Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 8 de 8
1.
Prim Health Care Res Dev ; 23: e79, 2022 12 14.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36515013

AIM: The present study aimed to investigate barriers to healthcare and their relationships to social and emotional well-being and intersectional inequalities for autistic adults during COVID-19 restrictions in the UK. BACKGROUND: Autistic adults experience severe health inequalities and report more barriers to accessing health services compared to other both disabled and non-disabled populations. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted many areas of society that may have increased vulnerability of autistic people to social and health inequalities, including delivery of healthcare from in-person to remote methods. METHOD: One hundred twenty-eight autistic adults who lived in the UK took part in an online survey. Measures included the Barriers to Healthcare Checklist (Short Form) and PROMIS outcome measure bank to assess emotional well-being and social support. Participants rated their agreement with items, retrospectively considering three different points of the trajectory of COVID-19 restrictions: before COVID-19, during the first lockdown in spring 2020, and in the month prior to taking the survey during autumn 2020. They completed a follow-up survey six months later to continue to assess change as restrictions in the UK were eased. FINDINGS: The average number of barriers to healthcare showed no significant change between all four time points. However, the nature of barriers to healthcare changed at the point of lockdown and persisted beyond the easing of COVID-19 restrictions. Barriers to healthcare were associated with some social and emotional well-being variables and demographic groups including gender, education and presence of additional disabilities. The findings may help to identify areas to target to improve access to both remote and in-person health systems for autistic people as modes of delivery continue to change over time.


Autistic Disorder , COVID-19 , Adult , Humans , Autistic Disorder/therapy , Autistic Disorder/psychology , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Communicable Disease Control , Social Support , Health Services Accessibility
2.
Health Soc Care Community ; 30(3): e621-e635, 2022 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34738679

Adults on the autism spectrum are affected by health disparities which significantly reduce life expectancy and experience barriers to accessing healthcare. Social prescribing is a holistic approach that diverts patients from primary care to health-enhancing activities in communities. However, there has been a lack of research attention to how autistic people navigate the social prescribing pathway and the ability of these approaches to address existing disparities. This mapping review aimed to synthesise features of non-medical, community-based interventions for autistic adults to assess their suitability for a social prescribing approach. A systematic search and screening process was used to identify literature reviews from medical databases (Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Cochrane reviews) and grey literature. We extracted data from 24 reviews and 19 studies including types of services, participants, outcomes, settings and procedures. A narrative and visual synthesis is used to map the variety of services and interventions identified, the outcome measures used, and the barriers and facilitators to progression through services in relation to a realist social prescribing framework. The review found that there has been minimal evaluation of holistic, low intensity services for autistic adults, such as those offered in social prescribing approaches. Outcome measures remain focused on features of autism and reveal less about the effects of interventions on health and wellbeing. Aspects of the social prescribing model were identified in the features of service pathways, but findings also suggested how social prescribing could be adapted to improve accessibility for autistic people.


Autistic Disorder , Adult , Autistic Disorder/therapy , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care
3.
Euro Surveill ; 22(36)2017 Sep 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28920571

The first documented British outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O55:H7 began in the county of Dorset, England, in July 2014. Since then, there have been a total of 31 cases of which 13 presented with haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS). The outbreak strain had Shiga toxin (Stx) subtype 2a associated with an elevated risk of HUS. This strain had not previously been isolated from humans or animals in England. The only epidemiological link was living in or having close links to two areas in Dorset. Extensive investigations included testing of animals and household pets. Control measures included extended screening, iterative interviewing and exclusion of cases and high risk contacts. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) confirmed that all the cases were infected with similar strains. A specific source could not be identified. The combination of epidemiological investigation and WGS indicated, however, that this outbreak was possibly caused by recurrent introductions from a local endemic zoonotic source, that a highly similar endemic reservoir appears to exist in the Republic of Ireland but has not been identified elsewhere, and that a subset of cases was associated with human-to-human transmission in a nursery.


Disease Outbreaks , Escherichia coli Infections/epidemiology , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/epidemiology , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/genetics , Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Communicable Diseases, Emerging , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , England/epidemiology , Escherichia coli Infections/diagnosis , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli Proteins/genetics , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/diagnosis , Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome/microbiology , Humans , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Recurrence , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Serogroup , Shiga Toxin 2/genetics
...