RESUMEN
Background/Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized treatment for melanoma and lung cancer and are in widespread use. This study aims to describe how patients and caregivers learn about ICI toxicities and their perceptions and experiences of toxicity. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of 42 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; n = 16) or melanoma (n = 26) who were initiating or discontinuing an ICI and their caregivers (n = 9). We conducted in-depth interviews to explore patients' and caregivers' experiences learning about and living with ICI side effects. We audio-recorded the first oncology visit after enrollment. We used a framework approach to code interview and visit transcripts and synthesized codes into themes. Results: The median age of patients was 67; 68% were male. Themes of participant interviews and clinician-patient dialogue included: i) Patients initiating an ICI received extensive information about side effects, which some patients found overwhelming or scary and difficult to absorb; ii) Patients who were deterred by fear of toxicity ultimately proceeded with treatment because of oncologist encouragement or the sense of no alternative; iii) participants found hope in the association between toxicity and ICI efficacy; iv) caregivers helped patients navigate the deluge of information and uncertainty related to ICIs. Participants suggested ways to improve ICI side effect education, such as incorporating patient stories. Conclusion: Patients perceived that ICI toxicity counseling was overwhelming yet were encouraged by oncologists' reassurance that serious side effects were manageable and by the framing of toxicity as a sign of efficacy. We identified opportunities to improve communication of ICI risks and benefits.
RESUMEN
With an increasing number of patients eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is on the rise. Dermatologic immune-related adverse events (D-irAEs) are the most common and earliest to manifest, often with important downstream consequences for the patient. Current guidelines lack clarity in terms of diagnostic criteria for D-irAEs. The goal of this project is to better define D-irAE for the purposes of identification, diagnosis, and future study of this important group of diseases.The objectives of this project were to develop consensus guidance for an approach to D-irAEs including disease definitions and severity grading. Knowing that consensus among oncologists, dermatologists, and irAE subspecialists would be critical for usability, we formed a Dermatologic irAE Disease Definition Panel. The panel was composed of 34 experts, including oncologists, dermatologists, a rheumatologist, and an allergist/immunologist from 22 institutions across the USA and internationally. A modified Delphi consensus process was used, with two rounds of anonymous ratings by panelists and two virtual meetings to discuss areas of controversy. Panelists rated content for usability, appropriateness, and accuracy on 9-point scales in electronic surveys and provided free text comments. A working group aggregated survey responses and incorporated them into revised definitions. Consensus was based on numeric ratings using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method with prespecified definitions.Following revisions based on panelist feedback, all items received consensus in the second round of ratings. Consensus definitions were achieved for 10 core D-irAE diagnoses: ICI-vitiligo, ICI-lichen planus, ICI-psoriasis, ICI-exanthem, ICI-bullous pemphigoid, ICI-Grover's, ICI-eczematous, ICI-eruptive atypical squamous proliferation, ICI-pruritus without rash, and ICI-erosive mucocutaneous. A standard evaluation for D-irAE was also found to reach consensus, with disease-specific exceptions detailed when necessary. Each disorder's description includes further details on disease subtypes, symptoms, supportive exam findings, and three levels of diagnostic certainty (definite, probable, and possible).These consensus-driven disease definitions standardize D-irAE classification in a useable framework for multiple disciplines and will be the foundation for future work. Given consensus on their accuracy and usability from a representative panel group, we anticipate that they can be used broadly across clinical and research settings.
Asunto(s)
Exantema , Oncólogos , Humanos , Consenso , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , RadioinmunoterapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) may improve antitumor responses. However, the risk of developing cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) in patients treated with ICI and TVEC has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the differences in cirAE development between patients treated with ICI alone and both ICI and TVEC (ICI + TVEC). METHODS: Patients with cutaneous malignancy receiving ICI with or without TVEC therapy at the Massachusetts General Brigham healthcare system were included. CirAE development, time from ICI initiation to cirAE, cirAE grade, cirAE morphology, and survival were analyzed. Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t test or Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables were used. To account for immortal time bias, we performed adjusted time-varying Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: The rate of cirAE development was 32.3% and 38.7% for ICI only and ICI + TVEC, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, ICI + TVEC was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of cirAE development (hazard ratio: 2.03, P = .006) compared to patients receiving ICI therapy alone. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective nature and limited sample size from a tertiary-level academic center. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore potential opportunities for dermatologists and oncologists in counseling and monitoring patients.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Viroterapia Oncolítica , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Viroterapia Oncolítica/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Non-invasive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ICI-nephritis) are urgently needed. Because ICIs block immune checkpoint pathways that include cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), we hypothesized that biomarkers of immune dysregulationpreviously defined in patients with congenital CTLA4 deficiency, including elevated soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2R) and flow cytometric cell-based markers of B and T cell dysregulation in peripheral blood may aid the diagnosis of ICI-nephritis. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with ICI-nephritis was compared with three prospectively enrolled control cohorts: ICI-treated controls without immune-related adverse events, patients not on ICIs with hemodynamic acute kidney injury (hemodynamic AKI), and patients not on ICIs with biopsy proven acute interstitial nephritis from other causes (non-ICI-nephritis). sIL-2R level and flow cytometric parameters were compared between groups using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to define the accuracy of sIL-2R and flow cytometric biomarkers in diagnosing ICI-nephritis. The downstream impact of T cell activation in the affected kidney was investigated using archived biopsy samples to evaluate the gene expression of IL2RA, IL-2 signaling, and T cell receptor signaling in patients with ICI-nephritis compared with other causes of drug-induced nephritis, acute tubular injury, and histologically normal controls. RESULTS: sIL-2R level in peripheral blood was significantly higher in patients with ICI-nephritis (N=24) (median 2.5-fold upper limit of normal (ULN), IQR 1.9-3.3), compared with ICI-treated controls (N=10) (median 0.8-fold ULN, IQR 0.5-0.9, p<0.001) and hemodynamic AKI controls (N=6) (median 0.9-fold-ULN, IQR 0.7-1.1, p=0.008). A sIL-2R cut-off point of 1.75-fold ULN was highly diagnostic of ICI-nephritis (area under the curve >96%) when compared with either ICI-treated or hemodynamic AKI controls. By peripheral blood flow cytometry analysis, lower absolute CD8+T cells, CD45RA+CD8+ T cells, memory CD27+B cells, and expansion of plasmablasts were prominent features of ICI-nephritis compared with ICI-treated controls. Gene expressions for IL2RA, IL-2 signaling, and T cell receptor signaling in the kidney tissue with ICI-nephritis were significantly higher compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Elevated sIL-2R level and flow cytometric markers of both B and T cell dysregulation may aid the diagnosis of ICI-nephritis.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Nefritis Intersticial , Humanos , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Antígeno CTLA-4 , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Interleucina-2 , Nefritis Intersticial/inducido químicamente , Nefritis Intersticial/diagnóstico , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) monotherapy is a standard treatment for advanced cutaneous melanoma, but its efficacy and toxicity are defined in white populations and remain poorly characterized in other ethnic groups, such as East Asian, Hispanic and African. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and toxicity of PD-1 monotherapy in different ethnic groups. METHODS: Clinical data for patients with unresectable or advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy between 2009 and 2019 were collected retrospectively from five independent institutions in the USA, Australia and China. Tumour response, survival and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were compared by ethnicity (white vs. East Asian/Hispanic/African) across different melanoma subtypes: nonacral cutaneous (NAC)/unknown primary (UP) and acral/mucosal/uveal. RESULTS: In total, 1135 patients were included. White patients had significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) [54%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 50-57% vs. 20%, 95% CI 13-28%; adjusted P < 0·001] and longer progression-free survival (14·2 months, 95% CI 10·7-20·3 vs. 5·4 months, 95% CI 4·5-7·0; adjusted P < 0·001) than East Asian, Hispanic and African patients in the NAC and UP subtypes. White ethnicity remained independently associated with a higher ORR (odds ratio 4·10, 95% CI 2·48-6·81; adjusted P < 0·001) and longer PFS (hazard ratio 0·58, 95% CI 0·46-0·74; adjusted P < 0·001) in multivariate analyses after adjustment for age, sex, primary anatomical location, metastasis stage, baseline lactate dehydrogenase level, mutational status and prior systemic treatment. White and East Asian/Hispanic/African patients shared similar ORR and progression-free survival in acral/mucosal/uveal melanomas. Similar melanoma-subtype-specific ethnic discrepancies were observed in complete response rate and overall survival. White patients had higher rates of gastrointestinal irAEs but lower rates of endocrine, liver and other rare types of irAEs. These differences in irAEs by ethnicity were not attributable to varying melanoma subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic discrepancy in clinical benefit is specific to melanoma subtype, and East Asian, Hispanic and African patients with NAC and UP melanomas have poorer clinical benefits than previously recognized. The ethnic discrepancy in toxicity observed across different melanoma subtypes warrants an ethnicity-based irAE surveillance strategy. More research is needed to elucidate the molecular and immunological determinants of these differences. What is already known about this topic? There is a great difference in response to immunotherapy between different subtypes of melanoma (cutaneous, mucosal, acral and uveal) in patients with advanced disease. What does this study add? Our data show for the first time that there are differences between different ethnic groups in terms of both response and toxicity to immunotherapy beyond the well-appreciated discrepancies due to melanoma subtype.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Etnicidad , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Melanoma Cutáneo MalignoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Our objective was to characterize the incidence, risk factors and clinical features of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients receiving dabrafenib and trametinib. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study examining the kidney outcomes of patients in a large healthcare system who received dabrafenib/trametinib between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome was AKI, defined as a 1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine from baseline within a 12-month study period. AKI severity and etiology was determined for each case by chart review. Logistic regression was used to evaluate baseline predictors of AKI. RESULTS: A total of 199 patients who received dabrafenib in our healthcare system from 2010 to 2019 were included in the analysis. Forty-two patients (21%) experienced AKI within 12 months; 10 patients (5% of the total cohort, 24% of AKI patients) experienced AKI occurring during a dabrafenib/trametinib-induced febrile syndrome characterized by fever, chills, gastrointestinal symptoms and elevated liver enzymes. Preexisting liver disease was the only significant predictor of AKI in the cohort. One patient had biopsy-proven granulomatous acute interstitial nephritis that resolved with corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Oncologists and nephrologists should be aware that AKI is common after dabrafenib/trametinib and a substantial number of cases occur in the setting of treatment-induced pyrexia.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Melanoma , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Humanos , Imidazoles , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/etiología , Mutación , Oximas , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas B-raf/uso terapéutico , Piridonas , Pirimidinonas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors are frontline therapy in advanced melanoma. Severe immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) often require immunosuppressive treatment with glucocorticoids (GCCs), but GCC use and its correlation with patient survival outcomes during anti-PD-1 monotherapy remains unclear. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In this multicenter retrospective analysis, patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy between 2009 and 2019 and detailed GCC use, data were identified from five independent cohorts, with median follow-up time of 206 weeks. IrAEs were tracked from the initiation of anti-PD-1 until disease progression, initiation of a new therapy, or last follow-up. Correlations between irAEs, GCC use, and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort of 947 patients, 509 (54%) developed irAEs. In the MGH cohort [irAE(+) n = 90], early-onset irAE (within 8 weeks of anti-PD-1 initiation) with high-dose GCC use (≥60-mg prednisone equivalent once a day) was independently associated with poorer post-irAE PFS/OS (progression-free survival/overall survival) [post-irAE PFS: HR, 5.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.10-13.70; P < 0.001; post-irAE OS: HR, 5.95; 95% CI, 2.20-16.09; P < 0.001] compared with irAEs without early high-dose GCC use. These findings were validated in the combined validation cohort [irAE(+) n = 419, post-irAE PFS: HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.04-2.76; P = 0.04; post-irAE OS: HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.15-3.39; P = 0.01]. Similar findings were also observed in the 26-week landmark analysis for post-irAE-PFS but not for post-irAE-OS. A sensitivity analysis using accumulated GCC exposure as the measurement achieved similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Early high-dose GCC use was associated with poorer PFS and OS after irAE onset. Judicious use of GCC early during anti-PD-1 monotherapy should be considered. Further prospective randomized control clinical trials designed to explore alternative irAE management options are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/mortalidad , Correlación de Datos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Despite initial responses1-3, most melanoma patients develop resistance4 to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). To understand the evolution of resistance, we studied 37 tumor samples over 9 years from a patient with metastatic melanoma with complete clinical response to ICB followed by delayed recurrence and death. Phylogenetic analysis revealed co-evolution of seven lineages with multiple convergent, but independent resistance-associated alterations. All recurrent tumors emerged from a lineage characterized by loss of chromosome 15q, with post-treatment clones acquiring additional genomic driver events. Deconvolution of bulk RNA sequencing and highly multiplexed immunofluorescence (t-CyCIF) revealed differences in immune composition among different lineages. Imaging revealed a vasculogenic mimicry phenotype in NGFRhi tumor cells with high PD-L1 expression in close proximity to immune cells. Rapid autopsy demonstrated two distinct NGFR spatial patterns with high polarity and proximity to immune cells in subcutaneous tumors versus a diffuse spatial pattern in lung tumors, suggesting different roles of this neural-crest-like program in different tumor microenvironments. Broadly, this study establishes a high-resolution map of the evolutionary dynamics of resistance to ICB, characterizes a de-differentiated neural-crest tumor population in melanoma immunotherapy resistance and describes site-specific differences in tumor-immune interactions via longitudinal analysis of a patient with melanoma with an unusual clinical course.
Asunto(s)
Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/terapia , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/genética , Receptores de Factor de Crecimiento Nervioso/genética , Antígeno B7-H1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antígeno B7-H1/inmunología , Cromosomas Humanos Par 15/genética , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Masculino , Melanoma/genética , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/patología , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/inmunología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso/inmunología , Filogenia , Receptores de Factor de Crecimiento Nervioso/inmunología , Microambiente Tumoral/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced nephritis are not evidence based and may lead to excess corticosteroid exposure. We aimed to compare a rapid corticosteroid taper to standard of care. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in patients with ICI-induced nephritis comparing a rapid taper beginning with 60 mg/day prednisone and tapered to 10 mg within 3 weeks to a historical control group that began 60 mg/day tapered to 10 mg within 6 weeks (standard of care). Renal recovery was defined as creatinine returning to within 1.5-fold baseline. The log-rank test compared the differences in time to renal recovery between the groups. We report rates of renal recovery at 30, 60 and 90 days, and timing and outcomes of ICI rechallenge. RESULTS: Thirteen patients received rapid corticosteroid taper and 14 patients received standard of care. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The median time to ≤10 mg/day prednisone was 20 days (IQR 15-25) in the rapid-taper group compared with 38 days (IQR 30-58) in the standard-of-care group. There was no significant difference in the time to renal recovery between the groups, though numerically higher numbers of patients recovered by 30 days, 11 (85%) in the rapid-taper arm versus 6 (46%) in the standard of care arm. Exposure to other nephritis-causing medications (proton pump inhibitor or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) during the corticosteroid taper was more common in the standard of care group, 9 (64%) versus rapid-taper group, 2 (15%), and was associated with longer time to renal recovery, 20 days (IQR 14-101) versus 13 days (IQR 7-34) in those that discontinued nephritis-causing medications. Fifteen (56%) of patients were rechallenged with ICIs, and only two (13%) developed recurrent nephritis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ICI-induced nephritis have excellent kidney outcomes when treated with corticosteroids that are tapered over 3 weeks.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Reducción Gradual de Medicamentos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Nefritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Boston , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefritis/inducido químicamente , Nefritis/inmunología , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce recently defined primary and secondary resistance to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy, there is lack of real-world data regarding differences in these resistance subtypes with respect to radiological dynamics and clinical manifestations. METHODS: We performed single-blind re-evaluations of radiological images by independent radiologists on a retrospectively assembled cohort of patients with advanced melanoma (n=254, median follow-up 31 months) receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy at Massachusetts General Hospital and Peking University Cancer Hospital. Radiological characteristics and timing at multiple crucial time points were analyzed and correlated with each other and with survival. Primary and secondary resistance was defined as per the SITC Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce definitions. RESULTS: The most significant target lesion measurement change took place within the first 3 months after anti-PD-1 initiation. Patients with stable disease with versus without tumor shrinkage at the initial evaluation exhibited distinct disease trajectory, as the rate of further upgrade to a partial or complete remission (CR/PR) was 44% and 0%, respectively. Eleven per cent of PR patients ultimately achieved a CR. In multivariate analyses, deeper response depth was independently associated with a more limited progression pattern, fewer involved organs, lower tumor burden, slower growth rate at disease progression (PD) (all p≤0.001), and longer post-progression survival (PPS) (bivariate analysis, p=0.005). Compared with primary resistance, secondary resistance was associated with less widespread PD pattern, lower tumor burden and slower tumor growth (all p≤0.001). Patients with secondary resistance were less likely to receive further systemic therapy (28% vs 57%, p<0.001) yet had significantly better PPS (HR 0.503, 95% CI 0.288 to 0.879, p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Radiological dynamics were variable, yet significantly correlated with survival outcomes. SITC-defined primary and secondary resistance are distinct clinical manifestations in patients with melanoma, suggesting the possibility of resistance-type-based therapeutic decision-making and clinical trial design, once further validated by future prospective studies.
Asunto(s)
Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Beijing , Boston , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Masculino , Melanoma/inmunología , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/inmunología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Criterios de Evaluación de Respuesta en Tumores Sólidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Neoplasias Cutáneas/inmunología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Carga Tumoral/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are effective against a variety of malignancies but can be limited by inflammatory toxicities such as enterocolitis. Enterocolitis is typically treated with systemically active glucocorticoids. Endoscopy can stratify patients by the severity of mucosal inflammation, including identifying patients with colitis in the absence of visible mucosal changes: microscopic colitis. Whether patients with CPI microscopic colitis could be managed differently from colitis with more severe mucosal involvement is unclear. The objective of this study was to describe outcomes in CPI microscopic colitis focusing on the response to first line treatment with budesonide. METHODS: We evaluated data from a retrospective cohort from a single-center large academic hospital. The participants were all adult patients evaluated by endoscopy for suspected CPI enterocolitis between 3/2017 and 3/2019. The exposures were: Mayo Endoscopic Score (range 0-3). The subset was: oral budesonide, maximum dose 12 mg daily, administered minimum of 5 weeks. The main outcomes and measures were: Primary: time from first CPI exposure to first glucocorticoid use; use of systemic glucocorticoids; time from symptom onset to resolution; continuation of CPI therapy; number of additional CPI infusions received. Secondary: admissions for symptom control; novel irAE development; need for second-line immunosuppression; oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 38 patients with biopsy confirmed CPI enterocolitis, 13 in the microscopic colitis cohort, and 25 in the non-microscopic colitis cohort. Budesonide use was higher in the microscopic colitis cohort (12/13 vs 3/25, p < 0.001), and systemic glucocorticoid use was higher in non-microscopic colitis (22/25 vs. 3/13, p < 0.001). Time from symptom onset to resolution did not differ. Microscopic colitis patients more frequently remained on CPI after developing (entero)colitis (76.9% vs 16.0%, p < 0.001). Microscopic colitis patients tolerating further CPI received, on average, 4.2 CPI infusions more than non-microscopic colitis patients tolerating CPI (5.8 vs 1.6, p = 0.03). Microscopic colitis was associated with increased time-to-treatment-failure (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14-0.66) and progression-free survival (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal mucosal inflammation without visible mucosal injury is a distinct, prevalent CPI enterocolitis subset that can be diagnosed by endoscopy. First-line budesonide appears effective in controlling "microscopic colitis" symptoms and prolonging immunotherapy duration. These findings present a compelling rationale for routine endoscopic evaluation of suspected CPI enterocolitis and suggest an alternative glucocorticoid-sparing treatment strategy for a subset of such patients.
Asunto(s)
Budesonida/uso terapéutico , Colitis Microscópica/diagnóstico , Colitis Microscópica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Biopsia , Budesonida/administración & dosificación , Budesonida/efectos adversos , Colitis Microscópica/etiología , Colonoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Mucosa Intestinal/inmunología , Mucosa Intestinal/metabolismo , Mucosa Intestinal/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether high doses of glucocorticoids have a negative impact on the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors. To control for the potential association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and improved survival, this study examined a unique cohort of patients who had the same irAE treated with varying glucocorticoid doses. METHODS: In total, 98 patients with melanoma who had ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis were identified retrospectively in the Partners Healthcare system using an automated electronic medical record query tool. Patients with melanoma who received ipilimumab at Massachusetts General Hospital without developing hypophysitis were listed in an actively maintained institutional patient database. Glucocorticoid doses for patients with hypophysitis were categorized as low dose (LD) or high dose (HD). Survival analyses were performed for patients who received ipilimumab monotherapy. RESULTS: Both overall survival (OS) and the time to treatment failure were significantly longer in the LD group compared with the HD group (hazard ratio, 0.24; P = .002 and 0.28, P = .001, respectively). Median OS and the time to treatment failure were not reached in the LD group and were 23.3 and 14.5 months, respectively, in the HD group. All patients who had hypophysitis had improved OS compared with patients who did not have hypophysitis (median, 28.2 vs 9.5 months; P = .0003). This advantage was maintained in the HD group versus the nonhypophysitis group (P = .02). Radiologic and endocrinologic outcomes and symptom resolution did not differ in the LD group versus the HD group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with melanoma who had ipilimumab-induced hypophysitis, those who received higher doses of glucocorticoids had reduced survival. This is the first study to demonstrate a potential negative effect of high glucocorticoid doses on the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors after an irAE. These findings have potential implications for the management of other irAEs.
Asunto(s)
Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Hipofisitis/inducido químicamente , Hipofisitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Ipilimumab/efectos adversos , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Ipilimumab/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiología , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Ipilimumab (Ipi) is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma. Little is known about Ipi-induced hypophysitis (IH), an important treatment complication. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of the study were as follows: 1) to examine the prevalence of IH, 2) to characterize the clinical course and treatment outcomes in IH, 3) to identify the risk factors for the development of IH, and 4) to determine optimal strategies for the management of IH. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. SETTING: The study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. SUBJECTS: One hundred fifty-four adult patients with metastatic melanoma were evaluated at Massachusetts General Hospital and were treated with Ipi between March 2008 and December 2013. INTERVENTION(S): The intervention included treatment with Ipi. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, pituitary hormone assessment, and patient survival were measured. RESULTS: IH was diagnosed in 17 patients (11%). Male gender (P = .02) and older age (P = .005), but not the cumulative dose of Ipi, were risk factors for IH. All patients with IH had anterior hypopituitarism (none had diabetes insipidus). Hypopituitarism was persistent in most individuals (76%). Diffuse pituitary enlargement was observed exclusively in all cases of IH and, upon retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging scans, this finding preceded the clinical diagnosis of hypophysitis in eight patients. Pituitary enlargement resolved rapidly (within 40 d in seven of seven patients). Median survival in patients with IH was 19.4 vs 8.8 months (P = .05) in the remainder of the cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Male gender and older age are risk factors for IH. Pituitary enlargement is sensitive and specific for IH in the appropriate setting, can precede the clinical diagnosis, and resolves rapidly. Anterior pituitary function recovery is uncommon. The incidence of hypophysitis may positively predict survival in melanoma patients treated with Ipi.