RESUMEN
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect and a leading cause of infant mortality. CHD often has a genetic etiology and recent studies demonstrate utility in genetic testing. In clinical practice, decisions around genetic testing choices continue to evolve, and the incorporation of rapid genome sequencing (rGS) in CHD has not been well studied. Though smaller studies demonstrate the value of rGS, they also highlight the burden of results interpretation. We analyze genetic testing in CHD at two time-points, in 2018 and 2022-2023, across a change in clinical testing guidelines from chromosome microarray (CMA) to rGS. Analysis of 421 hospitalized infants with CHD demonstrated consistent genetic testing across time. Overall, after incorporation of rGS in 2022-2023, the diagnostic yield was 6.8% higher compared to 2018, and this pattern was consistent across all patient subtypes analyzed. In 2018, CMA was the most common test performed, with diagnostic results for CHD in 14.3%, while in 2022-2023, rGS was the most frequent test performed, with results diagnostic for CHD in 16.9%. Additionally, rGS identified 44% more unique genetic diagnoses than CMA. This is the largest study to highlight the value of rGS in CHD and has important implications for management.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate genetic evaluation practices in newborns with the most common birth defect, congenital heart defects (CHD), we determined the prevalence and the yield of genetic evaluation across time and across patient subtypes, before and after implementation of institutional genetic testing guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 664 hospitalized newborns with CHD using multivariate analyses of genetic evaluation practices across time and patient subtypes. RESULTS: Genetic testing guidelines for hospitalized newborns with CHD were implemented in 2014, and subsequently genetic testing increased (40% in 2013 and 75% in 2018, OR 5.02, 95% CI 2.84-8.88, P < .001) as did medical geneticists' involvement (24% in 2013 and 64% in 2018, P < .001). In 2018, there was an increased use of chromosomal microarray (P < .001), gene panels (P = .016), and exome sequencing (P = .001). The testing yield was high (42%) and consistent across years and patient subtypes analyzed. Increased testing prevalence (P < .001) concomitant with consistent testing yield (P = .139) added an estimated 10 additional genetic diagnoses per year, reflecting a 29% increase. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CHD, yield of genetic testing was high. After implementing guidelines, genetic testing increased significantly and shifted to newer sequence-based methods. Increased use of genetic testing identified more patients with clinically important results with potential to impact patient care.