing BCS. METHODS: Women with invasive breast cancer treated by BCS between 1 June 2008 and 31 December 2009 were identified from a prospectively collected database in the Edinburgh Breast Unit. The maximum size of the tumour, measured microscopically, was compared with the size estimated before operation by mammography and ultrasound imaging. A multivariable analysis was performed to investigate factors associated with incomplete excision. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 311 women, of whom 193 (62·1 per cent) had a complete (CE group) and 118 (40·7 per cent) an incomplete (IE group) excision. Mammography underestimated tumour size in 75·0 per cent of the IE group compared with 40·7 per cent of the CE group (P < 0·001). Ultrasound imaging underestimated tumour size in 82·5 per cent of the IE group compared with 56·5 per cent of the CE group (P < 0·001). The risk of an incomplete excision was greater when mammography or ultrasonography underestimated pathological size: odds ratio (OR) 4·38 (95 per cent c.i. 2·59 to 7·41; P < 0·001) for mammography, and OR 3·64 (2·03 to 6·54; P < 0·001) for ultrasound imaging. For every 1-mm underestimation of size by mammography and ultrasonography, the relative odds of incomplete excision rose by 10 and 14 per cent respectively. CONCLUSION: Underestimation of tumour size by current imaging techniques is a major factor associated with incomplete excision in women undergoing BCS.

A study of margin width and local recurrence in breast conserving therapy for invasive breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Debate continues on what is an adequate margin width to define a clear margin and whether there is a need to excise pectoral fascia or remove skin in breast conserving surgery. This study set out to provide answers to these questions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 1411 patients with invasive breast cancer were treated by breast conserving surgery and post-operative whole breast radiotherapy from January 2000 to December 2005. Distance from each margin to any in situ or invasive cancer was measured and recorded. If full thickness of breast tissue was removed no re excision of anterior and posterior margins was performed even if disease was <1 mm from a margin. Patients ≤50 years of age and those with anterior or posterior margins <1 mm to invasive cancer had a radiation boost. Median follow-up time was 6.4 years. RESULTS: Local in breast tumour relapse (IBTR) occurred in 50 patients. The overall actuarial IBTR rate at 5 years was 2.2%. There was no difference in IBTR when comparing patients with radial margins of 1-5 mm or 5-10 mm. Anterior and posterior margins <1 mm or with ink on tumour cells were not associated with an increase in IBTR. CONCLUSION: There is no justification for radial margins of greater than 1 mm. If the anterior or posterior margin is <1 mm and full thickness of breast tissue has been removed, then re excision of these margins is unnecessary if boost radiotherapy is delivered.

Pooled long-term outcomes from two randomized trials of axillary node sampling with axillary radiotherapy versus axillary node clearance in patients with operable node-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to determine long-term overall, breast cancer-specific and metastasis-free survival as well as axillary relapse rate from a pooled analysis of two randomized trials in women with operable breast cancer. These trials compared axillary node sampling (ANS), combined with axillary radiotherapy (AXRT) if the sampled nodes were involved, with axillary node clearance (ANC). METHODS: Data from two clinical trials at the Edinburgh Breast Unit that randomized patients between 1980 and 1995 were pooled. Long-term survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression, with separate analyses for patients with node-positive (ANS + AXRT versus ANC) and node-negative (ANS versus ANC) disease. RESULTS: Of 855 women randomized, 799 were included in the present analysis after a median follow-up of 19·4 years. Some 301 patients (37·7 per cent) had node-positive disease. There was no evidence of a breast cancer survival advantage for ANS versus ANC in patients with node-negative disease (hazard ratio (HR) 0·88, 95 per cent c.i. 0·58 to 1·34; P = 0·557), or for ANS + AXRT versus ANC in those with node-positive breast cancer (HR 1·07, 0·77 to 1·50; P = 0·688). There was no metastasis-free survival advantage for ANS versus ANC in patients with node-negative tumours (HR 1·03, 0·70 to 1·51; P = 0·877), or ANS + AXRT versus ANC in those with node-positive disease (HR 1·03, 0·75 to 1·43; P = 0·847). Node-negative patients who underwent ANS had a higher risk of axillary recurrence than those who had ANC (HR 3·53, 1·29 to 9·63; P = 0·014). Similarly, among women with node-positive tumours, the risk of axillary recurrence was greater after ANS + AXRT than ANC (HR 2·64, 1·00 to 6·95; P = 0·049). CONCLUSION: Despite a higher rate of axillary recurrence with ANS combined with radiotherapy to the axilla, ANC did not improve overall, breast cancer-specific or metastasis-free survival. Axillary recurrence is thus not a satisfactory endpoint when comparing axillary treatments.

Adaptation to AI Therapy in Breast Cancer Can Induce Dynamic Alterations in ER Activity Resulting in Estrogen-Independent Metastatic Tumors.

PURPOSE: Acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is a major clinical problem in the treatment of breast cancer. The detailed mechanisms of how tumor cells develop this resistance remain unclear. Here, the adapted function of estrogen receptor (ER) to an estrogen-depleted environment following AI treatment is reported. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Global ER chromatin immuno-precipitation (ChIP)-seq analysis of AI-resistant cells identified steroid-independent ER target genes. Matched patient tumor samples, collected before and after AI treatment, were used to assess ER activity. RESULTS: Maintained ER activity was observed in patient tumors following neoadjuvant AI therapy. Genome-wide ER-DNA-binding analysis in AI-resistant cell lines identified a subset of classic ligand-dependent ER target genes that develop steroid independence. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant association between tumors, which fail to decrease this steroid-independent ER target gene set in response to neoadjuvant AI therapy, and poor disease-free survival and overall survival (n = 72 matched patient tumor samples, P = 0.00339 and 0.00155, respectively). The adaptive ER response to AI treatment was highlighted by the ER/AIB1 target gene, early growth response 3 (EGR3). Elevated levels of EGR3 were detected in endocrine-resistant local disease recurrent patient tumors in comparison with matched primary tissue. However, evidence from distant metastatic tumors demonstrates that the ER signaling network may undergo further adaptations with disease progression as estrogen-independent ER target gene expression is routinely lost in established metastatic tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these data provide evidence of a dynamic ER response to endocrine treatment that may provide vital clues for overcoming the clinical issue of therapy resistance. Clin Cancer Res; 22(11); 2765-77. ©2016 AACR.

Actinomyces Species Isolated from Breast Infections.

Actinomycosis is a chronic infection caused by Actinomyces species characterized by abscess formation, tissue fibrosis, and draining sinuses. The spectrum of infections caused by Actinomyces species ranges from classical invasive actinomycosis to a less invasive form of superficial skin and soft tissue infection. We present a review detailing all Actinomyces species isolated from breast infections in NHS Lothian between 2005 and 2013, Actinomyces species isolated from breast infections referred to the United Kingdom Anaerobe Reference Unit between 1988 and 2014, and cases describing Actinomyces breast infections published in the medical literature since 1994. Actinomyces species are fastidious organisms which can be difficult to identify and are likely to be underascertained as a cause of breast infections. Due to improved diagnostic methods, they are increasingly associated with chronic, recurrent breast infections and may play a more significant role in these infections than has previously been appreciated.

Intra-operative digital specimen radiology reduces re-operation rates in therapeutic mammaplasty for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate our experience with intra-operative imaging of therapeutic mammaplasty specimens at Edinburgh Breast Unit. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent therapeutic mammaplasty in Edinburgh Breast Unit between 2007 and 2013 who had intraoperative specimen radiography. RESULTS: 98 (100%) patients who underwent therapeutic mammaplasty for breast cancer had intra-operative imaging using the faxitron(®) system. 3 out of those 97 (3%) patients had a re-operation because of positive margins confirmed pathologically on cavity excision specimens, but only 1 out of 3 (1%) patients had residual breast cancer present within the re-excision specimen. None required mastectomy. Median age was 58 (range 34-81). Median follow up was 3.1 years (range 6 months - 5.5 years). There was no local recurrence or conversion to mastectomy in this group. CONCLUSION: Complete excision rate in patients who had intra-operative imaging during therapeutic mammaplsty procedure was 97% in our group. Faxitron(®) system is a useful adjunct in helping to achieve low incomplete excision rates.

Recommendations for standardized pathological characterization of residual disease for neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer by the BIG-NABCG collaboration.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) provides the unique opportunity to assess response to treatment after months rather than years of follow-up. However, significant variability exists in methods of pathologic assessment of response to NAST, and thus its interpretation for subsequent clinical decisions. Our international multidisciplinary working group was convened by the Breast International Group-North American Breast Cancer Group (BIG-NABCG) collaboration and tasked to recommend practical methods for standardized evaluation of the post-NAST surgical breast cancer specimen for clinical trials that promote accurate and reliable designation of pathologic complete response (pCR) and meaningful characterization of residual disease. Recommendations include multidisciplinary communication; clinical marking of the tumor site (clips); and radiologic, photographic, or pictorial imaging of the sliced specimen, to map the tissue sections and reconcile macroscopic and microscopic findings. The information required to define pCR (ypT0/is ypN0 or ypT0 yp N0), residual ypT and ypN stage using the current AJCC/UICC system, and the Residual Cancer Burden system were recommended for quantification of residual disease in clinical trials.

Meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative breast MRI on the surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: MRI has been used increasingly in the diagnosis and management of women with invasive breast cancer. However, its usefulness in the preoperative assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains questionable. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effects of MRI on surgical treatment of DCIS by analysing studies comparing preoperative MRI with conventional preoperative assessment. METHODS: Using random-effects modelling, the proportion of women with various outcomes in the MRI versus no-MRI groups was estimated, and the odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR (adjusted for study-level median age) for each model were calculated. RESULTS: Nine eligible studies were identified that included 1077 women with DCIS who had preoperative MRI and 2175 who did not. MRI significantly increased the odds of having initial mastectomy (OR 1·72, P = 0·012; adjusted OR 1·76, P = 0·010). There were no significant differences in the proportion of women with positive margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in the MRI and no-MRI groups (OR 0·80, P = 0·059; adjusted OR 1·10, P = 0·716), nor in the necessity of reoperation for positive margins after BCS (OR 1·06, P = 0·759; adjusted OR 1·04, P = 0·844). Overall mastectomy rates did not differ significantly according to whether or not MRI was performed (OR 1·23, P = 0·340; adjusted OR 0·97, P = 0·881). CONCLUSION: Preoperative MRI in women with DCIS is not associated with improvement in surgical outcomes.