The utility of arterial blood gas parameters and chest radiography in predicting appropriate intubations in burn patients with suspected inhalation injury-A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates the utility of arterial blood gas (ABG) parameters and chest radiography in predicting intubation need in patients with burn injuries with suspected inhalation injury. METHODS: Patients with suspected inhalation injury admitted to a single centre, Burn Intensive Care Unit, between April 4th 2016 and July 5th 2019, were included. Admission ABG parameters and chest radiograph opacification were compared with whether the patient received an appropriate intubation: defined as intubation for a duration of over 48 h. Area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was calculated (AUROC). RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included. The majority (84%; n = 75) were intubated, of which 81% (n = 61) received appropriate intubations. pH had an AUROC of 0.88 and a pH of <7.30 had an 80% sensitivity and specificity for detecting appropriate intubation. P/F ratio had an AUROC of 0.81 and a P/F ratio of <40 had a 70% sensitivity and specificity for appropriate intubation. Chest radiograph opacification had poor utility in this regard (AUROC = 0.69). Adding pH and P/F ratio to the ABA criteria improved their sensitivity in detecting appropriate intubations (sensitivity: ABA + pH + P/F = 0.97 vs ABA = 0.86; p = 0.013), without altering their specificity. CONCLUSIONS: In patients suspected inhalation injury, pH and P/F ratio were good predictors for appropriate intubations. Incorporating the parameters into the ABA criteria improved their clinical utility.

The Predictive Applicability of Liberal vs Restrictive Intubation Criteria in Adult Patients With Suspected Inhalation Injury-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

This study compares the ability of liberal vs restrictive intubation criteria to detect prolonged intubation and inhalation injury in burn patients with suspected inhalation injury. Emerging evidence suggests that using liberal criteria may lead to unnecessary intubation in some patients. A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted in adult patients with suspected inhalation injury admitted to intensive care at Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham between April 2016 and July 2019. Liberal intubation criteria, as reflected in local guidelines, were compared to restrictive intubation criteria, as outlined in the American Burn Association guidelines. The number of patients displaying positive characteristics from either guideline was compared to the number of patients who had prolonged intubation (more than 48 hours) and inhalation injury. In detecting a need for prolonged intubation (n = 85), the liberal criteria had greater sensitivity (liberal = 0.98 [0.94-1.00] vs restrictive = 0.84 [0.75-0.93]; P = .013). However, the restrictive criteria had greater specificity (restrictive = 0.96 [0.89-1.00] vs liberal = 0.48 [0.29-0.67]; P < .001). In detecting inhalation injury (n = 72), the restrictive criteria were equally sensitive (restrictive = 0.94 [0.87-1.00] vs liberal = 0.98 [0.84-1.00]; P = .48) and had greater specificity (restrictive = 0.86 [0.72-1.00] vs liberal = 0.04 [0.00-0.13]; P < .001). In patients who met liberal but not restrictive criteria, 65% were extubated within 48 hours and 90% did not have inhalation injury. Liberal intubation criteria were more sensitive at detecting a need for prolonged intubation, while restrictive criteria were more specific. Most patients intubated based on liberal criteria alone were extubated within 48 hours. Restrictive criteria were highly sensitive and specific at detecting inhalation injury.

Introduction of medical emergency teams in Australia and New Zealand: a multicentre study.

The philosophy behind medical emergency teams (METs) or rapid response teams leaving the intensive care unit (ICU) to evaluate and treat patients who are at risk on the wards and to prevent or rationalise admission to the ICU is by now well established in many health care systems. In a previous issue of Critical Care, Jones and colleagues report their analysis of the impact on outcomes of METs in hospitals in Australasia and link this to reports appearing in the world literature.