The rheumatology workforce in the Arab countries: current status, challenges, opportunities, and future needs from an ArLAR cross-sectional survey.

The Arab League of Associations for Rheumatology (ArLAR) Research Group (ARCH) conducted this study to investigate the number of current practicing rheumatologists in the Arab countries, to estimate the projected number of rheumatologists in 10 years, and to evaluate the current workload, practice profile, consultation waiting time, and geographical mobilities of these rheumatologists. This cross-sectional survey study was conducted in 16 Arab countries in two parts. The first survey was addressed nominally to national societies to estimate the current and projected workforce. The second was an anonymous e-survey elaborated by the study steering committee on the Google Forms platform and distributed to Arab rheumatologists using social media, WhatsApp, and mass e-mails to evaluate their practice. The mean number of rheumatologists in Arab countries was 0.84 per 100,000 inhabitants (mean age 47.5 years, 55% females), ranging from 0.06 (Sudan) to 1.86 (Tunisia). The number of rheumatologists is expected to increase by 50% in 2032. Nevertheless, a 20% increase in population associated with an increase in demand is also expected. Data from 446 rheumatologists (mean age 43.9 years, 60.5% females) revealed that 72% worked full-time, and 53% were employed in the public sector only. The average waiting time for a rheumatology consultation was 19.9 days. Of 394 rheumatologists, 19% obtained their rheumatology diplomas from non-Arab countries, and 47% of Gulf rheumatologists were non-citizen physicians. Considering local demographic disparities, healthcare system differences, and geographical mobilities, national authorities are advised to implement effective intervention plans to optimize the rheumatology workforce.

The role of 99mTc-labelled glucosamine (99mTc-ECDG) in the evaluation of rheumatic joint disease: a screening experience.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the localization pattern of a novel imaging agent, (99m)Tc-labelled glucosamine (ECDG), in a variety of rheumatic conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients were recruited into the study, with either active rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. (99m)Tc-ECDG was prepared in-house and patients received 400 MBq intravenously; thereafter, static images were acquired 15 min, 2 h and 4 h later, using a dual-head Siemens e-cam. Images were interpreted by an experienced physician for (a) accumulation of tracer at sites of known disease; (b) relative activity over time; (c) detection of subclinical disease; (d) detection of unrelated disease; and (e) distribution of tracer at involved joints. RESULTS: Optimal images were obtained by 2 h after injection in all patients. (99m)Tc-ECDG accumulated at all clinically known sites of disease. Uptake was most pronounced in the patients with active but untreated disease. Relative tracer activity at involved joints increased with time when compared with activity in the adjoining soft tissue, liver and cardiac blood pool. Focal uptake was seen with local pathology such as supraspinatus tendinitis. Tracer uptake correlated well with disease severity, and insignificant tracer accumulation was evident at sites with no documented disease. Tracer distribution in joints appeared to conform predominantly to the synovium in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, whereas it was articular in patients with degenerative joint disease. CONCLUSION: (99m)Tc-ECDG accumulates at sites of active rheumatic disease and is able to differentiate between synovial and bone uptake. This agent may have a role in the assessment and monitoring of rheumatic conditions.