Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
FEMS Microbiol Lett ; 363(5): fnw022, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26832643

RESUMEN

Legionella pneumophila is a pathogenic bacterium commonly found in water and responsible for severe pneumonia. Free-living amoebae are protozoa also found in water, which feed on bacteria by phagocytosis. Under favorable conditions, some L. pneumophila are able to resist phagocytic digestion and even multiply within amoebae. However, it is not clear whether L. pneumophila could infect at a same rate a large range of amoebae or if there is some selectivity towards specific amoebal genera or strains. Also, most studies have been performed using collection strains and not with freshly isolated strains. In our study, we assess the permissiveness of freshly isolated environmental strains of amoebae, belonging to three common genera (i.e. Acanthamoeba, Naegleria and Vermamoeba), for growth of L. pneumophila at three different temperatures. Our results indicated that all the tested strains of amoebae were permissive to L. pneumophila Lens and that there was no significant difference between the strains. Intracellular proliferation was more efficient at a temperature of 40°C. In conclusion, our work suggests that, under favorable conditions, virulent strains of L. pneumophila could equally infect a large number of isolates of common freshwater amoeba genera.


Asunto(s)
Acanthamoeba/microbiología , Legionella pneumophila/crecimiento & desarrollo , Naegleria/microbiología , Temperatura , Microbiología del Agua
2.
Int J Hyg Environ Health ; 217(2-3): 335-9, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23932411

RESUMEN

Free-living amoebae are naturally present in water. These protozoa could be pathogenic and could also shelter pathogenic bacteria. Thus, they are described as a potential hazard for health. Also, free-living amoebae have been described to be resistant to biocides, especially under their cyst resistant form. There are several studies on amoeba treatments but none of them compare sensitivity of trophozoites and cysts from different genus to various water disinfectants. In our study, we tested chlorine, monochloramine and chlorine dioxide on both cysts and trophozoites from three strains, belonging to the three main genera of free-living amoebae. The results show that, comparing cysts to trophozoites inactivation, only the Acanthamoeba cysts were highly more resistant to treatment than trophozoites. Comparison of the disinfectant efficiency led to conclude that chlorine dioxide was the most efficient treatment in our conditions and was particularly efficient against cysts. In conclusion, our results would help to adapt water treatments in order to target free-living amoebae in water networks.


Asunto(s)
Acanthamoeba/efectos de los fármacos , Amoeba/efectos de los fármacos , Compuestos de Cloro/farmacología , Cloro/farmacología , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Trofozoítos/efectos de los fármacos , Purificación del Agua/métodos , Bacterias , Cloraminas/farmacología , Quistes , Humanos , Óxidos/farmacología
3.
Water Res ; 46(3): 808-16, 2012 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22192759

RESUMEN

Legionella pneumophila is a ubiquitous environmental microorganism found in freshwater that can cause an acute form of pneumonia known as Legionnaires' disease. Despite widespread use of chlorine to ensure drinking water quality and awareness that L. pneumophila may escape these treatments, little is known about its effects on L. pneumophila. The aim of this study was to investigate the L. pneumophila transcriptional response induced by chlorine treatment. Transcriptome analysis, using DNA arrays, showed that a sublethal dose of chlorine induces a differential expression of 391 genes involved in stress response, virulence, general metabolism, information pathways and transport. Many of the stress response genes were significantly upregulated, whereas a significant number of virulence genes were repressed. In particular, exposure of L. pneumophila to chlorine induced the expression of cellular antioxidant proteins, stress proteins and transcriptional regulators. In addition, glutathione S-transferase specific activity was enhanced following chlorine treatment. Our results clearly indicate that chlorine induces expression of proteins involved in cellular defence mechanisms against oxidative stress that might be involved in adaptation or resistance to chlorine treatment.


Asunto(s)
Cloro/farmacología , Regulación Bacteriana de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Legionella pneumophila/efectos de los fármacos , Legionella pneumophila/genética , Transcripción Genética/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/metabolismo , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Genes Bacterianos/genética , Legionella pneumophila/patogenicidad , Estrés Fisiológico/efectos de los fármacos , Estrés Fisiológico/genética , Virulencia/efectos de los fármacos , Virulencia/genética
4.
Water Res ; 45(3): 1087-94, 2011 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21093012

RESUMEN

Free-living amoebae might be pathogenic by themselves and be a reservoir for bacterial pathogens, such as Legionella pneumophila. Not only could amoebae protect intra-cellular Legionella but Legionella grown within amoebae could undergo physiological modifications and become more resistant and more virulent. Therefore, it is important to study the efficiency of treatments on amoebae and Legionella grown within these amoebae to improve their application and to limit their impact on the environment. With this aim, we compared various water disinfectants against trophozoites of three Acanthamoeba strains and L. pneumophila alone or in co-culture. Three oxidizing disinfectants (chlorine, monochloramine, and chlorine dioxide) were assessed. All the samples were treated with disinfectants for 1 h and the disinfectant concentration was followed to calculate disinfectant exposure (Ct). We noticed that there were significant differences of susceptibility among the Acanthamoeba strains. However no difference was observed between infected and non-infected amoebae. Also, the comparison between the three disinfectants indicates that monochloramine was efficient at the same level towards free or co-cultured L. pneumophila while chlorine and chlorine dioxide were less efficient on co-cultured L. pneumophila. It suggests that these disinfectants should have different modes of action. Finally, our results provide for the first time disinfectant exposure values for Acanthamoeba treatments that might be used as references for disinfection of water systems.


Asunto(s)
Acanthamoeba/efectos de los fármacos , Cloro/farmacología , Desinfectantes/farmacología , Legionella pneumophila/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Temperatura
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA