Evaluating CXCL12 for Effects on Reactive Gene Expression in Primary Astrocytes.

Upon injury to the CNS, astrocytes undergo morphological and functional changes commonly referred to as astrocyte reactivity. Notably, these reactive processes include altered expression of factors that control immune processes and neuronal survival, as well as increased expression of the CXCL12 receptor, CXCR7/ACKR3. We now asked whether these events are related in that the astrocytic CXCL12 system modulates immune responses and/or neuronal survival. Short-term exposure of astrocytes cultured from the postnatal rat cortex to CXCL12 prominently increased the expression of serpine1/PAI1 on the mRNA level, but showed either no or only minor effects on the expression of additional reactive genes, selected from previous array studies. CXCL12-induced increases in PAI1 protein levels were only detectable in the additional presence of chemokines/cytokines, suggesting that translation of serpine1 mRNA depends on the cooperation of various factors. As expected, expression of most of the selected genes increased after acute or chronic activation of astrocytes with either LPS or a combination of IL-1ß and TNFα. CXCL12 partially attenuated expression of some of the LPS and IL-1ß/TNFα-induced genes under acute conditions, in particular those encoding CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CCL5. Taken together, these findings argue for the involvement of the astrocyte CXCL12 system in the control of the immune response of the injured CNS, where it may control distinct steps.

G protein­mediated EGFR transactivation is a common mechanism through which the CXCL12 receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7, control human cancer cell migration.

C­X­C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12) promotes metastasis of several tumors by affecting cell migration and invasion via its receptors, C­X­C chemokine receptor type (CXCR)4 and CXCR7. Current therapeutic approaches focus on the selective inactivation of either CXCR4 or CXCR7 in patients with cancer. Alternative strategies may emerge from the analysis of downstream events that mediate the migratory effects of CXCL12 in cancer cells. While CXCR4 activates cell signaling through both G proteins and arrestins, CXCR7 is believed to preferentially signal through arrestins. The present study analyzed the CXCL12­dependent chemotaxis of A549, C33A, DLD­1, MDA­MB­231 and PC­3 cells, in which either the activity of G proteins, EGFR or Src kinase was inhibited pharmacologically or the expression of arrestins was inhibited by RNA interference. The results demonstrated that CXCL12­induced migration of A549, C33A, DLD­1, MDA­MB­231 and PC­3 cells was attenuated by the Gαi/o­inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX), but was unaffected by small interfering RNA­mediated gene silencing of ß­arrestin1/2. In particular, the sensitivity of DLD­1 migration to PTX was unexpected, as it is solely dependent on the non­classical chemokine receptor, CXCR7. Furthermore, chemotactic responses to CXCL12 were additionally prevented by inhibiting EGFR activity via AG1478 and Src kinase activity via Src inhibitor­1. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that G protein­ and Src­dependent transactivation of EGFR is a common mechanism through which CXCL12­bound CXCR4 and/or CXCR7 control cancer cell migration and metastasis. These findings highlight EGFR as a potential therapeutic target that interferes with CXCL12­induced cancer expansion.

Interactions of the chemokines CXCL11 and CXCL12 in human tumor cells.

BACKGROUND: The chemokines, CXCL12 and CXCL11, are upregulated in tumors from many organs and control their progression. CXCL12 and CXCL11 affect tumor cell functions by either binding their prime receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR3, respectively, and/or CXCR7 as a common second chemokine receptor. In humans, CXCR3 exists in the functional splice variants, CXCR3A and CXCR3B, which either have pro- or anti-tumor activity, respectively. Despite the intimate crosstalk between the CXCL12- and CXCL11-system, the impact of a combination of CXCL12 and CXCL11 on tumor progression remains vague. METHODS: In the present work, we have analyzed CXCL12 and CXCL11 for combined effects on migration, invasion, proliferation, and cytostatic-induced apoptosis of the human tumor cells, A549, A767, A772, DLD-1, and MDA-MB-231. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the mode of interaction differs with respect to cell type and function and allows for either potentiation, attenuation or no changes of cellular responses. The divergent responses are not the result of the distinct use of different CXCL12- and CXCL11-receptors by the respective tumor cells, but in case of cell migration seem to be associated with the activation of p38 signaling pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings point to therapeutic limitations of ongoing efforts to selectively target CXCR3, CXCR4, or CXCR7 in cancer patients, and rather favor individualized targeting strategies.

Identification of CXCL11 as part of chemokine network controlling skeletal muscle development.

The chemokine, CXCL12, and its receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7, play pivotal roles during development and maintenance of limb muscles. CXCR7 additionally binds CXCL11, which uses CXCR3 as its prime receptor. Based on this cross-talk, we investigate whether CXCL11 would likewise affect development and/or function of skeletal muscles. Western blotting and immunolabelling demonstrated the developmentally restricted expression of CXCL11 in rat limb muscles, which was contrasted by the continuous expression of its receptors in proliferating and differentiating C2C12 cells as well as in late embryonic to adult rat limb muscle fibres. Consistent with a prime role in muscle formation, functional studies identified CXCL11 as a potent chemoattractant for undifferentiated C2C12 cells and further showed that CXCL11 does neither affect myoblast proliferation and differentiation nor metabolic/catabolic pathways in formed myotubes. The use of selective receptor antagonists unravelled complementary effects of CXCL11 and CXCL12 on C2C12 cell migration, which either require CXCR3/CXCR7 or CXCR4, respectively. Our findings provide new insights into the chemokine network controlling skeletal muscle development and function and, thus, might provide a base for future therapies of muscular diseases.

Functions of the CXCL12 Receptor ACKR3/CXCR7-What Has Been Perceived and What Has Been Overlooked.

The CXCL12 system is central to the development of many organs and is further crucially engaged in pathophysiological processes underlying cancer, inflammation, and cardiovascular disorders. This disease-associated role presently focuses major interest on the two CXCL12 receptors, CXCR4 and atypical chemokine receptor 3 (ACKR3)/CXCR7, as promising therapeutic targets. Major obstacles in these ongoing efforts are confusing reports on the differential use of either ACKR3/CXCR7 and/or CXCR4 across various cells as well as on the specific function(s) of ACKR3/CXCR7. Although basically no doubts remain that CXCR4 represents a classic chemokine receptor, functions assigned to ACKR3/CXCR7 range from those of a strictly silent scavenger receptor eventually modulating CXCR4 signaling to an active and independent signaling receptor. In this review, we depict a thorough analysis of our present knowledge on different modes of organization and functions of the cellular CXCL12 system. We further highlight the potential role of ACKR3/CXCR7 as a "crosslinker" of different receptor systems. Finally, we discuss mechanisms with the potency to impinge on the cellular organization of the CXCL12 system and hence might represent additional future therapeutic targets. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Delineating the recognized functions of atypical chemokine receptor 3 and CXCR4 in CXCL12 signaling is central to the more detailed understanding of the role of the CXCL12 system in health and disease and will help to guide future research efforts.

Cxcr4 and Sdf-1 are critically involved in the formation of facial and non-somitic neck muscles.

The present study shows that the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis regulates the migration of second branchial arch-derived muscles as well as non-somitic neck muscles. Cxcr4 is expressed by skeletal muscle progenitor cells in the second branchial arch (BA2). Muscles derived from the second branchial arch, but not from the first, fail to form in Cxcr4 mutants at embryonic days E13.5 and E14.5. Cxcr4 is also required for the development of non-somitic neck muscles. In Cxcr4 mutants, non-somitic neck muscle development is severely perturbed. In vivo experiments in chicken by means of loss-of-function approach based on the application of beads loaded with the CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100 into the cranial paraxial mesoderm resulted in decreased expression of Tbx1 in the BA2. Furthermore, disrupting this chemokine signal at a later stage by implanting these beads into the BA2 caused a reduction in MyoR, Myf5 and MyoD expression. In contrast, gain-of-function experiments based on the implantation of SDF-1 beads into BA2 resulted in an attraction of myogenic progenitor cells, which was reflected in an expansion of the expression domain of these myogenic markers towards the SDF-1 source. Thus, Cxcr4 is required for the formation of the BA2 derived muscles and non-somitic neck muscles.

CXCL11 promotes tumor progression by the biased use of the chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CXCR7.

The chemokine, CXCL11, is highly expressed in different solid tumors and controls tumor growth, metastasis, and lymphocyte infiltration. Although of potential clinical interest, it is presently unknown whether these tumor-promoting activities involve the CXCL11 receptors, CXCR3 and/or CXCR7. This issue is further intrigued by the fact that CXCR3 exists in the two functionally divergent splice variants, CXCR3A and CXCR3B, which exert pro- and anti-tumorigenic influences, respectively. To unravel the role of the various CXCL11 receptors in tumor progression, we have now defined their role in CXCL11-induced chemotaxis of the tumor cell lines, A549, C33-A, DLD-1, MDA-MB-231, and PC-3. CXCL11-induced cell migration was either sensitive to the CXCR3 antagonist, ÀMG487 (DLD-1), the CXCR7 antagonist, CCX771 (C33-A, PC-3), or both (A549, MDA-231). Moreover, in C33-A and PC-3 cells, but not in the other tumor cells, pharmacological activation and inhibition of CXCR3B prevented and potentiated CXCL11-induced cell migration, respectively. Both immunocytochemistry and Western blot analysis finally revealed that the observed cell type specific organization of the CXCL11 system is not the result of differences in expression levels or subcellular location of CXCL11 receptors. Our findings imply that the therapeutic use of CXCR3 antagonists in cancer patients requires exact knowledge of the organization of the CXCR3 system in the respective tumor.

The 5T4 oncofetal glycoprotein does not act as a general organizer of the CXCL12 system in cancer cells.

The chemokine, CXCL12, promotes cancer growth and metastasis through interaction with either CXCR4 and/or CXCR7. This tumor-specific organization of the CXCL12 system obscures current therapeutic approaches, aiming at the selective inactivation of CXCL12 receptors. Since it has been previously suggested that the cellular use of CXCR4 or CXCR7 is dictated by the 5T4 oncofetal glycoprotein, we have now tested whether 5T4 would represent a general and reliable marker for the organization of the CXCL12 system in cancer cells. The CXCR4 antagonist, AMD3100, as well as the CXCR7 antagonist, CCX771, demonstrated that the cancer cell lines A549, C33A, DLD-1, MDA-231, and PC-3 use either CXCR7 and/or CXCR4 for mediating CXCL12-induced chemotaxis and cell proliferation. The use of CXCL12 receptors as well as their subcellular localization remained unchanged in most cell lines following siRNA-mediated depletion of 5T4. In distinct cell lines, inhibition of 5T4 expression, however, modulated tumor cell migration and proliferation per se. Collectively our analyses fail to demonstrate general organizational influences of 5T4 of the CXCL12 system in different cancer cell lines, and, hence, dismiss its future use as a diagnostic marker.

Astrocytic expression of the CXCL12 receptor, CXCR7/ACKR3 is a hallmark of the diseased, but not developing CNS.

Based on our previous demonstration of CXCR7 as the major mediator of CXCL12 signaling in cultured astrocytes, we have now compared astrocytic expression of the CXCL12 receptors, CXCR7 and CXCR4, during CNS development and disease. In addition, we asked whether disease-associated conditions/factors affect expression of CXCL12 receptors in astrocytes. In the late embryonic rat brain, CXCR7+/GFAP+ cells were restricted to the ventricular/subventricular zone while CXCR4 was widely absent from GFAP-positive cells. In the early postnatal and adult brain, CXCR7 and CXCR4 were almost exclusively expressed by GFAP-immunoreactive astrocytes forming the superficial glia limitans. Contrasting the situation in the intact CNS, a striking increase in astrocytic CXCR7 expression was detectable in the cortex of rats with experimental brain infarcts, in the spinal cord of rats with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) and after mechanical compression, as well as in the in infarcted human cerebral cortex and in the hippocampus of Alzheimer's disease patients. None of these pathologies was associated with substantial increases in astrocytic CXCR4 expression. Screening of various disease-associated factors/conditions further revealed that CXCR7 expression of cultured cortical astrocytes increases with IFNγ as well as under hypoxic conditions whereas CXCR7 expression is attenuated following treatment with IFNß. Again, none of the treatments affected CXCR4 expression in cultured astrocytes. Together, these findings support the hypothesis of a crucial role of astrocytic CXCR7 in the progression of various CNS pathologies.

Evidence for the involvement of the CXCL12 system in the adaptation of skeletal muscles to physical exercise.

The chemokine CXCL12 and its primary receptor, CXCR4, not only promote developmental myogenesis, but also muscle regeneration. CXCL12 chemoattracts CXCR4-positive satellite cells/blood-borne progenitors to the injured muscle, promotes myoblast fusion, partially with existing myofibers, and induces angiogenesis in regenerating muscles. Interestingly, the mechanisms underlying muscle regeneration are in part identical to those involved in muscular adaptation to intensive physical exercise. These similarities now prompted us to determine whether physical exercise would impact the CXCL12 system in skeletal muscle. We found that CXCL12 and CXCR4 are upregulated in the gastrocnemius muscle of rats that underwent a four-week period of constrained daily running exercise on a treadmill. Double-staining experiments confirmed that CXCL12 and CXCR4 are predominantly expressed in MyHC-positive muscle fibers. Moreover, these training-dependent increases in CXCL12 and CXCR4 expression also occurred in rats with surgical coronary artery occlusion, implying that the muscular CXCL12 system is still active in skeletal myopathy resulting from chronic heart failure. Expression of the second CXCL12 receptor, CXCR7, which presumably acts as a scavenger receptor in muscle, was not affected by training. Attempts to dissect the molecular events underlying the training-dependent effects of CXCL12 revealed that the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis activates anabolic mTOR-p70S6K signaling and prevents upregulation of the catabolic ubiquitin ligase MurF-1 in C2C12 myotubes, eventually increasing myotube diameters. Together, these findings point to a pivotal role of the CXCL12-CXCR4 axis in exercise-induced muscle maintenance and/or growth.

Retrograde migration of pectoral girdle muscle precursors depends on CXCR4/SDF-1 signaling.

In vertebrates, muscles of the pectoral girdle connect the forelimbs with the thorax. During development, the myogenic precursor cells migrate from the somites into the limb buds. Whereas most of the myogenic precursors remain in the limb bud to form the forelimb muscles, several cells migrate back toward the trunk to give rise to the superficial pectoral girdle muscles, such as the large pectoral muscle, the latissimus dorsi and the deltoid. Recently, this developing mode has been referred to as the "In-Out" mechanism. The present study focuses on the mechanisms of the "In-Out" migration during formation of the pectoral girdle muscles. Combining in ovo electroporation, tissue slice-cultures and confocal laser scanning microscopy, we visualize live in detail the retrograde migration of myogenic precursors from the forelimb bud into the trunk region by live imaging. Furthermore, we present for the first time evidence for the involvement of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand SDF-1 during these processes. After microsurgical implantations of CXCR4 inhibitor beads in the proximal forelimb region of chicken embryos, we demonstrate with the aid of in situ hybridization and live-cell imaging that CXCR4/SDF-1 signaling is crucial for the retrograde migration of pectoral girdle muscle precursors. Moreover, we analyzed the MyoD expression in CXCR4-mutant mouse embryos and observed a considerable decrease in pectoral girdle musculature. We thus demonstrate the importance of the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis for the pectoral girdle muscle formation in avians and mammals.

The peculiarities of the SDF-1/CXCL12 system: in some cells, CXCR4 and CXCR7 sing solos, in others, they sing duets.

The chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12 induces and modulates major steps of ontogenesis, regeneration and tumorigenesis. Depending on the organ or tissue, CXCL12 serves as a proliferation or cell survival factor, influences differentiation, induces adhesion and/or regulates cell migration. These functions are mediated by the two chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7. Whereas CXCR4 is still viewed as the sole G-protein-activating and, hence, signaling receptor for CXCL12, CXCR7 is regarded as a non-classic scavenging or decoy receptor that modulates the function of CXCR4. However, this view might be too limited, since evidence has accumulated favoring a cell-type-specific mode of CXCL12 signaling. In addition to the "classic" CXCL12 signaling mode via CXCR4, CXCR4 and CXCR7 have to form a receptor unit for successful CXCL12 signaling in some cells. Moreover, examples exist whereby CXCL12 receptors split functions or switch roles, such that CXCR7 (instead of CXCR4) mediates signal transduction. The obvious lack of a universal mode of CXCL12 signaling urges a re-evaluation of the role of this chemokine in development, health and disease. This review depicts the exceptional characteristics of CXCL12-induced signal transduction in various cells and organs, points out remaining controversies and mentions consequences for therapeutic interventions.

Grk2 is an essential regulator of CXCR7 signalling in astrocytes.

We previously demonstrated that in astrocytes, SDF-1/CXCL12 exclusively signals through CXCR7 despite the additional presence of the alternate SDF-1/CXCL12 receptor, CXCR4. In addition, we provided evidence that astrocytic CXCR7-signalling involves a G protein-dependent mechanism. This is insofar remarkable as in all other cell types studied to date, CXCR7 either acts as a scavenger chemokine receptor, a modulator of CXCR4, or a non-classical chemokine receptor, signalling through ß-arrestin. To begin to unravel the molecular framework impinging the selective function of CXCR7 on a given cell type, we have now analysed the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (Grks) in astrocytic CXCR7 signalling. We demonstrate that Grk2 mediates signalling of SDF-1/CXCL12-bound CXCR7 as suggested by the finding that SDF-1/CXCL12-induced activation of Erk1/2 and Akt is abrogated following RNAi-mediated inhibition of Grk2, but not of Grk3, Grk5, or Grk6. We further unravel that Grk2 additionally controls signalling of SDF-1/CXCL12-bound CXCR7 in astrocytes by mediating internalization and subsequent silencing of CXCR7. Finally, we demonstrate that Grk2 is likewise expressed by microglial cells and Schwann cells, cell types in which CXCR7 does not act as a classical chemokine receptor. In conclusion, our findings establish that Grk2 tightly controls CXCR7 signalling in astrocytes, but does not imprint the cell type-specific function of this chemokine receptor.

Expression and function of the SDF-1 chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CXCR7 during mouse limb muscle development and regeneration.

The chemokine, SDF-1/CXCL12, and its receptor, CXCR4, have been implied to play major roles during limb myogenesis. This concept was recently challenged by the identification of CXCR7 as an alternative SDF-1 receptor, which can either act as a scavenger receptor, a modulator of CXCR4, or an active chemokine receptor. We have now re-examined this issue by determining whether SDF-1 would signal to C2C12 myoblasts and subsequently influence their differentiation via CXCR4 and/or CXCR7. In addition, we have analyzed CXCR7, CXCR4, and SDF-1 expression in developing and injured mouse limb muscles. We demonstrate that in undifferentiated C2C12 cells, SDF-1-dependent cell signaling and resulting inhibitory effects on myogenic differentiation are entirely mediated by CXCR4. We further demonstrate that CXCR7 expression increases in differentiating C2C12 cells, which in turn abrogates CXCR4 signaling. Moreover, consistent with the view that CXCR4 and CXCR7 control limb myogenesis in vivo by similar mechanisms, we found that CXCR4 expression is the highest in late embryonic hindlimb muscles and drops shortly after birth when secondary muscle growth terminates. Vice versa, CXCR7 expression increased perinatally and persisted into adult life. Finally, underscoring the role of the SDF-1 system in muscle regeneration, we observed that SDF-1 is continuously expressed by endomysial cells of postnatal and adult muscle fibers. Analysis of dystrophin-deficient mdx mice additionally revealed that muscle regeneration is associated with muscular re-expression of CXCR4. The apparent tight control of limb muscle development and regeneration by CXCR4 and CXCR7 points to these chemokine receptors as promising therapeutic targets for certain muscle disorders.

A novel cross-talk between endothelin and ErbB receptors controlling glutamate transporter expression in astrocytes.

The endothelin and epidermal growth factor (EGF) systems are central to the control of reactive brain processes and are thought to partly exert these tasks by endothelin-induced transactivation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Here we show that beyond EGFR transactivation, endothelins prevent the ligand-induced internalization of the EGFR. We unravel that endothelins abrogate internalization of the EGFR by either promoting the formation of "internalization-deficient" EGFR/ErB2-heterodimers or by activating c-Abl kinase, a negative regulator of EGFR internalization. We further provide evidence that this cross-talk is operational in the control of astrocytic glutamate transport. Specifically, we establish that the inhibitory effects exerted by endothelins on basal as well as EGF-induced expression of the major astroglial glutamate transporter subtype, glutamate transporter 1, are a direct consequence of the endothelin-dependent retention of the EGFR at the cell surface. Together our findings unravel a previously unknown cross-talk between endothelin and epidermal growth factor receptors, which may have implications for a variety of pathological conditions.

Transcriptional regulation of the GLAST/EAAT-1 gene in rat and man.

Various acute and chronic brain diseases result in disturbed expression of the glial glutamate transporters, GLAST/EAAT-1 and GLT-1/EAAT-2, and subsequent secondary neuronal cell death. The idea that glutamate-induced brain damage can be prevented by restoring glutamate homeostasis in the injured brain, focussed previous efforts on identifying the network controlling astrocytic glutamate transport. Since most of this work was performed with rat astrocytes, we now sought to compare the transcriptional regulation of the GLAST/EAAT-1 gene in rat and man. Reporter gene assay demonstrated that the human GLAST/EAAT-1 promoter comprises the 2.3 kb region immediately flanking the 5'-end of the human GLAST/EAAT-1 gene. Cloning of the previously unknown promoter of rat GLAST/EAAT-1 gene demonstrated maximal reporter gene activity with a sequence comprising the 1.5 kb region flanking the 5'-end of the gene as well as non-coding exon 1, and intron 1-2. Although the promoter regions from both species lacked sequence homology, they contained numerous identical consensus motifs. In human promoter constructs, dbcAMP, PACAP, EGF, and TGFα, which represent potent stimulators of endogenous GLAST/EAAT-1 expression, only further increased reporter gene activity in the presence of the GLAST/EAAT-1 3'-UTR. By contrast, the rat GLAST/EAAT-1 3'-UTR only mediated the stimulatory increases of dbcAMP. Moreover, the GLAST/EAAT-1 3'-UTR repressed constitutive GLAST/EAAT-1 expression in man, but enhanced GLAST/EAAT-1 transcription in rat. Together, our findings suggest the existence of close functional similarities of the GLAST/EAAT-1 promoter regions in man and rat and further point to a species-specific function of the GLAST/EAAT-1 3'-UTR in constitutive and regulated GLAST/EAAT-1 expression.

The presumed atypical chemokine receptor CXCR7 signals through G(i/o) proteins in primary rodent astrocytes and human glioma cells.

SDF-1/CXCL12 binds to the chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and CXCR7, and controls cell proliferation and migration during development, tumorigenesis, and inflammatory processes. It is currently assumed that CXCR7 would represent an atypical or scavenger chemokine receptor which modulates the function of CXCR4. Contrasting this view, we demonstrated recently that CXCR7 actively mediates SDF-1 signaling in primary astrocytes. Here, we provide evidence that CXCR7 affects astrocytic cell signaling and function through pertussis toxin-sensitive G(i/o) proteins. SDF-1-dependent activation of G(i/o) proteins and subsequent increases in intracellular Ca(2+) concentration persisted in primary rodent astrocytes with depleted expression of CXCR4, but were abolished in astrocytes with depleted expression of CXCR7. Moreover, CXCR7-mediated effects of SDF-1 on Erk and Akt signaling as well as on astrocytic proliferation and migration were all sensitive to pertussis toxin. Likewise, pertussis toxin abolished SDF-1-induced activation of Erk and Akt in CXCR7-only expressing human glioma cell lines. Finally, consistent with a ligand-biased function of CXCR7 in astrocytes, the alternate CXCR7 ligand, I-TAC/CXCL11, activated Erk and Akt through ß-arrestin. The demonstration that SDF-1-bound CXCR7 activates G(i/o) proteins in astrocytes could help to explain some discrepancies previously observed for the function of CXCR4 and CXCR7 in other cell types.

Connexin-deficiency affects expression levels of glial glutamate transporters within the cerebrum.

The glial glutamate transporter subtypes, GLT-1/EAAT-2 and GLAST/EAAT-1 clear the bulk of extracellular glutamate and are severely dysregulated in various acute and chronic brain diseases. Despite the previous identification of several extracellular factors modulating glial glutamate transporter expression, our knowledge of the regulatory network controlling glial glutamate transport in health and disease still remains incomplete. In studies with cultured cortical astrocytes, we previously obtained evidence that glial glutamate transporter expression is also affected by gap junctions/connexins. To assess whether gap junctions would likewise control the in vivo expression of glial glutamate transporters, we have now assessed their expression levels in brains of conditional Cx43 knockout mice, total Cx30 knockouts, as well as Cx43/Cx30 double knockouts. We found that either knocking out Cx30, Cx43, or both increases GLT-1/EAAT-2 protein levels in the cerebral cortex to a similar extent. By contrast, GLAST/EAAT-1 protein levels maximally increased in cerebral cortices of Cx30/Cx43 double knockouts, implying that gap junctions differentially affect the expression of GLT-1/EAAT-2 and GLAST/EAAT-1. Quantitative PCR analysis further revealed that increases in glial glutamate transporter expression are brought about by transcriptional and translational/posttranslational processes. Moreover, GLT-1/EAAT-2- and GLAST/EAAT-1 protein levels remained unchanged in the hippocampi of Cx43/Cx30 double knockouts when compared to Cx43fl/fl controls, indicating brain region-specific effects of gap junctions on glial glutamate transport. Since astrocytic gap junction coupling is affected in various forms of brain injuries, our findings point to gap junctions/connexins as important regulators of glial glutamate turnover in the diseased cerebral cortex.

Sequences of the non-coding RNA, NTAB, are contained within the 3'-UTR of human and rat EAAT2/GLT-1 transcripts and act as transcriptional enhancers.

In the CNS, extracellular glutamate is predominantly cleared by astroglial cells through the high-affinity glutamate transporter subtype, EAAT2/GLT-1. Expression of EAAT2/GLT-1 is perturbed in various acute and chronic brain diseases eventually allowing for the onset of neurotoxic extracellular glutamate concentrations and subsequent excitotoxic neuronal cell death. The idea that glutamate-induced brain damage could be prevented by restoring glutamate homeostasis in the injured brain, spurred considerable interest in identifying the mechanisms controlling EAAT2/GLT-1 expression. Since to date most of this study was done with rat astrocytes, an emerging issue is to whether these findings would also apply to humans. While so far it is known that the promoter region of the EAAT2/GLT-1 gene is strikingly similar in rat and man, little information is available on the function of the EAAT2/GLT-1 3'-UTR in the control of EAAT2/GLT-1 expression in general as well as across both species. We now report on the presence of a homologous sequence within the 3'-UTR of the human and rat EAAT2/GLT-1 gene which we identified as a partial sequence of the putative non-coding RNA, Ntab. We further demonstrate that fragments of Ntab act as enhancers of EAAT2/GLT-1 transcription. Finally, we unravel that partial Ntab sequences are selectively present in the vicinity of the EAAT2/GLT-1 gene in several other mammalians, implying a conserved function of this sequence in the vertebrate CNS.