Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol ; 382: 181-206, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38225103

RESUMEN

Immune checkpoints (ICs) play a central role in maintaining immune homoeostasis. The discovery that tumours use this physiological mechanism to avoid elimination by the immune system, opened up avenues for therapeutic targeting of ICs as a novel way of treating cancer. However, this therapy a new array of autoimmune side effects, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In this narrative review, we first recapitulate the physiological function of ICs that are approved targets for cancer immunotherapy (CTLA-4, PD-(L)1 and LAG-3), as the groundwork to critically discuss current knowledge on irAEs. Specifically, we summarize clinical aspects and examine a molecular classification and predisposing factors of irAEs. Finally, we discuss irAE treatment, particularly emphasizing how molecular knowledge is changing the current treatment paradigm.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Autoinmunidad , Neoplasias/patología , Inmunoterapia , Biología
2.
J Immunother Cancer ; 10(9)2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36171010

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related pneumonitis is the most frequent fatal immune-related adverse event associated with programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death ligand-1 blockade. The pathophysiology however remains largely unknown, owing to limited and contradictory findings in existing literature pointing at either T-helper 1 or T-helper 17-mediated autoimmunity. In this study, we aimed to gain novel insights into the mechanisms of ICI-related pneumonitis, thereby identifying potential therapeutic targets. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, single-cell RNA and T-cell receptor sequencing was performed on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of 11 patients with ICI-related pneumonitis and 6 demographically-matched patients with cancer without ICI-related pneumonitis. Single-cell transcriptomic immunophenotyping and cell fate mapping coupled to T-cell receptor repertoire analyses were performed. RESULTS: We observed enrichment of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in ICI-pneumonitis bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. The CD4+ T-cell compartment showed an increase of pathogenic T-helper 17.1 cells, characterized by high co-expression of TBX21 (encoding T-bet) and RORC (ROR-γ), IFN-G (IFN-γ), IL-17A, CSF2 (GM-CSF), and cytotoxicity genes. Type 1 regulatory T cells and naïve-like CD4+ T cells were also enriched. Within the CD8+ T-cell compartment, mainly effector memory T cells were increased. Correspondingly, myeloid cells in ICI-pneumonitis bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were relatively depleted of anti-inflammatory resident alveolar macrophages while pro-inflammatory 'M1-like' monocytes (expressing TNF, IL-1B, IL-6, IL-23A, and GM-CSF receptor CSF2RA, CSF2RB) were enriched compared with control samples. Importantly, a feedforward loop, in which GM-CSF production by pathogenic T-helper 17.1 cells promotes tissue inflammation and IL-23 production by pro-inflammatory monocytes and vice versa, has been well characterized in multiple autoimmune disorders but has never been identified in ICI-related pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS: Using single-cell transcriptomics, we identified accumulation of pathogenic T-helper 17.1 cells in ICI-pneumonitis bronchoalveolar lavage fluid-a phenotype explaining previous divergent findings on T-helper 1 versus T-helper 17 involvement in ICI-pneumonitis-,putatively engaging in detrimental crosstalk with pro-inflammatory 'M1-like' monocytes. This finding yields several novel potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of ICI-pneumonitis. Most notably repurposing anti-IL-23 merits further research as a potential efficacious and safe treatment for ICI-pneumonitis.


Asunto(s)
Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos , Neumonía , Antiinflamatorios , Proteínas Reguladoras de la Apoptosis , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Interleucina-17 , Interleucina-6 , Monocitos , Miembro 3 del Grupo F de la Subfamilia 1 de Receptores Nucleares , ARN , Receptores de Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos , Transcriptoma
3.
PLoS One ; 15(11): e0242300, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33175911

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive autopsy (MIA) is a validated and safe method to establish the cause of death (COD), mainly in low-resource settings. However, the additional clinical value of MIA in Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients in a high-resource setting is unknown. The objective was to assess if and how MIA changed clinical COD and contributing diagnoses in deceased COVID-19 patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A prospective observational cohort from April to May 2020 in a 981-bed teaching hospital in the epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium was established. Patients who died with either PCR-confirmed or radiologically confirmed COVID-19 infection were consecutively included. MIA consisted of whole-body CT and CT-guided Tru-Cut® biopsies. Diagnostic modalities were clinical chart review, radiology, microbiology, and histopathology which were assessed by two independent experts per modality. MIA COD and contributing diagnoses were established during a multi-disciplinary meeting. Clinical COD (CCOD) and contributing diagnosis were abstracted from the discharge letter. The main outcomes were alterations in CCOD and contributing diagnoses after MIA, and the contribution of each diagnostic modality. We included 18 patients, of which 7 after intensive care unit hospitalization. MIA led to an alteration in 15/18 (83%) patients. The CCOD was altered in 5/18 (28%) patients. MIA found a new COD (1/5), a more specific COD (1/5), a less certain COD (1/5), or a contributing diagnosis to be the COD (2/5). Contributing diagnoses were altered in 14/18 (78%) patients: 9 new diagnoses, 5 diagnoses dismissed, 3 made more specific, and 2 made less certain. Overall, histopathology contributed in 14/15 (93%) patients with alterations, radiology and microbiology each in 6/15 (40%), and clinical review in 3/15 (20%). Histopathology was deemed the most important modality in 10 patients, radiology in two patients, and microbiology in one patient. CONCLUSION: MIA, especially histological examination, can add valuable new clinical information regarding the cause of death in COVID-19 patients, even in a high-resource setting with wide access to premortem diagnostic modalities. MIA may provide important clinical insights and should be applied in the current ongoing pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04366882.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/patología , Neumonía Viral/patología , Anciano , Autopsia , Bélgica , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19 , Causas de Muerte , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagen , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico por imagen , Neumonía Viral/virología , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN Viral/metabolismo , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...