Agreement between Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE) and Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP) in neurodevelopmental assessment of preterm infants <32 weeks' gestation at term corrected age.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the agreement between HNNE and TIMP at TCA for preterm infants born <32+0 weeks' gestation, and to evaluate their correlation to PDMS-2 at 12-month corrected age (CA). METHODS: Infants born between November 2013 to June 2022 who had both HNNE and TIMP performed at TCA of 37+0-41+6 weeks gestation, and motor outcome assessed using the PDMS-2 at 12-month old were enrolled. The HNNE and 12-month PDMS-2 findings were categorized as optimal vs sub-optimal. TIMP was categorized as typical vs atypical. Cohen's kappa was used to determine the agreement between HNNE and TIMP. Sensitivity analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the predictive values of HNNE and TIMP on motor outcome at CA of 12-months. RESULTS: HNNE and TIMP done on 125 infants at TCA do not show reliable agreement. HNNE demonstrated slight and fair agreement with the 12-month Total Motor Quotient (TMQ) and Fine Motor Quotient (FMQ) of the PDMS-2 respectively. TIMP at TCA demonstrated fair agreement with all sub-domains of motor function on PDMS-2 at 12-months. In comparison with TIMP, HNNE at TCA is more sensitive at predicting suboptimal total, gross and fine motor outcomes at 12-month CA with sensitivity of 68.4 %, 51.9 %, and 83.3 % vs 44.4 %, 31.8 % and 53.3 % respectively. Atypical TIMP at TCA is more specific for suboptimal total, gross and fine motor outcomes at 12-month CA with specificity of 90.3 %, 89 % and 90.5 % respectively. Neurobehavioral assessments at TCA using HNNE and TIMP were predictive of suboptimal fine motor quotient at CA of 12-months with AUC of 0.760 (p = 0.011) and 0.718 (p = 0.032) respectively. The difference in AUC between the 2 instruments of 0.042 was not statistically significant (p = 0.741). CONCLUSIONS: While the HNNE and TIMP done at TCA did not demonstrate significant agreement, suboptimal HNNE and atypical TIMP at TCA were predictive of suboptimal FMQ on PDMS-2 at 12-month CA.

Trends in neonatal mortality and morbidity in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants over a decade: Singapore national cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Very preterm infants are at risk for neurodevelopmental impairment because of postnatal morbidities. This study aims to (1) compare the outcomes of very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants in Singapore during two time periods over a decade; 2) compare performances among Singaporean neonatal intensive care units (NICUs); and 3) compare a Singapore national cohort with one from the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN). METHODS: Singapore national data on VLBW infants born during two periods, 2007-2008 (SG2007, n = 286) and 2015-2017 (SG2017, n = 905) were extracted from patient medical records. The care practices and clinical outcomes among three Singapore NICUs were compared using SG2017 data. Third, using data from the ANZNN2017 annual report, infants with gestational age (GA) ≤29 weeks in SG2017 were compared with their Oceania counterparts. RESULTS: SG2017 had 9.9% higher usage of antenatal steroids (p < 0.001), 8% better survival for infants ≤26 weeks (p = 0.174), and used 12.7% lesser nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for patent ductus arteriosus closure (p < 0.001) than those of SG2007 cohort. Rate of late-onset sepsis (LOS) was almost halved (7.4% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.001), and exclusive human milk feeding after discharge increased threefold (p < 0.001). SG2017, in contrast, had a higher rate of chronic lung disease (CLD) (20.0% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.098). Within SG2017, the rates of LOS, CLD, and human milk feeding varied significantly between the three NICUs. When compared with ANZNN2017, SG2017 had significantly lower rates of LOS for infants ≤25 weeks (p = 0.001), less necrotizing enterocolitis for infants ≤27 weeks (p = 0.002), and less CLD across all GA groups. CONCLUSION: Postnatal morbidities and survival rates for VLBW infants in Singapore have improved over a decade. Outcomes for VLBW infants varied among three Singapore NICUs, which provide a rationale for collaboration to improve clinical quality. The outcomes of Singaporean VLBW infants were comparable to those of their ANZNN counterparts.

Comparison of the neurobehavioural profile of early-preterm infants against term and late-preterm infants using the Hammersmith neonatal neurological examination.

AIM: To compare the neurobehavioural profile of early-preterm infants (<32 weeks gestation) at term-corrected age (39+0 -41+6 weeks) versus late-preterm and full-term infants at similar term gestational ages. METHODS: Early-preterm infants were assessed neurologically at term-corrected age using the Hammersmith neonatal neurological examination. The raw scores of the 34 Hammersmith neonatal neurological examination items were converted to optimality scores. Pairwise comparison of neurobehavioural patterns between early-preterm infants at term-corrected age versus late-preterm and full-term infants at similar gestational ages were made using independent sample t tests. Differences in optimality scores between the three groups were evaluated using one-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: Sixty-eight early-preterm infants assessed at term-corrected age were compared against 75 late-preterm infants and 133 full-term infants. Mean total optimality scores (±standard deviation) of early-preterm, late-preterm and full-term infants at term-corrected age were 27.68 (±3.97), 29.09 (±2.45) and 31.58 (±1.39), respectively (P < 0.001). The mean optimality score of early-preterm infants was significantly lower when compared pairwise with late-preterm infants and full-term infants with mean difference of -1.42 (P = 0.013) and -3.91 (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The neurobehavioural profile of early-preterm infants lags significantly behind those of late-preterm and full-term infants at term-corrected age. This study also provides reference raw and optimality scores for all items in the Hammersmith neonatal neurological examination for early-preterm infants in a predominantly Asian population.

Validation of a smartphone-based screening tool (Biliscan) for neonatal jaundice in a multi-ethnic neonatal population.

AIM: Neonatal jaundice is an important and prevalent condition that can cause kernicterus and mortality. This study validated a smartphone-based screening application (Biliscan) in detecting neonatal jaundice. METHODS: A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at the neonatal unit in a tertiary teaching hospital between August 2020 and October 2021. All babies born at the gestation of 35 weeks and above with clinical jaundice or are recommended for screening of jaundice within 21 days of post-natal age were recruited. Using Biliscan, images of the babies' skin over the sternum were taken against a standard colour card. The application uses feature extraction and machine learning regression to estimate the bilirubin level. Independent Biliscan bilirubin estimates (BsB) were made and compared with total serum bilirubin (TSB) and transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) levels. Bland Altman plots were used to establish the agreement between BsB and TSB, as well as TcB, using the clinically acceptable limits of agreement of ±35 µmol/L, which were defined a priori. Pearson correlation coefficient was assessed to establish the strength of the relationship between BsB versus TSB and TcB. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-one paired TSB-BsB and 85 paired TcB-BsB measurements were obtained. Bland Altman plot for the entire group showed that 54% (33/61) of the pairs of TSB and BsB readings and 66% (56/85) of the pairs of TcB and BsB readings were within the maximum clinically acceptable difference of 35 µmol/L. Pearson r for BsB versus TSB and TcB was 0.54 (P < 0.001) and 0.66 (P < 0.001) respectively. Compared with TSB, the recommended gold standard measure for jaundice, Biliscan has a sensitivity of 76.92% and specificity of 70.83% for jaundice requiring phototherapy. The positive and negative predictive values in term infants were 93.3% and 36.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that there is moderate correlation and mediocre agreement between BsB and TSB, as well as TcB. Improvement to the application algorithm and further studies that include a larger population, and a wider range of bilirubin values are necessary before the tool may be considered for use in screening of jaundice in newborns.

Use of web-based game in neonatal resuscitation - is it effective?

BACKGROUND: Knowledge and skills decline within months post simulation-based training in neonatal resuscitation. To empower 'Millennial' learners to take control of their own learning, a single-player, unguided web-based Neonatal Resuscitation Game was designed. The present study investigates the effectiveness of the game on retention of resuscitation knowledge and skills. METHODS: The study evaluated 162 healthcare professionals who attended simulation-based training in neonatal resuscitation. Following standard simulation-based training, participants were assigned to either a gaming group (Gamers) with access to the web-based Neonatal Resuscitation Game or a control group (Controls) with no access to the game. Although Gamers were given access, game utilization was completely voluntary and at will. Some Gamers chose to utilize the web-based game (Players) and others did not (Non-players). Knowledge and skills in neonatal resuscitation were assessed upon completion of training and 6 months post-training using a multiple-choice question test and a manikin-based skills test. Changes in scores were compared statistically between Gamers vs Controls, Players vs Controls, and Players vs Controls + Non-players using two-sample t-tests. RESULTS: At the final assessment, declines in knowledge scores were seen in all groups. Mean change from baseline in knowledge and skill performance scores at 6 months, adjusted for baseline skill performance and MCQ test scores, did not differ significantly between Players vs Controls and Players vs Controls + Non-players. CONCLUSION: The web-based game in its current format may not be effective in facilitating retention of knowledge and technical skills in neonatal resuscitation.

Evaluation of neurological behaviour in late-preterm newborn infants using the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination.

AIM: We hypothesise that clinically well late-preterm infants (LPI) (34+0 -36+6 weeks) are neurologically more immature than their term counterparts, and this immaturity persists even when these infants reach term-corrected age (TCA). The primary aim of our study was to characterise and contrast the neurodevelopmental profile of well LPI with full-term infants (FTI) (39+0 -41+6 weeks) using the Hammersmith Neonatal Neurological Examination (HNNE). Our secondary aim was to obtain local reference ranges for the 34 items in the HNNE in an Asian-dominant population. METHODS: LPI were assessed at two time points: 12-72 h of life and at TCA of 39+0 -41+6 weeks, while FTI were assessed at 12-72 h of life using the HNNE. Each of the 34 items on the HNNE was assigned an optimality score (OS) of 0, 0.5 or 1, totalling up to 34. A quantitative comparison of the neurobehavioral patterns was made using two-sample t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 212 infants (79 LPI and 133 FTI) were recruited. Mean OSs for LPI and FTI at birth were (25.11 ± 3.36)/34 and (31.19 ± 1.50)/34, respectively, with a mean difference of 6.08 (P value <0.0001). The mean OS for LPI on reaching TCA was (28.91 ± 2.30)/34, with a mean difference of 2.28 (P value <0.0001). Reference OSs for the 34 items on the HNNE were also obtained. CONCLUSION: LPI are more immature than their term counterparts even on reaching TCA, with discrepancies most apparent in 'tone' and 'movement'. We provide reference OSs of 34 items in the HNNE for infants in an Asian-dominant population.

Singapore Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines 2016.

We present the revised Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines for Singapore. The 2015 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation Neonatal Task Force's consensus on science and treatment recommendations (2015), and guidelines from the American Heart Association and European Resuscitation Council were debated and discussed. The final recommendations of the National Resuscitation Council, Singapore, were derived after the task force had carefully reviewed the current available evidence in the literature and addressed their relevance to local clinical practice.