Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Cancer ; 207: 114172, 2024 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38905818

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies indicate an association between immunosuppression for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and impaired survival in patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors. Whether this is related to corticosteroids or second-line immunosuppressants is unknown. In the largest cohort thus far, we assessed the association of immunosuppressant type and dose with survival in melanoma patients with irAEs. METHODS: Patients with advanced melanoma who received immunosuppressants for irAEs induced by first-line anti-PD-1 ± anti-CTLA-4 were included from 18 hospitals worldwide. Associations of cumulative and peak dose corticosteroids and use of second-line immunosuppression with survival from start of immunosuppression were assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: Among 606 patients, 404 had anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4-related irAEs and 202 had anti-PD-1-related irAEs. 425 patients (70 %) received corticosteroids only; 181 patients (30 %) additionally received second-line immunosuppressants. Median PFS and OS from starting immunosuppression were 4.5 (95 %CI 3.4-8.1) and 31 (95 %CI 15-not reached) months in patients who received second-line immunosuppressants, and 11 (95 %CI 9.4-14) and 55 (95 %CI 41-not reached) months in patients who did not. High corticosteroid peak dose was associated with worse PFS and OS (HRadj 1.14; 95 %CI 1.01-1.29; HRadj 1.29; 95 %CI 1.12-1.49 for 80vs40mg), while cumulative dose was not. Second-line immunosuppression was associated with worse PFS (HRadj 1.32; 95 %CI 1.02-1.72) and OS (HRadj 1.34; 95 %CI 0.99-1.82) compared with corticosteroids alone. CONCLUSIONS: High corticosteroid peak dose and second-line immunosuppressants to treat irAEs are both associated with impaired survival. While immunosuppression is indispensable for treatment of severe irAEs, clinicians should weigh possible detrimental effects on survival against potential disadvantages of undertreatment.

2.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1662022 04 06.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35499591

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Jaundice is a clinical symptom as a result of cholestasis. It can be caused by a wide variety of disorders. Its differential diagnosis is broad. Therefore, it is important to determine whether the cause of the cholestasis is intrahepatic, hepatic or extrahepatic. Case description This article describes a 61-year-old male who was referred to our Gastroenterology Department. Transabdominal ultrasound showed dilatation of intrahepatic bile ducts and the common bile duct, probably caused by a sludge ball. He underwent an ERCP during which a mass instead of a gallstone was extracted. Histological examination showed (a metastasis of) a melanoma. The patient was referred to the dermatologist who found a melanoma on the chest. The final diagnosis was metastasis of melanoma to the common bile duct. CONCLUSION: Jaundice can be caused by a variety of disorders. A systematic approach based on signs and symptoms is essential to recognize uncommon diagnoses without unnecessary delay.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis , Cálculos Biliares , Ictericia , Melanoma , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos , Colestasis/etiología , Cálculos Biliares/complicaciones , Humanos , Ictericia/diagnóstico , Ictericia/etiología , Masculino , Melanoma/complicaciones , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...