RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preventing lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) is pivotal. In the present study we aimed to examine the recent trends in non-traumatic LEAs seen in the Northern Danish Region. METHODS: Using data from the regional Business Intelligence unit we identified all non-traumatic LEAs (n=689) performed in people above 50 years of age in the Northern Danish Region between January 2016 and December 2021 (approximately 600.000 inhabitants). Persons with diabetes (n=26,025) were identified based on ICD-10 codes and data from The National Health Insurance Service Registry, while preventive vascular procedures (n=1,097) were identified using surgical codes. Major LEA was defined as any amputation above the ankle. Incidence rates were expressed as events per 1.000 person-years. Trends were described as differences between the periods 2016-2018 and 2019-2021. RESULTS: A total of 249 (36%) major LEAs were performed in people with diabetes. People with diabetes were younger (71 vs 77 years, p<0.001) and more frequently male (70% versus 54%, p<0.001). Between 2016-2018 and 2019-2021 the incidence of major LEA declined from 1.76 (95% CI: 1.75-1.76) to 1.39 (1.39-1.39) in people with diabetes, and from 0.47 (0.47-0.47) to 0.20 (0.20-0.20) in people without diabetes (all p<0.001). Simultaneously, the incidence of preventive vascular surgery increased from 2.26 (2.26-2.26) to 3.48 (3.48-3.48) in people with diabetes and declined slightly in people without 0.49 (0.49-0.49) to 0.47 (0.47-0.47) (all p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite significant declines in major LEA in both people with and without diabetes, most of the decline was driven by a large reduction in major LEAs in people without diabetes. Diabetic foot, lower extremity amputation, major amputation, minor amputation, preventive vascular procedures, revascularization, vascular surgery.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate brain metabolites in type 1 diabetes and the associations with disease characteristics. We explored the metabolic profiles predicting different neuropathic phenotypes using multiple linear regression analyses. METHODS: We compared brain metabolites in 55 adults with type 1 diabetes (including painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), painless DPN, without DPN) with 20 healthy controls. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy measurements (N-acetylaspartate (NAA), glutamate (glu), myo-inositol (mI), and glycerophosphocholine (GPC) were obtained in ratios to creatine (cre)) from the parietal region, anterior cingulate cortex and thalamus. RESULTS: The overall diabetes group revealed decreased parietal NAA/cre compared to healthy controls (1.41 ± 0.12 vs. 1.55 ± 0.13,p < 0.001) and increased mI/cre (parietal: 0.62 ± 0.08 vs. 0.57 ± 0.07,p = 0.025, cingulate: 0.65 ± 0.08 vs. 0.60 ± 0.08,p = 0.033). Reduced NAA/cre was associated with more severe DPN (all p ≤ 0.04) whereas increased mI/cre was associated with higher hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (p = 0.02). Diabetes was predicted from decreased parietal NAA/cre, increased parietal ml/cre, and decreased thalamic glu/cre. DPN was predicted from decreased parietal NAA/cre and increased GPC/cre. Painful DPN was predicted from increased parietal GPC/cre and thalamic glu/cre. CONCLUSIONS: Specific metabolic brain profiles were linked to the different phenotypes of diabetes, DPN and painful DPN. SIGNIFICANCE: Assessment of metabolic profiles could be relevant for detailed understanding of central neuropathy in diabetes.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Preventative foot self-care is vital for avoiding diabetic foot ulcer episodes and lowering the risk of amputations. Yet, it demands high levels of health literacy and cognitive function. Objective: To investigate health literacy and cognitive function in persons presenting with a diabetic foot ulcer. Methods: Participants with type 2 diabetes were recruited from the tertiary foot clinic at Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark. The European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire and Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination were applied. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to evaluate foot self-care knowledge, attitude, and practice. The qualitative data were analyzed with a deductive approach based on a qualitative thematic analysis model. Subsequently, an integrated analysis of the quantitative and qualitative results was conducted. Results: The participants (n = 12) had a mean age of 62.6 ± 8.4 years, and 11 were males. The mean diabetes duration was 15.9 ± 8.9 years. Eight participants had a recurrent diabetic foot ulcer. The health literacy level was sufficient in nine participants, and cognitive function was normal in five participants. Three different profiles related to foot self-care (proactive, active, or passive, respectively) were constructed by the final integrated analysis: a proactive profile refers to taking preventative action in concordance with knowledge and attitude, an active profile to taking action in response to a situation, but challenged by conflicting levels of knowledge and attitude, and a passive profile to not taking action. Conclusion: The study suggests that people presenting with a diabetic foot ulcer have different foot self-care profiles based on person-specific health literacy, cognitive function, and knowledge, attitude, and practice element characteristics, highlighting the need for individualized education and intervention strategy instead of a one-size-fits-all approach.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Diabetic neuropathy can lead to decreased peripheral sensation and motor neuron dysfunction associated with impaired postural control and risk of falling. However, the relationship between decreased peripheral sensation and impaired vestibular function in diabetes mellitus is poorly investigated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between peripheral and autonomic measurements of diabetic neuropathy and measurements of vestibular function. METHODS: A total of 114 participants with type 1 diabetes (n = 52), type 2 diabetes (n = 51) and controls (n = 11) were included. Vestibular function was evaluated by video head impulse testing. Peripheral neuropathy was assessed by quantitative sensory testing and nerve conduction. Autonomic neuropathy using the COMPASS 31 questionnaire. Data were analyzed according to data type and distribution. RESULTS: Measurements of vestibular function did not differ between participants with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes or controls (all p-values above 0.05). Subgrouping of participants according to the involvement of large-, small- or autonomic nerves did not change this outcome. Correlation analyses showed a significant difference between COMPASS 31 and right lateral gain value (ρ = 0.23, p = 0.02,), while no other significant correlations were found. CONCLUSION: Diabetic neuropathy does not appear to impair vestibular function in diabetes, by means of the VOR. CLINICAL TRIALS: NCT05389566, May 25th, 2022.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Neuronitis Vestibular , Humanos , Neuropatías Diabéticas/complicaciones , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Neuronitis Vestibular/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicacionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms behind the diminished incretin effect in type 2 diabetes are uncertain, but impaired vagal transmission has been suggested. We aimed to investigate the association between the incretin effect and autonomic neuropathy, and the degree of dysglycaemia and duration of diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS: For a cross-sectional study, we included participants with either longstanding type 2 diabetes, recent onset, untreated diabetes and controls without diabetes matched for age, sex and body mass index. Autonomic nerve function was assessed with cardiovascular reflex tests, heart rate variability and sudomotor function. Visceral afferent nerves in the gut were tested performing rapid rectal balloon distention. An oral glucose tolerance test and an intravenous isoglycaemic glucose infusion were performed to calculate the incretin effect and gastrointestinal-mediated glucose disposal (GIGD). RESULTS: Sixty-five participants were recruited. Participants with diabetes had rectal hyposensitivity for earliest sensation (3.7 ± 1.1 kPa in longstanding, 4.0 ± 1.3 in early), compared to controls (3.0 ± 0.9 kPa), p = .005. Rectal hyposensitivity for earliest sensation was not associated with the incretin effect (rho = -0.204, p = .106), but an association was found with GIGD (rho -0.341, p = .005). Incretin effect and GIGD were correlated with all glucose values, HbA1c and duration of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal hyposensitivity was uncovered in both longstanding and early type 2 diabetes, and was not associated with the incretin effect, but with GIGD, implying a potential link between visceral neuropathy and gastrointestinal handling of glucose. Both the incretin effect and GIGD were associated with the degree of dysglycaemia and the duration of diabetes. PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED: Some of the data have previously been published and presented as a poster on the American Diabetes Association 83rd Scientific Sessions: Meling et al; 1658-P: Rectal Hyposensitivity, a Potential Marker of Enteric Autonomic Nerve Dysfunction, Is Significantly Associated with Gastrointestinally Mediated Glucose Disposal in Persons with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes 20 June 2023; 72 (Supplement_1): 1658-P. https://doi.org/10.2337/db23-1658-P.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Incretinas , Humanos , Incretinas/fisiología , Glucosa , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Glucemia , Estudios Transversales , InsulinaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Research has proven that epidermal and transcutaneous stimulation can identify the function of Aß and Aδ fibers (i.e., in diabetes) individually using different electrodes. In this study we aimed to determine the stability of perception thresholds when using such electrodes. METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers participated in this study. The perception threshold of Aß fibers (patch electrode) and Aδ fibers (pin electrode) was estimated 30 times during a period of 60 minutes. A threshold was established every other minute, alternating between the two electrodes. The stimulus duration was 1 millisecond and the interstimulus interval was 1.5 to 2.5 seconds. Linear regressions of the perception threshold as a function of time were performed. The slopes were used as an estimate of habituation and were compared between the electrodes. RESULTS: The slope was significantly larger when assessed by the pin electrode (median: 0.020 [0.009 to 0.030] mA/trial) than when assessed by the patch electrode (median: 0.005 [0.001 to 0.018] mA/trial) (P = .017, paired t test). During the session, total increases in perception threshold of approximately 55% and 1% were seen for the pin and patch electrodes, respectively. DISCUSSION: The two fiber types assessed showed significant perception threshold increases. The higher slope of the pin electrode indicated that the Aδ fibers were more prone to habituation than the Aß fibers, and that habituation should be considered during prolonged experiments. This assessment is valuable for future research on nerve fiber function using the technique for long session experiments.
RESUMEN
Background and Aims: Autonomic neuropathy is a common but often neglected complication of diabetes, prediabetes, and even in individuals with an elevated risk of diabetes. The Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS) 31 is a validated and easy-to-use questionnaire regarding autonomic symptoms. We aimed to use a digitally, Norwegian version of the COMPASS 31 in people with different durations of diabetes and healthy controls to consider feasibility and to investigate if scores could discriminate between positive and negative outcomes for established tests for diabetic neuropathy, including cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and a novel method of examining the gastrointestinal visceral sensitivity. Method: We included 21 participants with longstanding type 2 diabetes, 15 with early type 2 diabetes, and 30 matched controls. The mean age for all groups was 69 years. Participants were phenotyped by cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests, electrical skin conductance, sural nerve electrophysiology, and the monofilament test. As a proxy for gastrointestinal visceral and autonomic nerve function, evoked potentials were measured following rapid rectal balloon distention. Results: Participants with longstanding diabetes scored a median (IQR) of 14.9 (10.8-28.7) points, early diabetes of 7.3 (1.6-15.2), and matched controls of 8.6 (4.1-21.6), p = 0.04. Women and men scored 14.4 (5.5-28.7) and 7.8 (3.6-14.6) points, respectively, p = 0.01. Participants with definite or borderline CAN scored 14.3 (10.4-31.9) points, compared to participants with no CAN, 8.3 (3.2-21.5), p = 0.04. Lowering the diagnostic cut-off from 16 to 10 points increased the sensitivity from 0.33 to 0.83, with a decreased specificity from 0.68 to 0.55. Conclusion: We successfully used COMPASS 31 in Norwegian. Thus, following the guidelines, we suggest clinical implementation for the assessment of autonomic neuropathy. Participants with longstanding diabetes had an increased likelihood of symptoms and signs of autonomic neuropathy. For screening purposes, the sensitivity was improved by lowering the cut-off to 10 points, with a lower score nearly excluding the diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Estado Prediabético , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Sistema Nervioso Autónomo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: The axon-reflex flare response is a reliable method for functional assessment of small fibers in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), but broad adoption is limited by the time requirement. The aims of this study were to (1) assess diagnostic performance and optimize time required for assessing the histamine-induced flare response and (2) associate with established parameters. METHODS: A total of 60 participants with type 1 diabetes with (n = 33) or without (n = 27) DPN participated. The participants underwent quantitative sensory testing (QST), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and flare intensity and area size assessments by laser-Doppler imaging (FLPI) following an epidermal skin-prick application of histamine. The flare parameters were evaluated each minute for 15 min, and the diagnostic performance compared to QST and CCM were assessed using area under the curve (AUC). Minimum time-requirements until differentiation and to achieve results comparable with a full examination were assessed. RESULTS: Flare area size had better diagnostic performance compared with CCM (AUC 0.88 vs. 0.77, p < 0.01) and QST (AUC 0.91 vs. 0.81, p = 0.02) than mean flare intensity, and could distinguish people with and without DPN after 4 min compared to after 6 min (both p < 0.01). Flare area size achieved a diagnostic performance comparable to a full examination after 6 and 7 min (CCM and QST respectively, p > 0.05), while mean flare intensity achieved it after 5 and 8 min (CCM and QST respectively, p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: The flare area size can be evaluated 6-7 min after histamine-application, which increases diagnostic performance compared to mean flare intensity.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Histamina , Humanos , Histamina/farmacología , Fibras Nerviosas/fisiología , Axones , ReflejoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies suggest that cognitive impairment is more prevalent in individuals with painful and painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). However, the current evidence is not well described. This study investigated cognitive function in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and the association to painful/painless DPN and clinical parameters. METHODS: This cross-sectional, observational, case-control study included 58 participants with T1DM, sub-grouped into 20 participants with T1DM and painful DPN, 19 participants with T1DM and painless DPN, 19 participants with T1DM without DPN, and 20 healthy controls were included. The groups were matched for sex and age. The participants performed Addenbrooke's examination III (ACE-III), which assesses attention, memory, verbal fluency, language and visuospatial skills. Working memory was evaluated using an N-back task. Cognitive scores were compared between the groups and correlated to age, diabetes duration, HbA1c and nerve conduction measurements. RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, T1DM participants showed lower total ACE-III (p = .028), memory (p = .013) and language scores (p = .028), together with longer reaction times in the N-back task (p = .041). Subgroup analyses demonstrated lower memory scores in those with painless DPN compared with healthy controls (p = .013). No differences were observed between the three T1DM subgroups. Cognitive scores and clinical parameters were not associated. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the notion of cognitive alterations in T1DM and indicates that cognitive function is altered in T1DM regardless of underlying neuropathic complications. The memory domain appears altered in T1DM, particularly in those with painless DPN. Further studies are needed to verify the findings.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Casos y Controles , CogniciónRESUMEN
AIMS: To investigate the co-existence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN), and cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and to establish a model to predict CAN based on peripheral measurements. METHODS: Eighty participants (20 type 1 diabetes (T1DM) + PDPN, 20 T1DM + DPN, 20 T1DM-DPN (without DPN), and 20 healthy controls (HC)) underwent quantitative sensory testing, cardiac autonomic reflex tests (CARTs), and conventional nerve conduction. CAN was defined as ≥ 2 abnormal CARTs. After the initial analysis, the participants with diabetes were re-grouped based on the presence or absence of small (SFN) and large fibre neuropathy (LFN), respectively. A prediction model for CAN was made using logistic regression with backward elimination. RESULTS: CAN was most prevalent in T1DM + PDPN (50%), followed by T1DM + DPN (25%) and T1DM-DPN and HC (0%). The differences in prevalence of CAN between T1DM + PDPN and T1DM-DPN/HC were significant (p < 0.001). When re-grouping, 58% had CAN in the SFN group and 55% in the LFN group, while no participants without either SFN or LFN had CAN. The prediction model had a sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 67%, a positive predictive value of 30%, and a negative predictive value of 90%. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CAN predominantly co-exists with concomitant DPN.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Dolor/complicaciones , Conducción NerviosaRESUMEN
AIM: There is a lack of methods for investigating the autonomic nerves of the gastrointestinal tract. Our aim was to explore a novel test measuring visceral sensory evoked potentials (EPs) in response to rapid balloon distention in the rectum and compare it to established tests for diabetic neuropathy. METHOD: Participants with longstanding type 2 diabetes, newly onset, untreated diabetes <1 year, and matched controls, were included. Tests included cardiovascular reflex tests, orthostatic blood pressure, electrical skin conductance assessment, sural nerve testing and monofilament test. The rectal balloon distention pressure at earliest sensation and threshold of unpleasantness were identified and used to elicit mechanical EPs. RESULTS: The pressure at earliest sensation was higher in people with diabetes, 0.038 (0.012) bar vs. controls 0.030 (0.009) bar, p = 0.002, and in people with signs of peripheral neuropathy, 0.045 (0.014) bar, p < 0.01. Clinical correlations between EP amplitude and latency, and other tests were found. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal hyposensitivity was associated with both longstanding and early diabetes, indicating enteric sensory dysfunction already in early stages of diabetes. Correlation analyses may indicate that central afferent processing is affected in parallel with peripheral neuronal function.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Humanos , Recto/inervación , Recto/fisiología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Potenciales Evocados/fisiología , Tracto GastrointestinalRESUMEN
AIM: An objective assessment of small nerve fibers is key to the early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This study investigates the diagnostic accuracy of a novel perception threshold tracking technique in detecting small nerve fiber damage. METHODS: Participants with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) without DPN (n = 20), with DPN (n = 20), with painful DPN (n = 20) and 20 healthy controls (HCs) underwent perception threshold tracking on the foot and corneal confocal microscopy. Diagnostic accuracy of perception threshold tracking compared to corneal confocal microscopy was analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The rheobase, corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), and corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) (all P < .001) differed between groups. The diagnostic accuracy of perception threshold tracking (rheobase) was excellent for identifying small nerve fiber damage, especially for CNFL with a sensitivity of 94%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 97%, and negative predictive value 89%. There was a significant correlation between rheobase with CNFD, CNBD, CNFL, and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (all P < .001). CONCLUSION: Perception threshold tracking had a very high diagnostic agreement with corneal confocal microscopy for detecting small nerve fiber loss and may have clinical utility for assessing small nerve fiber damage and hence early DPN. CLINICAL TRIALS: NCT04078516.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Most medical educational programs emphasize clinical observation or clinical skill acquisition, fewer focus upon research. The Danish-American Research Exchange (DARE) program, sponsored by the Lundbeck Foundation, is unique in that the medical student initiates biomedical research collaboration between Danish and US medical institutions. To achieve this, Danish medical students (DARE students) conduct binational mentored research projects while based in the United States for 10 months. In addition, DARE students are introduced to interdisciplinary thinking about how to develop ultra-low-cost healthcare interventions through the '$10 Challenge'. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of DARE alumni over five consecutive years (2015-2020, n = 24). Research metrics included completion of a research project, primary authorship, and co-authorship of publications. The number of publications, prior to and after the DARE program were enumerated. For the first four cohorts, graduation from medical school and acceptance or intention to enter a joint MD-PhD program also were assessed. Two focus groups were conducted using constructivist grounded theory. Discussions were transcribed, redacted, and coded using Dedoose software. RESULTS: DARE Medical students were 31.2 years (range 24-35), the majority were women (67%;16/24). The majority (17/24;71%) completed a first author publication in a peer-reviewed journal with a median of 3.9 per DARE alumnus. DARE alumnus reported increased proficiency in biostatistics, epidemiology, coding and public speaking as well as stronger research qualities in creativity, critical thinking, comfort in approaching scientist in both the US and Denmark (p < 0.001 for all). Qualitative key themes included: increased confidence, a deepening of research inquiry and linkage to a research network. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminarily, this study suggests that medical students can initiate binational collaboration in medicine. Benefits include research productivity, intention to pursue academic medical careers, as well as positive impacts on motivation. This medical student-initiated research model lays the groundwork for using this model across other country pairs to promote binational collaboration.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Curriculum , Facultades de Medicina , Investigación Biomédica/educación , DinamarcaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: In this study we aimed to investigate the functional connectivity of brain regions involved in sensory processing in diabetes with and without painful and painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and the association with peripheral nerve function and pain intensity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study we used resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) to investigate functional brain connectivity of 19 individuals with type 1 diabetes and painful DPN, 19 with type 1 diabetes and painless DPN, 18 with type 1 diabetes without DPN, and 20 healthy control subjects. Seed-based connectivity analyses were performed for thalamus, postcentral gyrus, and insula, and the connectivity z scores were correlated with peripheral nerve function measurements and pain scores. RESULTS: Overall, compared with those with painful DPN and healthy control subjects, subjects with type 1 diabetes without DPN showed hyperconnectivity between thalamus and motor areas and between postcentral gyrus and motor areas (all P ≤ 0.029). Poorer peripheral nerve functions and higher pain scores were associated with lower connectivity of the thalamus and postcentral gyrus (all P ≤ 0.043). No connectivity differences were found in insula (all P ≥ 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: Higher functional connectivity of thalamus and postcentral gyrus appeared only in diabetes without neuropathic complications. Thalamic/postcentral gyral connectivity measures demonstrated an association with peripheral nerve functions. Based on thalamic connectivity, it was possible to group the phenotypes of type 1 diabetes with painful/painless DPN and type 1 diabetes without DPN. The results of the current study support that fMRI can be used for phenotyping, and with validation, it may contribute to early detection and prevention of neuropathic complications.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Humanos , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Corteza Somatosensorial/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Transversales , Dolor/complicaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A composite metric for the quality of glycemia from continuous glucose monitor (CGM) tracings could be useful for assisting with basic clinical interpretation of CGM data. METHODS: We assembled a data set of 14-day CGM tracings from 225 insulin-treated adults with diabetes. Using a balanced incomplete block design, 330 clinicians who were highly experienced with CGM analysis and interpretation ranked the CGM tracings from best to worst quality of glycemia. We used principal component analysis and multiple regressions to develop a model to predict the clinician ranking based on seven standard metrics in an Ambulatory Glucose Profile: very low-glucose and low-glucose hypoglycemia; very high-glucose and high-glucose hyperglycemia; time in range; mean glucose; and coefficient of variation. RESULTS: The analysis showed that clinician rankings depend on two components, one related to hypoglycemia that gives more weight to very low-glucose than to low-glucose and the other related to hyperglycemia that likewise gives greater weight to very high-glucose than to high-glucose. These two components should be calculated and displayed separately, but they can also be combined into a single Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) that corresponds closely to the clinician rankings of the overall quality of glycemia (r = 0.95). The GRI can be displayed graphically on a GRI Grid with the hypoglycemia component on the horizontal axis and the hyperglycemia component on the vertical axis. Diagonal lines divide the graph into five zones (quintiles) corresponding to the best (0th to 20th percentile) to worst (81st to 100th percentile) overall quality of glycemia. The GRI Grid enables users to track sequential changes within an individual over time and compare groups of individuals. CONCLUSION: The GRI is a single-number summary of the quality of glycemia. Its hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia components provide actionable scores and a graphical display (the GRI Grid) that can be used by clinicians and researchers to determine the glycemic effects of prescribed and investigational treatments.
Asunto(s)
Hiperglucemia , Hipoglucemia , Adulto , Humanos , Glucemia , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Hipoglucemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglucemia/diagnóstico , GlucosaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: It remains unknown why some people with diabetes develop painful neuropathies while others experience no pain. This study aimed to validate a novel method for assessing the function of small sensory nerves in diabetes to further elucidate this phenomenon. The function of large and small nerves was assessed using a novel perception threshold tracking technique in 3 well-characterized groups (n = 60) with type 1 diabetes, namely, (1) painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (T1DM + PDPN), (2) painless diabetic peripheral neuropathy (T1DM + DPN), and (3) no neuropathy (T1DM - DPN), and healthy controls (n = 20). Electrical currents with different shapes, duration, and intensities were applied by 2 different skin electrodes activating large and small fibers, respectively. The minimal current needed to activate the fibers were analyzed as the rheobase of the stimulus-response function. Nerve fiber selectivity was measured by accommodation properties of stimulated nerves. The rheobase of both fiber types were highest for T1DM + PDPN, followed by T1DM + DPN, T1DM - DPN, and healthy controls, indicating that the nerve properties are specific in individuals with diabetes and pain. There was an overall significant difference between the groups ( P < 0.01). The accommodation properties of stimulated fibers were different between the 2 electrodes ( P < 0.05) apart from in the group with T1DM + PDPN, where both electrodes stimulated nerves displaying properties similar to large fibers. Perception threshold tracking reveals differences in large and small nerve fiber function between the groups with and without diabetes, DPN, and pain. This indicates that the methods have potential applications in screening DPN and explore further the features differentiating painful from nonpainful DPN.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Humanos , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Dolor , Fibras Nerviosas , PercepciónRESUMEN
Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technology has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN). The treatment involves surgical implantation of electrodes and a power source that delivers electrical current to the spinal cord. This treatment decreases the perception of pain in many chronic pain conditions, such as PDN. The number of patients with PDN treated with SCS and the amount of data describing their outcomes is expected to increase given four factors: (1) the large number of patients with this diagnosis, (2) the poor results that have been obtained for pain relief with pharmacotherapy and noninvasive non-pharmacotherapy, (3) the results to date with investigational SCS technology, and (4) the recent FDA approval of systems that deliver this treatment. Whereas traditional SCS replaces pain with paresthesias, a new form of SCS, called high-frequency 10-kHz SCS, first used for pain in 2015, can relieve PDN pain without causing paresthesias, although not all patients experience pain relief by SCS. This article describes (1) an overview of SCS technology, (2) the use of SCS for diseases other than diabetes, (3) the use of SCS for PDN, (4) a comparison of high-frequency 10-kHz and traditional SCS for PDN, (5) other SCS technology for PDN, (6) deployment of SCS systems, (7) barriers to the use of SCS for PDN, (8) risks of SCS technology, (9) current recommendations for using SCS for PDN, and (10) future developments in SCS.
RESUMEN
Painful diabetic neuropathy is a common vexing problem for people with diabetes and a costly problem for society. The pathophysiology is not well understood, and no safe and effective mechanistically-based treatment has been identified. Poor glycemic control is a risk factor for painful diabetic neuropathy. Excessive intraneuronal glucose in people with diabetes can be shunted away from physiological glycolysis into multiple pathological pathways associated with neuropathy and pain. The first three treatments that are traditionally offered consist of risk factor reduction, lifestyle modifications, and pharmacological therapy, which includes only three drugs that are approved for this indication by the United States Food and Drug Administration. All of these traditional treatments are often inadequate for relieving neuropathic pain, and thus, new approaches are needed. Modern devices based on neuromodulation technology, which act directly on the nervous system, have been recently cleared by the United States Food and Drug Administration for painful diabetic neuropathy and offer promise as next-in-line therapy when traditional therapies fail.
RESUMEN
AIMS: This study investigated brain structure in patients of type 1 diabetes with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and type 1 diabetes with neuropathic pain and the associations to clinical, peripheral, and cognitive measurements. METHODS: Sixty individuals with type 1 diabetes and 20 healthy controls were included in the study. Nineteen individuals with type 1 diabetes and neuropathic pain, 19 with type 1 diabetes and DPN, 18 with type 1 diabetes without DPN, and 20 healthy controls were included in the brain analyses. We utilized structural brain magnetic resonance imaging to investigate total and regional gray matter volume. RESULTS: Significant lower gray matter volume was found in type 1 diabetes with neuropathic pain and in type 1 diabetes without DPN compared to healthy controls (p=0.024 and p=0.019, respectively). Lower insula volume was observed in all three diabetes groups (all p≤0.050). Thalamus and hippocampus volume was lower in type 1 diabetes with neuropathic pain, cerebellum volume was lower in type 1 diabetes with DPN, and somatosensory cortex volume was lower in type 1 diabetes without DPN (all p≤0.018). Attenuated memory was associated with lower gray matter volume in type 1 diabetes with DPN. No associations were found between gray matter volume and clinical/peripheral measurements. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated lower gray matter volume in individuals with type 1 diabetes regardless of the presence of DPN and neuropathic pain. Hence, central gray matter alteration was not associated with peripheral alterations.