Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 7 de 7
1.
Mediterr J Rheumatol ; 34(3): 302-314, 2023 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37941856

In 2017, the Moroccan Society of Rheumatology (SMR) issued guidelines for the treatment of severe ankylosing spondylitis. The emergence of new therapeutic classes, the update of international guidelines for axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis, and the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges encountered by rheumatologists has led to the development of recent SMR guidelines for the management of SpA patients. A group-work included rheumatologists, specialists in physical medicine and rehabilitation, and epidemiologists from various sectors was tasked with writing these recommendations based on a literature review, then adapting them to the national context. Thus, 33 recommendations were selected and organized into two sections: diagnostic and therapeutic. The diagnostic section included three general principles and fourteen recommendations. The first, second, and third recommendations concerned the definition and diagnostic criteria for psoriatic arthritis and psoriatic arthritis. In the management of SpA, Recommendation 4 prioritized the importance of opportunity windows. The recommendation5 concerned the diagnostic and prognostic significance of HLAB27. The sixth and seventh recommendations related to imaging of the sacroiliac joints and the spine. The eighth recommendation focuses on the diagnosis and evaluation of perivascular thrombosis activity. The ninth and tenth recommendations concerned the evaluation of SpA activity and psoriatic arthritis. The eleventh and twelfth recommendations concern the evaluation of function and structural progression. The recommendation number thirteen concerned the diagnosis and treatment of coxitis. Recommendation 14 focuses on the most common co-morbidities and extra-rhinitological manifestations observed in SpA.

2.
Mediterr J Rheumatol ; 34(2): 139-151, 2023 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37654637

The advent of new therapeutic classes and the updating of international recommendations have justified the development of recent recommendations by the Moroccan Society of Rheumatology. Methods Guidelines were drafted by a core steering committee after performing a literature search. A multidisciplinary task force, including three fellows, eleven rheumatologists, a specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation, an epidemiologist from hospital-university, hospital and liberal sectors and one patient assessed the Best Practice Guidelines using 2 rounds of anonymous online voting by modified Delphi process. Thus, 19 recommendations were developed. Recommendation 1 concerns the therapeutic principles, recommendation 2 insists on the information and education of the patient, recommendation 3 concerns the general measures to be adopted, namely physical activity, smoking cessation and psychological support, recommendation 4 concerns Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs which constitute the first-line treatment, recommendations 5 to 7 concern the use of analgesics, of general and local corticosteroid therapy and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, recommendations 8 to 13 deal with the use of biologic agents, including new classes and their indications in radiographic and nonradiographic axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis, follow-up and management in case of failure or remission, recommendation 14 deals with the indication for Janus kinase inhibitors drugs, recommendation 15 deals with physical treatment and recommendation 16 deals with the indication of surgery. Recommendations 17 to 19 deal with special situations, namely fibromyalgia, vaccination and pregnancy. A well-defined therapeutic strategy with first- and second-line treatments has been established.

3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(8): 2797-2805, 2023 08 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36637182

OBJECTIVES: To explore current management practices for PMR by general practitioners (GPs) and rheumatologists including implications for clinical trial recruitment. METHODS: An English language questionnaire was constructed by a working group of rheumatologists and GPs from six countries. The questionnaire focused on: 1: Respondent characteristics; 2: Referral practices; 3: Treatment with glucocorticoids; 4: Diagnostics; 5: Comorbidities; and 6: Barriers to research. The questionnaire was distributed to rheumatologists and GPs worldwide via members of the International PMR/Giant Cell Arteritis Study Group. RESULTS: In total, 394 GPs and 937 rheumatologists responded to the survey. GPs referred a median of 25% of their suspected PMR patients for diagnosis and 50% of these were returned to their GP for management. In general, 39% of rheumatologists evaluated patients with suspected PMR >2 weeks after referral, and a median of 50% of patients had started prednisolone before rheumatologist evaluation. Direct comparison of initial treatment showed that the percentage prescribing >25 mg prednisolone daily for patients was 30% for GPs and 12% for rheumatologists. Diagnostic imaging was rarely used. More than half (56%) of rheumatologists experienced difficulties recruiting people with PMR to clinical trials. CONCLUSION: This large international survey indicates that a large proportion of people with PMR are not referred for diagnosis, and that the proportion of treatment-naive patients declined with increasing time from referral to assessment. Strategies are needed to change referral and management of people with PMR, to improve clinical practice and facilitate recruitment to clinical trials.


General Practitioners , Giant Cell Arteritis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica , Humans , Giant Cell Arteritis/diagnosis , Giant Cell Arteritis/drug therapy , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/diagnosis , Polymyalgia Rheumatica/drug therapy , Rheumatologists , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 70(4): 157-162, 2022 Aug.
Article Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35786508

OBJECTIVES: After the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, various countries took preventive health measures to limit the spread of the coronavirus. The quality of life (QOL) of many populations was affected by lockdown and social distancing. The pandemic increased healthcare professionals' workload and decreased doctors' QOL. Our study aimed to evaluate the QOL of doctors in southern provinces of Morocco during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the study compared QOL of the two genders at that time. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional and descriptive study. The sample included 257 doctors practicing in the southern provinces of Morocco. To assess QOL, we used the online self-administered WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, which evaluates QOL in four domains: physical, mental, social and environmental. The cut-off between good and poor QOL was 60. RESULTS: All doctors showed poor QOL in all domains. The mean scores and standard deviations for the physical, mental, social, and environmental domains were 57.88 ± 17.12, 57.09 ± 20.13, 55.57 ± 23.66 and 47.99 ± 17.34, respectively. Comparing the two genders, males had a higher QOL than females with a statistically significant difference (p-value ≤ 0.05) in all domains. Both men and women had poor QOL in the environmental domain (less than 60). Doctors who worked directly in the COVID-19 circuit had poorer QOL in all domains. Even with scores lower than 60, males working in COVID-19 circuit had better QOL compared to females, except in the social domain. CONCLUSION: Southern Moroccan doctors' QOL was reduced in all domains. All doctors working in COVID-19 circuit had poor QOL, and women's scores were even lower than those of men.


COVID-19 , Quality of Life , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires
7.
J Med Case Rep ; 11(1): 181, 2017 Jul 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28676098

BACKGROUND: Tuberculous spondylodiscitis is a frequent localization of tuberculosis. Multi-tiered involvement and an association with sternal localization are rare. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of multi-tiered tuberculous spondylodiscitis with sternal localization in an immunocompetent 41-year-old Arab woman who had inflammatory bilateral sciatica L5 and S1 and a history of low back pain caused by a trauma. Radiography, computed tomography, and a vertebral biopsy were useful for diagnosis. She reacted well to anti-bacillary treatment despite the occurrence of multiple paravertebral and subcutaneous abscesses. The medullar magnetic resonance imaging control performed at 4 months, 12 months, and 1 year after the end of treatment showed a favorable evolution. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid the delay of diagnosis, especially in our endemic context, tuberculosis must be evoked usually. This will improve the prognosis of our patients.


Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Discitis/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Sternum/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Tuberculosis, Spinal/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Biopsy , Discitis/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Tuberculosis, Spinal/drug therapy , Tuberculosis, Spinal/physiopathology
...