Postoperative Spinal Orthoses: Types and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative bracing (POB) after spinal surgery is a common practice that has been used for many decades. In the past few years, the indications, types, and outcomes of POB have been heavily questioned after many studies revealed no consistent evidence to support or refute the use of spinal orthoses after surgery. SUMMARY: Currently, there are no indications of the type, duration, or indication for many spinal orthoses and few studies have assessed their efficacy. Although much of the literature lacks adequate comparisons of brace types or specific indications, POB is still widely used for various surgical procedures. This study evaluated the current evidence concerning POB of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbosacral spine.

Compartment Syndrome Due to Reperfusion Injury from an Axillary Artery Occlusion: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Introduction: While commonly caused by traumatic injury and fracture, compartment syndrome can also result from reperfusion injury. Very few cases of prophylactic fasciotomy are mentioned when considering time to revascularization after prolonged vascular ischemia. We present a case of a patient who underwent multiple compartment prophylactic fasciotomies following reperfusion injury in the upper extremity. Case Report: We report a 72-year-old male that suffered from an anterior shoulder dislocation after a ground-level fall. After reduction, pulses were not measurable, and angiography indicated an axillary artery occlusion. Immediately after operative reperfusion, compartments became tense. Orthopedic surgeons subsequently performed arm anterior, posterior, and forearm volar and mobile wad compartment fasciotomies, after 13 h of ischemia. The patient tolerated the procedure, and at the latest follow-up, was working to improve strength in the extremity. Conclusion: Even when the circumstances of injury seem to be less traumatic as in this case of a ground-level fall, we document the importance of prompt recognition and intervention of suspected compartment syndrome following prolonged ischemia and revascularization of the upper extremity.

"Sawbones": A pilot study assessing simulation-based orthopedic training for medical students.

Intro: Simulation-based training has become a valuable new tool in medical education across the country. The Orthopedic Surgery Interest Group (OSIG) at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine organized a benchtop training workshop known as "Sawbones" to give medical students essential exposure to basic techniques and instruments commonly used in orthopedic surgery. This pilot study seeks to investigate the participating students' perceptions of this workshop as part of a potential longitudinal intervention. Methods: A total of 30 medical students (MS1-MS4) with a documented interest in orthopedic surgery were randomly selected via email invitation to participate in this workshop. Students first had a lecture-based training session with faculty on an overview of screw fixation. Participants then formed groups that were headed by an orthopedic resident or attending and took turns fixing fractures on model bones made of synthetic material. Following the session, students were sent an anonymous Qualtrics survey to assess their satisfaction with the workshop. Results: A total of 22 students (73%), responded to the survey. On a ten-point scale, the average reported interest in orthopedics was 9.2 (SD 0.4). All students (n = 22, 100%) reported that they would like more hands-on orthopedic experiences as a component of their medical education. Nineteen students (86.4%) reported that this training increased their interest in pursuing a career in orthopedic surgery and twenty-one (95.5%) further stated that they would recommend this training to other students. Discussion: Based on the results of this pilot study, Sawbones was promising at engaging students in orthopedics, providing a team environment, and introducing students to orthopedic skills and instrumentation. Providing these sessions in a longitudinal manner could provide opportunities for mentorship and better prepare students for a residency in orthopedics. We recommend a program like Sawbones to better address the lack of Orthopedic exposure in medical school.

Does Surgeon Level of Expertise Correlate with Patient Outcomes?

Background It is difficult to evaluate the results of surgical techniques as there is inherent variability between surgeons in regard to experience, skill level, and knowledge. Tang suggested a classification system in 2009 in an attempt to standardize surgeon level of expertise, with categories ranging from nonspecialist (Level I) to expert (Level V). This epidemiological analysis of all articles citing Tang's original paper examines if a surgeon's self-reported level of expertise correlates with outcomes and evaluates whether the current definition of Tang level is sufficient to account for expertise bias. Methods In May 2021, all articles citing Tang level of expertise were identified ( N = 222). Articles were included if they described a novel technique and provided author(s)' levels ( n = 205). Statistical analysis was conducted, and p -values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results The most common specialties reporting Tang level of expertise were orthopaedic surgery (82.9%) and plastic surgery (15.5%). The most common subspecialty was hand surgery. 2020 was the year with the most studies reporting level of expertise (31.7%), followed by 2021 (20.0%) and 2019 (17.1%). The majority of studies (80.5%) reported positive results with their technique, and of these, 63.3% were statistically significant. Level of expertise was not significantly associated with a doctoral degree, type of residency completed, fellowship completion, hand fellowship, author sex, study type, or result significance. Discussion The current Tang classification is both underreported and incomplete in its present state. To account for expertise bias, we recommend all authors report Tang level when describing surgical techniques. Studies with multiple authors should explicitly state the level of each author, as well as a weighted average accounting for the total contribution of each individual.

Influential literature regarding proximal junctional kyphosis: A bibliometric review.

Study design: Retrospective review. Objective: This bibliometric review summarizes the publication trends and critical information about the most cited Proximal Junction Kyphosis (PJK) articles. Background: Data: Proximal junctional kyphosis is frequently diagnosed after spinal fusion surgery. However, there continues to be heavy debate regarding the definition, incidence, risk factors, and treatment of this disorder. Methods: Nine hundred eleven articles were found when searching The Web of Science database with the keywords "Proximal junctional kyphosis" and "proximal junctional failure." The 200 top-cited articles were reviewed and screened to ensure PJK was discussed. The articles were filtered based on the highest to lowest number of citations, and the top 50 articles were chosen. Inclusion criteria included articles that contained a discussion of PJK and outcomes after surgery. Exclusion criteria included articles without mentioning PJK, or that studied non-human subjects. The 50 most cited articles were sorted by level of evidence and their classification for analysis. Results: The 50 most cited articles in this study were published a total of 6056 times. These articles were cited 71-413 times in the literature, with publications from 1994 to 2018. Most of the top 50 articles (64%) were published in the USA. Specifically, HSS and Washington University are the institutions with the most contributions to the publication of the most cited articles on PJK (n = 16). Lenke was the author that contributed to most publications in the top 50 articles on PJK. Conclusion: This study provides a framework for the most cited articles published on PJK. Most articles on this topic were in the category of clinical outcomes (36%) and were of a level of evidence III (46%). Most of the top-cited articles came from the journal Spine (68%) and were published in the USA (64%). These top-cited papers are essential to understanding this critical trending topic in spine surgery. Level of evidence: III.

Orthopedic approaches for bone sarcoma: A bibliometric review of the 50 most cited papers.

Background: Curative treatment of bone sarcoma is primarily based on operative management. The Orthopedic Oncology approach towards this disease has evolved greatly to the breakthrough in systemic treatment options as well as unique implant designs favoring limb salvage over amputations. The purpose of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of the top 50 most cited papers related to the orthopedic the approach to bone sarcomas. Methods: We queried the ISI Web of Knowledge database in July 2022. Keywords utilized were: ""Bone Sarcoma" OR "Osteosarcoma" OR "Ewing Sarcoma" OR "Chondrosarcoma" OR "Chordoma". The top 50 articles pertaining to the orthopedic approach to bone sarcoma were included for analysis and included manuscript title, authors, citation count, journal and publication year. Results: The mean number of citations are 187.06 (Range 125-400; SD 67.83). The average citations per year is 10.03 (Range 47.86-3.43; SD 8.05). Many articles were published from 2000 to 2009 (n = 20) and 1990-1999 (n = 13). The majority of the articles were published by institutions within the United States (n = 32). The most common level of evidence was level IV (n = 37). Majority of the articles focused on treatment outcome (n = 22). Conclusion: This study offers a comprehensive review of the most cited literature regarding orthopedic approaches to bony sarcomas. Modern treatment approaches for bone sarcoma has resulted in an increased focus within the literature on achieving disease free survival wide tissue margins. Understanding the trends of available studies allows for physicians and researchers to target and innovate future areas of study.

Supplemental musculoskeletal anatomy education in a shortened medical school curriculum.

To address anatomy knowledge gaps exacerbated by the education constraints of a new shortened medical school curriculum and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Orthopedic Surgery Interest Group (OSIG) created a novel hybrid anatomy curriculum for students interested in orthopedic surgery. The main objectives were to determine (1) Does this elective supplement to the curriculum improve students' perceived confidence with regard to orthopedic anatomy? (2) What are the students' preferred formats for receiving this elective supplement to the curriculum? To determine this, we used a prospective study design to determine the impact of the OSIG's student-led hybrid anatomy sessions. A survey with a five-point Likert scale (1) Strongly disagree; (2) Disagree; (3) Neither agree nor disagree; (4) Agree; (5) Strongly agree; was used to quantify responses. Chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests and T-tests were used when appropriate. Our results show that participants without prior anatomy experience rated the course higher on average when compared with those with prior anatomy experience (4.27 vs. 3.67, respectively; p = 0.168). Most students (88.2%) prefer for anatomy sessions to be held more frequently and 76.4% enjoyed having virtual components. 82.4% of participants reported that this course improved their self-confidence regarding orthopedic anatomy, and 100% would recommend it to other students. Most students enjoyed the course and reported improved self-perceived anatomy knowledge after participating. Medical schools that have a shortened anatomy curriculum can consider using the present study as a model for an optional musculoskeletal anatomy supplement at their institution.

Traumatic Irreducible Pediatric Radial Head Dislocations: A Unique Case and Review of the Literature.

Background: Irreducible radial head dislocations are uncommon injuries and blocks to reduction typically result from interposed soft tissue. We report the case of a pediatric patient who sustained an irreducible radial head dislocation with a concomitant posterior elbow dislocation and coronoid process fracture. To the author's knowledge, irreducible radial head dislocations presenting as part of a terrible triad like constellation of injuries have not been previously reported. A case-based review of the literature was also performed. Case Description: A 7-year-old male presents to our pediatric hospital as a transfer from an outside hospital after sustaining a posterolateral radial head and posterior elbow dislocation secondary to a fall. CT imaging and 3D reconstruction revealed a Type 1 coronoid process fracture. At our institution, closed attempts at reduction in the operating room under fluoroscopy with general anesthesia were also unsuccessful. Open reduction of the radial head and repair of the soft tissue structures was ultimately required to stabilize the patient's elbow injury. Conclusion: Irreducible pediatric radial head dislocations are rare and inherently unstable injuries. To the authors' knowledge, there are no prior reports of irreducible radial head dislocations that present in a terrible triad like fashion with a coronoid process fracture and posterior elbow dislocation. In the present report, successful treatment of this injury required open reduction and soft tissue repair. Level of Evidence: IV.