Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 9(1): e715, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38322297

RESUMEN

Background: Mediastinal masses in children with cancer present unique challenges, including the risk of respiratory and hemodynamic compromise due to the complex anatomy of the mediastinum. Multidisciplinary communication is often a challenge in the management of these patients. After a series of patients with mediastinal masses were admitted to Riley Hospital for Children Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, the time from presentation to biopsy and pathology was greater than expected. We aimed to reduce the time to biopsy by 25% and demonstrate improved multidisciplinary communication within 6 months of protocol implementation for patients presenting to Riley Hospital for Children Emergency Department with an anterior mediastinal mass. Methods: Quality improvement methodology created a pathway that included early multidisciplinary communication. The pathway includes communication between the emergency department and multiple surgical and medical teams via a HIPPA-compliant texting platform. Based on patient stability, imaging findings, and sedation risks, the approach and timing of the biopsy were determined. Results: The pathway has been used 20 times to date. We successfully reduced the time to biopsy by 38%, from 25.1 hours to 15.4 hours. There was no statistically significant reduction in time to pathology. The multidisciplinary team reported improved communication from a baseline Likert score of 3.24 to 4. Conclusions: By initiating early multidisciplinary communication, we reduced the time to biopsy and pathology results, improving care for our patients presenting with anterior mediastinal masses.

2.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 5(4): e336, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32766507

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis is extremely painful, with no superior single analgesic modality. We introduced a methadone-based multimodal analgesia protocol, aiming to decrease the length of hospital stay (LOS), improve pain control, and decrease the need for additional opioids. METHODS: We analyzed 122 idiopathic scoliosis patients with posterior instrumented spinal fusion. They were matched by age, sex, surgeon, and the number of levels fused before and after the implementation of the new protocol. This analysis included 61 controls (intrathecal morphine, gabapentin, intravenous opioids, and adjuncts) and 61 patients on the new protocol (scheduled methadone, methocarbamol, ketorolac/ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and oxycodone with intravenous opioids as needed). The primary outcome was LOS. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, total opioid use (morphine milligram equivalents), time to a first bowel movement, and postdischarge phone calls. RESULTS: New protocol patients were discharged earlier (median LOS, 2 days) compared with control patients (3 days; P < 0.001). Total inpatient morphine consumption was lower in the protocol group (P < 0.001). Pain scores were higher in the protocol group on the day of surgery, similar on postoperative day (POD) 1, and lower by POD 2 (P = 0.01). The new protocol also reduced the median time to first bowel movement (P < 0.001), and the number of postdischarge pain-related phone calls (P < 0.006). CONCLUSION: Methadone-based multimodal analgesia resulted in significantly lower LOS compared with the conventional regimen. It also provided improved pain control, reduced total opioid consumption, and early bowel movement compared with the control group.

3.
Haemophilia ; 25(4): 626-632, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31144379

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Multidisciplinary clinics in academic settings are often inefficient and can lead to lengthy clinic visits for patients and staff. AIM: We aimed to use quality improvement (QI) methodology and a multidisciplinary approach to optimize outpatient comprehensive haemophilia clinic flow. METHODS: At baseline, a multidisciplinary QI team created a key driver diagram to identify drivers of haemophilia clinic flow. Identified drivers included patient needs/scheduling, provider flow and laboratory/research requirements. From December 2016 to August 2017, value stream mapping (VSM) was used to identify barriers to clinic flow, and plan-do-study-act cycles were used to address these barriers. Interventions included (a) standardizing the order in which providers saw patients to enable time-sensitive laboratories, (b) improving HTC team meeting functionality, (c) optimizing a visual management board and implementing a flow coordinator, (d) initiating a team huddle prior to clinic start and (e) modifying the clinic appointment template. Timely laboratory draw was used as a surrogate marker of clinic flow, and VSM utilization percentage was used as an objective measure of efficiency. RESULTS: We did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in timed laboratory draws; however, clinic utilization percentage increased by 30%, which resulted in adding point-of-care musculoskeletal ultrasound services without lengthening clinic duration. CONCLUSION: Quality improvement methodology is an effective means of improving clinic utilization in a multidisciplinary clinic.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Hemofilia A , Atención al Paciente/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Flujo de Trabajo , Humanos , Laboratorios , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Haemophilia ; 25(2): 258-263, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30748062

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Haemophilia is a disorder complicated by bleeding episodes that require emergent medical evaluation. Factor replacement dosing can present challenges for emergency department (ED) care. AIMS: We aimed to reduce out-of-range factor dosing in the ED. Specifically, we sought to increase the number of haemophilia ED patient visits between encounters where sub-optimal factor dosing was administered from a baseline of 4-15 encounters. METHODS: A chart review was completed on all patients with haemophilia A (HA) or B (HB) seen in the ED for injuries requiring factor concentrate from September 2015 to August 2016. Injuries were classified as minor-requiring a 50% factor correction or major-requiring a 100% factor correction. Optimal dosing range was defined as 90%-120% of the institutional guideline goal for the degree of injury. The predicted optimal dose range for each patient was compared to the actual dose administered. RESULTS: Baseline data demonstrated optimal dosing range in 70% of encounters. There was no difference between patients with HA or HB in frequency of out-of-range dosing (P = 0.15). There was no difference in frequency of out-of-range dosing between types of clotting factor concentrate used. After initiation of quality improvement (QI) interventions, we achieved 16 encounters between out-of-range dosing, exceeding our goal of 15. However, this success was not sustained. CONCLUSION: Optimal coagulation factor dosing is important for patient care and resource management. QI interventions promoted increased accuracy of factor dosing for patients with haemophilia seen in the ED.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Lactante , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Adulto Joven
5.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 41(5): e284-e289, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30339654

RESUMEN

The "Joint Outcomes Study" (JOS) demonstrated improved joint outcomes for patients receiving primary prophylaxis versus on-demand therapy. The impact of primary prophylaxis on inpatient health care utilization is not well-defined. To evaluate changes in hospitalization care of children with hemophilia before and after the 2007 JOS publication, this study utilized the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) to evaluate admissions for patients with hemophilia A or B (age, 2 to 7) admitted between January 2002 and 2006 (pre-JOS) and January 2010 and 2014 (post-JOS). Discharge diagnosis codes and clinical transaction classifications were used to differentiate bleeding episodes, infections, bypass agent use, length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) management. Overall, admissions for bleeding episodes did not change (26.5% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 23.6% post-JOS, P=0.10). However, admissions for suspected infections increased (3.0% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 7.2% post-JOS, P<0.01) while confirmed infections remained stable. Meanwhile, ICU utilization decreased (7.8% of admissions pre-JOS vs. 4.9% post-JOS, P<0.01). The necessity for ICU care in children with hemophilia has decreased since publication of the JOS. However, expanded adoption of primary prophylaxis is associated with more hospitalizations for suspected systemic infections, likely due to utilization of central venous catheters to deliver clotting factor concentrates.


Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia B/complicaciones , Pacientes Internos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Hemartrosis , Hemorragia , Humanos , Infecciones , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...