Cerebrospinal Fluid Findings Are Poor Predictors of Appropriate FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel Utilization in Pediatric Patients.

Molecular testing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using the BioFire FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (FA-M/E) panel permits rapid, simultaneous pathogen detection. Due to the broad spectrum of targeted organisms, FA-M/E testing may be restricted to patients with abnormal CSF findings. We sought to determine if restriction is appropriate in our previously healthy and/or immunocompromised pediatric patients. FA-M/E was ordered on 1,025 CSF samples from 948 patients; 121 (11.8%) specimens were FA-M/E positive. Of these, 89 (73.6%) were virus positive, and 30 (24.8%) were bacterium positive. The most common targets detected were enterovirus (n = 38), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) (n = 30), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 14). Pleocytosis with white blood cell (WBC) levels of ≥5 cells/mm3 and ≥10 cells/mm3 were found in 33.1% and 24.3% of all specimens, respectively. Using WBC levels of ≥5 cells/mm3, 63.4% (59/93) of positive specimens exhibited pleocytosis, compared to 29.5% (233/789) of negative specimens. Among positive specimens, 54.4% (37/68) of viral and 87% (20/23) of bacterial cases had pleocytosis. The use of a pleocytosis cutoff of ≥10 cells/mm3 would have missed an additional enterovirus, one cytomegalovirus (CMV), and two HHV-6 diagnoses. CSF glucose and protein levels were normal for 83/116 (75.2%) and 51/116 (44%) positive specimens. Abnormal glucose in combination with WBC levels of ≥10 cells/mm3 showed high specificity (94.5%) and was a better predictor of FA-M/E positivity than abnormal protein. Sensitivity and positive predictive values were <90% for all biomarkers. CSF pleocytosis and abnormal glucose/protein were poor predictors of FA-M/E. Restricting FA-M/E orders based on pleocytosis or other abnormal parameters would have resulted in missed diagnostic opportunities, particularly for the detection of viruses in both previously healthy and immunocompromised patients.

One Year in the Life of a Rapid Syndromic Panel for Meningitis/Encephalitis: a Pediatric Tertiary Care Facility's Experience.

Early establishment of infectious processes allows for expedited clinical management of meningitis and encephalitis. The FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (FA-M/E) panel provides rapid detection of potential pathogens associated with encephalitis/meningitis in both immunocompetent and compromised patients. Here, we conducted a 1-year review of the performance of the FA-M/E panel at a tertiary care children's hospital. Two hundred sixty-five samples from 251 patients were tested. We found 87.25% (219/251) were negative, 9.96% (25/251) were positive for viral analytes, and 3.19% (8/251) were positive for bacterial analytes. When possible, positive results were confirmed by alternate testing; 4/6 available bacterial positives and 17/20 available viral positives were confirmed by retrospective culture or molecular testing.

Radiologic discrepancies in children with special healthcare needs in a pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: After-hours radiologic interpretation by nonradiology attendings or resident radiologists introduces the risk of discrepancies. Clinical outcomes following radiologic discrepancies among pediatric emergency department (ED) patients are poorly described. In particular, children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN), have more opportunities for discrepancies and potential consequences than non- CSHCN. Our objective was to determine the rates and types of radiologic discrepancies, and to compare CSHCN to non-CSHCN. METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2015, all children who underwent a diagnostic imaging study at a free-standing children's ED were included. Data collected included radiologic studies - type and location - and clinical details - chief complaint and CSHCN type. Differences between preliminary reads and final pediatric radiology attending reads were defined as discrepancies, and categorized by clinical significance. Descriptive statistics, z-tests, and chi-square were used. RESULTS: Over 8months, 8310 visits (7462 unique patients) had radiologic studies (2620 CSHCN, 5690 non-CSHCN). A total of 198 (2.4%) radiologic discrepancies [56 (28.3%) CSHCN, 142 (71.7%) non-CSHCN] were found. Chief complaints for CSCHN were more often within the cardiac, pulmonary and neurologic systems (p<0.001 for each), whereas non-CSHCN presented with more trauma (p<0.001). The rates of discrepancies (CSHCN 2.1%, non- CSHCN 2.5%, p=0.3) and severity of clinical consequences (p=0.6) were not significantly different between CSHCN and non-CSHCN. CONCLUSION: Though the frequency and type of radiologic studies performed between CSHCN and non-CSHCN were different, we found no significant difference in the rate of radiologic discrepancies or the rate of clinically significant radiologic discrepancies.