Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation has no anti-inflammatory effect in diabetes.

Chronic inflammation is associated with diabetes and contributes to the development and progression of micro- and macrovascular complications. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has been proposed to reduce levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines in non-diabetics by activating the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. We investigated the anti-inflammatory potential of tVNS as a secondary endpoint of a randomized controlled trial in people with diabetes (NCT04143269). 131 people with diabetes (type 1: n = 63; type 2: n = 68), gastrointestinal symptoms and various degrees of autonomic neuropathy were included and randomly assigned to self-administer active (n = 63) or sham (n = 68) tVNS over two successive study periods: (1) Seven days with four daily administrations and, (2) 56 days with two daily administrations. Levels of systemic inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ) were quantified from blood samples by multiplex technology. Information regarding age, sex, diabetes type, and the presence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) was included in the analysis as possible confounders. No differences in either cytokine were seen after study period 1 and 2 between active and sham tVNS (all p-values > 0.08). Age, sex, diabetes type, presence of CAN, and baseline levels of inflammatory cytokines were not associated with changes after treatment (all p-values > 0.07). A tendency towards slight reductions in TNF-α levels after active treatment was observed in those with no CAN compared to those with early or manifest CAN (p = 0.052). In conclusion, tVNS did not influence the level of systemic inflammation in people with diabetes.

Individualized Pain Treatment in Chronic Pancreatitis (INPAIN): An International, Multicenter, Investigator-initiated, Prospective, Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Pain is the foremost complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP), affecting about 70% of patients. However, the pathophysiological understanding and management of CP-related pain is complex, likely as patients have diverse "pain phenotypes" responding differently to treatment. This study aims to develop a bedside test panel to identify distinct pain phenotypes, investigate the temporal evolution, and determine whether they can be used to predict treatment response. METHOD: The INPAIN study is an international, multi-center, observational, longitudinal cohort study comprised of 4 sub-studies. The studies will prospectively enroll 400 CP patients (50 without pain and 350 with pain) and 50 control subjects, conducting biannual observations for four years. The test panel is comprised of comprehensive subjective and objective assessment parameters. Statistical analysis strategies differ across the sub-studies. A model to predict treatment efficacy will be developed using various machine learning techniques, including an artificial intelligence approach, with internal cross-validation. Trajectories in pain parameters will be characterized by graphical analysis and mixed effect models. DISCUSSION: The INPAIN study aims to comprehensively understand pain in CP through a test panel developed for routine clinical use. This tool has the potential to personalize treatments, improve clinical practice, enhance patient care, improve quality of life, and minimize treatment side effects.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Reduces Pressure Pain Sensitivity in Patients with Non-Malignant Chronic Pain.

OBJECTIVES: Non-malignant chronic pain is a clinical challenge because pharmacological treatment often fails to relieve pain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a treatment that could have the potential for pain relief and improvement in quality of life. However, there is a lack of clinical trials evaluating the effects of tDCS on the pain system. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of 5 days of anodal tDCS treatment on the pain system in chronic non-malignant pain patients using quantitative sensory testing (QST) and quality of life questionnaires: (1) Brief Pain Inventory-short form (BPI-sf), (2) European Organization for Research and Treatment of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-C30), and (3) Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). METHODS: Eleven non-malignant chronic pain patients (51±13.6 years old, 5M) participated in the study. Anodal tDCS was applied for five consecutive days, followed by sham stimulation after a washout period of at least two weeks. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) and pain tolerance thresholds (PTT) were assessed in different body regions on days 1 and 5. RESULTS: Anodal tDCS appeared to maintain PTT at C5 (clavicle) on day 5, but sham stimulation decreased PTT (P=0.007). Additionally, anodal tDCS increased PTT compared to sham at day 5 at Th10 ventral dermatomes (P=0.014). Both anodal and sham tDCS decreased the BPI-sf total and interference scores, and the EORTC-C30 fatigue score, but no interaction effect was observed. DISCUSSION: This study adds to the evidence in the literature that tDCS may be a potential therapeutic tool for the management of non-malignant chronic pain.

Global trends in opioid use for pain management in acute pancreatitis: A multicentre prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Since there is no current international consensus on the optimal approach for pain management in acute pancreatitis (AP), analgesic practices may vary across different healthcare settings. OBJECTIVE: This study explored global disparities in analgesic use, in particular opioids, during admission and at discharge in hospitalised AP patients. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the prospective PAINAP database, which included all admissions for AP between April and June 2022 with a 1-month follow-up. Demographic details, analgesic use, and clinical outcomes were recorded during admission and at discharge. Odds ratios (ORs) for opioid use during admission and at discharge were identified using multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Amongst the 1864 patients (52% males, median age 56 (interquartile range, 41-71)) across three different continents, simple analgesics were predominantly used as the primary analgesic (70%). Opioid use during admission was lowest in European centres (67%). Admission in Asian (OR, 2.53 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.59-4.04), p < 0.001), and Australian (OR, 5.81 (95% CI, 3.19-10.56), p < 0.001) centres was associated with opioid administration during admission compared with European centres. Increased pain severity, longer pre-admission pain duration, organ failure, and longer length of admission increased opioid use during admission. At discharge, Asian (OR, 2.01 (95% CI, 1.40-2.88), p < 0.001) and Australian (OR, 1.91 (95% CI, 1.28-2.85), p = 0.002) centres were associated with opioid prescription compared with European centres. Increased pain severity, longer pre-admission pain duration, acute necrotic collections, and walled-off necrosis also increased the likelihood of opioid prescription at discharge. CONCLUSION: There are substantial intercontinental differences in opioid use for AP pain. Accordingly, there is a need for international guidelines on pain management in AP.

The influence of tramadol on bowel function: A randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Tramadol is a weak opioid used to treat moderate pain. Stronger opioids inhibit gastrointestinal function, but little is known about the gastrointestinal effects of tramadol. Our aim was to investigate if tramadol causes opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD). Twenty healthy male participants (mean age 24 [range 20-31] years) were included. Tramadol (extended-release formulation, 200 mg/day) or placebo was administered for 10 days in two study periods separated by 3 weeks. Gastrointestinal transit times and segmental volume, motility and water content were investigated with the 3D-transit system and magnetic resonance imaging. Bowel movements and gastrointestinal symptoms were recorded daily. Tramadol prolonged colonic transit time (34 h vs. 25 h, p < 0.001) and increased small bowel motility (p < 0.01) and water content (p = 0.002) compared to placebo. Across all days of treatment, tramadol reduced the number of mean daily bowel movements (p = 0.001) and increased mean stool consistency (p = 0.006). Gastrointestinal symptom scores increased with tramadol (indigestion: +358%, p = 0.01; constipation: +475%, p = 0.01). Additionally, more participants fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for constipation after tramadol treatment compared to placebo (40% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). This study showed that tramadol treatment is associated with OIBD, and management of constipation and other bowel symptoms should, therefore, be prioritised when treating pain patients with tramadol.

EndoFLIP evaluation of the pylorus during minimal invasive Ivor-Levis esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: During esophagectomy for malignancy, the anterior and posterior branches of the vagus nerve are transected in order to achieve surgical radicality. This leads to loss of central nervous system-control of the pylorus which may lead to delayed gastric emptying. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of the EndoFLIP technique for assessment of pyloric biomechanical properties in patients undergoing esophagectomy. METHODS: A feasibility study in six patients undergoing surgery was conducted. EndoFLIP measurements were carried out preoperative (Pre-op), after surgical resection (Post-op) and following prophylactic balloon dilatation of the pylorus (Post-dil). By measuring the cross-sectional area and pressure of the pylorus the pyloric compliance and the incremental pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep) were calculated. RESULTS: Placing the catheter in the pyloric region was successfully achieved in all six patients. No complications were observed. Resection of the esophagus increased the incremental pyloric elastic modulus (Ep) from 0.59 ± 0.18 kPa to 0.99 ± 0.34 kPa (p = 0.03). After dilatation, the Ep was reduced to 0.53 ± 0.23 kPa (p = 0.04), which was close to Pre-op (p = 0.62). The pyloric compliance showed a similar pattern as that found for Ep. CONCLUSION: The EndoFLIP system holds promise for assessment of biomechanics of the pyloric region in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer.

A sham-controlled, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a treatment option for patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) who experience pain that does not respond to standard interventions. However, there is a lack of sham-controlled trials to support its efficacy. METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, cross-over trial enrolled 16 CP patients with insufficient pain relief from standard therapies. Patients underwent high-frequency (1000 Hz) paraesthesia-free SCS or sham for two 10-day stimulation periods, separated by a 3-day washout period. The primary outcome was daily pain intensity registered in a pain diary based on a numeric rating scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes included various questionnaires. Quantitative sensory testing was used to probe the pain system before and after interventions. RESULTS: The average daily pain score on the NRS at baseline was 5.2 ± 1.9. After SCS, the pain score was 4.2 ± 2.1 compared to 4.3 ± 2.1 in the sham group (mean difference -0.1, 95% CI [-1.4 to 1.1]; P = 0.81). Similarly, no differences were observed between groups for the maximal daily pain score, secondary outcomes or quantitative sensory testing parameters. During an open-label, non-sham-controlled and non-blinded extension of the study, the average daily NRS was 5.2 ± 1.7 at baseline, 3.2 ± 1.8 at 3 months, 2.9 ± 1.9 at 6 months and 3.4 ± 2.2 at 12 months of follow-up (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this first sham-controlled trial of SCS in painful CP, we did not find evidence of short-term pain relief with paraesthesia-free high-frequency (1000 Hz) stimulation. However, evaluation of the long-term effect by larger sham-controlled trials with long-term follow-up is warranted. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: In this first sham-controlled trial to apply high-frequency (1000 Hz) spinal cord stimulation in patients with visceral pain due to chronic pancreatitis, we did not find evidence for clinically relevant pain relief. Taken together with potential procedure-related complications, adverse effects and costs associated with spinal cord stimulation, our findings question its use for management of visceral pain.

Social disparity is associated with an increased risk of acute and chronic pancreatitis.

AIM: To study social disparity in acute pancreatitis (AP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP).We also aimed at exploring whether an interaction exists between alcohol intake and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: Prospective cohort study based on data from 271 696 men and women participating in the Danish National Health Surveys 2010, and 2013. Information on alcohol and smoking parameters, body mass index (BMI), diet, and education, were self-reported and information on family income was obtained from administrative registers. Outcome variables (acute and chronic pancreatitis) were obtained from national health registers. RESULTS: The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of developing AP and CP increased with decreasing family income. Compared to participants in the highest income quintile, participants in the lowest income quintile had 43 (95% CI: 14-80%), 99 (95% CI: 26-214%), and 56% (95% CI: 26-94%) higher incidence rates of AP, CP, and all pancreatitis, respectively. The associations persisted after adjustment for alcohol intake, smoking, BMI, and diet.Likewise, participants with only primary school education had an IRR for an AP of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.06-1.59) compared to those with higher education after adjustment for baseline year, age, and sex. We found no interactions between alcohol intake and income or between alcohol intake and education in relation to neither AP, CP, nor all pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: This large prospective population study showed a significant social disparity in incidence rates of pancreatitis by family income, with higher rates among those with the lowest income and education independent of risk factors such as alcohol intake, smoking, BMI, and diet.

Opium tincture has anti-propulsive effects in patients with chronic diarrhea: a randomized, placebo-controlled, and cross-over trial.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic diarrhea affects approximately 5% of the population. Opioids inhibit gastrointestinal motility, and opium tincture has shown anti-propulsive effects in healthy, but no controlled studies of its clinical efficacy exist. We aimed to investigate the anti-propulsive and central nervous system (CNS) effects of opium tincture in patients with chronic diarrhea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in subjects with chronic diarrhea refractory to standard treatment. Participants received opium tincture or placebo during two intervention periods, each lasting seven days. Bowel movements were recorded daily, and gastrointestinal transit time was investigated with the wireless motility capsule system. Gastrointestinal symptoms, health-related quality of life, and CNS effects (pupil size, reaction time, memory, and general cognition) were also investigated, along with signs of addiction. RESULTS: Eleven subjects (mean age: 45 ± 17 years, 46% males) with a median of 4.7 daily bowel movements were included. The number of daily bowel movements was reduced during opium tincture treatment to 2.3 (p = 0.045), but not placebo (3.0, p = 0.09). Opium tincture prolonged the colonic transit time compared to placebo (17 h vs. 12 h, p < 0.001). In both treatment arms, there were no changes in self-reported gastrointestinal symptoms, health-related quality of life, or CNS effects, and no indication of addiction was present. CONCLUSION: Opium tincture induced anti-propulsive effects in patients with chronic diarrhea refractory to standard treatment. This indicates that opium tincture is a relevant treatment strategy for selected patients with chronic diarrhea. Moreover, no evidence of opioid-induced sedation or addiction was found.Trial Registration Number: NCT05690321 (registered 2023-01-10).

No Effect of Methylnaltrexone on Acute Pancreatitis Severity: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Opioids used to manage severe pain in acute pancreatitis (AP) might exacerbate the disease through effects on gastrointestinal and immune functions. Methylnaltrexone, a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist, may counteract these effects without changing analgesia. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial included adult patients with AP and systemic inflammatory response syndrome at 4 Danish centers. Patients were randomized to receive 5 days of continuous intravenous methylnaltrexone (0.15 mg/kg/d) or placebo added to the standard of care. The primary end point was the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System score after 48 hours of treatment. Main secondary outcomes included pain scores, opioid use, disease severity, and mortality. RESULTS: In total, 105 patients (54% men) were randomized to methylnaltrexone (n = 51) or placebo (n = 54). After 48 hours, the Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System score was 134.3 points in the methylnaltrexone group and 130.5 points in the placebo group (difference 3.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] -40.1 to 47.6; P = 0.87). At 48 hours, we found no differences between the groups in pain severity (0.0, 95% CI -0.8 to 0.9; P = 0.94), pain interference (-0.3, 95% CI -1.4 to 0.8; P = 0.55), and morphine equivalent doses (6.5 mg, 95% CI -2.1 to 15.2; P = 0.14). Methylnaltrexone also did not affect the risk of severe disease (8%, 95% CI -11 to 28; P = 0.38) and mortality (6%, 95% CI -1 to 12; P = 0.11). The medication was well tolerated. DISCUSSION: Methylnaltrexone treatment did not achieve superiority over placebo for reducing the severity of AP.

Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy and Endoscopy for the Treatment of Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis : A Sham-Controlled, Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: No randomized controlled trials have substantiated endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct in patients with painful chronic pancreatitis. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pain-relieving effect of pancreatic duct decompression in patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones. DESIGN: 24-week, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03966781). SETTING: Asian Institute of Gastroenterology in India from February 2021 to July 2022. PARTICIPANTS: 106 patients with chronic pancreatitis. INTERVENTION: Combined extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) compared with sham procedures. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was pain relief on a 0- to 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were assessed after 12 and 24 weeks and included 30% pain relief, opioid use, pain-free days, questionaries, and complications to interventions. RESULTS: 52 patients in the ESWL/ERP group and 54 in the sham group were included. At 12 weeks, the ESWL/ERP group showed better pain relief compared with the sham group (mean difference in change, -0.7 [95% CI, -1.3 to 0] on the VAS; P = 0.039). The difference between groups was not sustained at the 24-week follow-up, and no differences were seen for 30% pain relief at 12- or 24-week follow-up. The number of pain-free days was increased (median difference, 16.2 days [CI, 3.9 to 28.5 days]), and the number of days using opioids was reduced (median difference, -5.4 days [CI, -9.9 to -0.9 days]) in the ESWL/ERP group compared with the sham group at 12-week follow-up. Safety outcomes were similar between groups. LIMITATION: Single-center study and limited duration of follow-up. CONCLUSION: In patients with chronic pancreatitis and intraductal stones, ESWL with ERP provided modest short-term pain relief. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Asian Institute of Gastroenterology and Aalborg University Hospital.

Intra-pancreatic fat deposition and its relation to obesity: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

OBJECTIVES: Intra-pancreatic fat deposition (IPFD) is suspected to be associated with various medical conditions. This study aimed to assess pancreatic fat content in lean and obese individuals, characterize obese individuals with and without IPFD, and explore the underlying mechanisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two obese individuals without diabetes and 35 lean controls underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using proton density fat fraction (PDFF) maps to evaluate pancreatic and hepatic fat content, and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) content. Pancreatic fibrosis was explored by T1 relaxation time and MR elastography (MRE) measurements. Associations between pancreatic fat, measures of obesity and metabolic syndrome were examined using uni- and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Pancreatic PDFF was higher in obese than in lean controls (median 8.0%, interquartile range (6.1;13.3) % vs 2.6(1.7;3.9)%, p < 0.001). Obese individuals with IPFD (PDFF ≥6.2%) had higher waist circumference (114.0 ± 12.5 cm vs 105.2 ± 8.7 cm, p = 0.007) and VAT (224.9(142.1; 316.1) cm2 vs 168.2(103.4; 195.3) cm2, p < 0.001) than those without. In univariate analysis, pancreatic PDFF in obese individuals correlated with BMI (r = 0.27, p = 0.03), waist circumference (r = 0.44, p < 0.001), VAT (r = 0.37, p = 0.004), hepatic PDFF (r = 0.25, p = 0.046) and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.32, p = 0.01). However, in multivariate analysis, only VAT was associated to pancreatic fat content. MRI measures of pancreatic fibrosis indicated no evident fibrosis in relation to increased pancreatic fat content. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic fat content was increased in obese individuals compared with lean controls and predominantly correlated with the amount of visceral adipose tissue. Pancreatic fat content was not clearly linked to measures of pancreatic fibrosis.

A comparison of function lumen imaging probe measurements of anal sphincter function in fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) is a test of anal sphincter distensibility under evaluation by specialist centers. Two measurement protocols termed "stepwise" and "ramp" are used, risking a lack of standardization. This study aims to compare the performance of these protocols to establish if there are differences between them. METHODS: Patients with fecal incontinence were recruited and underwent measurement with both protocols at a tertiary pelvic floor referral unit. Differences in minimum diameter, FLIP bag pressure, and distensibility index (DI) at rest and during squeeze were calculated at various FLIP bag volumes. KEY RESULTS: Twenty patients (19 female, mean age 61 [range: 38-78]) were included. The resting minimum diameter at 30 and 40 mL bag volumes were less in the stepwise protocol (mean bias: -0.55 mm and -1.18 mm, p < 0.05) along with the DI at the same bag volumes (mean bias: -0.37 mm2/mmHg and -0.55 mm2/mmHg, p < 0.05). There was also a trend towards greater bag pressures at 30 mL (mean bias: +2.08 mmHg, p = 0.114) and 40 mL (mean bias: +2.81 mmHg, p = 0.129) volumes in the stepwise protocol. There were no differences between protocols in measurements of minimum diameter, maximum bag pressure, or DI during voluntary squeeze (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION AND INFERENCES: There are differences between the two commonly described FLIP measurement protocols at rest, although there are no differences in the assessment of squeeze function. Consensus agreement is required to agree the most appropriate FLIP measurement protocol in assessing anal sphincter function.

Metabolic Sequelae and All-Cause Mortality in Chronic Pancreatitis With and Without Prior Acute Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk of metabolic sequelae and all-cause mortality in a population-based cohort of chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients with and without prior acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: We used nationwide health registries to identify all Danish residents (18 years and older) with incident CP from 2000 to 2018. Information on AP/CP diagnoses, metabolic sequelae (post-pancreatitis diabetes mellitus [PPDM], exocrine pancreatic dysfunction, and osteoporosis), and all-cause mortality were obtained from Danish national health registries. CP cases were stratified based on the presence of AP before CP diagnosis. The risk of metabolic sequelae and all-cause mortality was expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), calculated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 9,655 patients with CP were included. Among patients with CP, 3,913 (40.5%) had a prior AP diagnosis. Compared with patients without a history of AP, patients with prior AP had a decreased risk of death (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.74-0.84), which was largely confined to the initial period after CP diagnosis. Patients with prior AP had an increased risk of PPDM (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.38-1.69), which persisted for up to a decade after CP diagnosis. No overall differences in risk were observed for exocrine pancreatic dysfunction (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.07) and osteoporosis (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.74-1.02). DISCUSSION: This nationwide study revealed that most of the patients with CP have no prior episode(s) of AP, indicating that an attack of AP sensitizing the pancreas is not essential for CP development. CP patients with and without prior AP have different risk profiles of PPDM and all-cause mortality.

Opioid analgesia and severity of acute pancreatitis: An international multicentre cohort study on pain management in acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of analgesic modalities on short-term outcomes in acute pancreatitis remains unknown. However, preclinical models have raised safety concerns regarding opioid use in patients with acute pancreatitis. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the association between analgesics, particularly opioids, and severity and mortality in hospitalised patients with acute pancreatitis. METHODS: This prospective multicentre cohort study recruited consecutive patients admitted with a first episode of acute pancreatitis between April 1 and 30 June 2022, with a 1-month follow-up. Data on aetiology, clinical course, and analgesic treatment were collected. The primary outcome was the association between opioid analgesia and acute pancreatitis severity, which was analysed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among a total of 1768 patients, included from 118 centres across 27 countries, 1036 (59%) had opioids administered on admission day, and 167 (9%) received opioids after admission day. On univariate analysis, moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis was associated with male sex, Asian ethnicity, alcohol aetiology, comorbidity, predicted severe acute pancreatitis, higher pain scores, longer pain duration and opioid treatment (all p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, comorbidity, alcohol aetiology, longer pain duration and higher pain scores increased the risk of moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, opioids administered after admission day (but not on admission day) doubled the risk of moderately severe or severe disease (OR 2.07 (95% CI, 1.29-3.33); p = 0.003). Opioid treatment for 6 days or more was an independent risk factor for moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis (OR 3.21 (95% CI, 2.16-4.79; p < 0.001). On univariate analysis, longer opioid duration was associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Opioid treatment increased the risk of more severe acute pancreatitis only when administered after admission day or for 6 days or more. Future randomised studies should re-evaluate whether opioids might be safe in acute pancreatitis.

Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation for treating gastrointestinal symptoms in individuals with diabetes: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, multicentre trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Diabetic gastroenteropathy frequently causes debilitating gastrointestinal symptoms. Previous uncontrolled studies have shown that transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS) may improve gastrointestinal symptoms. To investigate the effect of cervical tVNS in individuals with diabetes suffering from autonomic neuropathy and gastrointestinal symptoms, we conducted a randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind (participants and investigators were blinded to the allocated treatment) study. METHODS: This study included adults (aged 20-86) with type 1 or 2 diabetes, gastrointestinal symptoms and autonomic neuropathy recruited from three Steno Diabetes Centres in Denmark. Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive active or sham stimulation. Active cervical tVNS or sham stimulation was self-administered over two successive study periods: 1 week of four daily stimulations and 8 weeks of two daily stimulations. The primary outcome measures were gastrointestinal symptom changes as measured using the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) and the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS). Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal transit times and cardiovascular autonomic function. RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants were randomised to the active group, while 77 were randomised to the sham group. Sixty-three in the active and 68 in the sham group remained for analysis in study period 1, while 62 in each group were analysed in study period 2. In study period 1, active and sham tVNS resulted in similar symptom reductions (GCSI: -0.26 ± 0.64 vs -0.17 ± 0.62, p=0.44; GSRS: -0.35 ± 0.62 vs -0.32 ± 0.59, p=0.77; mean ± SD). In study period 2, active stimulation also caused a mean symptom decrease that was comparable to that observed after sham stimulation (GCSI: -0.47 ± 0.78 vs -0.33 ± 0.75, p=0.34; GSRS: -0.46 ± 0.90 vs -0.35 ± 0.79, p=0.50). Gastric emptying time was increased in the active group compared with sham (23 min vs -19 min, p=0.04). Segmental intestinal transit times and cardiovascular autonomic measurements did not differ between treatment groups (all p>0.05). The tVNS was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Cervical tVNS, compared with sham stimulation, does not improve gastrointestinal symptoms among individuals with diabetes and autonomic neuropathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04143269 FUNDING: The study was funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF180C0052045).

Pancreatic quantitative sensory testing to predict treatment response of endoscopic therapy or surgery for painful chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic duct obstruction: study protocol for an observational clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment for abdominal pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) remains challenging in the setting of central nervous system sensitisation, a phenomenon of remodelling and neuronal hyperexcitability resulting from persistent pain stimuli. This is suspected to render affected individuals less likely to respond to conventional therapies. Endotherapy or surgical decompression is offered to patients with pancreatic duct obstruction. However, the response to treatment is unpredictable. Pancreatic quantitative sensory testing (P-QST), an investigative technique of standardised stimulations to test the pain system in CP, has been used for phenotyping patients into three mutually exclusive groups: no central sensitisation, segmental sensitisation (pancreatic viscerotome) and widespread hyperalgesia suggestive of supraspinal central sensitisation. We will test the predictive capability of the pretreatment P-QST phenotype to predict the likelihood of pain improvement following invasive treatment for painful CP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This observational clinical trial will enrol 150 patients from the University of Pittsburgh, Johns Hopkins and Indiana University. Participants will undergo pretreatment phenotyping with P-QST. Treatment will be pancreatic endotherapy or surgery for clearance of painful pancreatic duct obstruction. PRIMARY OUTCOME: average pain score over the preceding 7 days measured by Numeric Rating Scale at 6 months postintervention. Secondary outcomes will include changes in opioid use during follow-up, and patient-reported outcomes in pain and quality of life at 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention. Exploratory outcomes will include creation of a model for individualised prediction of response to invasive treatment. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial will evaluate the ability of P-QST to predict response to invasive treatment for painful CP and develop a predictive model for individualised prediction of treatment response for widespread use. This trial was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board. Data and results will be reported and disseminated in conjunction with National Institutes of Health policies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04996628.

Circulating immune signatures in chronic pancreatitis with and without preceding acute pancreatitis: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate profiles of circulating immune signatures in healthy controls and chronic pancreatitis patients (CP) with and without a preceding history of acute pancreatitis (AP). METHODS: We performed a phase 1, cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected serum samples from the PROspective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and Translation StuDies (PROCEED) study. All samples were collected during a clinically quiescent phase. CP subjects were categorized into two subgroups based on preceding episode(s) of AP. Healthy controls were included for comparison. Blinded samples were analyzed using an 80-plex Luminex assay of cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. Group and pairwise comparisons of analytes were performed between the subgroups. RESULTS: In total, 133 patients with CP (111 with AP and 22 without AP) and 50 healthy controls were included. Among the 80 analytes studied, CP patients with a history of AP had significantly higher serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-15) and chemokines (Cutaneous T-Cell Attracting Chemokine (CTACK), Monokine induced Gamma Interferon (MIG), Macrophage-derived Chemokine (MDC), Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 (MCP-1)) compared to CP without preceding AP and controls. In contrast, CP patients without AP had immune profiles characterized by low systemic inflammation and downregulation of anti-inflammatory mediators, including IL-10. CONCLUSION: CP patients with a preceding history of AP have signs of systemic inflammatory activity even during a clinically quiescent phase. In contrast, CP patients without a history of AP have low systemic inflammatory activity. These findings suggest the presence of two immunologically diverse subtypes of CP.

Diarrhoea of unknown cause: medical treatment in a stepwise mannerManagement of Idiopathic Diarrhoea Based on Experience of Step-Up Medical Treatment.

The basic principle for the treatment of idiopathic diarrhoea (functional diarrhoea K59.1) is to delay transit through the gut in order to promote the absorption of electrolytes and water. Under mild conditions, bulking agents may suffice. With increasing severity, antidiarrhoeal pharmaceuticals may be added in a stepwise manner. In diarrhoea of unknown aetiology, peripherally-acting opioid receptor agonists, such as loperamide, are first-line treatment and forms the pharmaceutical basis of antidiarrheal treatment. As second-line treatment opium drops have an approved indication for severe diarrhoea when other treatment options fail. Beyond this, various treatment options are built on experience with more advanced treatments using clonidine, octreotide, as well as GLP-1 and GLP-2 analogs which require specialist knowledge the field.

Chronic diarrhoea without an established cause is common.There are a small number of clinical trials, often with a limited number of patients or healthy volunteers.Treatment is often carried out on a trial-and-error basis, with considerable variation in the choice of treatment.There is a paucity of guidelines, and there is a gap in knowledge concerning treatment goals, such as the frequency, consistency and form of stool.The stepwise approach to the treatment of chronic idiopathic diarrhoea described in this article is based on clinical knowledge and experience.