Evaluating the influence of ultra-processed food intake on associations between dietary indices with systemic inflammation in adulthood and old ages.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Low-grade systemic inflammation (LGSI) is critical to developing many chronic diseases. In turn, it has been shown that the diet can modulate favorably or unfavorably the inflammatory status. Thus, evaluating the diet from appropriate approaches is fundamental; to do so, there are different proposals for dietary indexes. We aimed to: (i) investigate the association between three well-known dietary indexes and LGSI biomarkers; (ii) test these associations individually or in combination with an indicator of ultra-processed foods (UFPs) intake. (iii) as an additional aim, hypothesizing that all the indexes should be capable of identifying the inflammatory potential of diet, we tested the hypothesis that these indexes agree and correlate with each other. METHODS: Cross-sectional population-based data of adults and older persons (n = 583). Dietary data were obtained through two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls (24HDR) and calculated for Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII), Mediterranean-Style Dietary Pattern Score (MSDPS); Brazilian Healthy Eating Index - Revised (BHEI-R) and energy ingested from UPFs (UPFs ratio). An LGSI score was created from some plasma inflammatory biomarkers [C-Reactive Protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and adiponectin]. Logistic and linear regression models tested the associations between dietary indexes and LGSI score. RESULTS: The MSDPS and DII were significantly associated with our inflammatory score, but the BHEI-R did not. Including UPFs in regression models did not increase the strength of these associations. CONCLUSIONS: From the three scores, the dietary inflammatory index and the Mediterranean-style dietary pattern score (MSDPS) were the ones that showed significant association with the inflammatory biomarker. The combination of the indexes with a ratio of UPF intake did not increase the significance of our analyses. The best agreement between the indexes was found between MSDPS and UPFs ratio; the only pair of indexes considered concordant and correlated was the BHEI-R and DII.

Comparison and convergent validity of five Mediterranean dietary indexes applied to Brazilian adults and older adults: data from a population-based study (2015 ISA-Nutrition).

Different dietary indexes are proposed to investigate adherence to the Mediterranean diet (MD). However, they are based on different methodologies, and limited research has compared them to each other, particularly in non-Mediterranean populations. We aimed to compare five indexes intended to measure adherence to the MD. The sample was composed of adults and older adults (n 1187) from 2015 ISA-Nutrition, a cross-sectional population-based study in São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Dietary data obtained through two 24-h dietary recalls (24HDR) from which the Mediterranean diet scale (MDS), Mediterranean diet Score (MedDietscore), Mediterranean dietary pattern (MDP), Mediterranean Adequacy Index (MAI) and Mediterranean-Style Dietary Pattern Score (MSDPS) were calculated. The correlations and agreements between them were analysed by Spearman's correlation and linearly weighted Cohen's Kappa coefficients, respectively. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) were applied to investigate their convergent validity. The highest correlations were found between MDP and MAI (r = 0⋅76; 95% CI 0⋅74-0⋅79) and between MDP and MDS (r = 0⋅72; 95% CI 0⋅69-0⋅75). The greatest agreements observed were moderate, between MDP v. MAI (κ = 0⋅57, P < 0⋅001) and MDP v. MDS (κ = 0⋅48, P < 0⋅001). The goodness-of-fit of CFA for MedDietscore (RMSEA = 0⋅033, 90% CI 0⋅02-0⋅042; SRMR = 0⋅042) and MSDPS (RMSEA = 0⋅028, 90% CI 0⋅019-0⋅037; SRMR = 0⋅031) had acceptable values for absolute fit indices. Vegetables, olive oil, MUFA:SFA ratio and cereals with legumes were more relevant to characterise the MD (factor loadings ≥0⋅50). The MDS, MAI and MDP classified the population similarly, but the MedDietscore showed better performances in evaluating adherence to the MD. These results provided guidance for the most appropriate Mediterranean dietary index to be applied in non-Mediterranean populations.