Use of tocilizumab in amyloid a nephropathy associated with Sweet syndrome: a case report and literature review.

Amyloid A nephropathy is a possible complication of chronic inflammatory disease. Proteinuria and kidney failure are the main features of the disease. Tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL6-R antibody approved for rheumatoid arthritis, is a promising choice for histologically demonstrated nephropathy. We describe a case of kidney amyloid associated with Sweet syndrome treated with TCZ. The patient was affected by Sweet syndrome associated with proteinuria. Kidney biopsy showed amyloid deposits. During the follow-up, cutaneous and renal findings were refractory to many immunosuppressive regimen (cyclophosphamide, leflunomide, interferon and steroid). After few years, the patient developed rapidly progressive nephropathy associated with nephrotic syndrome (proteinuria up to 6 g/die). A second kidney biopsy was performed and it showed worsening of amyloid nephropathy. Thus, TCZ was administrated (8 mg/kg once a month) and it stabilized kidney function and induced partial remission of the nephrotic syndrome in the following 2 years.

Blood pressure phenotype reproducibility in CKD outpatients: a clinical practice report.

Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement is encouraged by recent hypertension guidelines for assessing BP phenotypes. These showed acceptable reproducibility in the short term, but few data exist about long-term reproducibility, particularly for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. We evaluated changes of the BP phenotypes at 6 and 12 months in 280 consecutive non-dialysis CKD outpatients (186 males, age 71 ± 12 years, eGFR 38 ± 13 ml/min/1.73), without any change in drug therapy. Elevated BP is defined as office BP > 140/90 and home BP > 135/85 mmHg for defining the following BP phenotypes: sustained uncontrolled hypertension (SUCH); white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH); masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH); and controlled hypertension (CH). At baseline, the prevalence of the phenotypes was SUCH 36.6%, CH 30.1%, WUCH 25.4% and MUCH 7.9%, and it was similar at 6 months and 12 months. On the other hand, individual phenotype reproducibility at 12 months was poor both overall (38.0%) and across the different phenotypes (SUCH 53.9%, WUCH 32.4% and CH 32.1%, MUCH 9.1%). Patients who were not maintaining the same phenotype (non-concordant) were not distinguished by age, sex, BMI, eGFR, presence of diabetes or cardiovascular disease, or pharmacological therapy. When reproducibility of BP phenotypes both at 6 months and at 12 months was assessed, it was very low (19.6%), particularly for MUCH (0%), CH (14%) and WUCH (15.5%), while it was 31% for SUCH. In a CKD cohort, the overall prevalence of the different BP phenotypes defined by office and home BP remains constant over time. However, only 38% of patients maintained the same phenotype at 12 months, suggesting a poor reproducibility over time for the BP phenotypes.

[Nutritional and Functional assessment of peritoneal dialysis patients in the clinical practice: Report from MITO-DP Group]. / Valutazione Nutrizionale e Funzionale dei pazienti in dialisi peritoneale nella pratica clinica: l'esperienza del Gruppo Medico-Infermieristico Toscano di Dialisi Peritoneale (M.I.TO.-DP).

Nutritional abnormalities and physical inactivity are risk factors of increased morbidity and mortality in patients with ESRD. Identify and define malnutrition, in particular protein-energy depletion (PEW), is an important task in the management of renal patients. The aim of this multicenter observational study was to implement the assessment of nutritional status and functional capacity in patients on peritoneal dialysis, including tests and validated methods which are relatively easy to apply in daily clinical practice. The study includes all the 133 prevalent patients (80 m, 53 f, age 65 14 years), in peritoneal dialysis treatment (vintage 26 19 months) in 9 centers in Tuscany. We performed anthropometry, bioimpedance (BIA), clinical biochemistry, evaluation of habitual physical activity (RAPA tests) and performance (Sit-To-Stand test), appetite-evaluation questionnaire, and indices including the Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS), Geriatric Nutrition Risk Index (GNRI), Charlson comorbidity index, Barthel and Karnowsky index. The latter showed a condition of dependence in 7.2% and 19.7% of cases, respectively. Poor appetite was recorded in 48.2%. The majority of patients fell within the overweight / obesity range (51%) with waist circumference values associated with increased cardiovascular risk in 51% of males and 60% of females. At the BIA analysis, a BCMI <8 kg/m2 was detected in 39% of patients; an estimated protein intake <1.0 g / kg/d was found in 59% of cases; 34% of patients had serum albumin <3.5 g / dl; control of acidosis was good (bicarbonate 25.4 3.8 mM) but hyperphosphatemia was present in 64.6% of patients. A condition of sedentary or light physical activity was reported by 65.1% of patients, vigorous activity only by 11.9%. The 86.5% of patients able to perform the Sit-to-stand test reported a lower than the reference values for age and sex. A diagnosis of PEW was possible in 8% of our series, while a MIS score> 11, indicative of PEW, took place in 12.7% of cases. The values of the MIS correlated directly with age and the degree of comorbidity and inversely with the sit-to-stand test, RAPA tests and appetite level. The data in this study show that single tests indicative of malnutrition disorders are frequent to be found in our series of peritoneal dialysis patients. However, a diagnosis of PEW is quite infrequent. A large percentage of patients are overweight with increased abdominal adiposity, and reduced cell mass and protein intake below recommended levels; the level of habitual physical activity is low, and the level of physical capability is scarce. Therefore it is conceivable a nutritional counseling intervention to increase the intake of proteins, limiting the phosphorus and (when indicated) energy intake and to stimulating spontaneous physical activity or arranging assisted programs for functional rehabilitation. Close monitoring of the nutritional status and implementation of programs of adapted physical activity should have a prominent role in the clinical management of patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Are autoimmune diseases or glomerulonephritis affecting the development of panel-reactive antibodies in candidates for renal transplantation?

Panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) are a major obstacle to kidney transplantation (KTx). It is not completely clear why only some patients develop PRA, whereas others do not. We hypothesized that other factors, such as autoimmune diseases involving the kidney, might be a trigger for PRA development. We reviewed the original diseases that led to renal failure and their possible role in PRA development. Charts of 270 patients on the active waiting list for KTx were reviewed for complete demographics, presence of PRA, peak PRA level, first KTx or retransplantation, original disease, blood transfusions, pregnancy and rejection. Patients were divided into group 1 (PRA >10%) and group 2 (PRA <10%). There was a significantly higher proportion of patients in group 1 with autoimmune diseases than in group 2. The same proportion was found significant for all of the patients as well as for the patients listed for the first KTx (new patients). Previous KTx has significant impact on both class I and II peak PRA levels when compared with new patients who are already sensitized. A subanalysis of retransplantation showed patients with autoimmune disease (54%) have more graft loss due to rejection compared with nonautoimmune disease (43%). There is an association between high PRA level and autoimmune diseases causing renal failure regardless of the previous KTx status. Besides the risk of recurrence, autoimmune disease seems to affect the risk of graft loss due to rejection.

Renal pathology and clinical presentations of polyomavirus nephropathy in simultaneous kidney pancreas transplant recipients compared with kidney transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the renal histopathology and clinical course of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKP) recipients with kidney transplant (KT) recipients with polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN). METHODS: Between 1997 and 2002, 20 patients (7 SKP, 13 KT) were diagnosed with PVN. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of PV-N were correlated with histopathologic examinations of renal allograft biopsy and compared between SKP and KT recipients. RESULTS: There were no differences in demographics between SKP and KT recipients with PV-N. The mean time to PVN was 611 (172 to 1174) days posttransplant in SKP and 343 (83 to 720) days posttransplant in KT (P =.05). The serum creatinine at the time of diagnosis was similar between SKP and KT recipients. All patients were treated with reduction in immunosuppression. After a median follow-up of 2 years, the patient survival was 71% in SKP and 100% in KT. Four grafts (57%) were lost owing to PVN in SKP group and three grafts (23%) were lost owing to PVN in the KT group. More patients (43%) in SKP had a history of acute rejection prior to diagnosis of PVN compared to KT (8%) and biopsy-proven tacrolimus nephrotoxicity prior to PVN was more common in SKPT (86%) than in KT (8%) patients (P <.05). SKP patients with evidence of diffuse fibrosis and high total sum scores at time of presentation all subsequently lost their grafts. CONCLUSIONS: SKP recipients with PVN had a worse clinical course than KT recipients.

Polyomavirus in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: To report the incidence and clinical characteristics of polyomavirus (PV) nephritis in kidney (KTX) and kidney-pancreas transplant (KPTX) recipients. METHODS: Single center retrospective analysis of all cases of PV nephritis in KTX and KPTX patients transplanted between 1994 and 1999. RESULTS: Thirteen (5 KTX and 8 KPTX) patients (2.1%) had PV nephritis diagnosed on multiple biopsies (n = 22) among 504 KTX and 106 KPTX recipients. The incidence of PV nephritis was higher in cadaver donor transplants (2.6% cadaver vs. 0.7% living donors), after KPTX (1% KTX vs. 7.5% KPTX), in males (3.3% male vs. 0.7% female), and in diabetic patients (4.4% diabetic vs. 0.8% nondiabetic). The mean time to diagnosis of PV nephritis was 18 (range 6-48) months after KTX and 17 (range 9-31) months after KPTX. Three KTX patients and 5 KPTX patients had calcineurin inhibitor toxicity on biopsy prior to developing PV nephritis. Reduction in immunosuppression occurred in 100% of KTX and 63% of KPTX patients. Three patients (23%) developed rejection within 3 months of diagnosis of PV, 1 after a reduction in immunosuppression. Despite multiple antiviral treatment regimens, renal allograft failure requiring dialysis occurred in 60% of KTX and 50% of KPTX patients. All KPTX patients remain insulin independent and 2 were successfully retransplanted with living donor kidneys. 2 patients (15%) died but there was no mortality directly related to the virus. CONCLUSIONS: Polyomavirus nephritis may be increasing in incidence and appears to be unresponsive to either conventional antiviral agents or a reduction in immunosuppression. Most of our cases occurred in male diabetic patients undergoing cadaveric donor transplantation and were preceded by biopsy-proven nephrotoxicity. Further studies are needed to better define the pathogenesis of PV and effective antiviral treatment.

Observations on the use of sirolimus and tacrolimus in high-risk renal transplant recipients.

Sirolimus is the first of a group of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors to be introduced for clinical use in the United States. At the University of Tennessee in Memphis, we have evolved strategies for the use of sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients; which utilize the drug as a primary immunosuppressant and exploit its potential for preserving renal function. Conversions from the calcineurins to sirolimusbased immunosuppression established the efficacy of calcineurin-free immunosuppressants in selected high-risk patients. The conversion experience stimulated the design of protocols for primary use of sirolimus. Posttransplant use of sirolimus was associated with low incidence of rejection whether sirolimus was used with low-dose Prograf or in calcineurin-free protocols. Primary use with full-dose Prograf was associated with a high incidence of calcineurin-related nephrotoxicity and was abandoned in our program. Hematologic and lipid side effects were manageable, as was an observed increase in wound-healing problems and lymphocele formation. Continuous modifications of the sirolimus protocols to increase our benefit-to-risk ratio are ongoing and indicate a continued role for the drug in posttransplant immune suppression.

Conversion to sirolimus in solid organ transplantation: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors are associated with adverse events, including nephrotoxicity and diabetes that might reduce the benefits of long-term graft survival. We report our experience in converting kidney (K), kidney-pancreas (KP), pancreas (P), and (L) recipients from a calcineurin inhibitor/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone dose-induced nephrotoxicity (K = 9, KP = 5, P = 1, L = 5), hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) (K = 7, KP = 5), chronic allograft nephropathy (K = 12, L = 1), and glucose intolerance (K = 9, KP = 6, P = 2, L = 2). METHODS: The conversion protocol consisted of an abrupt discontinuation of the calcineurin inhibitor with sirolimus (8-12 mg, PO loading dose) initiated 24-72 hours after stopping the calcineurin inhibitor. Sirolimus was titrated to target trough levels of 12-16 ng/mL. Daclizumab 2 mg/kg IV was given to all KP and P recipients on days 0 and 14 postconversion. RESULTS: Resolution of HUS occurred in 12 of 12 patients (100%) with a drop in serum creatinine from 3.3 +/- 1.5 to 1.8 +/- 0.9 mg/dL (P =.04). Sirolimus conversion due to nephrotoxicity, HUS, and chronic allograft nephropathy improved serum creatinine from 2.9 +/- 1.4 to 2.2 +/- 0.9 mg/dL (P =.01). Eleven of 19 patients (58%) resolved glucose intolerance. Two patients suffered rejection due to noncompliance. Increases in cholesterol (208 +/- 70 to 243 +/- 77 mg/dL, P <.05) and triglycerides (232 +/- 145 to 265 +/- 148 mg/dL, P = NS), and minimal reduction in platelet values (243 +/- 85 to 237 +/- 85, P = NS) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that a calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppressive regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids preserves graft function in patients with clinical indications warranting calcineurin inhibitor discontinuation.

Evolving experience of hepatitis B virus prophylaxis in liver transplantation.

Passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is important to prevent recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for chronic HBV cirrhosis. With availability of lamivudine (3TC), the use of combination prophylaxis with long-term HBIG/3TC has been shown to prevent short-term HBV recurrence. This report compares HBV recurrence rates between groups receiving no/short-term HBIG, long-term HBIG alone, or HBIG/3TC prophylaxis, and describes HBIG requirements during the first 6 and 12 months in the latter two groups. This study involved patients undergoing OLT at the University of Tennessee-Memphis between May 1990 and July 2001. During this period, 388 liver transplants were performed at our center. All hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive recipients (n = 27) were included in this retrospective analysis. The groups were similar with regard to pre-transplant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, weight, and pre-transplant diagnosis. Owing to the retrospective study design, median follow-up was longer for the no-prophylaxis (5.6 years) and the HBIG-alone (6.0 years) groups compared to the HBIG/3TC group (4.2 years). Patient survival was 50% in the no-prophylaxis and 71% in the HBIG-alone groups compared to 100% in the HBIG/3TC group (P = 0.09). When censored for death with a functioning graft, graft survival was 50% in the no-prophylaxis and 86% in the HBIG-alone group compared to 100% in the HBIG/3TC group (P = 0.07). The overall incidence of HBV recurrence in the no-prophylaxis era was 100% and 21% in the HBIG-alone era compared to 0% in the HBIG/3TC era (P < 0.001), despite similar mean and median HBIG trough titers in the HBIG-alone and HBIG/3TC groups. The incidence of HBV recurrence in HBV DNA-positive recipients was 100% in the no-prophylaxis era, 30% in the HBIG-alone era, and 0% in the HBIG/3TC era (P < 0.001). Recipients in the HBIG-alone group had a nearly two-fold increase in HBIG requirement at 6 and 12 months in order to maintain similar HBIG trough titers post-transplant compared to recipients in the HBIG/3TC group despite similar pre-transplant HBV serology. This increased HBIG requirement in the HBIG-alone group resulted in a marked increase in the mean overall cost of HBV prophylaxis in this group ($47,367 US dollars at 6 months; $84,280 US dollars at 12 months) compared to the HBIG/3TC group ($25,931 US dollars at 6 months; $49,599 US dollars at 12 months). These data demonstrate an improvement in patient and graft survival rates in the group receiving combination HBIG/3TC prophylaxis compared to the HBIG-alone and no-prophylaxis groups. There was a significant reduction in HBV recurrence in the group receiving combination HBIG/3TC when compared to the groups receiving HBIG alone or no prophylaxis. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the addition of 3TC to the long-term HBIG regimen led to elimination of the disparity previously described in HBV recurrence rates between HBV DNA-positive and HBV DNA-negative recipients. Importantly, our data demonstrates a complete lack of HBV recurrence in the HBIG/3TC group at a median follow-up of 4.2 years. Additionally, the data show that the addition of 3TC to the post-operative prophylaxis regimen resulted in a reduction in the requirement of HBIG at 6 and 12 months, which markedly reduced the overall cost of post-transplant HBV prophylaxis.

Rhodococcus equi pulmonary infection in a pancreas-alone transplant recipient: consequence of intense immunosuppression.

We report the case of a pancreas-alone transplant recipient who developed Rhodococcus equi pneumonia after receiving multiple courses of antilymphocyte therapy for the treatment of recurrent acute pancreas allograft rejection. We also review and discuss the diagnosis, clinical course, and treatment of 18 cases of R. equi infection reported in solid organ transplant recipients. The lung is the most common primary site of infection, but R. equi infection is difficult to diagnose because of the pleomorphic, gram-positive, and partially acid-fast nature of the organism. Treatment usually involves a combination of antibiotics including rifampin, macrolides, vancomycin, and ciprofloxacin. The optimal duration of therapy is unknown, but relapse is common if the duration of treatment is less than 14 days. The duration of therapy should be guided by clinical recovery, culture results, and radiographic findings. Monitoring levels of immunosuppressive agents-such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine-is needed in order to avoid clinically significant drug interactions with rifampin or the macrolides when these agents are used in order to treat R. equi infection in the transplant population.

Renal allograft outcomes in African American versus Caucasian transplant recipients in the tacrolimus era.

METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1999, 185 kidney transplants were performed with tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression including 120 African American (AA, 65%) and 65 Caucasian recipients (C, 35%). Mean follow-up was 34 months. The AA group was characterized by a higher incidence of renal disease due to hypertension (72% AA vs 37% C, P <.001), pretransplant dialysis (95% AA vs 82% C, P =.003), waiting time (1.9 years AA vs 1.1 years C, P =.02), cadaveric donation (88% AA vs 68% C, P =.01), HLA mismatching (mean 3.5 AA vs 2.4 C, P <.001), and delayed graft function (DGF; 50% AA vs 22% C, P =.001). RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates were 96% AA versus 83% C (P = NS) and 83% AA versus 75% C, (P = NS), respectively. The incidence of acute rejection (21% AA vs 12% C, P = NS) and mean time to acute rejection (12 months AA vs 11 months C) were similar. Although the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was comparable (7% AA vs 5% C), the mean time to CAN was shorter in AA recipients (18 months AA vs 37 months C, P =.03). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest marked improvement in post-transplant outcomes in the TAC era in patients with multiple immunologic risk factors including AA ethnicity, cadaveric donor source, DGF, and HLA mismatching.

A 9-year experience with 126 pancreas transplants with portal enteric drainage.

HYPOTHESIS: A novel technique of pancreas transplantation (PTX) with portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric exocrine drainage (portal enteric) was developed at our center to improve the PTX procedure. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Single-center experience at a university hospital. PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION: From October 1990 through December 1999, we performed 126 PTXs with portal enteric drainage, including 90 simultaneous kidney PTXs (SKPT) and 36 solitary PTXs (18 sequential PTXs after kidney transplantation and 18 PTXs alone). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient and graft survival rates; medical and surgical morbidity. Three groups, representing 3 eras of immunosuppression, were compared. Thirty patients underwent SKPT with muromonab-CD3 induction and cyclosporine-based therapy in era 1 (October 1990 through June 1995); 42 SKPTs received tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression without antibody induction in era 2 (July 1995 through May 1998); and 18 SKPTs were performed in era 3 (June 1998 through December 1999) with either basiliximab or daclizumab induction. RESULTS: One-year patient survival rates after SKPT were 77% in era 1, 93% in era 2, and 100% in era 3 (P =.03). The 1-year kidney graft survival rates were 77% in era 1, 93% in era 2, and 94% in era 3 (P =.08). The 1-year pancreas graft survival rates after SKPT were 60% in era 1, 83% in era 2, and 83% in era 3 (P =.06). The incidences of rejection (63% vs. 33% vs. 39%; P<.001) and thrombosis (20% vs. 7% vs. 6%; P<.001) were decreased in eras 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous kidney PTXs with portal enteric drainage can be performed with improved outcomes.

Long-term outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients with portal-enteric versus systemic-bladder drainage.

We retrospectively reviewed long-term outcomes in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant (SKPT) recipients with portal-enteric (P-E) versus systemic-bladder (S-B) drainage. Forty-five patients were alive with functioning grafts 1 year after SKPT and were followed up for a minimum of 3 years (mean, 5.9 years), including 26 patients with P-E drainage and 19 patients with S-B drainage. Recipient demographic and transplant characteristics were similar between the two groups. In both groups, hospital admissions decreased significantly with increasing time after SKPT, although significantly fewer readmissions occurred in the first year in the P-E than the S-B group. The most common reason for readmission in both groups was infection, followed by miscellaneous, surgical, and immunologic morbidity. The incidence of readmission for dehydration was significantly less in the P-E group (P < 0.01). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were similar between groups, although the number of antihypertensive medications was significantly less in the S-B group. Although fasting C-peptide levels were significantly greater in the S-B group, the two groups were similar with regard to carbohydrate (fasting serum glucose, hemoglobin A(1c)) and lipid (total cholesterol) metabolism. Renal and pancreas allograft functions were similar between the two groups. At 1 year post-SKPT, stabilization in most diabetic complications was reported. Four quality-of-life surveys that provided 29 scores were completed 6 to 24 months (mean, 18.5 months) after SKPT. Improved quality of life was reported in all but one of the scales, with many dimensions showing significant improvements. At 3 years after SKPT, no activity limitation was reported in 76% of patients with P-E drainage versus 53% with S-B drainage (P = 0.11). Five-year actual patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates after P-E versus S-B drainage are 92% and 84%, 81% and 79%, and 88% and 74%, respectively (P = not significant). SKPT with P-E drainage is a safe and effective method to treat advanced diabetic nephropathy and is associated with decreasing morbidity, improving rehabilitation and quality of life, and stablizing metabolic function over time. The long-term prognosis after the first year is excellent and at least similar to the results achieved with S-B drainage.

Patterns of cytomegalovirus infection in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone with ganciclovir prophylaxis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroid immunosuppression on cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in combination with ganciclovir prophylaxis in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has not been well studied. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of 75 SKPTs performed between 1 January 1996 and 7 January 1999. All patients received ganciclovir for 3 months, but CMV donor (D)+ / recipient (R)- patients received ganciclovir for 6 months. RESULTS: 16/74 (22%) were CMV D+/R-, 25 (33%) D+/R+, 16 (22%) D-/R+, and 17 (23%) D-/R- (1 patient with unknown donor serology was excluded). The mean time to CMV infection was 198 days post-transplant. The incidence of either CMV infection or tissue invasive CMV disease was 16/74 (22%), including 9 (12%) with CMV infection and 7 (10%) CMV disease. The one-year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 91%, 89%, and 83%, respectively. The mean follow-up was 29 months (minimum of 12 months). CMV infection was not associated with an increased incidence of graft failure or mortality. The D+/R- group had the highest incidence of CMV infection (44%) compared with the other serologic groups (17%, P=0.02). Concurrent CMV and rejection occurred more frequently in the D+/R- than the other serologic groups (25% vs. 7%, P=0.03). The D-/R- group had the best outcomes, with no CMV infection, improved kidney graft survival at the end of follow-up (82% vs. 72%, P=0.04) and the highest event-free survival (no CMV infection, rejection, or graft loss) when compared to the other groups (76% vs. 33%, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to previous studies, ganciclovir prophylaxis delayed the onset and reduced the severity of CMV infection in patients receiving TAC, MMF, and steroids. Despite ganciclovir prophylaxis, CMV seronegative patients receiving CMV D+ organs had worse outcomes than seronegative recipients receiving CMV D- organs.

Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis in pancreas transplant recipients.

Human ehrlichioses are tick-borne infections caused by bacteria in the genus Ehrlichia of the family Rickettsiaceae. To date there have been three cases of ehrlichiosis reported in the transplant population, a human monocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) infection in a liver transplant recipient and two cases of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) in kidney transplant recipients. We report three pancreas transplant patients who developed HGE in the last two years at a single southeastern center in the United States. All three patients had clinical, laboratory, and pathophysiologic findings on bone marrow biopsy and peripheral blood smears consistent with HGE, and responded to doxycycline therapy. In the setting of potent immunosuppression, ehrlichiosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of transplant patients presenting with persistent fever, pancytopenia, and abnormal liver function. Patients with ehrlichiosis infection may be at risk for developing other opportunistic infections or lymphoproliferative disease.

A prospective comparison of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric versus portal-enteric drainage.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric (SE) versus portal-enteric (PE) drainage in a prospective fashion. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: To improve the physiology of pancreas transplantation, the authors developed a new technique of portal venous delivery of insulin and enteric drainage of the exocrine secretions. METHODS: During a 26-month period, the authors prospectively alternated 54 consecutive simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplants to either SE (n = 27) or PE (n = 27) drainage. The two groups were well matched for numerous characteristics. Maintenance immunosuppression in both groups consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. RESULTS: Patient survival rates were 93% SE versus 96% PE; kidney graft survival rates were 93% in both groups. Pancreas transplantation survival (complete insulin independence) was 74% after SE versus 85% after PE drainage with a mean follow-up of 17 months. The mean length of initial hospital stay was 12.4 days in the SE group and 12.8 days in the PE group. The SE group was characterized by a slight increase in the number of readmissions. The incidences of acute rejection (33%) and major infection (52%) were similar in both groups. The incidence of intraabdominal infection was slightly higher in the SE group. However, the early relaparotomy rate was similar between groups. The composite endpoint of no rejection, graft loss, or death was attained in 56% of SE versus 59% of PE patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation with SE or PE drainage can be performed with comparable short-term outcomes.