Comparison of the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided medial lumbar bundle branch block on pain related to lumbar facet joints: a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter randomized interventional prospective study was to compare the ultrasound (US)-guided lumbar medial branch block (LMBB) with the fluoroscopy (FS)-guided LMBB in terms of analgesic efficacy and disability in the setting of the treatment of pain arising from the lumbar facet joints (LFJ). METHODS: Fifty adults with a "LFJ" syndrome were randomized into two groups: in group FS, fluoroscopic-guidance was used to block the medial branch at three lumbar levels (L3-L4, L4-L5 and L5-S1); in group US, same blocks were performed under ultrasound. Needle transverse approach was used with both techniques. Effects of these procedures were assessed with a Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAPS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Duke's Activity Status Index (DASI) scale, before the treatment, 1 week and 1 month after. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score was also collected before the procedure. Analysis of variance, one (for non-inferiority) and two-sided Mann-Whitney tests and Chi-square tests were performed. RESULTS: LMBB under US-guidance was not inferior to FS-guidance (P = 0.047) in terms of VAPS, ODI and DASI at 1 week and 1 month. Duration of techniques and HADS were similar between groups (=0.34; p = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: The medial lumbar bundle branch block under ultrasound-guidance is not inferior to the fluoroscopy-guidance procedure in effectively alleviating pain arising from the facet joints. Considering that this ultrasound technique has the benefit of an irradiation-free, real-time procedure, it can be considered as an effective alternative to the fluoroscopy-guided technique.

Nutritional rehabilitation after acute illness among older patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute illness can lead to disability and reduced quality of life in older patients. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of nutritional rehabilitation provided during and after hospitalisation for an acute event on functional status, muscle mass, discharge destination and quality of life of older patients. METHODS: The protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021264971). Articles were searched using Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar and Clinical. TRIALS: gov. For studies included in the meta-analysis, Hedges'g standardized mean difference effect size was calculated and transformed in odds ratios. RESULTS: We identified 7383 articles, of which 45 publications (41 trials, n = 8538 participants, mean age 80.35 ± 7.01 years.) were eligible for the systematic review. Patients were hospitalized for acute medical diseases (n = 6925) and fractures (n = 1063). The interventions included supplementation with a fixed amount of oral nutritional supplements (ONS, n = 17 trials), individualized diet plan (n = 3), combination of physical exercise with nutrition therapy (n = 14 trials), combination of anabolic agents with nutrition therapy (n = 5 trials). Overall nutritional rehabilitation improved functional status (Odds ratio 1.63 [1.15; 2.3], p = 0.003) and muscle mass (Odds ratio 2.61 [1.22; 5.5], p = 0.01), but not the quality of life or the discharge destination. CONCLUSION: Nutritional rehabilitation was found to improve functional status and muscle mass. There is a need for larger studies involving older hospitalized patients.

Jet Ventilation Reduces Coronary Sinus Movement in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: An Observational Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND: One of the reasons that high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) is used is due to the near immobility of thoracic structures. However, no study has quantified the movements of cardiac structures during HFJV compared with normal mechanical ventilation. METHODS: After ethical approval and written informed consent, we included 21 patients scheduled for atrial fibrillation ablation in this prospective crossover study. Each patient was ventilated with both normal mechanical ventilation and HFJV. During each ventilation mode, displacements of the cardiac structure were measured by the EnSite Precision mapping system using a catheter placed in the coronary sinus. RESULTS: The median [Q1-Q4] displacement was 2.0 [0.6-2.8] mm during HFJV and 10.5 [9.3-13.0] mm during conventional ventilation (p < 0.000001). CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the minimal movement of cardiac structures during HFJV compared to standard mechanical ventilation.

A novel metrics to predict right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Right Heart Failure (RHF) is a severe complication that can occur after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, increasing early and late mortality. Although numerous RHF predictive scores have been developed, limited data exist on the external validation of these models. We therefore aimed at comparing existent risk score models and identifying predictors of severe RHF at our center. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center analysis, clinical, biological and functional data were collected in patients implanted with a LVAD between 2011 and 2020. Early severe RHF was defined as the use of inotropes for ≥ 14 days, nitric oxide use for ≥ 48 h or unplanned right-sided circulatory support. Risk models were evaluated for the primary outcome of RHF or RVAD implantation by means of logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Among 92 patients implanted, 24 (26%) developed early severe RHF. The EUROMACS-RHF risk score performed the best in predicting RHF (C = 0.82-95% CI: 0.68-0.90), compared with the other scores (Michigan, CRITT). In addition, we developed a new model, based on four variables selected for the best reduced logistic model: the INTERMACS level, the number of inotropes used, the ratio of right atrial/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and the ratio of right ventricle/left ventricle diameters by echocardiography. This model demonstrated significant discrimination of RHF (C = 0.9-95% CI: 0.76-0.96). CONCLUSION: Amongst available risk scores, EUROMACS-RHF performs best to predict the occurrence of RHF after LVAD implantation. Our model's performance compares well to the EUROMACS-RHF score, adding a more objective parameter to RV function evaluation.

Predicting personalised remifentanil effect site concentration for surgical incision using the nociception level index: A prospective calibration and validation study.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate antinociception can cause haemodynamic instability. The nociception level (NOL) index measures response to noxious stimuli, but its capacity to predict optimal antinociception is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine if NOL index change to a tetanic stimulus in cardiac and noncardiac surgery patients could predict the required remifentanil concentration for haemodynamic stability at skin incision. DESIGN: A prospective two-phase cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing remifentanil-propofol target controlled infusion (TCI) anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: During the calibration phase, investigators evaluated the tetanic stimulus induced NOL index change under standardised TCI remifentanil-propofol anaesthesia during a no-touch period [bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 60, NOL index under 15]. If the NOL index change was 20 or greater following tetanic stimulation, investigators repeated the tetanus at higher remifentanil concentrations until the response was blunted. Surgeons incised the skin at this remifentanil concentration. The investigators derived a prediction model and in the validation phase calculated, using the NOL response to a single tetanus, the required incision remifentanil concentration for the start of surgery. MAIN OUTCOME: Haemodynamic stability at incision [i.e. maximum heart rate (HR) < 20% increase from baseline, minimum HR (40 bpm) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) ± <20% of baseline]. RESULTS: During the calibration phase, no patient had hypertension. Two patients had a HR increase slightly greater than 20% (25.4 and 26.7%) within the first 2 min of surgery, but neither of these two patients had a HR above 76 bpm. Two patients were slightly hypotensive after incision (MAP 64 and 73 mmHg). During the validation phase, neither tachycardia nor hypotension occurred, but MAP increased to 21.5% above baseline for one patient. CONCLUSION: During a no-touch period in patients under steady-state general anaesthesia [propofol effect site concentration (Ce) required for BIS between 40 and 60], the NOL index response to a tetanic stimulus under remifentanil antinociception can be used to personalise remifentanil Ce for the start of surgery and ensure stable haemodynamics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03324269.

Long-Term Outcome After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as Bridge to Left Ventricular Assist Device Preceding Heart Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) as a bridge to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in heart transplant (HT) candidates (ie, double bridge to HT) was associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared to LVAD bridging to HT (ie, single bridge to HT). DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing LVAD support from 2011 to 2020. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox-Mantel hazard ratios (HR) were calculated during LVAD support and after HT. Postoperative complications were collected. SETTING: University Hospital Erasme. PARTICIPANTS: HT candidates requiring LVAD. INTERVENTIONS: VA ECMO bridging to LVAD (ECMO-LVAD group [n = 24]) versus LVAD (LVAD group [n = 64]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent HeartWare LVAD (HVAD, Medtronic) placement. Survival to hospital discharge and during the entire study period were lower in the ECMO-LVAD group (66.7% v 92.2%; p = 0.0027, and 37.5% v 62.5%; p = 0.035, respectively). Overall HR of death was 2.46 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-5.37; p = 0.005) in the ECMO-LVAD group and remained elevated throughout their time on LVAD support (HR 3.24 [95% CI: 1.15-9.14]; p = 0.0036). However, in patients who underwent HT (n = 50), mortality was similar between groups (HR 1.33 [95% CI: 0.33-5.31]; p = 0.66). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the ECMO-LVAD group (infection = 83.3% v 51.6%, p = 0.007; renal replacement therapy = 45.8% v 9.4%, p = 0.0001; post-LVAD ECMO = 25.0% v 1.6%; p = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: VA ECMO as a bridge to LVAD support before HT was associated with increased morbidity and mortality during LVAD support. However, in patients who underwent HT, outcomes were similar regardless of VA ECMO bridging.

Earlier and lower dose administration of sugammadex: A randomised placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sugammadex allows for rapid reversal of muscle relaxation after the use of rocuronium or vecuronium. The lowest recommended dose is 2 mg kg-1 intravenously when there are two twitches during the train-of-four stimulation. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and risks of a lower dose of sugammadex administered earlier. DESIGN: Monocentric randomised controlled double-blind study. SETTING: Academic hospital. PATIENTS: Eighty patients were enrolled and randomised in 8 groups of 10 patients, 56 were finally evaluated. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were distributed in two clusters constituting four groups each. In the first cluster, injections were administered after the return of one twitch with the train-of-four (TOF1). In the second cluster, injections were delivered after the return of two twitches with the TOF (TOF2). We created four groups in each cluster for different dosages: placebo, 0.5, 1 or 2 mg kg-1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time between the injection of sugammadex and full recovery (TOF ratio > 0.9) that is expressed in minutes. RESULTS: Fifty-six successive patients were assessed between February and August 2018. The difference to TOF greater than 0.9 was not statistically significant between groups with the same dose administered at different times (F value = 0.001, P value = 0.975). There was a significant difference between groups with a different dosage administered at the same time (F ratio = 28.34; P value <0.0001). Concerning the time to TOF greater than 0.9 from the time point of TOF1, the timing of the dosages were statistically significant using log rank test (P < 0.0001). No patient presented a reparalysis. CONCLUSION: No difference between injecting sugammadex at TOF1 or TOF2 was found regarding time to full recovery. Difference regarding sugammadex quantity was found and compatible with other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: 'BRIDION_ERASME', EudraCT: 2017-005074-19.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on Nociception Level Index-guided remifentanil antinociception: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of dexmedetomidine on Nociception Level Index-guided (Medasense, Israel) antinociception to reduce intra-operative opioid requirements has not been previously investigated. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine if low-dose dexmedetomidine would reduce remifentanil requirements during Nociception Level Index-guided antinociception without increasing complications associated with dexmedetomidine. DESIGN: Double-blind randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Two university teaching hospitals in Brussels, Belgium. PATIENTS: American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 patients (n = 58) undergoing maxillofacial or cervicofacial surgery under propofol--remifentanil target-controlled infusion anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: A 30 min infusion of dexmedetomidine, or equal volume of 0.9% NaCl, was infused at 1.2 µg kg-1 h-1 immediately preceding induction and then decreased to 0.6 µg kg-1 h-1 until 30 min before ending surgery. Nociception Level Index and frontal electroencephalogram guided the remifentanil and propofol infusions, respectively. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the remifentanil requirement. Other outcomes included the propofol requirement, cardiovascular status and postoperative outcome. RESULTS: Mean ±â€ŠSD remifentanil (3.96 ±â€Š1.95 vs. 4.42 ±â€Š2.04 ng ml-1; P = 0.0024) and propofol (2.78 ±â€Š1.36 vs. 3.06 ±â€Š1.29 µg ml-1; P = 0.0046) TCI effect site concentrations were lower in the dexmedetomidine group at 30 min postincision and remained lower throughout surgery. When remifentanil (0.133 ±â€Š0.085 vs. 0.198 ±â€Š0.086 µg kg-1 min-1; P = 0.0074) and propofol (5.7 ±â€Š2.72 vs. 7.4 ±â€Š2.80 mg kg-1 h-1; P = 0.0228) requirements are represented as infusion rates, this effect became statistically significant at 2 h postincision. CONCLUSION: In ASA 1 and 2 patients receiving Nociception Level Index-guided antinociception, dexmedetomidine decreases intra-operative remifentanil requirements. Combined frontal electroencephalogram and Nociception Level Index monitoring can measure dexmedetomidine's hypnotic and opioid-sparing effects during remifentanil-propofol target-controlled infusion anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03912740, EudraCT: 2018-004512-22.

Intravenous lidocaine to prevent endothelial dysfunction after major abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Major abdominal surgery is associated with endothelial glycocalyx disruption. The anti-inflammatory effects of lidocaine were recently associated with endothelial barrier protection. METHODS: This was a single-centre, parallel group, randomized, controlled, double blind, pilot trial. Forty adult patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were included between December 2016 and March 2017 in the setting of a University Hospital in Brussels (Belgium); reasons for non-inclusion were planned liver resection and conditions associated to increased risk of local anesthetics systemic toxicity. Patients were randomized to receive either lidocaine by continuous intravenous administration or an equivalent volume of 0.9% saline. The primary endpoint was the postoperative syndecan-1 concentration (difference between groups). Near-infrared spectroscopy of the thenar eminence in association with the vascular occlusion test, and contemporary analysis of flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery were the secondary outcomes, along with haemodynamic data. Blood samples and data were collected before surgery (T0), and at 1-3 h (T1) and 24 h (T2) post-surgery. RESULTS: Syndecan-1 concentration increased significantly post-surgery (P < 0.001), but without any difference between groups. The near-infrared spectroscopy-derived and flow-mediated dilation-derived variables showed minor changes unrelated to group assignment. Compared with the placebo group, the intervention group had a significantly lower peri-operative mean arterial pressure and cardiac index, despite equally conducted goal-directed haemodynamic management. Postoperative lactate concentrations were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine failed to have any effect on endothelial function. Since in comparisons to other types of clinical situations, syndecan-1 was only slightly upregulated, endothelial dysfunction after major abdominal surgery might be overestimated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: « ISRCTN Registry ¼ identifier: ISRCTN63417725. Date: 15/06/2020. Retrospectively registered.

Gradual withdrawal of remifentanil delays initial post-operative analgesic demand after thyroid surgery; double-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Mismanagement of remifentanil leads to severe side effects such as opioid-induced tolerance and hyperalgesia. Recently studies revealed an alternative withdrawal method to limit these side effects. A gradual withdrawal of remifentanil seems to be associated with less pain. The hypothesis of this double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was that a gradual withdrawal of remifentanil would be associated with less immediate post-operative pain compared to after an abrupt discontinuation of remifentanil in patients who underwent thyroid surgery. METHODS: This double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary level hospital in Brussels (Belgium) from April until August 2017. 34 patients undergoing thyroid surgery were randomized and 29 patients completed the study. After randomization, patients undergoing thyroid surgery were allocated to two groups: one with an abrupt discontinuation of remifentanil after surgery and one with a gradual withdrawal of remifentanil after surgery. The primary outcome was the initial post-operative demand of analgesic medication. RESULTS: Gradual withdrawal of remifentanil was associated with a delayed initial post-operative demand of analgesic medication (P = 0.006). The first morphine bolus was given after 76.3 +/- 89.0 min in the group with a gradual withdrawal of remifentanil versus after 9.0 +/- 13.5 min in the group with an abrupt discontinuation of remifentanil. However, overall morphine consumption, numeric rating scale scores, Ramsay Sedation Scale scores, and quality of recovery scores (QoR-40) were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Though overall morphine consumption, numeric rating scale scores, Ramsay Sedation Scale scores, and quality of recovery scores (QoR-40) are not altered, a gradual withdrawal of remifentanil after thyroid surgery is safe and associated with a delayed initial post-operative demand of analgesic drugs. The withdrawal process does, however, require vigilance and training. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03110653 (PI: Luc Barvais; date of registration: 03/31/2017).

Synchronized mandibular movement and capnography: a novel approach to obstructive airway detection during procedural sedation-a post hoc analysis of a prospective study.

Perioperative complications related to obstructive sleep apnea still occur despite the use of partial pressure end-tidal CO2[Formula: see text] and pulse oximetry. Airway obstruction can complicate propofol sedation and a novel monitor combining mandibular movement analysis with capnography may facilitate its detection. Patients scheduled for sleep endoscopy were recruited and monitored with standard monitoring, [Formula: see text] and Jaw Activity (JAWAC) mandibular movement sensors. A post hoc analysis investigated airway obstruction prediction using a Respiratory Effort Sequential Detection Algorithm (RESDA) based on [Formula: see text] and mandibular movement signals. 21 patients were recruited and 54 episodes of airway obstruction occurred. RESDA detected obstructive apnea [mean ± SD (median)] 29 ± 29 (21) s, p < 0.0001, before [Formula: see text] alone. This prolonged the time between obstructive apnea detection and decrease to 90% oxygen saturation 64 ± 38 (54) versus 38 ± 20 (35) s, p < 0.0001. It predicted airway obstruction with a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 93%, respectively. The RESDA algorithm, which is based on the combination of capnography with mandibular movement assessment of respiratory effort, can more rapidly alarm anesthetists of airway obstruction during propofol sedation than [Formula: see text] alone. However, [Formula: see text] pulse oximetry, and clinical monitoring are still required.Trial Registry numbers: ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT02909309) https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02909309 .

Comparison of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Predicting Postoperative Pain and Pain Chronicization After Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective study evaluating the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ) in 110 patients undergoing spine surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of the PSQ-total and PSQ-minor scores with the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in predicting the immediate postoperative pain of patients after spinal surgery and their risk of developing a chronically painful state. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies evaluating the PSQ as a preoperative determinant for the development of chronic pain are lacking. Therefore, we undertook the following study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing lumbar or cervical spine surgery were prospectively included in the study. The PSQ-total and PSQ-minor, the PCS and its subscores, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Neck Disability Index were used preoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative Visual Analog Scale scores for pain at rest and movement and analgesics were recorded. At 12 months postoperatively, the Neck Disability Index and the ODI were once more assessed to evaluate pain chronicization. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients scheduled to undergo surgery at our spine center participated in the study. Our results highlighted that Visual Analog Scale scores were increased for high catastrophizers at rest on the first postoperative day when compared with low catastrophizers. Preoperative use of opioids and a high score on the rumination subscale of the PCS were linked to greater postoperative morphine consumption. At 12 months, the PCS, the PSQ-total, and PSQ-minor showed correlations with the development of a chronically painful state for ODI scores >21, indicating a marked persistent disability. CONCLUSIONS: Both PSQ and PCS showed an ability to predict a chronically painful state as defined by the persistence of disability after lumbar surgery.

Placebo versus low-dose ketamine infusion in addition to remifentanil target-controlled infusion for conscious sedation during oocyte retrieval: A double-blinded, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no gold standard for monitored anaesthesia care during oocyte retrieval. OBJECTIVE: In our institution, the standard is a conscious sedation technique using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil, titrated to maintain a visual analogue pain score less than 30 mm. This protocol is well accepted by patients but is associated with frequent episodes of respiratory depression. The main objective of this study was to evaluate whether the addition of a continuous intravenous infusion of ketamine could reduce these episodes. DESIGN: Controlled, randomised, prospective, double-blinded study. SETTING: The current study was conducted in a tertiary-level hospital in Brussels (Belgium) from December 2013 to June 2014. PATIENTS: Of the 132 women undergoing oocyte retrieval included, 121 completed the study. INTERVENTION: After randomisation, patients received either a ketamine infusion (40 µg kg min over 5 min followed by 2.5 µg kg min) or a 0.9% saline infusion in addition to the variable remifentanil TCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of respiratory depression episodes. Effect site target remifentanil concentrations, side effects, pain score, patient satisfaction and incidence of pregnancy were also recorded. RESULTS: No significant difference in the incidence of respiratory events was noted (pulse oximetry oxygen saturation < 95% was 49% in the ketamine group and 63% in the control group; P = 0.121). No patient required ventilatory support. In the ketamine group, visual analogue pain score and remifentanil concentrations were significantly reduced, but the latter remained above 2 ng ml. Postoperative nausea was less frequent in the ketamine group, 4 versus 15% (P = 0.038). The addition of ketamine did not influence length of stay nor patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: The addition of low plasma levels of ketamine to a TCI remifentanil conscious sedation technique did not decrease the incidence nor the severity of respiratory depression. Continuous monitoring of capnography and oxygen saturation is always required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EUDRACT number 2013-003040-23.

Does ultrasound guidance improve the efficacy of dorsal penile nerve block in children?

BACKGROUND: Penile nerve block (PNB) is a well-established technique used for circumcision; it requires the injection of local anesthetics close to the dorsal nerve of the penis. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided PNB versus the classical landmark-based technique (LBT) in children undergoing circumcision. METHODS: Forty boys, aged 1-14 years old that were scheduled for circumcision were randomly assigned to ultrasound-guided and landmark-based groups. All patients were placed under standard anesthesia with sevoflurane. In each group, patients received the penile block with ropivacaine, 0.75 mg·kg(-1) per side, and 0.05 mg·kg(-1) at the penis base. Groups were compared for intraoperative failure rate of the block, anesthesia time, postoperative pain scale, time of first required dose of paracetamol, time to first micturition, and average duration of stay in the postanesthesia care unit. RESULTS: The failure rate of dorsal PNB was not statistically different between groups (P = 0.5). Ultrasound guidance improved the efficacy of the PNB compared to the LBT in terms of postoperative pain scores on arrival in the PACU (P < 0.01) and after 30 min (P < 0.01). The ultrasound-guided technique also delayed the time to the first paracetamol dose administration (P < 0.0001), but the duration of the procedure, defined as the time between anesthesia induction and the end of surgery, was increased by 10 min in the US-guided group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided PNB improved the efficacy of the block compared with the LBT in terms of the postoperative pain during the first postoperative hour and the time to the first requirement for postoperative analgesia.