Towards Consistency in Pediatric Brain Tumor Measurements: Challenges, Solutions, and the Role of AI-Based Segmentation.

MR imaging is central to the assessment of tumor burden and changes over time in neuro-oncology. Several response assessment guidelines have been set forth by the Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) working groups in different tumor histologies; however, the visual delineation of tumor components using MRIs is not always straightforward, and complexities not currently addressed by these criteria can introduce inter- and intra-observer variability in manual assessments. Differentiation of non-enhancing tumor from peritumoral edema, mild enhancement from absence of enhancement, and various cystic components can be challenging; particularly given a lack of sufficient and uniform imaging protocols in clinical practice. Automated tumor segmentation with artificial intelligence (AI) may be able to provide more objective delineations, but rely on accurate and consistent training data created manually (ground truth). Herein, this paper reviews existing challenges and potential solutions to identifying and defining subregions of pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) that are not explicitly addressed by current guidelines. The goal is to assert the importance of defining and adopting criteria for addressing these challenges, as it will be critical to achieving standardized tumor measurements and reproducible response assessment in PBTs, ultimately leading to more precise outcome metrics and accurate comparisons among clinical studies.

Training and Comparison of nnU-Net and DeepMedic Methods for Autosegmentation of Pediatric Brain Tumors.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tumor segmentation is essential in surgical and treatment planning and response assessment and monitoring in pediatric brain tumors, the leading cause of cancer-related death among children. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and has high interoperator variability, underscoring the need for more efficient methods. After training, we compared 2 deep-learning-based 3D segmentation models, DeepMedic and nnU-Net, with pediatric-specific multi-institutional brain tumor data based on multiparametric MR images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multiparametric preoperative MR imaging scans of 339 pediatric patients (n = 293 internal and n = 46 external cohorts) with a variety of tumor subtypes were preprocessed and manually segmented into 4 tumor subregions, ie, enhancing tumor, nonenhancing tumor, cystic components, and peritumoral edema. After training, performances of the 2 models on internal and external test sets were evaluated with reference to ground truth manual segmentations. Additionally, concordance was assessed by comparing the volume of the subregions as a percentage of the whole tumor between model predictions and ground truth segmentations using the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The mean Dice score for nnU-Net internal test set was 0.9 (SD, 0.07) (median, 0.94) for whole tumor; 0.77 (SD, 0.29) for enhancing tumor; 0.66 (SD, 0.32) for nonenhancing tumor; 0.71 (SD, 0.33) for cystic components, and 0.71 (SD, 0.40) for peritumoral edema, respectively. For DeepMedic, the mean Dice scores were 0.82 (SD, 0.16) for whole tumor; 0.66 (SD, 0.32) for enhancing tumor; 0.48 (SD, 0.27) for nonenhancing tumor; 0.48 (SD, 0.36) for cystic components, and 0.19 (SD, 0.33) for peritumoral edema, respectively. Dice scores were significantly higher for nnU-Net (P ≤ .01). Correlation coefficients for tumor subregion percentage volumes were higher (0.98 versus 0.91 for enhancing tumor, 0.97 versus 0.75 for nonenhancing tumor, 0.98 versus 0.80 for cystic components, 0.95 versus 0.33 for peritumoral edema in the internal test set). Bland-Altman plots were better for nnU-Net compared with DeepMedic. External validation of the trained nnU-Net model on the multi-institutional Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge in Pediatrics (BraTS-PEDs) 2023 data set revealed high generalization capability in the segmentation of whole tumor, tumor core (a combination of enhancing tumor, nonenhancing tumor, and cystic components), and enhancing tumor with mean Dice scores of 0.87 (SD, 0.13) (median, 0.91), 0.83 (SD, 0.18) (median, 0.89), and 0.48 (SD, 0.38) (median, 0.58), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The pediatric-specific data-trained nnU-Net model is superior to DeepMedic for whole tumor and subregion segmentation of pediatric brain tumors.

Integrating imaging and genomic data for the discovery of distinct glioblastoma subtypes: a joint learning approach.

Glioblastoma is a highly heterogeneous disease, with variations observed at both phenotypical and molecular levels. Personalized therapies would be facilitated by non-invasive in vivo approaches for characterizing this heterogeneity. In this study, we developed unsupervised joint machine learning between radiomic and genomic data, thereby identifying distinct glioblastoma subtypes. A retrospective cohort of 571 IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients were included in the study, and pre-operative multi-parametric MRI scans and targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) data were collected. L21-norm minimization was used to select a subset of 12 radiomic features from the MRI scans, and 13 key driver genes from the five main signal pathways most affected in glioblastoma were selected from the genomic data. Subtypes were identified using a joint learning approach called Anchor-based Partial Multi-modal Clustering on both radiomic and genomic modalities. Kaplan-Meier analysis identified three distinct glioblastoma subtypes: high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk, based on overall survival outcome (p < 0.05, log-rank test; Hazard Ratio = 1.64, 95% CI 1.17-2.31, Cox proportional hazard model on high-risk and low-risk subtypes). The three subtypes displayed different phenotypical and molecular characteristics in terms of imaging histogram, co-occurrence of genes, and correlation between the two modalities. Our findings demonstrate the synergistic value of integrated radiomic signatures and molecular characteristics for glioblastoma subtyping. Joint learning on both modalities can aid in better understanding the molecular basis of phenotypical signatures of glioblastoma, and provide insights into the biological underpinnings of tumor formation and progression.

Comparison of volumetric and 2D-based response methods in the PNOC-001 pediatric low-grade glioma clinical trial.

Background: Although response in pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) includes volumetric assessment, more simplified 2D-based methods are often used in clinical trials. The study's purpose was to compare volumetric to 2D methods. Methods: An expert neuroradiologist performed solid and whole tumor (including cyst and edema) volumetric measurements on MR images using a PACS-based manual segmentation tool in 43 pLGG participants (213 total follow-up images) from the Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium (PNOC-001) trial. Classification based on changes in volumetric and 2D measurements of solid tumor were compared to neuroradiologist visual response assessment using the Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System (BT-RADS) criteria for a subset of 65 images using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Longitudinal modeling of solid tumor volume was used to predict BT-RADS classification in 54 of the 65 images. Results: There was a significant difference in ROC area under the curve between 3D solid tumor volume and 2D area (0.96 vs 0.78, P = .005) and between 3D solid and 3D whole volume (0.96 vs 0.84, P = .006) when classifying BT-RADS progressive disease (PD). Thresholds of 15-25% increase in 3D solid tumor volume had an 80% sensitivity in classifying BT-RADS PD included in their 95% confidence intervals. The longitudinal model of solid volume response had a sensitivity of 82% and a positive predictive value of 67% for detecting BT-RADS PD. Conclusions: Volumetric analysis of solid tumor was significantly better than 2D measurements in classifying tumor progression as determined by BT-RADS criteria and will enable more comprehensive clinical management.