Treating Mental Health and Quality of Life in Older Cancer Patients with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has been successfully utilized in improving mental health (MH) and quality of life (QoL) in the general population, regardless of age. Cancer, which is most frequently diagnosed in older adults, is a debilitating illness that has a detrimental and long-lasting effect on patients' MH and QoL. While numerous studies have demonstrated CBT's efficacy, little evidence exists for its role in older cancer patients. This study, using MH and QoL metrics, evaluates the effectiveness of CBT for older adult cancer patients. METHODS: Focusing on MH and QoL and an average age of over 60 years old, a final analysis was performed on 17 clinical trials with a total of 124 effect sizes, including 3073 participants receiving CBT. "Metaphor" and "Robumeta" packages in R Statistical Software (version 4.2.2) were used for analysis, which included robust variance estimation (RVE) in intercept-only meta-regression, and univariate meta-regression for moderator analysis. RESULTS: With 17 clinical trials and 124 effect sizes, our results show that CBT moderately improves MH and QoL in cancer patients d = 0.19, 95% CI 0.0166-0.364, p < 0.0399. The delivery format was shown to be a strong moderator of CBT effectiveness with interpersonal technological interventions combined with pre-programmed segments having a very strong treatment effect size (d = 1.7307, 95% CI 1.5244-1.937, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of CBT in older adult cancer patients statistically improves MH and QoL, with delivery format and stages of treatment having important roles. Tech-only interpersonal interventions combined with pre-programmed CBT provide an avenue for targeting older adult cancer patients.

A systematic approach to the management of menses prophylaxis and suppression in pre-menopausal hematologic cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Hematologic malignancies in women of reproductive age carry significant additional morbidity due to menstrual bleeding in conjunction with disease and treatment-associated cytopenias. Several agents for menses prophylaxis and suppression exist, but there is a paucity of data comparing these therapies, particularly in the cancer setting. DATA SOURCES: A thorough literature review and evaluation of available data was conducted via PubMed search and combined with clinical expertise. DATA SUMMARY: The goal of prophylaxis therapy is to induce amenorrhea until it is considered safe to resume menstrual cycles. GnRH agonists remain the management of choice in achieving menses control and amenorrhea. Suppression is more likely achieved when the therapy is initiated in the late luteal phase or with the concomitant use of oral contraceptives. The effective use of oral contraceptives is achievable in appropriately selected patients. Although attractive as prophylactic agents, GnRH agonists have a slow onset of amenorrhea and can be associated with an initial increase in bleeding, thus are of limited value in immediate menorrhagia management. We recommend prioritizing estrogen therapy given its documented efficacy, and adding tranexamic acid as a secondary agent for severe or refractory bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Thus far in the literature, this is the most comprehensive proposed pathway for the prevention and suppression of menorrhagia in hematologic cancer patients. Our protocol provides a step-wise approach for the management of menses prophylaxis and suppression to provide standardization amongst clinicians and adaptations for patient-specific needs.

Prognostic impact of 'multi-hit' versus 'single hit' TP53 alteration in patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases.

While there is clear evidence to suggest poorer outcome associated with multi-hit (MH) TP53 mutation compared to single-hit (SH) in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), data are conflicting in both higher-risk MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We conducted an indepth analysis utilizing data from 10 US academic institutions to study differences in molecular characteristics and outcomes of SH (n= 139) versus MH (n= 243) TP53MTAML. Complex cytogenetics (CG) were more common in MH compared to SH TP53MT AML (p <0.001); whereas ASXL1 (p= <0.001), RAS (p<0.001), splicing factor (p= 0.003), IDH1/2 (p= 0.001), FLT3 ITD (p= <0.001) and NPM1 (p= 0.005) mutations significantly clustered with SH TP53MT AML. Survival after excluding patients who received best supportive care alone was dismal but not significantly different between SH and MH (event free survival [EFS]: 3.0 vs 2.20 months, p= 0.22/ overall survival [OS]: 8.50 vs 7.53 months, respectively, p= 0.13). In multivariable analysis, IDH1 mutation and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) as a time-dependent covariate were associated with superior EFS (HR; 0.44, 95% CI: 0.19-1.01, p= 0.05/ HR; 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18-0.62, p<0.001) and OS (HR; 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08-0.71, p= 0.01/ HR; 0.28, 95% CI: 0.16-0.47, p<0.001). While complex CG (HR; 1.56, 95% CI: 1.01-2.40, p= 0.04) retained unfavorable significance for OS. Our analysis suggests that unlike in MDS, multihit TP53MT is less relevant in independently predicting outcomes in patients with AML.

Expedited evaluation of hereditary hematopoietic malignancies in the setting of stem cell transplantation.

Not available.