RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is fatal in patients with gastrointestinal perforation (GIP). However, few studies have focused on this issue. AIM: To investigate the risk factors for postoperative sepsis in patients with GIP. METHODS: This was a retrospective study performed at the Department of General Surgery in our treatment center. From January 2016 to December 2018, the medical records of patients with GIP who underwent emergency surgery were reviewed. Patients younger than 17 years or who did not undergo surgical treatment were excluded. The patients were divided into the postoperative sepsis group and the non-postoperative sepsis group. Clinical data for both groups were collected and compared, and the risk factors for postoperative sepsis were investigated. The institutional ethical committee of our hospital approved the study. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six patients were admitted to our department with GIP. Fourteen patients were excluded: Four were under 17 years old, and 10 did not undergo emergency surgery due to high surgical risk and/or disagreement with the patients and their family members. Two hundred twelve patients were finally enrolled in the study; 161 were men, and 51 were women. The average age was 62.98 ± 15.65 years. Postoperative sepsis occurred in 48 cases. The prevalence of postoperative sepsis was 22.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 17.0%-28.3%]. Twenty-eight patients (13.21%) died after emergency surgery. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the time interval from abdominal pain to emergency surgery [odds ratio (OR) = 1.021, 95%CI: 1.005-1.038, P = 0.006], colonic perforation (OR = 2.761, CI: 1.821-14.776, P = 0.007), perforation diameter (OR = 1.062, 95%CI: 1.007-1.121, P = 0.027), and incidence of malignant tumor-related perforation (OR = 5.384, 95%CI: 1.762-32.844, P = 0.021) were associated with postoperative sepsis. CONCLUSION: The time interval from abdominal pain to surgery, colonic perforation, diameter of perforation, and the incidence of malignant tumor-related perforation were risk factors for postoperative sepsis in patients with GIP.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Zinc Finger Protein 281 (ZNF281) was recently identified as a novel oncogene in several human carcinomas. However, the clinical significance of ZNF281 in colorectal cancer (CRC) and the molecular mechanisms by which ZNF281 promotes the growth and metastasis of CRC remain unknown. METHODS: ZNF281 expression in CRC tissues was assessed, and the outcomes were analyzed to determine the clinical importance of ZNF281 expression. Cell Transwell assays and a wound healing assay were performed to assess the effects of ZNF281 on CRC cell migration and invasion in vitro. Western blotting was applied to analyze the potential mechanisms. RESULTS: ZNF281 mRNA and protein levels were significantly increased in CRC tissues compared with normal colon tissues, and high ZNF281 expression was associated with advanced T stage, N stage, TNM stage and differentiation. Therefore, ZNF281 expression might be an independent prognostic indicator in CRC patients. Moreover, knockdown of ZNF281 expression suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion by inhibiting the Wnt/ß-catenin pathway. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that ZNF281 plays a critical role in the progression and metastasis of CRC and could represent a potential therapeutic target for CRC.