[Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 4]. / Minimalinvasive Therapien des benignen Prostatasyndroms : Die deutsche S2e-Leitlinie 2023 ­ Teil 4/4.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive for benign prostatic obstruction (LUTS/BPO) are one of the most frequent diseases in men and can have a significant impact on quality of life. Instrumental therapies are common, and many patients seek minimally invasive treatment options. OBJECTIVE: Presentation and evidence-based evaluation of the minimally invasive therapy for benign prostatic syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Summary and overview of chapters 11-13 on minimally invasive therapies for LUTS/BPO of the current long version of the German S2e guideline. RESULTS: In case of absolute indication for surgery or after unsatisfactory or undesired medical therapy, minimally invasive treatments such as UroLift® (Neotract Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA), Rezá¿¡m™ (Boston Scientific, Malborough, MA, USA), iTIND™ (Olympus America Inc., Westborough, MA, USA), and prostatic artery embolization (PAE) can be considered. These indirect/delayed ablative therapies offer lower morbidity and the possibility of performing them under local anesthesia, but they are inferior to direct ablative/resective techniques in terms of effectiveness and sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: The updated German S2e guideline summarizes evidence-based recommendations for new minimally invasive therapies for LUTS/BPO, which present alternative treatment options for selected patients.

[Surgical treatment options of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction : The German S2e guideline 2023-part 3]. / Operative Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms ­ klassische Desobstruktion : Die deutsche S2e-Leitlinie 2023 ­ Teil 3.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) are one of the most common diagnoses in clinical practice. Bothersome LUTS impact considerably quality of life of men and may cause severe complications without treatment. According to the diagnostic assessment every patient should be treated with an adequate therapy. Management comprises a conservative approach, medication, novel minimally invasive options, and surgical procedures with the aim to remove the obstructing adenoma. The German guideline panel has updated the German guidelines on diagnostic evaluation and management of LUTS due to BPO. OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based recommendations of surgical treatment options of LUTS due to BPO are evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chapters 11.1.1 and 11.2 of the updated German S2e guideline on the management of LUTS due to BPO are summarized as a review article. RESULTS: A treatment algorithm based on current evidence has been proposed. It is considered to provide guidance for the selection of the best procedure according to the needs of the patient. Anatomic features of the prostate, the patients' morbidity, and the preservation of ejaculatory function are taken into account for the choice of the best procedures. These surgical options can be divided into techniques with direct, delayed or no removal of the adenoma, procedures with suprapubic access, and embolizing approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The updated German S2e guideline on the management of LUTS due to BPO provides evidence-based recommendations for the selection of the best procedure according to the needs of the individual patient.

[Conservative and pharmacological treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia : The German S2e-guideline 2023-part2]. / Konservative und medikamentöse Therapie des benignen Prostatasyndroms : Die deutsche S2e-Leitlinie 2023 ­ Teil 2.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, in German guidelines: benign prostatic syndrome [BPS]) is considered the most common disease of the lower urinary tract in men and can have a tremendous impact on the quality-of-life of affected patients. Conservative and pharmacological therapy of this disease are of great importance, both in improving LUTS and reducing progression-related complications. OBJECTIVES: Presentation of the conservative and pharmacological treatment options according to the current German S2e guideline on BPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Summary and overview of chapters 9 and 10 of the current German S2e guideline on BPS. RESULTS: In addition to a controlled watchful waiting for BPS patients without an absolute indication for prostate surgery, a variety of phytopharmacological formulations and synthetic drugs according to the symptomatology and clinical progress are available. Phytotherapy should, due to inconsistent study data, only be considered for mild to moderate symptoms. Synthetic drugs include alpha-blockers, 5α-reductase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, antimuscarinics and, more recently, the ß3-agonist mirabegron in the current guideline. In addition, various combination therapies are listed and evaluated according to their indications, effects and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The current German S2e guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of BPS provides an evidence-based foundation for finding the best possible and most effective medication.

[Diagnostic work-up of benign prostatic hyperplasia : The German S2e-guideline 2023 part 1]. / Diagnostik des benignen Prostatasyndroms : Die deutsche S2e-Leitlinie 2023 Teil 1.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; in German guidelines: benign prostatic syndrome [BPS]) is the most frequent urological disease in men and can result in a considerable deterioration of quality-of-life. BPS can be associated with LUTS, benign prostatic enlargement (BPE), and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) or benign prostatic obstruction (BPO), respectively. The expert group on BPS of the German Society of Urology has re-evaluated the tests for the assessment of BPH and provides evidence-based recommendations. OBJECTIVES: Presentation and evidence-based rating of tests for the assessment of patients with BPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Summary and overview of chapters 5, 6, and 8 of the latest long version of the German S2e guideline on BPS. RESULTS: The diagnostic work-up should clarify (1) whether the complaints of the patient are caused by BPS, (2) how relevant the complaints are and whether treatment is necessary, (3) whether complications of the lower or upper urinary tract already exist, and (4) which treatment will be most suitable. Baseline assessment should be done in all BPS patients and include history, measurement of LUTS and quality-of-life, urinalysis, serum prostate-specific antigen, post-void residual, ultrasound of the lower urinary tract, including measurements of prostate volume, intravesical prostatic protrusion and detrusor wall thickness, and ultrasound of the upper urinary tract. Additional tests can follow when questions remain unanswered after baseline assessment. These optional tests include bladder diaries, uroflowmetry, serum creatinine, urethrocystoscopy, other noninvasive tests for the determination of BOO/BPO such as penile cuff test, condom catheter method and near-infrared spectroscopy, and other imagining tests such as X­ray and MRI investigations. CONCLUSIONS: The updated German S2e guideline summarizes evidence-based recommendations on the diagnostic work-up, including the assessment of the BPS components BPE, LUTS, and BOO/BPO.

Urological de novo malignancy after kidney transplantation: a case for the urologist.

PURPOSE: The development of de novo malignancies is a well-known complication after renal transplantation. With increasing donor and recipient age the risk of post-transplant malignancy including genitourinary cancers is increasing. Thus, urologists have an increasing likelihood of treating these cases. We report our experience with the management of urological de novo malignancies after renal transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urological de novo malignancies developed in 29 of 802 patients after renal transplantation between 1988 and 2009. Data were analyzed for tumor incidence, treatment, followup and possible factors contributing to tumor development. RESULTS: Patients had renal cell carcinoma (12 at a median of 46.5 months after renal transplantation), transitional cell carcinoma (6 bladder cases at 35 months, 2 renal pelvis cases at 37.5 months), carcinoma of the prostate (7 at 69 months) and seminoma (2 at 41.5 months). No treatment related graft losses occurred. Of 3 cases of renal cell carcinoma developing in the graft 2 were treated with nephron sparing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Urological post-transplant malignancies are an increasing problem for urologists. Regular surveillance after renal transplantation is mandatory to detect early occurrence of de novo malignancies and standard urological treatment principles can be applied. Nonfunctioning native kidneys with suspicious lesions should be removed early. Radical pelvic surgery after renal transplantation and nephron sparing procedures in the graft can be a challenge even for the experienced urologist, and require surgical versatility.

Complementary and alternative medicine in urology.

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) includes various practices, measures and products which are not presently considered to be a part of conventional (mainstream) medicine. Herbal products, vitamins, minerals and amino acids are increasingly popular as dietary supplements for the treatment, improvement and prophylaxis of urological diseases, and to improve general health and well-being. As these products are freely available without prescription, conventional healthcare providers are often unaware that their patients are using CAM. It is essential to know that some herbal supplements may act in the same way as chemical drugs, and that they originate 'from nature' does not mean that they are safe and/or with no potential harmful effects and/or toxicity. Eventual interactions with conventional medications and contamination with prescription drugs and metals have been reported. The active components of many phytotherapeutic preparations and their mechanism(s) of action are still being determined and evaluated. There is scientific evidence for the effectiveness of some CAM treatments, but for most there are important key questions yet to be answered through basic research and well-designed studies according to established guidelines. Because of the increasing popularity and use of CAM, conventional healthcare providers, including urologists, should not ignore it, and be well informed about the benefits and potential risks of dietary supplements, so that they can advise their patients about this developing field. Whenever necessary and possible, lifestyle and behavioural changes should be recommended before using CAM, and eventually be supplemented by CAM as a second step.

The role of phytotherapy in treating lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Despite their traditional popularity in many European countries and their increasing use as dietary supplements in the United States, the role of phytotherapeutic agents in treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is continuously debated. If strict criteria of evidence-based medicine are applied, the available data have not yet provided clear evidence of efficacy for most phytotherapeutic preparations. Different extraction procedures used by the different manufacturers, the variations of the raw products (plants) used and the fact that the potentially active component(s) of the final product and its (their) mechanism(s) of action are still under investigation make comparisons between the various products impossible. Thus, one product might have clinical efficacy while another might not. Therefore, as long as the composition of the final product of the various preparations is not proven to be identical, each manufacturer's preparation must be evaluated separately, using the gold standard of placebo-controlled studies according to accepted guidelines. Conclusions of meta-analyses that include products from different plants undergoing different extraction procedures and that are used in different dosages may be misleading. A number of short-term randomised trials and some metaanalyses in the recent literature suggest clinical efficacy and good tolerability for some preparations, mainly extracts from Serenoa repens and also Pygeum africanum, products with high concentrations of beta-sitosterol, and pumpkin seeds. It is also claimed that the efficacy of an extract from S. repens is comparable to that of finasteride and alpha-blockers. However, as has been demanded by the International Consultations on BPH, additional randomised, placebo-controlled trials are needed before phytotherapeutic agents can be recommended as an effective option in treating LUTS and BPH.