RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common complication in patients with neurogenic bladder. The long-term use of antibiotic drugs induces an increase in antimicrobial resistance and adverse drug reactions. Bacterial interference is a new concept to prevent recurrent UTI which consists in a bladder colonization with low virulence bacteria. We performed a literature review on this emerging therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Literature review of bacterial interference to prevent symptomatic urinary tract infection in neurological population. RESULTS: Seven prospectives study including 3 randomized, double-blind and placebo controlled trial were analyzed. The neurological population was spinal cord injured in most cases. The bladder colonization was performed with 2 non-pathogen strains of Escherichia coli: HU 2117 and 83972. At 1 month, 38 to 83% of patients were colonized. Mean duration of colonization was 48.5 days to 12.3 months. All studies showed that colonization might reduce the number of urinary tract infections and is safe with absence of serious side effects. CONCLUSION: Bacterial interference is a promising alternative therapy for the prevention of recurrent symptomatic urinary tract infections in neurogenic patients. This therapy should have developments for a daily use practice and for a long-term efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Antibiosis/fisiología , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/prevención & control , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Humanos , Recurrencia , Prevención Secundaria/normas , Prevención Secundaria/tendencias , Nivel de Atención , Vejiga Urinaria/microbiología , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/complicaciones , Vejiga Urinaria Neurogénica/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiologíaAsunto(s)
Fibroelastosis Endocárdica/etiología , Fumar Marihuana/efectos adversos , Válvula Mitral/patología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Adulto , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Isquemia Encefálica/patología , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Fibroelastosis Endocárdica/patología , Fibroelastosis Endocárdica/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/patología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The lazy bladder syndrome (LBS) is characterized by an infrequent voiding, a large bladder capacity without neurological or urological disorders. In spite of being relatively common, there is little literature about it. The aim of our study was to compare the clinical features and urodynamic findings in asymptomatic or symptomatic patients with lazy bladder syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 126 adult patients diagnosed with lazy bladder syndrome. Clinical and radiological features, urodynamic findings and therapeutic management were evaluated. With these data, we divided patients into 2 groups: asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. After, we performed a comparative analysis of the data. RESULTS: The incident of LBS was significantly higher in women (81%). Twenty-one patients were asymptomatic (17%), 105 patients were symptomatic (83%). The patients with symptomatic LBS were significantly older (54.3 years ± 14.7). Voiding dysfunction (53%) and urinary retention (27%) were the most common symptoms in symptomatic group. In the uroflowmetry test, maximum and mean uroflow were significantly higher in asymptomatic group (P=0.0074). Reduced bladder sensation revealed no difference in the 2 groups, but in the symptomatic group, detrusor has also a poor contractility (P=0.0001). Nineteen patients (18%) had uro-nephrological complications. CONCLUSION: LBS is certainly underestimated. Voiding dysfunction, urinary retention in infrequent voiders or uro-nephrological complication (urinary tract infection with fever, ureteral reflux ) should recall LBS diagnosis. The hypothesis of bladder structural failure or autonomic nervous system dysfunction may be discussed (suggested). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5.