Treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Premature Infants: Intravenous Paracetamol or Oral Ibuprofen?

BACKGROUND: The similarity in the mechanism of action between paracetamol and ibuprofen can cause similar side effects. However, in preterm neonates with feeding intolerance, intravenous (IV) paracetamol has replaced oral ibuprofen. Therefore, a comparison of the effectiveness and side effects is essential. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the data of 118 preterm infants with a definite diagnosis of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), including 59 patients who received oral ibuprofen and 59 patients who received IV paracetamol were analyzed. Laboratory evaluations of serum total and direct bilirubin, hemoglobin, and creatinine levels before and seven days after treatment were made. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and multiple multinomial logistic regression models, the effect of two treatment groups on the post-treatment variables as well as their efficacy comparison were evaluated. RESULTS: In both pre- and post-treatment periods, there was no significant association between echocardiography variables with treatment groups. The results from the ANCOVA model showed that the paracetamol and ibuprofen were followed by a significant decrease in the mean total bilirubin and Hct variables after treatment by 1.38 and 1.65 units, respectively. In addition, results from the Mann-Whitney U test revealed that the median Hb and K differences after and before treatment had a significant difference between the two treatment groups. Furthermore, based on the multiple multinomial logistic model results, the odds of complete arterial duct closure with IV paracetamol was 1.27 times higher than with oral ibuprofen, while in the oral ibuprofen group, the odds of closing was 1.44 times higher than the IV paracetamol group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intravenous paracetamol has equal efficacy compared to oral ibuprofen in the treatment of PDA. Also, it seems to be associated with a lower risk of hyperbilirubinemia following the treatment.

Neuroimaging Findings of the High-risk Neonates and Infants Referred to Mofid Children's Hospital.

Objectives: Neuroimaging in high-risk neonates and infants is done to help child neurologists predict the future neurodevelopmental outcome of these children. In this study, we assessed high-risk neonates and infants admitted to the NICU or neonatal wards of Mofid children's Hospital, especially regarding clinical development and brain imaging. Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 170 patients admitted to the neonatal and NICU ward of Mofid children's Hospital. Considering the inclusion criteria, 112 patients were included in this project. Brain ultrasonography was performed on almost all of these babies by a single radiologist. Some patients underwent a brain CT scan, and brain MRI without contrast was done on the others. These images were interpreted and compared by a single pediatric neuro-radiologist blinded to clinical data. All of these babies were followed up until 18 months of age. Results: In this study, 57.1% of the patients were male and 42.9% were female. Of 44 patients who obtained Electroencephalogram (EEG) during the hospitalization period with probable seizure, 25 (56.8%) had normal EEGs. Of 89 babies who were examined by ultrasound, 19 (21.3%) had abnormal findings; ventriculomegaly and then germinal matrix hemorrhage (GMH) were the most common abnormalities. Also, 27 cases (71.1%) of 38 patients undergoing a CT scan had abnormal findings. The most common findings were a hypodense area in the white matter and ventriculomegaly. Of 41 patients who underwent MRI between 1 and 27 months, 34 cases (82.9%) had an abnormal MRI. The most common findings were periventricular hyperintensities in 17 cases (41.5%), mildly delayed myelination in 15 cases (36.6%), and severe brain atrophy or thinning of corpus callosum or white matter volume loss in seven cases (17.1%). During the follow-up period, which was 18.55 ± 6.56 months, 79 (70.5%) of the children had normal development and 33 (29.5%) were suffering from a global neurodevelopmental delay. More precisely, 49 (43.7%) and 35 (31.2%) patients had motor development delay and delayed verbal development, respectively. The abnormal findings of brain imaging in the ultrasound, CT scan, and MRI were all significantly associated with an adverse neurodevelopmental outcome (P <0.001, P = 0.02, and P <0.001, respectively). Conclusion: In this study, we showed that at any time before six months or after one year of age, the result of brain MRI was a strong predictor of the patient's outcome.