An interlaboratory study evaluating the interpretation of forensic glass evidence using refractive index measurements and elemental composition.

Seventeen laboratories participated in three interlaboratory exercises to assess the performance of refractive index, micro X-ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy (µXRF), and Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) data for the forensic comparison of glass samples. Glass fragments from automotive windshields were distributed to the participating labs as blind samples and participants were asked to compare the glass samples (known vs. questioned) and report their findings as they would in casework. For samples that originated from the same source, the overall correct association rate was greater than 92% for each of the three techniques (refractive index, µXRF, and LIBS). For samples that originated from different vehicles, an overall correct exclusion rate of 82%, 96%, and 87% was observed for refractive index, µXRF, and LIBS, respectively. Special attention was given to the reporting language used by practitioners as well as the use of verbal scales and/or databases to assign a significance to the evidence. Wide variations in the reported conclusions exist between different laboratories, demonstrating a need for the standardization of the reporting language used by practitioners. Moreover, few labs used a verbal scale and/or a database to provide a weight to the evidence. It is recommended that forensic practitioners strive to incorporate the use of a verbal scale and/or a background database, if available, to provide a measure of significance to glass forensic evidence (i.e., the strength of an association or exclusion).

Chemistry of phosphine-borane adducts at platinum centers: synthesis and reactivity of PtII complexes with phosphinoborane ligands.

Reaction of [Pt(PEt(3))(3)] with the primary and secondary phosphine-borane adducts PhRPH x BH(3) (R=H, Ph) resulted in oxidative addition of a P-H bond at the Pt(0) center to afford the complexes trans-[PtH(PPhR x BH(3))(PEt(3))(2)] (1: R=H; 2: R=Ph). The products 1 and 2 were characterized by (1)H, (11)B, (13)C, (31)P, and (195)Pt NMR spectroscopy, and the molecular structures were verified by X-ray crystallography. In both cases, a trans arrangement of the hydride ligand with respect to the phosphidoborane ligand was observed. When 2 was treated with PhPH(2) x BH(3), a novel phosphidoborane ligand-exchange reaction occurred which yielded 1 and Ph(2)PH x BH(3). Treatment of 2 with one equivalent of depe (depe=1,2-bis(diethylphosphino)ethane) resulted in the formation of the complex cis-[PtH(PPh(2) x BH(3))(depe)] (3), in which the hydride ligand and the phosphidoborane ligand are in a cis arrangement. Treatment of 3 with PhPH(2) x BH(3) was found to result in an exchange of the phosphidoborane ligands to give the complex cis-[PtH(PPhH x BH(3))(depe)] (4) and Ph(2)PH x BH(3). Complex 4 was found to undergo further reaction in the presence of PhPH(2) x BH(3) to give meso-cis-[Pt(PPhH x BH(3))(2)(depe)] (5) and rac-cis-[Pt(PPhH x BH(3))(2)(depe)] (6).

Novel Cyclopentadienyl-Free Organolanthanides: The First Examples of Five-Membered Amidolanthanide Heterocycles.

Reactions of LnCl(3) (Ln = Nd, Gd, Yb) and [{Me(2)SiN(R)Li}(2)] (R = t-Bu, Ph) give the chloride-bridged dimers [{{(t-Bu)NSiMe(2)SiMe(2)N(t-Bu)}Ln(&mgr;-Cl)(THF)}(2)] (1, Ln = Nd; 2, Ln = Gd; 3, Ln = Yb) and [{{(Ph)NSiMe(2)SiMe(2)N(Ph)}Ln(&mgr;-Cl)(THF)(2)}(2)] (4, Ln = Nd; 5, Ln = Gd; 6, Ln = Yb) in good yields. Compounds 2 and 5 were structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography: 2, triclinic, P&onemacr;, a = 10.321(2) Å, b = 11.116(2) Å, c = 13.434(3) Å, alpha = 107.57(3) degrees, beta = 111.31(3) degrees, gamma = 90.67(3) degrees, V = 1356.1(5) Å(3), Z = 1, R = 0.0233; 5, monoclinic, P2(1)/n, a = 13.913(13) Å, b = 12.914(9) Å, c = 16.434(14) Å, beta = 105.64(3) degrees, V = 2843(4) Å(3), Z = 2, R = 0.0281. The chloro functions in 1-6 remain reactive, demonstrated by the isolation of the trifluoroacetate derivatives of 1 and 2. Treatment of 1 or 2 with 2 equiv of NaOCOCF(3) gives [{{(t-Bu)NSiMe(2)SiMe(2)N(t-Bu)}Ln(&mgr;-OCOCF(3))(THF)}(2)] (7, Ln = Nd; 8, Ln = Gd). The structure of 8 was determined by a single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. Crystal data for 8: triclinic, P&onemacr;, a = 11.045(2) Å, b = 16.120(3) Å, c = 16.949(3) Å, alpha = 66.17(3) degrees, beta = 85.51(3) degrees, gamma = 78.27(3) degrees, V = 2702.9(9) Å(3), Z = 2, R = 0.0311. The structure of 8 shows the trifluoroacetate group adopting a bridging bidentate mode of coordination.

Organometallic Fluorides of Zirconium and Hafnium in the Synthesis of Carboxylate Complexes: Molecular Structures of [{(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))ZrF(OCOCF(3))(2)}(2)] and [(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))(2)Zr(OCOCF(3))(2)].

The reaction of [(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))ZrF(3)] and [(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))HfF(3)] with Me(3)SiOCOCF(3) yields the dinuclear complexes [{(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))ZrF(OCOCF(3))(2)}(2)] (1) and [{(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))HfF(OCOCF(3))(2)}(2)] (2), regardless of the molar ratio employed. [(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))(2)ZrF(2)] reacts with 1 and 2 equiv of Me(3)SiOCOCF(3) to form the mononuclear compounds [(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))(2)Zr(OCOCF(3))(2)] (3) and [(eta(5)-C(5)Me(5))(2)ZrF(OCOCF(3))] (4), respectively. The molecular structures of 1 and 3 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray analysis: 1, triclinic, P&onemacr;, a = 9.508(3) Å, b = 11.002(4) Å, c = 17.528(3) Å, alpha = 78.55(4), beta = 76.80(2), gamma = 87.51(2) degrees, V = 1750(1) Å(3), Z = 2, R = 0.0378; 3, monoclinic, C2/c, a = 18.553(4) Å, b = 9.110(2) Å, c = 16.323(3) Å, beta = 114.88(3) degrees, V = 2503(1) Å(3), Z = 4, R = 0.0457. Compound 1 shows bridging bidentate and chelating carboxylate ligands as well as bridging fluorine atoms. The zirconium atoms are seven coordinated and have an 18-electron configuration. X-ray studies of 3 reveal two structural components where the carboxylate ligands coordinate in a monodentate (major component) and a chelating manner (minor component).