Identifying Risk Factors for Anthracycline Chemotherapy-induced Phlebitis in Women with Breast Cancer: An Observational Study.

AIMS: Anthracycline chemotherapy administered via a peripheral cannula results in severe anthracycline chemotherapy-induced phlebitis (ACIP) in about 20-30% of patients. Administering chemotherapy via a central venous catheter (CVC) prevents ACIP. However, CVCs are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and sepsis. Our aim was to identify risk factors associated with severe ACIP and to provide evidence about the individual risk of developing symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study of 263 women with breast cancer receiving peripheral administration of anthracycline chemotherapy at a UK cancer centre was conducted between May 2016 and January 2018. Data were collected at baseline and every 3 weeks following each chemotherapy treatment, using both healthcare professional- and participant-reported symptom assessments. RESULTS: After three cycles of chemotherapy, 27% of participants experienced severe ACIP. Factors associated with symptom severity were identified as: arm used for chemotherapy administration, epirubicin dose, age, pre-existing hypertension, comorbidity, ethnic group and pain during chemotherapy administration. The sequence of arm used for chemotherapy administration was the single most significant factor (P < 0.001). When alternating arms were used no other risk factor was influential. Where alternating arms were not used, younger age and higher dose were associated with higher-grade symptoms, with age being more influential than dose. The cumulative effect of increasing symptom severity with repeated cycles was also identified (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: It is recommended that a CVC is not routinely required for women with breast cancer who have not undergone an axillary node clearance and receive chemotherapy in alternate arms. The need for a CVC for women who are planned to receive all anthracycline chemotherapy cycles in the same arm should be assessed in the light of peripheral venous access assessment and the key risk factors of age, dose and number of cycles.

Patient-centred value framework for haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Growing budgetary demands have led to increased scrutiny of healthcare spending for rare diseases, leading to a unified goal within the haemophilia community to define objectively patient-centred value in haemophilia care. AIM: To develop a patient-centred outcomes framework with global applicability for assessing value in haemophilia healthcare. METHODS: An international, multidisciplinary panel of experts convened to identify the range of patient impacts of haemophilia health care and organize these into a three-tiered, patient-centred outcomes framework based on Porter's model for assessing value. RESULTS: In addition to measures common to other chronic diseases (eg survival and quality of life), Tier 1, health status achieved or retained, includes haemophilia-specific outcomes of bleeding frequency, musculoskeletal complications and life-threatening bleeds, as well as measures of function or activity. Tier 2, process of recovery, includes such outcomes as time to initial treatment, time to recovery and time missed at education/work; also included are disutility of care, measured by inhibitor development, pathogen transmission/infections, orthopaedic intervention and difficult venous access. Tier 3, sustainability of health, is measured by bleed avoidance, maintenance of productive lives and good health over time; potential long-term negative consequences include insufficient or inappropriate therapy and age-related complications. The applicability of the outcomes framework for different types of haemophilia healthcare interventions is described. CONCLUSION: Haemophilia health care can affect multiple patient-centred outcomes across diverse patient types and healthcare systems. This framework organizes those outcomes for informing value-based decision making by multiple stakeholders and provides the basis for further refinement and development of a standardized outcomes set.

Factors associated with repeat diagnosis of syphilis in genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic attendees in the North East of England, 2002-2014.

This study aimed to identify factors associated with repeat syphilis infection in North East England, in order to inform local prevention and control opportunities. We undertook a case-case study comparing individuals diagnosed with single or multiple episodes of syphilis infection within genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in NE England (12 clinics serving a population of 2.5 million). Study cases were verified as having had true re-infection by a GUM clinician (using serological and/or clinical parameters) and control cases (3 per case) frequency matched to cases by age and year of presentation. The odds of exposure to sexual behavioural and clinical factors were compared for cases and control cases using stepwise multivariable logistic regression. We included 66 cases and 235 control cases. The majority of cases (62/66) and control cases (165/235) were men who had sex with men (MSM). Data were missing for 0-64% of cases across different variables. Following multivariable analysis HIV seropositivity (OR 23.3, 95% CI 4.32-125.9), failure to attend follow-up (OR 4.63, 95% CI 1.11-19.31), stage of infection and deprivation were associated with re-infection ( p < 0.001). In this study, HIV seropositivity and failure to attend follow-up were associated with re-infection with syphilis. Actions targeted at these groups may help to reduce ongoing transmission.

The haemtrack home therapy reporting system: Design, implementation, strengths and weaknesses: A report from UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation.

INTRODUCTION: Haemtrack is an electronic home treatment diary for patients with inherited bleeding disorders, introduced in 2008. It aimed to improve the timeliness and completeness of patient-reported treatment records, to facilitate analysis of treatment and outcome trends. The system is easy to use, responsive and accessible. METHODS: The software uses Microsoft technologies with a SQL Server database and an ASP.net website front-end, running on personal computers, android and I-phones. Haemtrack interfaces with the UK Haemophilia Centre Information System and the National Haemophilia Database (NHD). Data are validated locally by Haemophilia Centres and centrally by NHD. Data collected include as follows: treatment brand, dose and batch number, time/date of bleed onset and drug administration, reasons for treatment (prophylaxis, bleed, follow-up), bleed site, severity, pain-score and outcome. RESULTS: Haemtrack was used by 90% of haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) in 2015, registering 2683 patients using home therapy of whom 1923 used Haemtrack, entering >17 000 treatments per month. This included 68% of all UK patients with severe haemophilia A. Reporting compliance varied and 55% of patients reported ≥75% of potential usage. Centres had a median 78% compliance overall. A strategy for progressively improving compliance is in place. Age distribution and treatment intensity were similar in Haemtrack users/non-users with severe haemophilia treated prophylactically. CONCLUSION: The Haemtrack system is a valuable tool that may improve treatment compliance and optimize treatment regimen. Analysis of national treatment trends and large-scale longitudinal, within-patient analysis of changes in regimen and/or product will provide valuable insights that will guide future clinical practice.

Friction, lubrication, and in situ mechanics of poroelastic cellulose hydrogels.

The tribology between biphasic materials is challenging to predict and interpret due to the interrelationship between mechanical properties, microstructure and movement of the fluid phase contained within. A new approach is presented to deconvolute these effects for cellulose hydrogels, which have a fibrous network that is akin to the microstructure of articular cartilage and plant cell walls. This is achieved by developing a tribo-rheological technique that uniquely incorporates in situ mechanical characterisation (compression-relaxation and small amplitude oscillatory shear) immediately prior to measuring the tribological response between pairs of hydrogels. A radial pressure gradient is generated upon compression-relaxation of the poroelastic hydrogels that results in a non-uniform film thickness at the interface between them. Simulations of this process show that contact between gels occurs in an outer annulus region. Accounting for the predicted contact area between hydrogels varying in cellulose density and pectin solution viscosity causes measured tribology data to collapse onto a single curve; the apparent static friction between hydrogel tribopairs increases with the storage modulus of the hydrogels according to a power law with exponent 0.67. The method is used to compare the influence of plant cell wall polysaccharides, xyloglucan and arabinoxylan, on the interactive forces between cellulose fibres; xyloglucan is found to reduce the static friction between the hydrogels while arabinoxylan had no significant effect. The methodologies presented should provide a new framework for studying the friction between gels and other biphasic soft materials and polymeric surface films.

Target plasma factor levels for personalized treatment in haemophilia: a Delphi consensus statement.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic replacement with factor concentrate is the optimal treatment for persons with severe haemophilia to avoid or minimize bleeding. This ultimately prevents or reduces joint disease and improves life expectancy and quality of life towards values matching those in the normal population. However, uncertainty still exists around the optimal regimens to be prescribed for prophylaxis. An increasing number of treating physicians and patients are showing interest in patient-tailored approaches to prophylaxis, which aim to harmonize the prophylaxis regimen with the patients' bleeding phenotype, levels of physical activity and a variety of other variables. METHODS: A modified Delphi technique was adopted to generate consensus. The expert panel met in person to set the objectives, be trained on the Delphi technique and agree on the desired level of consensus. Three iterations were used to identify the targets, the scenarios and their combinations. RESULTS: Twenty-eight scenarios and eight target levels were identified and used to issue recommendations. The panel reached the desired level of consensus on positive or negative recommendations. Areas where consensus was not reached were identified and proposed as areas for future research. Prospective assessment of the validity of most of the proposed targets is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: We have generated, by expert consensus, target plasma levels of factor concentrate to be used to tailor treatment for persons with haemophilia.

Use of the UKHCDO Database for a postmarketing surveillance study of different doses of recombinant factor VIIa in haemophilia.

INTRODUCTION: Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is recommended in Europe at standard (3 × 90 µg kg-1 ) or high (1 × 270 µg kg-1 ) doses. When granting the license for the high dose, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) requested postmarketing surveillance for thrombosis. This was conducted by the United Kingdom National Haemophilia Database (NHD) on behalf of Novo Nordisk and the EMA. AIM: To assess the use and safety of rFVIIa utilizing prospective data collected by the NHD (1 January 2008 to 30 June 2011). RESULTS: Data were obtained from 67 haemophilia A/B patients with inhibitors treated for 1057 bleeds and 31 acquired haemophilia patients treated for 70 bleeds. Initial rFVIIa dose was categorized post hoc as low (<90 µg kg-1 ), intermediate (≥90-<180 µg kg-1 ) or high (≥180-<270 or ≥270 µg kg-1 ). For haemophilia A/B, high and lower initial rFVIIa dose was used for 38.4% and 51.4% of episodes, respectively, while for acquired haemophilia, the values were 11.4% and 77.1% respectively. Median initial doses were higher for haemophilia A/B (146.3 µg kg-1 ) than acquired haemophilia (90.5 µg kg-1 ). A single administration of rFVIIa was the most frequently used regimen for haemophilia A/B, in contrast with standard recommendations and previous reports. For acquired haemophilia, most episodes were treated with multiple doses. No adverse drug reactions or thromboembolic events were reported for any rFVIIa dose. CONCLUSION: The novel use of a national database for postmarketing surveillance has demonstrated acceptable safety for all recommended doses of rFVIIa.

European retrospective study of real-life haemophilia treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia treatment varies significantly between individuals, countries and regions and details of bleed rates, factor consumption and injection frequency are often not available. AIM: To provide an overview of the FVIII/FIX treatment practice and outcome for patients with haemophilia A (HA) or haemophilia B (HB) across Europe. METHODS: Non-interventional, 12-month retrospective study where anonymized data were retrieved from haemophilia centres/registers in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Male patients (all ages) receiving coagulation factor treatment 24 months prior to the study, with basal FVIII/FIX levels ≤5 IU dL-1 , without inhibitors, were included. Data were summarized descriptively. RESULTS: In total, 1346 patients with HA and 312 with HB were included in the analysis; 75% and 57% had severe disease (FVIII/FIX < 1 IU dL-1 ) respectively. Prophylaxis was most common for severe haemophilia, especially for children, whereas on-demand treatment was more common for moderate haemophilia in most countries. The mean (SD) prescribed prophylactic treatment ranged from 67.9 (30.4) to 108.4 (78.1) (HA) and 32.3 (10.2) to 97.7 (32.1) (HB) IU kg-1 per week, across countries. Most patients on prophylaxis were treated ≥3 times/week (HA) or two times/week (HB). The median annual bleeding rate (ABR) for patients on prophylaxis ranged from 1.0 to 4.0 for severe HA, and from 1.0 to 6.0 for severe HB, while those with moderate haemophilia generally had slightly higher ABRs. Median ABRs for on-demand-treated severe HA ranged from 4.5 to 18.0, and for HB, 1.5 to 14.0. CONCLUSION: Treatment practice varied greatly between centres and countries and patients treated on-demand and prophylactically both experienced bleeds, emphasizing the need for further optimization of care.

Practical aspects of factor concentrate use in patients with von Willebrand disease undergoing invasive procedures: a European survey.

INTRODUCTION: The bleeding propensity in von Willebrand disease (VWD) is usually moderate or mild and patients with VWD do not need continuous treatment, but do require extra increased haemostatic cover when undergoing dental or surgical procedures. Desmopressin can be effective in certain patient groups and this has been considered in a previous publication. AIM: This paper now seeks to evaluate current knowledge and practice in the use of factor concentrate in the management of VWD patients undergoing invasive procedures. METHODS: A literature search was performed on the use of factor concentrates to cover invasive procedures and a survey of current practice in a number of specialist haematology centres across Europe represented by the European Haemophilia Strategy Board was conducted. RESULTS: Our review of the literature and the results of the survey showed considerable heterogeneity in treatment regimens, and a lack of consistency in reporting of the variables that determine factor concentrate dosing and monitoring. CONCLUSION: By analysing the literature, examining guidelines and using consensus deliberation, this survey allowed the group to develop recommendations for management of VWD patients undergoing invasive procedures.

An epidemiological review of gastrointestinal outbreaks associated with Clostridium perfringens, North East of England, 2012-2014.

An anecdotal increase in C. perfringens outbreaks was observed in the North East of England during 2012-2014. We describe findings of investigations in order to further understanding of the epidemiology of these outbreaks and inform control measures. All culture-positive (>105 c.f.u./g) outbreaks reported to the North East Health Protection Team from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2014 were included. Epidemiological (attack rate, symptom profile and positive associations with a suspected vehicle of infection), environmental (deficiencies in food preparation or hygiene practices and suspected vehicle of infection) and microbiological investigations are described. Forty-six outbreaks were included (83% reported from care homes). Enterotoxin (cpe) gene-bearer C. perfringens were detected by PCR in 20/46 (43%) and enterotoxin (by ELISA) and/or enterotoxigenic faecal/food isolates with indistinguishable molecular profiles in 12/46 (26%) outbreaks. Concerns about temperature control of foods were documented in 20/46 (43%) outbreaks. A suspected vehicle of infection was documented in 21/46 (46%) of outbreaks (meat-containing vehicle in 20/21). In 15/21 (71%) identification of the suspected vehicle was based on descriptive evidence alone, in 5/21 (24%) with supporting evidence from an epidemiological study and in 2/21 (10%) with supporting microbiological evidence. C. perfringens-associated illness is preventable and although identification of foodborne outbreaks is challenging, a risk mitigation approach should be taken, particularly in vulnerable populations such as care homes for the elderly.

Practical aspects of DDAVP use in patients with von Willebrand Disease undergoing invasive procedures: a European survey.

INTRODUCTION: Desamino D-arginine vasopressin (DDAVP or desmopressin) is a useful and effective haemostatic treatment for patients with von Willebrand Disease (VWD). However, there are still issues regarding in which subtypes of VWD DDAVP is appropriate and little consensus on its use in different surgical settings. We also lack information concerning the appropriate laboratory parameters that should be monitored. AIM: The European Haemophilia Therapy Strategy Board (EHTSB) wished to investigate published information and clinical use of DDAVP in VWD patients. METHODS: We conducted a literature survey on management of VWD during surgical interventions and undertook a survey of specialist haematologist centres across Europe to assess current management of VWD patients. RESULTS: DDAVP is ineffective in type 3 VWD and its use in type 2B remains controversial due to the possibility of thrombocytopenia. It can, however, be used effectively to cover minor surgery and dental procedures in most other VWD patients. For major surgery there is wider use of factor concentrate in preference to DDAVP depending on the subtype of VWD. We give consensus recommendations on the use of DDAVP for surgical interventions in VWD including laboratory parameters that denote an adequate response and contraindications to its use. CONCLUSIONS: DDAVP can be recommended to cover invasive procedure in selected patients with VWD, however, we need more information and systematic recording of adverse events associated with DDAVP use in VWD. A companion paper will be published covering the use of factor concentrates in VWD patients.

Pharmacokinetics, phenotype and product choice in haemophilia B: how to strike a balance?

At the 7th Annual Congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) held in Brussels, Belgium, in February 2014, Pfizer sponsored a satellite symposium entitled: "Pharmacokinetics, phenotype and product choice in haemophilia B: How to strike a balance?" Co-chaired by Cedric Hermans (Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium) and Mike Laffan (Imperial College, London, UK), the symposium provided an opportunity to debate whether pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters are good surrogates for clinical efficacy for haemophilia B in clinical practice, consider the perceptions and evidence of disease severity, and examine how these considerations can inform approaches to balancing the potential risks and benefits of the currently available treatment options for haemophilia B. PK parameters are routinely measured in clinical practice and are a requirement of regulatory bodies to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of products; however, the relationship between measured PK parameters and clinical efficacy is yet to be determined, an issue that was debated by Gerry Dolan (University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK) and Erik Berntorp (Lund University, Malmö Centre for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Malmö, Sweden). Elena Santagostino (Universita degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy) reviewed how differing perceptions on the severity of haemophilia B compared with haemophilia A may have an impact on clinical decision-making. Finally, Andreas Tiede (Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany), examined the considerations for balancing the potential risks and benefits of the currently available treatment options for haemophilia B. Although the pathophysiology of haemophilia B has been widely studied and is largely understood, continued investigation and discussion around the optimal management course and appropriate therapeutic choice is warranted.

Managing haemophilia for life: 4th Haemophilia Global Summit.

The 4th Haemophilia Global Summit was held in Potsdam, Germany, in September 2013 and brought together an international faculty of haemophilia experts and delegates from multidisciplinary backgrounds. The programme was designed by an independent Scientific Steering Committee of haemophilia experts and explored global perspectives in haemophilia care, discussing practical approaches to the optimal management of haemophilia now and in the future. The topics outlined in this supplement were selected by the Scientific Steering Committee for their relevance and potential to influence haemophilia care globally. In this supplement from the meeting, Jan Astermark reviews current understanding of risk factors for the development of inhibitory antibodies and discusses whether this risk can be modulated and minimized. Factors key to the improvement of joint health in people with haemophilia are explored, with Carlo Martinoli and Víctor Jiménez-Yuste discussing the utility of ultrasound for the early detection of haemophilic arthropathy. Other aspects of care necessary for the prevention and management of joint disease in people with haemophilia are outlined by Thomas Hilberg and Sébastian Lobet, who highlight the therapeutic benefits of physiotherapy and sports therapy. Riitta Lassila and Carlo-Federico Perno describe current knowledge surrounding the risk of transmission of infectious agents via clotting factor concentrates. Finally, different types of extended half-life technology are evaluated by Mike Laffan, with a focus on the practicalities and challenges associated with these products.

Enhancing haemophilia care through registries.

Clinical registries or databases have an increasing role in the management of inherited bleeding disorders. Initially, research-based registries provided valuable data and now national databases are increasingly being developed with multiple stakeholders, including persons with haemophilia (PWH) and payers, to enable improvements and efficiencies in care. Registries are extending to international collaborations to collect adverse event data and comparisons of national approaches to the management of haemophilia to improve the availability of product to PWH.

Atrial fibrillation in patients with haemophilia: a cross-sectional evaluation in Europe.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common health problem in the general population, but data on prevalence or management in patients with haemophilia (PWH) are lacking. The aims of this study were to analyse the prevalence of AF and risk factors for stroke using a cross-sectional pan-European design and to document current anticoagulation practice. The ADVANCE Working Group consists of members from 14 European haemophilia centres. Each centre retrieved data on their PWH with AF. From the total of 3952 adult PWH, 33 had AF with a mean age of 69 years (IQR 62-76). Haemophilia was severe in seven (21%), moderate in six (18%) and mild in 20 (61%) patients. The overall AF prevalence was 0.84% and increased with age; 0.42% in patients 40-60 years and 3.4% in patients >60 years. The mean CHA2 DS2 -Vasc score was 1.3 (range 0-4), predominantly determined by age and hypertension. Hypertension was reported in 48% of PWH with AF. In 11 patients (33%), anticoagulation was started of whom nine aspirin and two vitamin K antagonists. Of these 11 patients, nine had mild haemophilia. Anticoagulation was given in 42% of patients with a CHA2 DS2 -Vasc score ≥2. During follow-up (mean 57 months), there were no thrombotic events reported, nor increases in bleeding severity. The prevalence of AF in haemophilia increases with age and is predominantly present in mild haemophilia. PWH have a low stroke risk based on their CHA2 DS2 -Vasc scores, that might be even lower considering the hypocoagulable state. Only 33% of PWH with AF receives any form of anticoagulation therapy.

Switching clotting factor concentrates: considerations in estimating the risk of immunogenicity.

The development of neutralizing antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) is the most serious complication of therapy for haemophilia A. There is now excellent documentation that a large number of both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the risk of FVIII inhibitor incidence. One of the environmental factors that has been proposed as an influence on this complication is the occurrence of FVIII product switching. There are only a small number of clinical studies that have addressed this question, and thus, the amount of objective information available to assess this association is limited. In this review, in addition to summarizing past evidence pertinent to this subject, we present the results of a complementary strategy, a Delphi analysis, to add to the considerations of product switching and FVIII immunogenicity. With the imminent arrival in the clinic of several new FVIII products, the haemophilia community must be prepared to collect prospectively controlled data to better address this important management issue.

Clinical management of older persons with haemophilia.

Life expectancy for people with haemophilia (PWH) has improved and is now approaching that of the general population. The growing population of elderly PWH will therefore increasingly face the age-related morbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, malignant disease, liver disease, and bone and joint related diseases, as well as the lifestyle and psychosocial factors that accompany many of these conditions. For many PWH, frequent contact with haemophilia specialists within the comprehensive care centres supplants the relationship that individuals in the general population have with their general practitioners. As a result, there is a risk that elderly PWH may miss the chronic disease screening opportunities offered to the general population. This review focuses on the screening tests and examinations recommended for age-related comorbidities in the general population that may be applicable to the growing population of older people with haemophilia.

Applicability of the European Society of Cardiology guidelines on management of acute coronary syndromes to people with haemophilia - an assessment by the ADVANCE Working Group.

There are no evidence-based guidelines for antithrombotic management in people with haemophilia (PWH) presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of the study was to review the current European Society of Cardiology guidelines, and to consider how best they should be adapted for PWH. Structured communication techniques based on a Delphi-like methodology were used to achieve expert consensus on key aspects of clinical management. The main final statements are as follows: (i) ACS and myocardial revascularization should be managed promptly by a multidisciplinary team that includes a haemophilia expert, (ii) each comprehensive care centre for adult PWH should have a formal clinical referral pathway with a cardiology centre with an emergency unit and 24 h availability of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), (iii) PCI should be performed as soon as possible under adequate clotting factor protection, (iv) bare metal stents are preferred to drug-eluting stents, (v) anticoagulants should only be used in PWH after replacement therapy, (vi) minimum trough levels should not fall below 5-15% in PWH on dual antiplatelet therapy, (vii) the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after ACS and PCI should be limited to a minimum, (viii) the use of GPIIb-IIIa inhibitors is not recommended in PWH other than in exceptional circumstances, (ix) the use of fibrinolysis may be justified in PWH when primary PCI (within 90 min) is not available ideally under adequate clotting factor management. It is hoped that the results of this initiative will help to guide optimal management of ACS in PWH.