RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has become the standard treatment method for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Concerns about lesser pain and better cosmesis led to the evolution of uniportal access. This study prospectively compared the results of the uniportal, two-port, and three-port thoracoscopic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty-five patients were randomized into three groups according to the port numbers. The groups were compared regarding the operation time, hospital stay, amount of drainage, area of pleurectomy, complications, recurrences, and pain scores. RESULTS: Except for the amount of drainage (p = 0.03), no factors were found to be statistically significant. The overall recurrence rate was 5%. Although the first and second week pain scores were not statistically significant, the single-incision group patients had significantly less pain at 4, 24, and 72 hours (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study indicated that uniportal VATS approach is less painful and has better cosmetic results, besides it is as efficient as two- or three-port VATS approach.
Asunto(s)
Neumotórax/cirugía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Drenaje , Femenino , Humanos , Longevidad , Masculino , Tempo Operativo , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Neumotórax/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Background Posterior mediastinal lesions are classified as solid lesions and cysts. The treatment for both types is surgery. We evaluated the surgical outcomes and recurrence rates after video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy for posterior mediastinal lesions. Methods Data of 66 resections for posterior mediastinal masses between 2000 and 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-two patients were treated by video-assisted thoracic surgery (group V) and 44 underwent thoracotomy (group T); 29 (43.9%) were female and 37 (56.1%) were male, the mean age was 45.9 ± 14.7 years. Results Bronchogenic cyst was the most common cystic lesion (10/12, 83.3%), and benign schwannoma was the most common solid lesion (32/54, 59.2%). The mean diameter of solid lesions was 5.19 ± 2.4 cm (group V 3.98 ± 1.8 vs. group T 5.78 ± 2.5 cm, p = 0.006). The tumor diameter was 4.06 ± 1.9 cm in asymptomatic patients and 6.93 ± 2.2 cm ( p < 0.001) in symptomatic patients. In group V, hospital stay and duration of drainage were significantly shorter than in group T ( p = 0.02, p = 0.01). Local recurrence was detected in 4 (6.1%) patients. Cystic lesions had a higher recurrence rate than solid lesions ( p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in recurrence rates in groups V and T ( p = 0.59). Conclusion Video-assisted thoracic surgery is a safe method for surgical treatment of posterior mediastinal lesions, with a shorter drainage time and postoperative hospitalization and similar recurrence rates. More recurrences are seen in patients with cystic lesions.
Asunto(s)
Quiste Mediastínico/cirugía , Neoplasias del Mediastino/cirugía , Neurilemoma/cirugía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Toracotomía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Quiste Mediastínico/diagnóstico por imagen , Quiste Mediastínico/patología , Neoplasias del Mediastino/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias del Mediastino/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neurilemoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neurilemoma/patología , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video/efectos adversos , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The treatment of postpneumonectomic empyema is challenging. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) in the treatment of patients with open window thoracostomy (OWT). METHODS: Between January 2010 and April 2014, eight patients developed empyema following pneumonectomy for malignant diseases in our department and then underwent an OWT with subsequent VAC therapy; their cases were retrospectively studied. Each session of VAC therapy lasted 72 hours, and therapy was completed after approximately 6 sessions. RESULTS: OWT in six patients resulted in either decreased size or complete closure after VAC treatment. Five patients had a bronchopleural fistula (BPF), which was closed either with a tracheal stent (three patients), primary suture, or omentoplasty. The BPF in one of these patients closed during VAC therapy. The treatment failed in two patients due to the microfistula becoming obvious in one and persistence of the fistula in the other. CONCLUSION: We believe that the use of VAC in the treatment of postpneumonectomy empyema is effective, except for patients with BPF.