Background and purpose: Treatment planning for MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic tumors can be challenging, leading to a wide variation of protocols and practices. This study aimed to harmonize treatment planning by developing a consensus planning protocol for MR-guided pancreas SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Materials and methods: A consortium was founded of thirteen centers that treat pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. A phased planning exercise was conducted in which centers iteratively created treatment plans for two cases of pancreatic cancer. Each phase was followed by a meeting where the instructions for the next phase were determined. After three phases, a consensus protocol was reached. Results: In the benchmarking phase (phase I), substantial variation between the SBRT protocols became apparent (for example, the gross tumor volume (GTV) D99% ranged between 36.8 - 53.7 Gy for case 1, 22.6 - 35.5 Gy for case 2). The next phase involved planning according to the same basic dosimetric objectives, constraints, and planning margins (phase II), which led to a large degree of harmonization (GTV D99% range: 47.9-53.6 Gy for case 1, 33.9-36.6 Gy for case 2). In phase III, the final consensus protocol was formulated in a treatment planning system template and again used for treatment planning. This not only resulted in further dosimetric harmonization (GTV D99% range: 48.2-50.9 Gy for case 1, 33.5-36.0 Gy for case 2) but also in less variation of estimated treatment delivery times. Conclusion: A global consensus protocol has been developed for treatment planning for MR-guided pancreatic SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Aside from harmonizing the large variation in the current clinical practice, this protocol can provide a starting point for centers that are planning to treat pancreatic tumors on MR-Linac systems.
Introduction: Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a promising treatment modality for pancreatic cancer and is being employed by an increasing number of centers worldwide. However, clinical outcomes have only been reported on a small scale, often from single institutes and in the context of clinical trials, in which strict patient selection might limit generalizability of outcomes. This study presents clinical outcomes of a large, international cohort of patients with (peri)pancreatic tumors treated with online adaptive MRgRT. Methods: We evaluated clinical outcomes and treatment details of patients with (peri)pancreatic tumors treated on a 1.5 Tesla (T) MR-linac in two large-volume treatment centers participating in the prospective MOMENTUM cohort (NCT04075305). Treatments were evaluated through schematics, dosage, delivery strategies, and success rates. Acute toxicity was assessed until 3 months after MRgRT started, and late toxicity from 3-12 months of follow-up (FU). The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) at baseline and 3 months of FU. Furthermore, we used the Kaplan-Meier analysis to calculate the cumulative overall survival. Results: A total of 80 patients were assessed with a median FU of 8 months (range 1-39 months). There were 34 patients who had an unresectable primary tumor or were medically inoperable, 29 who had an isolated local recurrence, and 17 who had an oligometastasis. A total of 357 of the 358 fractions from all hypofractionated schemes were delivered as planned. Grade 3-4 acute toxicity occurred in 3 of 59 patients (5%) with hypofractionated MRgRT and grade 3-4 late toxicity in 5 of 41 patients (12%). Six patients died within 3 months after MRgRT; in one of these patients, RT attribution could not be ruled out as cause of death. The QLQ-C30 global health status remained stable from baseline to 3 months FU (70.5 at baseline, median change of +2.7 [P = 0.5]). The 1-year cumulative overall survival for the entire cohort was 67%, and that for the primary tumor group was 66%. Conclusion: Online adaptive MRgRT for (peri)pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac could be delivered as planned, with low numbers of missed fractions. In addition, treatments were associated with limited grade 3-4 toxicity and a stable QoL at 3 months of FU.
Background: Surgical resection is the standard of care for the treatment of pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors (pNETs) in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1). However, surgery can cause significant short- and long-term morbidity. Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a potential effective treatment with little side effects. With traditional radiotherapy techniques, irradiation of pancreatic tumors to high dose levels was hampered by poor visibility of the tumor during treatment. MRgRT uses onboard MRI to guide the treatment, thereby enabling delivery of ablative irradiation doses to the tumor, while sparing surrounding tissues. In this study, we describe results from a systematic review assessing efficacy of radiotherapy in pNET and present the protocol of the PRIME study. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for articles assessing efficacy and side effects of radiotherapy for the treatment of pNETs. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I Risk of Bias Tool for observational studies. Descriptive statistics were used to describe results of included trials. Results: Four studies comprising of 33 patients treated by conventional radiotherapy were included. Despite the heterogeneity of studies, radiotherapy appeared to be effective for the treatment of pNETs with most patients responding (45.5%) or stabilizing (42.4%) in tumor size. Conclusion and trial design: Due to the limited literature available and concerns about damage to surrounding tissue, conventional radiotherapy is currently little used for pNETs. The PRIME study is a phase I-II trial with a single arm prospective cohort study design, investigating the efficacy of MRgRT in MEN1 patients with pNET. MEN1 patients with growing pNETs with a size between 1.0 and 3.0 cm without malignant features are eligible for inclusion. Patients are treated with 40 Gy in 5 fractions on the pNET, using online adaptive MRgRT on a 1.5T MR-linac. The primary endpoint is the change in tumor size at MRI 12 months follow-up. Secondary endpoints include radiotoxicity, quality of life, endocrine and exocrine pancreas function, resection rate, metastatic free and overall survival. When MRgRT is found effective with low radiotoxicity, it could reduce the need for surgery for pNET and preserve quality of life. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO https://clinicaltrials.gov/, (CRD42022325542).
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 , Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Humans , Clinical Trial Protocols as Topic , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neuroendocrine Tumors/radiotherapy , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
INTRODUCTION: Organ preservation is associated with superior functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. Only 10% of patients are eligible for organ preservation following short-course radiotherapy (SCRT, 25 Gy in five fractions) and a prolonged interval (4-8 weeks) to response evaluation. The organ preservation rate could potentially be increased by dose-escalated radiotherapy. Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is anticipated to reduce radiation-induced toxicity and enable radiotherapy dose escalation. This trial aims to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of dose-escalated SCRT using online adaptive MRgRT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The preRADAR is a multicentre phase I trial with a 6+3 dose-escalation design. Patients with intermediate-risk rectal cancer (cT3c-d(MRF-)N1M0 or cT1-3(MRF-)N1M0) interested in organ preservation are eligible. Patients are treated with a radiotherapy boost of 2×5 Gy (level 0), 3×5 Gy (level 1), 4×5 Gy (level 2) or 5×5 Gy (level 3) on the gross tumour volume in the week following standard SCRT using online adaptive MRgRT. The trial starts on dose level 1. The primary endpoint is the MTD based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) per dose level. DLT is a composite of maximum one in nine severe radiation-induced toxicities and maximum one in three severe postoperative complications, in patients treated with TME or local excision within 26 weeks following start of treatment. Secondary endpoints include the organ preservation rate, non-DLT, oncological outcomes, patient-reported QoL and functional outcomes up to 2 years following start of treatment. Imaging and laboratory biomarkers are explored for early response prediction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. The primary and secondary trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: WHO International Clinical Trials Registry (NL8997; https://trialsearch.who.int).
Radiation Injuries , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Quality of Life , Organ Preservation , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiation Injuries/prevention & control , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
Background and purpose: Online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided treatment planning for pancreatic tumors on 1.5T systems typically employs Cartesian 3D T 2w magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main disadvantage of this sequence is that respiratory motion results in substantial blurring in the abdomen, which can hamper delineation accuracy. This study investigated the use of two motion-robust radial MRI sequences as main delineation scan for pancreatic MR-guided radiotherapy. Materials and methods: Twelve patients with pancreatic tumors were imaged with a 3D T 2w scan, a Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER) scan (partially overlapping strips), and a 3D Vane scan (stack-of-stars), on a 1.5T MR-Linac under abdominal compression. The scans were assessed by three radiation oncologists for their suitability for online adaptive delineation. A quantitative comparison was made for gradient entropy and the effect of motion on apparent target position. Results: The PROPELLER scans were selected as first preference in 56% of the cases, the 3D T 2w in 42% and the 3D Vane in 3%. PROPELLER scans sometimes contained a large interslice variation which would have compromised delineation. Gradient entropy was significantly higher in 3D T 2w patient scans. The apparent target position was more sensitive to motion amplitude in the PROPELLER scans, but substantial offsets did not occur under 10 mm peak-to-peak. Conclusion: PROPELLER MRI may be a superior imaging sequence for pancreatic MRgRT compared to standard Cartesian sequences. The large interslice variation should be mitigated through further sequence optimization before PROPELLER can be adopted for online treatment adaptation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic cancer, intrafraction motion is typically monitored with (interleaved) 2D cine MRI. However, tumor surroundings are often not fully captured in these images, and motion might be distorted by through-plane movement. In this study, the feasibility of highly accelerated 3D cine MRI to reconstruct the delivered dose during MR-guided SBRT was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 3D cine MRI sequence was developed for fast, time-resolved 4D imaging, featuring a low spatial resolution that allows for rapid volumetric imaging at 430 ms. The 3D cines were acquired during the entire beam-on time of 23 fractions of online adaptive MR-guided SBRT for pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. A 3D deformation vector field (DVF) was extracted for every cine dynamic using deformable image registration. Next, these DVFs were used to warp the partial dose delivered in the time interval between consecutive cine acquisitions. The warped dose plans were summed to obtain a total delivered dose. The delivered dose was also calculated under various motion correction strategies. Key DVH parameters of the GTV, duodenum, small bowel and stomach were extracted from the delivered dose and compared to the planned dose. The uncertainty of the calculated DVFs was determined with the inverse consistency error (ICE) in the high-dose regions. RESULTS: The mean (SD) relative (ratio delivered/planned) D99% of the GTV was 0.94 (0.06), and the mean (SD) relative D0.5cc of the duodenum, small bowel, and stomach were respectively 0.98 (0.04), 1.00 (0.07), and 0.98 (0.06). In the fractions with the lowest delivered tumor coverage, it was found that significant lateral drifts had occurred. The DVFs used for dose warping had a low uncertainty with a mean (SD) ICE of 0.65 (0.07) mm. CONCLUSION: We employed a fast, real-time 3D cine MRI sequence for dose reconstruction in the upper abdomen, and demonstrated that accurate DVFs, acquired directly from these images, can be used for dose warping. The reconstructed delivered dose showed only a modest degradation of tumor coverage, mostly attainable to baseline drifts. This emphasizes the need for motion monitoring and development of intrafraction treatment adaptation solutions, such as baseline drift corrections.
Pancreatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine , Radiosurgery/methods , Feasibility Studies , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Objective. Intrafraction motion is a major concern for the safety and effectiveness of high dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the upper abdomen. In this study, the impact of the intrafraction motion on the delivered dose was assessed in a patient group that underwent MR-guided radiotherapy for upper abdominal malignancies with an abdominal corset.Approach. Fast online 2D cine MRI was used to extract tumor motion during beam-on time. These tumor motion profiles were combined with linac log files to reconstruct the delivered dose in 89 fractions of MR-guided SBRT in twenty patients. Aside the measured tumor motion, motion profiles were also simulated for a wide range of respiratory amplitudes and drifts, and their subsequent dosimetric impact was calculated in every fraction.Main results. The average (SD)D99%of the gross tumor volume (GTV), relative to the plannedD99%, was 0.98 (0.03). The average (SD) relativeD0.5ccof the duodenum, small bowel and stomach was 0.99 (0.03), 1.00 (0.03), and 0.97 (0.05), respectively. No correlation of respiratory amplitude with dosimetric impact was observed. Fractions with larger baseline drifts generally led to a larger uncertainty of dosimetric impact on the GTV and organs at risk (OAR). The simulations yielded that the delivered dose is highly dependent on the direction of on baseline drift. Especially in anatomies where the OARs are closely abutting the GTV, even modestLRorAPdrifts can lead to substantial deviations from the planned dose.Significance. The vast majority of the fractions was only modestly impacted by intrafraction motion, increasing our confidence that MR-guided SBRT with abdominal compression can be safely executed for patients with abdominal tumors, without the use of gating or tracking strategies.
Abdominal Neoplasms , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Abdomen , Abdominal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Humans , Motion , Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Pancreatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiometry , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiosurgery/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been shown to be a promising therapy for unresectable pancreatic tumors. However, intrafraction motion, caused by respiratory motion and organ drift, is one of the main concerns for efficient dose delivery in ungated upper abdominal radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to analyze the intrafraction gross tumor volume (GTV) motion in a clinical cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 13 patients that underwent online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided SBRT for malignancies in the pancreatic region (5 × 8 Gy). An abdominal corset was fitted in order to reduce the abdominal respiratory motion. Coronal and sagittal cine magnetic resonance images of the tumor region were made at 2 Hz during the entire beam-on time of each fraction. We used deformable image registration to obtain GTV motion profiles in all three directions, which were subsequently high-pass and low-pass filtered to isolate the motion caused by respiratory motion and baseline drift, respectively. RESULTS: The mean (SD) respiratory amplitudes were 4.2 (1.9) mm cranio-caudal (CC), 2.3 (1.1) mm ventral-dorsal (AP) and 1.4 (0.6) mm left-right (LR), with low variability within patients. The mean (SD) maximum baseline drifts were 1.2 (1.1) mm CC, 0.5 (0.4) mm AP and 0.5 (0.3) mm LR. The mean (SD) minimum baseline drifts were -0.7 (0.5) mm CC, -0.6 (0.5) mm AP and -0.5 (0.4) mm LR. CONCLUSION: Overall tumor motion during treatment was small and interfractionally stable. These findings show that high-precision ungated MR-guided SBRT is feasible with an abdominal corset.
BACKGROUND: Introduction of online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy enables stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of upper abdominal tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of MR-guided SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-linac in patients with unresectable upper abdominal malignancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients treated at the UMC Utrecht (April 2019 to December 2020) were identified in the prospective 'Multi-OutcoMe EvaluatioN of radiation Therapy Using the MR-linac' (MOMENTUM) study. Feasibility of treatment was arbitrarily defined as an on-table time interval of ≤60 min for >75% of delivered fractions and completion of >95% of fractions as scheduled, reflecting patient tolerability. Acute treatment-related toxicity was assessed at 3 months of follow-up and graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 5.0. RESULTS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with a median follow-up time of 8 (range 4-23) months were treated with 35 Gray (n = 4) and 40 Gray (n = 21) in five fractions over 2 weeks. For all fractions, contours were adapted based on the daily anatomy and delivered within 47 min/fraction (range 30-74). In 98/117 fractions (84%), adapted treatment was completed within 1 h. All patients received the scheduled irradiation dose as planned. No acute grade 3 toxicity or higher was reported. Treatment resulted in pain alleviation in 11/13 patients. DISCUSSION: Online adaptive MR-guided SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-linac is feasible and well-tolerated in patients with unresectable upper abdominal malignancies. Dose escalation studies, followed by comparative studies, are needed to determine the optimal radiation dose for irradiation of upper abdominal malignancies.
Abdominal Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided , Abdomen , Humans , Prospective Studies , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
PURPOSE: This study assessed the margins needed to cover tumor intrafraction motion during an MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) dose-escalation strategy in intermediate risk rectal cancer. METHODS: Fifteen patients with rectal cancer were treated with neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy, 5x5 Gy, according to an online adaptive workflow on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Per patient, 26 3D T2 weighted MRIs were made; one reference scan preceding treatment and five scans per treatment fraction. The primary tumor was delineated on each scan as gross tumor volume (GTV). Target coverage margins were assessed by isotropically expanding the reference GTV until more than 95% of the voxels of the sequential GTVs were covered. A margin with a coverage probability threshold of 90% was defined as adequate. Intra- and interfraction margins to cope with the movement of the GTV in the period between scans were calculated to indicate the target volume margins. Furthermore, the margin needed to cover GTV movement was calculated for different time intervals. RESULTS: The required margins to cover inter- and intrafraction GTV motion were 17 mm and 6 mm, respectively. Analysis based on time intervals between scans showed smaller margins were needed for adequate GTV coverage as time intervals became shorter, with a 4 mm margin required for a procedure of 15 min or less. CONCLUSION: The shorter the treatment time, the smaller the margins needed to cover for the GTV movement during an online adaptive MRgRT dose-escalation strategy for intermediate risk rectal cancer. When time intervals between replanning and the end of dose delivery could be reduced to 15 min, a 4 mm margin would allow adequate target coverage.
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Motion , Particle Accelerators , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy
