RESUMEN
AIM: To describe our Spoke Center experience in Damage Control Surgery (DCS) in a non traumatic patient and the possibility of delayed abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Material of Study The case of a 73 years old Caucasian male treated with DCS for a septic shock due to a duodenal perforation and his clinical course till the abdominal wall reconstruction. RESULTS: We made DCS with abbreviated laparotomy, suture of the ulcer and duodenostomy with a foley placed in right hypochondrium. Patiens was discharged with a low-flow fistula and with TPN. After 18 months we made an open cholecystectomy and a complete abdominal wall reconstruction with Fasciotens Hernia System® adding a biological mesh. DISCUSSION AND COMMENTS: Periodic training in emergency settings and in complex abdominal wall procedures is the right way to manage critic clinical case. Like Niebuhr's abbreviated laparotomy experience also in our case this procedure allows primary closure of complex hernias and is potentially less prone to complications than component separation methods. Unlike Fung's experience we didn' t use negative pressure wound therapy system (NPWT) equally achieving good results. CONCLUSIONS: Elective repair of abdominal wall disaster is possible even in elderly patients who have been treated by abbreviated laparotomy and DCS surgery. In order to obtain good results is fundamental to have a trained staff. KEY WORDS: Damage Control Surgery (DCS), Giant incisional Hernia, Abdominal Wall Repair.
Asunto(s)
Pared Abdominal , Hernia Ventral , Hernia Incisional , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Músculos Abdominales/cirugía , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Hernia Ventral/cirugía , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Laparotomía , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) is a rare malignant tumor of the connective tissue and usually grows to a large size, undetected. Diagnosis is currently based on collective findings from clinical examinations and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, the latter of which show a fat density mass and possible surrounding organ involvement. Surgical resection is the main therapeutic strategy. The efficacy and safety of further therapeutic choices, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, are still controversial. CASE SUMMARY: A 61-year-old man presented with complaint of a large left inguinal mass that had appeared suddenly, after a slight exertion. Ultrasonography revealed an omental inguinal hernia. During further clinical examination, an enormous palpable abdominal mass, continuing from the left inguinal location, was observed. CT revealed a giant RLPS, with remarkable mass effect and wide visceral dislocation. After multidisciplinary consultation, surgical intervention was performed. Subsequent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were precluded by the mass' large size and retroperitoneal localization, features typically associated with non-response to these types of treatment. Instead, the patient underwent conservative treatment via radical surgical excision. After 1 year, his clinical condition remained good, with no radiological signs of recurrence. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment via surgery resulted in a successful outcome for a large RLPS.
RESUMEN
Background: A less-invasive surgery is often required today for many tumors, when oncologic radicality is strictly ensured, both to minimize hospital stay and health costs and to guarantee aesthetical results. Breast surgery for cancer has been radically changed in the last years since conservative interventions are widely performed everywhere. Methods: The authors present 75 cases of early breast cancer, randomly treated with standard quadrantectomy and subcutaneous quadrantectomy; the totally subcutaneous surgical technique implies only a short periareolar skin incision and a complete quadrant resection with skin and subcutaneous layer preservation. Continuous data were analyzed by unpaired Student's t-test. The Chi-square test was used to cumulate categorical variables. The Kaplan-Meyer method and log-rank test were used to compare the overall survival and disease-free survival. Results: No difference was found among the two groups in terms of the type of tumor, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), early complications, radicality, and mortality. The only significant differences were both found in the length of hospital stay and in postoperative breast deformity that required further intervention in some cases. Conclusion: In the era of mini-invasive surgery and quality assurance, the authors conclude that subcutaneous quadrantectomy is a safe procedure that allows less health cost and a better aesthetical result.