RESUMEN
Pregnant patients are at greater risk of hospitalization with severe COVID-19 than non-pregnant people. This was a retrospective observational cohort study of remnant clinical specimens from patients who visited acute care hospitals within the Johns Hopkins Health System in the Baltimore, MD-Washington DC, area between October 2020 and May 2022. Participants included confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-infected pregnant people and matched non-pregnant people (the matching criteria included age, race/ethnicity, area deprivation index, insurance status, and vaccination status to ensure matched demographics). The primary dependent measures were clinical COVID-19 outcomes, infectious virus recovery, viral RNA levels, and mucosal anti-spike (S) IgG titers from upper respiratory tract samples. A total of 452 individuals (117 pregnant and 335 non-pregnant) were included in the study, with both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals represented. Pregnant patients were at increased risk of hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 4.2; confidence interval [CI] = 2.0-8.6), intensive care unit admittance (OR = 4.5; CI = 1.2-14.2), and being placed on supplemental oxygen therapy (OR = 3.1; CI = 1.3-6.9). Individuals infected during their third trimester had higher mucosal anti-S IgG titers and lower viral RNA levels (P < 0.05) than those infected during their first or second trimesters. Pregnant individuals experiencing breakthrough infections due to the Omicron variant had reduced anti-S IgG compared to non-pregnant patients (P < 0.05). The observed increased severity of COVID-19 and reduced mucosal antibody responses particularly among pregnant participants infected with the Omicron variant suggest that maintaining high levels of SARS-CoV-2 immunity through booster vaccines may be important for the protection of this at-risk population.IMPORTANCEIn this retrospective observational cohort study, we analyzed remnant clinical samples from non-pregnant and pregnant individuals with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections who visited the Johns Hopkins Hospital System between October 2020 and May 2022. Disease severity, including intensive care unit admission, was greater among pregnant than non-pregnant patients. Vaccination reduced recovery of infectious virus and viral RNA levels in non-pregnant patients, but not in pregnant patients. In pregnant patients, increased nasopharyngeal viral RNA levels and recovery of infectious virus were associated with reduced mucosal IgG antibody responses, especially among women in their first trimester of pregnancy or experiencing breakthrough infections from Omicron variants. Taken together, this study provides insights into how pregnant patients are at greater risk of severe COVID-19. The novelty of this study is that it focuses on the relationship between the mucosal antibody response and its association with virus load and disease outcomes in pregnant people, whereas previous studies have focused on serological immunity. Vaccination status, gestational age, and SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant impact mucosal antibody responses and recovery of infectious virus from pregnant patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Embarazo , Humanos , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2 , Formación de Anticuerpos , Infección Irruptiva , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , ARN Viral , Inmunoglobulina GRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Variation in host immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 is regulated by multiple genes involved in innate viral response and cytokine storm emergence like IL-10 and TNFa gene polymorphisms. We hypothesize that IL-10; -592 C > A and - 1082 A > G and TNFa-308 G > A are associated with the risk of SARS-COV2 infections and clinical outcome. METHODS: Genotyping, laboratory and radiological investigations were done to 110 COVID-19 patients and 110 healthy subjects, in Ismailia, Egypt. RESULTS: A significant association between the - 592 A allele, A containing genotypes under all models (p < 0.0001), and TNFa A allele with risk to infection was observed but not with the G allele of the - 1082. The - 592 /-1082 CG and the - 592 /-1082/ -308 CGG haplotypes showed higher odds in COVID-19 patients. Severe lung affection was negatively associated with - 592, while positive association was observed with - 1082. Higher D-dimer levels were strongly associated with the - 1082 GG genotype. Survival outcomes were strongly associated with the GA genotype of TNFa. -308 as well as AGG and AAA haplotypes. CONCLUSION: IL-10 and TNFa polymorphisms should be considered for clinical and epidemiological evaluation of COVID-19 patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Interleucina-10 , Humanos , COVID-19/genética , Frecuencia de los Genes , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Genotipo , Interleucina-10/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , ARN Viral , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/genéticaRESUMEN
The rapidity with which SARS-CoV-2 XBB variants rose to predominance has been alarming. We used a large cohort of patients diagnosed with Omicron infections between September 2022 and mid-February 2023 to evaluate the likelihood of admission or need for supplemental oxygen in patients infected with XBB variants. Our data showed no significant association between XBB or XBB.1.5 infections and admissions. Older age groups, lack of vaccination, immunosuppression and underlying heart, kidney, and lung disease showed significant associations with hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Anciano , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Análisis por Conglomerados , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
Importance: Pregnant women are at increased risk of severe COVID-19, but the contribution of viral RNA load, the presence of infectious virus, and mucosal antibody responses remain understudied. Objective: To evaluate the association of COVID-19 outcomes following confirmed infection with vaccination status, mucosal antibody responses, infectious virus recovery and viral RNA levels in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women. Design: A retrospective observational cohort study of remnant clinical specimens from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients between October 2020-May 2022. Setting: Five acute care hospitals within the Johns Hopkins Health System (JHHS) in the Baltimore, MD-Washington, DC area. Participants: Participants included confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women and matched non-pregnant women (matching criteria included age, race/ethnicity, and vaccination status). Exposure: SARS-CoV-2 infection, with documentation of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Main Outcomes: The primary dependent measures were clinical COVID-19 outcomes, infectious virus recovery, viral RNA levels, and mucosal anti-spike (S) IgG titers from upper respiratory tract samples. Clinical outcomes were compared using odds ratios (OR), and measures of virus and antibody were compared using either Fisher's exact test, two-way ANOVA, or regression analyses. Results were stratified according to pregnancy, vaccination status, maternal age, trimester of pregnancy, and infecting SARS-CoV-2 variant. Resultss: A total of 452 individuals (117 pregnant and 335 non-pregnant) were included in the study, with both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals represented. Pregnant women were at increased risk of hospitalization (OR = 4.2; CI = 2.0-8.6), ICU admittance, (OR = 4.5; CI = 1.2-14.2), and of being placed on supplemental oxygen therapy (OR = 3.1; CI =13-6.9). An age-associated decrease in anti-S IgG titer and corresponding increase in viral RNA levels (P< 0.001) was observed in vaccinated pregnant, but not non-pregnant, women. Individuals in their 3rd trimester had higher anti-S IgG titers and lower viral RNA levels (P< 0.05) than those in their 1st or 2nd trimesters. Pregnant individuals experiencing breakthrough infections due to the omicron variant had reduced anti-S IgG compared to non-pregnant women (P< 0.05). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, vaccination status, maternal age, trimester of pregnancy, and infecting SARS-CoV-2 variant were each identified as drivers of differences in mucosal anti-S IgG responses in pregnant compared with non-pregnant women. Observed increased severity of COVID-19 and reduced mucosal antibody responses particularly among pregnant participants infected with the Omicron variant suggest that maintaining high levels of SARS-CoV-2 immunity may be important for protection of this at-risk population.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An increase in influenza like illness in children and adolescents at the Johns Hopkins Health system during summer 2022 was associated with increased positivity for enterovirus/ rhinovirus. We sought to characterize the epidemiology and viral evolution of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68). METHODS: A cohort of remnant respiratory samples tested at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory was screened for EV-D68. EV-D68 positives were characterized by whole genome sequencing and viral loads were assessed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). Genomic changes and viral loads were analyzed along with patients' clinical presentations. RESULTS: Of 566 screened samples, 126 were EV-D68 (22.3%). The median age of EV-D68 infected patients was four years, a total of 52 required supplemental oxygen (41.3%), and 35 (27.8%) were admitted. Lung disease was the most frequent comorbidity that was associated with hospitalization. A total of 75 complete and 32 partial genomes were characterized that made a new cluster within the B3 subclade that was closest to US genomes from 2018. Amino acid changes within the BC and DE loops were identified from 31 genomes (29%) which correlated with an increase in average viral load in respiratory specimens and the need for supplemental oxygen. CONCLUSIONS: EV-D68 outbreaks continue to cause influenza like illness that could be overwhelming for the health system due to a significant demand for high flow oxygen. Viral evolution and an increase in the susceptible population are likely driving the trends of the increased EV-D68 infections.
Asunto(s)
Enterovirus Humano D , Infecciones por Enterovirus , Gripe Humana , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Virosis , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , Lactante , Preescolar , Enterovirus Humano D/genética , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Virosis/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterovirus/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , FilogeniaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prior observation has shown differences in COVID-19 hospitalization risk between SARS-CoV-2 variants, but limited information describes hospitalization outcomes. METHODS: Inpatients with COVID-19 at 5 hospitals in the eastern United States were included if they had hypoxia, tachypnea, tachycardia, or fever, and SARS-CoV-2 variant data, determined from whole-genome sequencing or local surveillance inference. Analyses were stratified by history of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection. The average effect of SARS-CoV-2 variant on 28-day risk of severe disease, defined by advanced respiratory support needs, or death was evaluated using models weighted on propensity scores derived from baseline clinical features. RESULTS: Severe disease or death within 28 days occurred for 977 (29%) of 3369 unvaccinated patients and 269 (22%) of 1230 patients with history of vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among unvaccinated patients, the relative risk of severe disease or death for Delta variant compared with ancestral lineages was 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.49). Compared with Delta, the risk for Omicron patients was .72 (95% CI: .59-.88) and compared with ancestral lineages was .94 (.78-1.1). Among Omicron and Delta infections, patients with history of vaccination or prior SARS-CoV-2 infection had half the risk of severe disease or death (adjusted hazard ratio: .40; 95% CI: .30-.54), but no significant outcome difference by variant. CONCLUSIONS: Although risk of severe disease or death for unvaccinated inpatients with Omicron was lower than with Delta, it was similar to ancestral lineages. Severe outcomes were less common in vaccinated inpatients, with no difference between Delta and Omicron infections.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pacientes Internos , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The variant of concern Omicron has become the sole circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant for the past several months. Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.3, BA.4, and BA.5 evolved over the time, with BA.1 causing the largest wave of infections globally in December 2021-January 2022. This study compared the clinical outcomes in patients infected with different Omicron subvariants and the relative viral loads and recovery of infectious virus from upper respiratory specimens. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2-positive remnant clinical specimens, diagnosed at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory between December 2021 and July 2022, were used for whole-genome sequencing. The clinical outcomes of infections with Omicron subvariants were compared with infections with BA.1. Cycle threshold (Ct) values and the recovery of infectious virus on the VeroTMPRSS2 cell line from clinical specimens were compared. RESULTS: BA.1 was associated with the largest increase in SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related hospitalizations at the Johns Hopkins system. After a peak in January, cases decreased in the spring, but the emergence of BA.2.12.1 followed by BA.5 in May 2022 led to an increase in case positivity and admissions. BA.1 infections had a lower mean Ct value when compared with other Omicron subvariants. BA.5 samples had a greater likelihood of having infectious virus at Ct values <20. CONCLUSIONS: Omicron subvariants continue to be associated with a relatively high rate of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) positivity and hospital admissions. The BA.5 infections are more while BA.2 infections are less likely to have infectious virus, suggesting potential differences in infectibility during the Omicron waves.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula , Laboratorios , Línea CelularRESUMEN
Background: The variant of concern, Omicron, has become the sole circulating SARS-CoV-2 variant for the past several months. Omicron subvariants BA.1, BA.2, BA.3, BA.4, and BA.5 evolved over the time, with BA.1 causing the largest wave of infections globally in December 2021- January 2022. In this study, we compare the clinical outcomes in patients infected with different Omicron subvariants and compare the relative viral loads, and recovery of infectious virus from upper respiratory specimens. Methods: SARS-CoV-2 positive remnant clinical specimens, diagnosed at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory between December 2021 and July 2022, were used for whole genome sequencing. The clinical outcomes of infections with Omicron subvariants were compared to infections with BA.1. Cycle threshold values (Ct) and the recovery of infectious virus on VeroTMPRSS2 cell line from clinical specimens were compared. Results: The BA.1 was associated with the largest increase in SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate and COVID-19 related hospitalizations at the Johns Hopkins system. After a peak in January cases fell in the spring, but the emergence of BA.2.12.1 followed by BA.5 in May 2022 led to an increase in case positivity and admissions. BA.1 infections had a lower mean Ct when compared to other Omicron subvariants. BA.5 samples had a greater likelihood of having infectious virus at Ct values less than 20. Conclusions: Omicron subvariants continue to associate with a relatively high positivity and admissions. The BA.5 infections are more while BA.2 infections are less likely to have infectious virus, suggesting potential differences in infectibility during the Omicron waves. Funding: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract 75D30121C11061, NIH/NIAID Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance contract HHS N2772201400007C, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland department of health, and The Modeling Infectious Diseases in Healthcare Network (MInD) under awards U01CK000589.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUNDIncreased SARS-CoV-2 reinfection rates have been reported recently, with some locations basing reinfection on a second positive PCR test at least 90 days after initial infection. In this study, we used Johns Hopkins SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance data to evaluate the frequency of sequencing-validated, confirmed, and inferred reinfections between March 2020 and July 2022.METHODSPatients who had 2 or more positive SARS-CoV-2 tests in our system, with samples sequenced as a part of our surveillance efforts, were identified as the cohort for our study. SARS-CoV-2 genomes of patients' initial and later samples were compared.RESULTSA total of 755 patients (920 samples) had a positive test at least 90 days after the initial test, with a median time between tests of 377 days. Sequencing was attempted on 231 samples and was successful in 127. Rates of successful sequencing spiked during the Omicron surge; there was a higher median number of days from initial infection in these cases compared with those with failed sequences. A total of 122 (98%) patients showed evidence of reinfection; 45 of these patients had sequence-validated reinfection and 77 had inferred reinfections (later sequencing showed a clade that was not circulating when the patient was initially infected). Of the 45 patients with sequence-validated reinfections, 43 (96%) had reinfections that were caused by the Omicron variant, 41 (91%) were symptomatic, 32 (71%) were vaccinated prior to the second infection, 6 (13%) were immunosuppressed, and only 2 (4%) were hospitalized.CONCLUSIONSequence-validated reinfections increased with the Omicron surge but were generally associated with mild infections.FUNDINGFunding was provided by the Johns Hopkins Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance (HHSN272201400007C), CDC (75D30121C11061), Johns Hopkins University President's Fund Research Response, Johns Hopkins Department of Pathology, and the Maryland Department of Health.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Reinfección , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Genoma ViralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In December 2021, the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant displaced the Delta variant and caused an unprecedented spike in the numbers of COVID-19 cases. This study reports the positivity rates of circulating non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses and evaluates coinfections of these viruses with SARS-CoV-2 during the Omicron surge. METHODS: Data from the multiplex respiratory panels used for diagnosis at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory were used to assess positivity rates and respiratory virus coinfections in the time frame between November 2021 and February 2022. Clinical presentations and outcomes were assessed in the cohort of 46 patients who had SARS-CoV-2 coinfections with other respiratory viruses. RESULTS: Between November 2021 and February 2022, the high positivity of SARS-CoV-2 outcompeted enterovirus/rhinovirus and other circulating respiratory viruses and was associated with a notable decrease in influenza A infections. Coinfections represented 2.3% of the samples tested by the extended multiplex respiratory panel. SARS-COV-2 coinfections represented 25% of the coinfections in this time frame and were mostly SARS-COV-2/enterovirus/rhinovirus. Of the SARS-CoV-2 coinfection cohort, 3 patients were hospitalized and were coinfected with influenza-A (2) or RSV (1). Cough and shortness of breath were the most frequent symptoms (29%) followed by fever (28%). CONCLUSIONS: The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron surge was associated with a change in the circulation of other respiratory viruses. Coinfections were most prevalent with viruses that showed the highest positivity in this time frame.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfección , Infecciones por Enterovirus , Gripe Humana , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Virus , Humanos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Rhinovirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Virus/genéticaRESUMEN
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a multi-system autoimmune disease with synovial joints involvement. The triad of autoimmunity, genetics, and environment is the key player in RA pathogenesis. We intended to investigate gene expression of C-C Chemokine Ligand 2 (CCL2), protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 22 (PTPN22), and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) in RA patients versus controls, and its correlation with the activity of the disease. The relative expression of PTPN22, CTLA-4, and CCL2 in the peripheral blood of 59 RA patients and 50 controls was determined using RT-PCR. There was a significantly higher median (inter-quartile range) expression of CTLA-4 and CCL2 in RA patients in comparison to controls (P < 0.05). However, in RA patients, PTPN22 expression was significantly lower than in controls (P=0.0001). A weak significant correlation was detected between PTPN22 and either CTLA-4 or CCL2. Also, on comparing RA patients with moderate to severe disease activity versus those who have a mild disease activity, CCL2 was significantly over-expressed (P > 0.05). Thus, in Egyptian RA patients, there was a significant PTPN22 down-expression and greater expression of CTLA-4 and CCL2. Moreover, over-expression of CCL2 in RA patients with moderate-to-severe disease activity was significant. We conclude that these three key genes could become useful diagnostic markers for RA and CCL2 expression as a good prognostic tool for RA disease activity.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Proteína Tirosina Fosfatasa no Receptora Tipo 22 , Artritis Reumatoide/genética , Antígeno CTLA-4/genética , Egipto , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Proteína Tirosina Fosfatasa no Receptora Tipo 22/genéticaRESUMEN
Background: Increased reinfection rates with SARS-CoV-2 have recently been reported, with some locations basing reinfection on a second positive PCR test at least 90 days after initial infection. Methods: We identified cases where patients had two positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 and evaluated which of these had been sequenced as part of our surveillance efforts, and evaluated sequencing and clinical data. Results: 750 patients (920 samples) had a positive test at least 90 days after the initial test. The median time between tests was 377 days, and 724 (79%) of the post 90-day positives were collected after the emergence of the Omicron variant in November 2021. Sequencing was attempted on 231 samples and successful in 127. Successful sequencing spiked during the Omicron surge and showed higher median days from initial infection compared to failed sequences (median 398 days compared to 276 days, p<0.0005). A total of 122 (98%) patients showed evidence of reinfection, 45 of which had sequence proven reinfection and 77 had inferred reinfections (later sequence showed a clade that was not circulating when the patient was initially infected). Children accounted for only 4% of reinfections. 43 (96%) of 45 infections with sequence proven reinfection were caused by the Omicron variant, 41 (91%) were symptomatic, 32 (71%), were vaccinated prior to the second infection, and 6 (13%) were Immunosuppressed. Only 2 (4%) were hospitalized, and both had underlying conditions. Conclusion: Sequence proven reinfections increased with the Omicron variant but generally caused mild infections.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections in December 2021 was driven primarily by the Omicron variant, which largely displaced the Delta over a three-week span. Outcomes from infection with Omicron remain uncertain. We evaluated whether clinical outcomes and viral loads differed between Delta and Omicron infections during the period when both variants were co-circulating. METHODS: In this retrospective observational cohort study, remnant clinical specimens, positive for SARS-CoV-2 after standard of care testing at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory, between the last week of November and the end of December 2021, were used for whole viral genome sequencing. Cycle threshold values (Ct) for viral RNA, the presence of infectious virus, and levels of respiratory IgG were measured, and clinical outcomes were obtained. Differences in each measure were compared between variants stratified by vaccination status. FINDINGS: The Omicron variant displaced Delta during the study period and constituted 95% of the circulating lineages by the end of December 2021. Patients with Omicron infections (N = 1,119) were more likely to be vaccinated compared to patients with Delta (N = 908), but were less likely to be admitted (0.33 CI 0.21-0.52), require ICU level care (0.38 CI 0.17-0.87), or succumb to infection (0.26 CI 0.06-1.02) regardless of vaccination status. There was no statistically significant difference in Ct values based on the lineage regardless of the vaccination status. Recovery of infectious virus in cell culture was reduced in boosted patients compared to fully vaccinated without a booster and unvaccinated when infected with the Delta lineage. However, in patients with Omicron infections, recovery of infectious virus was not affected by vaccination. INTERPRETATION: Compared to Delta, Omicron was more likely to cause breakthrough infections of vaccinated individuals, yet admissions were less frequent. Admitted patients might develop severe disease comparable to Delta. Efforts for reducing Omicron transmission are required as, though the admission risk might be lower, the increased numbers of infections cause large numbers of hospitalizations. FUNDING: NIH/NIAID Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance contract HHS N2772201400007C, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland department of health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract 75D30121C11061, and The Modeling Infectious Diseases in Healthcare Network (MInD) under awards U01CK000589.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Hospitales , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Carga ViralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections in December 2021 in the United States was driven primarily by the Omicron variant which largely displaced the Delta over a three week span. Outcomes from infection with the Omicron remain uncertain. We evaluate whether clinical outcomes and viral loads differ between Delta and Omicron infections during the period when both variants were co-circulating. METHODS: Remnant clinical specimens from patients that tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after standard of care testing between the last week of November and the end of December 2021were used for whole viral genome sequencing. Cycle threshold values (Ct) for viral RNA, the presence of infectious virus, and levels of respiratory IgG were measured, and clinical outcomes were obtained. Differences in each measure were compared between variants stratified by vaccination status. RESULTS: The Omicron variant displaced the Delta during the study period and constituted 95% of the circulating lineages by the end of December 2021. Patients with Omicron infections (N= 1121) were more likely to be vaccinated compared to patients with Delta (N = 910), but were less likely to be admitted, require ICU level care, or succumb to infection regardless of vaccination status. There was no significant difference in Ct values based on the lineage regardless of the vaccination status. Recovery of infectious virus in cell culture was reduced in boosted patients compared to fully vaccinated without a booster and unvaccinated when infected with the Delta lineage. However, in patients with Omicron infections, recovery of infectious virus was not affected by vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Omicron infections of vaccinated individuals are expected, yet admissions are less frequent. Admitted patients might develop severe disease comparable to Delta. Efforts for reducing the Omicron transmission are required as even though the admission risk is lower, the numbers of infections continue to be high. RESEARCH IN CONTEXT EVIDENCE BEFORE THIS STUDY: The unprecedented increase in COVID-19 cases in the month of December 2021, associated with the displacement of the Delta variant with the Omicron, triggered a lot of concerns. An understanding of the disease severity associated with infections with Omicron is essential as well as the virological determinants that contributed to its widespread predominance. We searched PubMed for articles published up to January 23, 2022, using the search terms ("Omicron") AND ("Disease severity") as well as ("Omicron") AND ("Viral load") And/ or ("Cell culture"). Our search yielded 3 main studies that directly assessed the omicron's clinical severity in South Africa, its infectious viral load compared to Delta, and the dynamics of viral RNA shedding. In South Africa, compared to Delta, Omicron infected patients showed a significant reduction in severe disease. In this study, Omicron and non-Omicron variants were characterized based on S gene target failure using the TaqPath COVID-19 PCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In the study from Switzerland that assessed the infectious viral load in Omicron versus Delta, the authors analyzed only 18 Omicron samples that were all from vaccinated individuals to show that compared to Delta, Omicron had equivalent infectious viral titers. The third study that assessed the Omicron viral dynamics showed that the peak viral RNA in Omicron infections is lower than Delta. No published studies assessed the clinical discrepancies of Omicron and Delta infected patients from the US, nor comprehensively assessed, by viral load and cell culture studies, the characteristics of both variants stratified by vaccination status. ADDED VALUE OF THIS STUDY: To the best of our knowledge, this is the only study to date to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes after infection with the Omicron variant compared to Delta in the US using variants characterized by whole genome sequencing and a selective time frame when both variant co-circulated. It is also the first study to stratify the analysis based on the vaccination status and to compare fully vaccinated patients who didn't receive a booster vaccination to patients who received a booster vaccination. In addition, we provide a unique viral RNA and infectious virus load analyses to compare Delta and Omicron samples from unvaccinated, fully vaccinated, and patients with booster vaccination. IMPLICATIONS OF ALL THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE: Omicron associated with a significant increase in infections in fully and booster vaccinated individuals but with less admissions and ICU level care. Admitted patients showed similar requirements for supplemental oxygen and ICU level care when compared to Delta admitted patients. Viral loads were similar in samples from Omicron and Delta infected patients regardless of the vaccination status. The recovery of infectious virus on cell culture was reduced in samples from patients infected with Delta who received a booster dose, but this was not the case with Omicron. The recovery of infectious virus was equivalent in Omicron infected unvaccinated, fully vaccinated, and samples from patients who received booster vaccination. FUNDING: NIH/NIAID Center of Excellence in Influenza Research and Surveillance contract HHS N2772201400007C, Johns Hopkins University, Maryland department of health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention contract 75D30121C11061.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prior observation has shown differences in COVID-19 hospitalization rates between SARS-CoV-2 variants, but limited information describes differences in hospitalization outcomes. METHODS: Patients admitted to 5 hospitals with COVID-19 were included if they had hypoxia, tachypnea, tachycardia, or fever, and data to describe SARS-CoV-2 variant, either from whole genome sequencing, or inference when local surveillance showed â¥95% dominance of a single variant. The average effect of SARS-CoV-2 variant on 14-day risk of severe disease, defined by need for advanced respiratory support, or death was evaluated using models weighted on propensity scores derived from baseline clinical features. RESULTS: Severe disease or death within 14 days occurred for 950 of 3,365 (28%) unvaccinated patients and 178 of 808 (22%) patients with history of vaccination or prior COVID-19. Among unvaccinated patients, the relative risk of 14-day severe disease or death for Delta variant compared to ancestral lineages was 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.55). Compared to Delta variant, this risk for Omicron patients was 0.78 (95% CI 0.62-0.97) and compared to ancestral lineages was 1.04 (95% CI 0.84-1.24). Among Omicron and Delta infections, patients with history of vaccination or prior COVID-19 had one-half the 14-day risk of severe disease or death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.46, IQR 0.34-0.62) but no significant outcome difference between Delta and Omicron infections. CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk of severe disease or death for unvaccinated patients with Omicron was lower than Delta, it was similar to ancestral lineages. Severe outcomes were less common in vaccinated patients, but there was no difference between Delta and Omicron infections.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Quiescent leukemia stem cells (LSCs) play a major role in therapeutic resistance and disease progression of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). LSCs belong to the primitive population; CD34+CD38-Lin-, which does not distinguish normal hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from CML LSCs. Because Thomsen-Friedenreich/CD176 antigen is expressed on CD34+ HSC and IL1RAP is tightly correlated to BCR-ABL expression, we sought to increase the specificity towards LSC by using additional biomarkers. METHODS: We evaluated the co-expression of both antigens on CD34+ peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from both healthy volunteers and CML patients, using flow cytometry. Then, we used site-directed mutagenesis to induce knob-in-hole mutations in the human IgG heavy chain and the human lambda light chain to generate the bi-specific antibody (Bis-Ab) TF/RAP that binds both antigens simultaneously. We measured complement-directed cytotoxicity (CDC) in CML samples with the Bis-Ab by flow cytometry. RESULTS: In contrast to healthy volunteers, CML samples displayed a highly significant co-expression of CD176 and IL1RAP. When either a double-positive cell line or CML samples were treated with increasing doses of Bis-Ab, increased binding and CDC was observed indicating co-operative binding of the Bis-Ab as compared to monoclonal antibodies. DISCUSSION: These results show that the bi-specific antibody is capable of targeting IL1RAP+ and CD176+ cell population among CML PBMCs, but not corresponding normal cells in CDC assay. We hereby offer a novel strategy for the depletion of CML stem cells from the bulk population in clinical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.