SARS-CoV-2 vaccination willingness and humoral vaccination response in radiation oncology patients.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection has been and, in some parts, still is a threat to oncologic patients, making it crucial to understand perception of vaccination and immunologic responses in this vulnerable patient segment. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in relation to malignant disease characteristics and therapies have so far not been studied consecutively in larger oncologic patient populations. This study captures SARS-CoV-2 vaccination willingness and humoral immune response in a large consecutive oncologic patient collective at the beginning of 2021. METHODS: 1142 patients were consecutively recruited over 5.5 months at a tertiary department for radiation oncology and were assessed for vaccination willingness via a standardized interview. In already vaccinated patients total SARS-CoV-2 S antibody titres against the spike protein (Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S) and were evaluated 35 days or later after the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. RESULTS: Vaccination willingness was high with a rate of 90 %. The most frequent reasons for rejection were: undecided/potential vaccination after therapy, distrust in the vaccine and fear of interaction with comorbidities. Factors associated with lower vaccination willingness were: worse general condition, lower age and female sex. 80 % of the participants had been previously vaccinated, 8 % reported previous infection and 16 % received vaccination during antineoplastic therapy. In 97.5 % of the vaccinated patients Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S was detected. In a univariable analysis parameters associated with non-conversion were: lower performance status, spread to the local lymphatics (N + ), hematologic disease and diffuse metastases. All patients with oligometastatic disease achieved positive Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titres. For patients with two vaccinations several risk factors were identified, that were associated with low antibody concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination willingness among oncologic patients was high in the first months after its availability, and most patients had already received one or two doses. Over 97 % of vaccinated patients had measurable anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titres. Our data supports early identification of low humoral responders after vaccination and could facilitate the design of future oncologic vaccine trials (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04918888).

Heritability analysis of liver stiffness detected by ultrasound shear wave elastography: a twin study.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common condition with a subset of individuals developing liver fibrosis as a major risk factor for advanced liver disease. The contribution of genetic factors to this progression remains incompletely understood. Our aim was to analyze heritability in the development of liver fibrosis estimated by ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in an asymptomatic adult twin cohort. METHODS: In total 172 adult Hungarian twins (51 monozygotic and 36 dizygotic pairs; 63% women; mean age 54.9 ± 15.1 years) underwent B-mode ultrasonography to assess steatosis and SWE to determine Young's modulus as a noninvasive marker or liver fibrosis. RESULTS: We identified 99 subjects with steatosis, which was mild in 46 subjects (46%), moderate in 52 subjects (52%) and severe in a single subject (1%). Mean Young's modulus was 7.58 ± 3.53 kPa in this slightly overweight study cohort (BMI: 25.7 ± 4.6 kg/m2). Univariate analysis adjusted for age, sex and BMI indicated no discernible role for genetic components in the presence of liver stiffness, whereas shared and unshared environmental effects accounted for 38.3% (95% confidence interval (CI), 17-56.1%) and 61.7% (95% CI, 43.9-83%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support the heritability of liver stiffness in an asymptomatic, twin cohort with slight overweight and variable degree of steatosis, underscoring the importance of environmental factors in the development of NAFLD and liver fibrosis.