Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Matched-Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia is the predominant regimen in outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but induction often is unsuccessful, unobtainable, or against patient preference. We compared outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) TJA with spinal versus general anesthesia in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center (ASC). METHODS: We took 105 general anesthesia TJA and one-to-one nearest-neighbor matched them to 105 spinal anesthesia TJA over 7 years at 1 ASC. The rate of successful SDD, minutes to discharge, postoperative pain and nausea, and 90-day complications were compared. Postanesthesia care unit outcomes were additionally stratified by spinal anesthetic (mepivacaine versus bupivacaine). RESULTS: All spinal anesthetic patients underwent SDD compared with 103 (98%) general anesthetic patients (P = .498). Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia patients spent the fewest minutes in postanesthesia care unit prior to discharge from the facility (206), followed by general anesthesia (227), and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (291; P < .001). General anesthesia patients had the highest levels of pain at 1 hour (5.2 versus 1.5 versus 1.5) and 2 hours (3.2 versus 2.0 versus 1.3) postoperatively, and rates of nausea (48 versus 22 versus 28%) compared with mepivacaine and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, respectively. The 90-day complications (6 versus 7), admissions (1 versus 3), and reoperations (5 versus 2) were similar among spinal and general anesthesia, respectively (P ≥ .445). CONCLUSIONS: Both spinal and general anesthesia led to reliable SDD with similar 90-day complication rates. General anesthesia facilitated faster discharge from the ASC compared with bupivacaine spinal anesthesia but led to higher levels of pain and incidence of nausea postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3, Retrospective Cohort Comparison.

Comparison of triamcinolone and methylprednisolone efficacy and steroid flare reaction rates after shoulder corticosteroid injection: a prospective interrupted time series study.

BACKGROUND: A corticosteroid flare reaction is a well-described phenomenon that causes significant pain and dysfunction. The paucity of literature impedes decision making regarding which corticosteroid to use for shoulder injection. The purpose of this study was to compare methylprednisolone acetate (MPA) and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injections in the glenohumeral joint and/or subacromial space in terms of efficacy and the incidence of steroid flare reactions. METHODS: In this prospective, interrupted time series, parallel study, patients received injections in the glenohumeral joint and/or subacromial space. MPA and TA were used during 2 discrete 3-month periods. The injections consisted of 2 mL of lidocaine, 2 mL of bupivacaine, and 80 mg of either MPA or TA. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were recorded immediately before injection; 1-7 days after injection; and 3, 6, and 12 months after injection. The primary outcome was the incidence of a steroid flare reaction, defined as a post-injection increase in the VAS score by ≥2 points. The secondary outcome was injection failure, defined as a post-injection VAS score greater than the baseline score or the need for another intervention. We used linear mixed models with a patient-level random intercept to identify the mean VAS score change for TA injections in the first week after injection. RESULTS: MPA or TA shoulder injections were administered in 421 patients; of these patients, 15 received bilateral-joint injections whereas 406 received a single-joint injection, for a total of 436 injections (209 MPA and 227 TA injections). Pain scores in the first week after injection were available for 193 MPA and 199 TA injections. Significantly more patients in the MPA cohort reported flare reactions compared with the TA cohort (22.8% vs. 4.0%, P < .001) during the first week after injection. In the first week after injection, the mean VAS score of patients receiving TA injections was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.47-1.63) lower than that of patients receiving MPA injections when adjusted for age, sex, race, pain type, surgeon type, and injection site. At 3 months, surveys for 169 MPA and 172 TA injections were completed, with no significant difference in the rate of injection failure for MPA vs. TA (42.6% vs. 36.1%, P = .224). Treatment failure rates were significantly higher for MPA than for TA at 6 months (78.44% vs. 62.5%, P < .001) but not at 12 months (81.18% vs. 81.42%, P = .531.) CONCLUSION: TA injections resulted in a >5-fold reduction in steroid flare reactions, with statistically superior 6-month efficacy rates, compared with MPA injections. This study supports TA as a more viable corticosteroid option for shoulder injection.

The Incidence of Posterolateral Tibial Plateau and Central Lateral Femoral Condylar Impaction Fractures in a Pediatric and Young Adult Population.

BACKGROUND: Posterolateral tibial plateau and central lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures are known to occur in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. There have been no prior investigations into the incidence and morphology of posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures in the setting of ACL injury in a pediatric population. METHODS: Patients between 9 and 22 years of age with knee magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs) performed demonstrating complete or partial ACL tear were included in this study. MRI reports were reviewed to denote the presence of posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, or lateral collateral ligament injury, meniscus tears, cartilage lesions. MRIs were reviewed by 2 fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons to denote the presence of posterolateral tibial plateau and central lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures and physeal status of femoral and tibial physes. Statistical analysis performed included χ 2 analysis and the Student t testing. RESULTS: A total of 328 patients with a primary ACL tear were identified. The mean age of patients included was 16.5 years (range: 9.0-21.5). The incidence of posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures was 83/328 (25.3%) while the incidence of lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures was 119/328 (36.3%). Bipolar impaction fractures occurred in 37/328 (11.3%). Of the 83 tibial impaction fractures identified, 82 were low-grade morphologic subtypes. Patients with lateral tibial plateau impaction fractures were older than those with no fracture (17.2±2.2 vs. 16.3±2.1, P =0.001). Only 3/38 (7.9%) patients with an open tibial physis sustained a tibial plateau impaction fracture compared with 80/290 (27.6%) with a closed tibial physis (χ 2 value: 6.9, P =0.009). There was no difference in proportion of patients with lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures based on femoral physeal status ( P =0.484). CONCLUSION: The incidence of posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures in the setting of ACL tear in a pediatric and young adult patient population appears to be lower while lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures occur more frequently when comparing to previously reported incidences found in adult populations in the literature. Furthermore, posterolateral tibial plateau impaction fractures occur less frequently in those with an open proximal tibial physis and high-grade posterolateral tibial plateau bone loss is exceedingly rare in pediatric and young adult patients. Lateral femoral condylar impaction fractures are associated with lateral meniscal tears and medial meniscal ramp lesions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-cross-sectional study.

Opioid-sparing pain management protocol after shoulder arthroplasty results in less opioid consumption and higher satisfaction: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic has become a central focus in health care. In an effort to reduce opioid use, orthopedic surgeons use multimodal strategies to control postoperative pain. However, no clear consensus exists on ideal pain management strategies after shoulder arthroplasty, and most protocols are opioid-driven. This study sought to determine if patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty using a postoperative opioid-sparing pain-control regimen would have equivalent pain scores and satisfaction as patients using a traditional opioid-based regimen. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled and randomized into an opioid-sparing (OS) or a traditional opioid-based (OB) postoperative pain protocol. Both groups received opioid education, periarticular injection with liposomal bupivacaine, and preoperative and postoperative multimodal management (acetaminophen, celecoxib, and gabapentin). The OB group was discharged with 40 oxycodone tablets and standard icing, whereas the OS group received ketorolac during admission, continuous cryotherapy, and discharged with 10 oxycodone tablets for rescue. Patients were queried regarding levels of pain and opioid consumption at days 1-7 and at 2, 6, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was recorded at 1, 2, 6, and 12 weeks. Range of motion (ROM), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), and Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12 weeks postoperatively. Complications, readmissions, and reoperations were recorded. RESULTS: In 78 patients, no difference in VAS pain scores were seen at any time between groups. The OS group consumed less oral morphine equivalents (OME) from inpatient hospitalization to 12 weeks postoperatively (P < .05). Total OME consumption was reduced by 213% for the OS vs. the OB group (112 vs. 239; P < .0001). The OS group consumed fewer opioid pills at all time points (P < .05). A 395% reduction in number of opioid pills consumed in the first 12 weeks postoperatively was seen in the OS vs. the OB group (4.3 vs. 17.0; P < .0001). Significantly more patients in the OS group discontinued opioids by 2 weeks postoperatively (86.1% vs. 58.5%; P = .011), and 94.4% in the OS group discontinued opioids by 6 weeks postoperatively. The OS group was more satisfied with pain management at 1 and 6 weeks (P = .05). No difference in ROM, ASES or SANE scores, complications, readmissions, or reoperations were seen between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a nearly 4-fold reduction in opioid pain pill consumption and earlier cessation of opioids with an OS pain management protocol. Patients also reported higher satisfaction with this pain management strategy.