Parkinson's disease incidence and prevalence assessment in France using the national healthcare insurance database.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The incidence and prevalence of Parkinson's disease are important for public health planning yet there is a lack of representative, up-to-date estimations for France. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study, subjects with suspected Parkinson's were identified in the EGB database, a 1/97 random sample of the national healthcare insurance database, linked to the national hospital-discharge summary database. Incidence and prevalence were estimated using a specific definition that included those with a diagnosis (hospitalization or listed as a long-term chronic disease for full reimbursement) and a sensitive definition that also included those with an indicative drug reimbursement profile. Estimations were extrapolated to the national population, standardizing on age and gender. RESULTS: According to either the specific or the sensitive definitions, the annual incidence of Parkinson's disease during the study period was respectively 36 and 49 per 100,000 person-years and prevalence in 2010 was 308-410 per 100,000 persons in the population as a whole. According to the age groups 55-64, 65-74, 75-84 and ≥85 years incidence was respectively 33-46, 139-172, 301-363 and 442-560 per 100,000 person-years amongst men and 32-55, 81-117, 203-270 and 251-313 per 100,000 person-years amongst women. The 2010 prevalence stratified by the same age groups was 293-376, 898-1161, 2524-3011 and 3760-4578 per 100,000 persons amongst men and 199-351, 618-889, 1910-2433 and 2504-3263 per 100,000 persons amongst women. CONCLUSIONS: The specific and sensitive definitions of disease bracket the true values; the relatively small range indicates that the current study provides good estimations of incidence and prevalence of Parkinson's disease for recent years in France.

Use of the recommended drug combination for secondary prevention after a first occurrence of acute coronary syndrome in France.

PURPOSE: The recommended pharmacotherapy for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is long-term treatment with a combination of four therapeutic classes: beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents (including aspirin), statins or other lipid-lowering agents, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. The aim of this study was to describe use and persistence of the recommended drug combination after the first occurrence of ACS in France. METHODS: This was a database cohort study of patients with first registration for ACS between 2004 and 2007 in a representative sample of the French healthcare insurance database (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires, EGB). The drugs of interest were those recommended. Persistence was assessed for patients dispensed three or all four drug classes within 2 months following ACS. Discontinuation was defined by a gap of more than 6 weeks between two dispensations. The follow-up period was 24 months after ACS occurrence. RESULTS: Of 2,057 patients with incident ACS, 872 (42.4 %) had at least one dispensation of each of the four recommended drug classes, and 684 (33.3 %) had three of the four classes. Persistence to treatment at 24 months was 57.4 % (95 % CI [54.0-60.6]) for patients with four classes, and 55.5 % (95 % CI [51.6-59.1]) with three classes. Discontinuation of initial combination was higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years at ACS occurrence, those with associated ongoing chronic disease, and in those who did not suffer myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Post-ACS secondary prevention in France is not optimal, especially in patients who did not have myocardial infarction.

When patients report diseases that prescribers seem unaware of: discordance between patient and physician reporting of risk-related previous history in NSAID users from the CADEUS study.

Prescribers are often unaware of possibly dangerous previous medical histories (PMHs) of their patients. Data from a study of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users served to identify factors associated with this lack of awareness. In this study, we analyzed the factors that may have led prescribers to report the absence of some PMHs that the patients reported as being present. Of 26,618 patients prescribed an NSAID, 469 (1.7%) reported a PMH of unstable angina, 648 (2.4%) reported heart failure, 2,244 (8.4%) reported gastric or duodenal ulcer, 489 (1.8%) reported upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB), 5,343 (20.0%) reported gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and 7,832 (29.4%) reported dyspepsia. Between 64 (GERD) and 92% (UGIB) of these patient-reported PMHs were absent in the corresponding prescribers' reports. This discordance was associated with the following factors: patients of younger age, female patients, less frequent patient-prescriber contact, prescription of NSAID by a specialist, no recent specialist consultation, hospitalization or surgery related to the PMH, and no dispensation of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) for digestive disorder-related PMHs. The study showed that a substantial proportion of prescribers seemed unaware of the presence of risk-related PMHs that the patient reported when asked.